31 January 2007 GAINS Review Peringe Grennfelt Christer Agren Matti Johansson Rob Maas Simone Schucht Les White With comments from: Helen ApSimon Julio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Commission - DG Environment Clean Air for Europe Jacques Delsalle European Commission European Commission DG Environment, Unit C1 Update on TREMOVE.
Advertisements

Purpose: Integrated assessment of options to control air pollution in Europe Model the full chain from sources to impacts Multi-effects: acidification,
European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport n° 1 Air Quality & CAFE AREHNA WORKSHOP Kos, 3-5 May 2003 Mrs Michèle LEPELLETIER.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Links between climate, air pollution and energy policies Findings from the.
State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,
IAM activities in the UK comparisons with GAINS & work on emission projections and the road transport sector Helen ApSimon, T Oxley, N Hasnain, A Elshkaki.
Italian Agency for New Technology Energy and the Environment Italian-Polish workshop, Warsaw, 17th of March, 2006 The MINNI Project: An Integrated Assessment.
Integrated Assessment Modeling, cost-effectiveness, and agricultural projections in the RAINS model Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied.
Benefits Analysis and CBA in the EC4MACS Project Mike Holland, EMRC Gwyn Jones, AEA Energy and Environment Anil Markandya, Metroeconomica.
National work with the GAINS model: experiences from Sweden and other countries Работы в рамках модели GAINS на национальном уровне: опыт Швеции и других.
The potential for further reductions of PM emissions in Europe M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Janusz Cofala The RAINS model: Modelling of emission controls and costs.
The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Recent methodological changes in the GAINS model M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, F. Wagner Meeting of the Task.
M. Amann, W. Schöpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen The RAINS-GHG Model Approach Work in progress.
European Commission: DG Environment Overview of projections data use in the European policy-making process TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections, 30 October.
Global and regional black carbon mitigation opportunities Zig Klimont Improving BC Emissions Estimates and Abatement.
European Commission - DG Environment Clean Air for Europe Jacques Delsalle European Commission European Commission DG Environment, Unit C1 Further Development.
European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.
Baseline emission projections for the EU-27 Results from the EC4MACS project and work plan for the TSAP revision Markus Amann International Institute for.
Workshop on the use of GAINS model for the revision of the Gothenburg Protocol Focus on key measures to improve air quality in Europe and the role of EECCA.
The GAINS model. Rationale Air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) often stem from the same sources Energy consumption and agricultural activities.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.
1 Co-benefits of options for cleaner energy use in China Wellcome Trust Meeting, London, May 27, 2008 Kristin Aunan, CICERO China – an important country.
Application of IIASA GAINS Model for Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution in Europe Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
M. Amann G. Klaassen, R. Mechler, J. Cofala, C. Heyes International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Modelling synergies and trade-offs between.
The GAINS model State of play
Mitigation of primary PM emissions Overview of existing technical and non- technical emissions mitigation techniques M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International.
Co-benefits of Integrated Approach to Air Quality Management and Climate Change Mitigation Role of Integrated Assessment Methods in SEA Dr. Vladislav.
IIASA International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) An Integrated Assessment Model for Fine Particulate Matter in Europe Markus Amann, M.
GAINS databases Links and interactions with the international reporting processes UNECE TFEIP/EIONET meeting Dublin, Ireland, October, 2007 Z.Klimont.
New concepts and ideas in air pollution strategies Richard Ballaman Chairman of the Working Group on Strategies and Review.
Clean Air for Europe TFIAM Conference Small scale combustion installation AMIENS May 2004 André Zuber & Michel Sponar European Commission TFIAM Conference.
IIASA M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress in developing the baseline scenario for CAFE.
RAINS becomes GAINS and other “future” stories TFIEP Workshop on Emission Projections Thessaloniki, Greece, October, 2006 Zbigniew Klimont EMEP Centre.
European Commission: DG Environment Objectives and Policy Context of EC4MACS Ger Klaassen Kick-Off meeting EC4MACS 6 March 2007.
European Commission - DG Environment Clean Air for Europe TREMOVE baseline Consistency check with PRIMES-RAINS baseline UNECE TFIAM, Amiens 11 May 2004.
Current knowledge and possible systematic biases Linkages with greenhouse gas policy Fabian Wagner M. Amann, C. Berglund, J. Cofala, L. Höglund, Z. Klimont,
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International.
Janusz Cofala and Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Application.
Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg,
Future challenges for integrated assessment modelling Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Data sources for GAINS Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
GAINS emission projections for the EU Clean Air Policy Package Work in Zbigniew Klimont Task Force on.
IIASA analysis of near-term mitigation potentials and costs in Annex I countries.
The links to global problems Presentation at the 25 th anniversary special event of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution “Past successes.
Summary and Recommendations from the Joint TFEIP/TFIAM Workshop on Emission Projections Marc Deslauriers, Environment Canada Thessaloniki, Greece, Oct.
Clean Air for Europe TFIAM Conference Planning of the CAFE programme AMIENS May 2004 André Zuber & Matti Vainio Environment DG - European Commission TFIAM.
Clean Air for Europe CAFE workplan CAFE WG TS PA 16 June André Zuber European.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Cost-effectiveness Analysis in CAFE and the Need for Information about Urban Air Quality.
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility
Meeting of the Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling Prague, May 2-4, 2007 EC4MACS European Consortium for Modelling of Air Pollution and Climate.
Stakeholder Expert Group on the Review of EU Air Policy 6-7 June 2011
State of play in developing the NEC baseline scenario
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Updating the Baseline and Maximum Control scenarios State of play of the.
Three policy scenarios for CAFE
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z
Markus Amann, CIAM Status of the RAINS model development for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol.
On the policy effectiveness of abatement measures
CAFE baseline dissemination workshop
General comments (1) Price level needs to be specified (recommended: € 2000). Operation and maintenance costs (O+M) should be splitted into fixed (depending.
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
The Thematic strategy and the possible measures of action
Draft Baseline Scenarios for CAFE
CAFE baseline dissemination workshop
Janusz Cofala and Zbigniew Klimont
Overview: Benefit Analysis in CAFE
Thematic Assessment Report on Ammonia
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
Presentation transcript:

