Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – UTTAR PRADESH On 09.04.2009 Ministry of HRD Government of India MDM-PAB Meeting – UTTAR PRADESH On 09.04.2009

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Part-I Review of Implementation of MDMS in Uttar Pradesh (Primary + Upper Primary) (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Questions? What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served? What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on 31.03.08 as well as 31.12.08? How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains? What is the level of lifting? How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level? How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost? How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served? …… contd Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Contd ….., Questions? How much MME was utilized? Under what activities? What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices? Part –II What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008? How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data? Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Benchmarks Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served) Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%) Lifting of foodgrains [1.4.08 to 31.12.08]: 85% (+ or – 10%) Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [1.4.08 to 31.12.08]: 73% (+ or – 10%) Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed. Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous. State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines. Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

NON-COVERAGE : Institutions (Primary) (3% Not Covered) (3% Not Covered) No. of Institutions (17% NC) (7% NC) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

NON-COVERAGE : Institutions (Primary) –Dist-wise Sl. No. Districts No. of Institutions No. of Institution serving MDM NON-COVERAGE No. % 1 Balrampur 1,343 1,073 270 20% 2 Santkabir Nagar 992 842 150 15% 3 Sonbhadra 1,514 1,373 141 9% 4 Siddharthnagar 1,700 1,549 151 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

NON-COVERAGE : Institutions ( Upper Primary) (9% Not Covered) (9% Not Covered) No. of Institutions (10% NC) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

NON-COVERAGE : Institutions ( Up. Primary) –Dist-wise Sl. No. Districts No. of Institutions No. of Institution serving MDM NON-COVERAGE No. % 1 Hameerpur 745 361 384 52% 2 Balrampur 689 434 255 37% 3 Siddharthnagar 722 542 180 25% 4 Sultanpur 909 695 214 24% 5 Bahraich 939 741 198 21% 6 Fatehpur 554 141 20% 7 Hardoi 983 784 199 8 Rai Bareily 659 529 130 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Plan Vs Performance: (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3) ( 26% Less) (22% Less) No. of children (In lakh) (39% Less) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

No. of Children availing MDM (Primary) MDM-PAB Approval (Target) Vs. Average no. of Children Availed MDM (Achievement) Sl. No. Districts Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for 2008-09 Average No. of children availing MDM as on 31.12.2008 Difference No. of children % LOW 1 Kaushambi 1,48,903 62,725 -86,178 -58% 2 Etah 2,71,129 1,15,825 -1,55,304 -57% 3 Lakhimpur Kheri 3,78,349 1,86,253 -1,92,096 -51% 4 Shravasti 91,372 50,363 -41,009 -45% 5 Kushinagar 2,30,133 1,27,784 -1,02,349 -44% 6 Jhansi 1,37,639 78,011 -59,628 -43% 7 Gonda 2,57,555 1,47,058 -1,10,497 8 Ambedkar nagar 1,58,845 92,790 -66,055 -42% 9 Aligarh 2,21,098 1,30,746 -90,352 -41% 10 Santkabir Nagar 1,47,938 90,274 -57,664 -39% Excess 11 Faizabad 95,871 1,36,222 40,351 42% 12 Barabanki 2,19,487 2,54,451 34,964 16% Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals .

No. of Children availing MDM ( Upper Primary) MDM-PAB Approval (Target) Vs. Average no. of Children Availed MDM (Achievement) Sl. No. Districts Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for 2008-09 Average No. of children availing MDM as on 31.12.2008 Difference No. of children % LOW 1 Kushinagar 94,139 21,573 -72,566 -77% 2 Shravasti 21,495 7,535 -13,960 -65% 3 Meerut 38,541 13,516 -25,025 4 Etah 83,760 30,117 -53,643 -64% 5 Balrampur 46,705 17,468 -29,237 -63% 6 Gonda 62,126 23,992 -38,134 -61% 7 Sultanpur 1,44,247 56,099 -88,148 8 Santkabir Nagar 64,812 27,673 -37,139 -57% 9 Ambedkar nagar 74,139 32,611 -41,528 -56% 10 Sitapur 99,901 43,985 -55,916 11 Badaun 69,105 31,429 -37,676 -55% 12 Ballia 1,12,477 54,220 -58,257 -52% Cntd... Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals .

No. of Children availing MDM ( Upper Primary) MDM-PAB Approval (Target) Vs. Average no. of Children Availed MDM (Achievement) Sl. No. Districts Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for 2008-09 Average No. of children availing MDM as on 31.12.2008 Difference No. of children % LOW 13 Mathura 61,204 29,706 -31,498 -51% 14 Lucknow 54,856 26,929 -27,927 15 Azamgarh 1,42,611 70,196 -72,415 16 Jhansi 55,288 27,452 -27,836 -50% 17 Mahoba 29,987 14,927 -15,060 EXCESS 18 Firozabad 2,709 38,479 35,770 1320% 19 Mainpuri 10,485 37,819 27,334 261% 20 Farrukhabad 25,634 33,976 8,342 33% 21 Agra 40,814 53,130 12,316 30% Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals .

Plan Vs Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3) (12% more) No. of Working days Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Plan Vs Performance (No. of Meal in Q1+Q2+Q3) (Primary + Upper Primary) 17% Less No. of Meal (in Crore) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Number of Meals ( PY + U PY) MDM-PAB Approval (Target) Vs. Meals actually served (Achievement) Sl. No. Districts Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for 2008-09 ( In Cr.) Meals actually served as on 31.12.2008 ( In Cr.) Short-served No. of meals % 1 Gonda 7.85 2.65 -5.20 -66% 2 Pilibheet 5.01 1.83 -3.19 -64% 3 Etah 7.09 2.62 -4.48 -63% 4 Azamgarh 10.28 3.88 -6.40 -62% 5 Lakhimpur Kheri 11.26 4.26 -7.00 6 Shravasti 2.60 0.99 -1.61 7 Sitapur 11.33 4.44 -6.90 -61% 8 Lucknow 5.12 2.04 -3.08 -60% 9 Ballia 7.80 3.14 -4.67 10 Mahrajganj 5.93 2.57 -3.35 -57% 11 Badaun 8.07 3.51 -4.56 12 Bhadohi 3.97 1.78 -2.19 -55% 13 Meerut 3.08 1.47 -52% 14 Sultanpur 8.93 4.29 -4.64 15 Bahraich 6.86 3.33 -3.53 -51% Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals .

Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative) Foodgrains (in MTs) *: Including unspent balance of 59370.00 MTs as on 31.3.2008 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise) Foodgrains (in MTs) *: Including unspent balance of 59370.00 MTs as on 31.3.2008 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Huge Unspent Balance of foodgrains (Foodgrains in MTs) As on 31.12.2008 Sl. No. Districts USB as on 31.12.08 Annual Requirement USB as % of Annual Requirement 1 Lakhimpur Kheri 21476.01 18461.51 116% 2 Mathura 3355.39 4476.27 75% 3 Hameerpur 1924.44 2816.03 68% 4 Sitapur 6476.55 11031.05 59% 5 Mirzapur 3599.31 6171.57 58% 6 Shahjahanpur 3209.92 6493.18 49% 7 Baghpat 996.83 2179.16 46% 8 Shravasti 1159.31 2542.98 9 Mahrajganj 2832.64 6233.00 45%

Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.08 to 31.12.08) Foodgrains (in MTs) 100% 80% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08) Benchmark : 73% 4.10 Lakh MTs 3.27 Lakh MTs 2.37 Lakh MTs Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Foodgrains Utilization– Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008) Benchmark :73% Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.) Rs. 809.15 Cr. Rs. 703.60 Cr. Rs. 462.26 Cr. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Cooking Cost Utilisation – Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise) State average: 58%(FG) & 57%(CC) % Utilisation Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise) State average: 58%(FG) & 57%(CC) % Utilisation Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Qty of foodgrains Sl. No District No. of Meals served Expected consumption of food grains (MTs) Actual Consumption of food grains (MTs) Deficit in % Deficit Consumption 1 Muradabad 5.72 Cr. 6113.24 4191.56 -31% 2 Rampur 2.75 Cr. 2745.42 1887.72 3 Saharanpur 2.55 Cr. 2893.04 2334.41 -19% 4 Hathras 1.90 Cr. 2078.31 1731.71 -17% 5 Ambedkar nagar 2.59 Cr. 2801.03 2377.29 -15% 6 Kanpur Nagar 1.65 Cr. 1820.62 1565.02 -14% 7 Sitapur 4.44 Cr. 4817.25 4151.83 8 Kannauj 2.50 Cr. 2712.05 2343.35

Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Cooking Cost (Rs. In Lakhs) Sl. No District No. of Meals served Expected consumption of Cooking cost Actual Consumption of Cooking cost Deficit in % Deficit Consumption 1 Chandauli 28359184 627.55 217.09 -65% 2 Fatehpur 37104356 805.79 494.35 -39% 3 Ambedkar nagar 25476354 550.33 361.83 -34% 4 Barabanki 45851210 984.96 708.83 -28% 5 Rai Bareily 36753912 805.83 609.46 -24% 6 Faizabad 31180500 684.28 531.00 -22% 7 Ghaziyabad 20711400 455.85 359.84 -21% 8 Kanpur Nagar 24145510 523.03 424.36 -19% 9 Meerut 14683468 317.50 260.30 -18% 10 Gautambuddh ngr. 10278876 222.03 186.82 -16% 11 Saharanpur 25485369 565.92 480.83 -15%

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India MME Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08) Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) 27% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08) Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) (100%) (76%) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Sheds) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Devices) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Performance Score card – A Summary Sl. No. Component Achievement Benchmark 1. Foodgrains Availability 80% 85% 2. Foodgrains Utilisation 58% 73% 3. Cooking Cost Utilisation 57% 4. MME Utilisation 27% 100% 5. Kitchen Shed construction 65% 6. Kitchen Devices procurement 76% 7 QPRs received 2 nos. 3 nos. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2009-10 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY) (down by 7%) No. of children (in lakhs) (down by 17%) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) 2009-10 (Proposed) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2008-09 (UPPER PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) 2009-10 (Proposed) *:SSA= Govt+LB+GA Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM Sl. No Year As per DISE Data As per MDM Sanctions 1 2006-07 191 235 3 2007-08 195 220 4 2008-09 Not available 205 5 2009-10 233 (State’s claim for 2009-10) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Thank You Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India