31 January 2007 GAINS Review Peringe Grennfelt Christer Agren Matti Johansson Rob Maas Simone Schucht Les White With comments from: Helen ApSimon Julio Lumbreras

Methodological changes (after CAFE-TS) Baseline & current policy definition Emission factors (cars, stoves) Increased background ozone Urban exposure (City-Delta, population data) Ecosystem dependent deposition rates More meteorological years Refinement of optimization method (from cost curves to individual technologies) GAINS Review phase I

GAINS Review phase I

GAINS Review phase I

An example cost curve for SO2 Source: IIASA GAINS Review phase I

Multi-pollutant measures Structural measures: Energy savings, efficiency improvements, bans: all pollutants ↓ Increased use of natural gas: CO2, SO2, VOC, NOx, PM ↓ CH4 ↑ Biomass: CO2 ↓ VOC, PM, CH4 ↑ Stationary sources: SCR, SNCR: NOx, CO ↓, NH3, N2O ↑ Fluidized bed combustion: SO2, NOx↓, N2O ↑ Advanced residential combustion: VOC, PM, CO, CH4 ↓ FGD: SO2, PM ↓ CO2 ↑ IGCC: CO2, SO2, NOx, PM ↓ CHP: all pollutants ↓ Mobile sources: Euro-standards: NOx, VOC, PM, CO ↓ NH3, N2O ↑ Low sulfur fuels: SO2, PM ↓ Diesel: CO2, VOC↓, PM, NOx, SO2 ↑ GAINS Review phase I

Differences between the RAINS and GAINS optimization RAINS optimization: Decides how far to move up the cost curve (keeping underlying activity levels fixed!) Cost curves are independent from each other Thus multi-pollutant measures are treated as single-pollutant GAINS optimization Decides which measure to use (incl. multi-pollutant) Each measure has one cost, but can have impacts on more than one pollutant If cost-effective and possible, change the underlying activity (through, e.g., efficiency improvements) GAINS Review phase I

GAINS Review phase I

Validation of RAINS cost curves with GAINS (the “RAINS-mode” of GAINS)- Italy, NOx, 2020 Source: IIASA GAINS Review phase I

Comparison of optimized results of GAINS with multi-pollutant measures treated as single pollutant measures (vertical) and as multi-pollutant measures (horizontal) Source: IIASA GAINS Review phase I

Conclusions GAINS (in RAINS mode) can replicate RAINS cost curves Optimization results are not very different Optimized results of GAINS (in RAINS mode) are as reliable as those of RAINS Warning: single pollutant cost curves generated by GAINS cannot be added ! GAINS Review phase I

The full GAINS mode offers further reduction potential (EU-25, 2020) Source: IIASA GAINS Review phase I

… and potential for cost reduction Source: IIASA GAINS Review phase I

Recommendations for review phase 2 (2007/2008) Keep informing policy makers on interactions between GHG and air pollution policies using the full GAINS mode Before official use of GAINS: schedule bilateral consultations on data used for GHG mitigation options and bilateral review of assumptions in PRIMES, TREMOVE & CAPRI scenarios Compare GAINS results with other (national) models that integrate GHG and air pollutant abatement Organize a peer review with experts from the energy and climate community focused on the treatment of GHG mitigation options Organize a full review in 2009 GAINS Review phase I