Connecting Fidelity Observations to Secondary Reading Coaching

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Inquiry Team Eydie Wilson, Ph.D. Math Coach November 3, 2009.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Effective Intervention Using Data from the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI-5) Developed by the authors of the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI) -5,
What To Do When A Student Does Not Respond To An Academic Intervention Brian Lloyd Ed. S., NCSP May 2 nd, 2013.
DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING USING STUDENT DATA-BECAUSE IT’S BEST PRACTICE & IT’S REQUIRED Dr. David D. Hampton Bowling Green State University.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES JOHNS Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Portage North Middle School Principal: Dr. Celeste Harris Assistant Principal: Mr. Craig Medd “Where Failure is not an Option!”
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 11 Learning and Cognition in the Content Areas.
1 / 27 California Educational Research Association 88 th Annual Conference Formative Assessment: Implications for Student Learning San Francisco, CA November.
DO YOU BELIEVE?.
Systems Requirements for RTI The nuts and bolts that hold it all together!
Establishing Training Capacity for Classroom Management Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Kim Herrmann, S.S.P. University of South Florida Marla Dewhirst Illinois.
RtII for Middle School Bethann M. McCain; RtII Consultant
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-based Reading Instruction Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
Knightime A time for enhancing student achievement and closing learning gaps.
Exploring the Relationship between Teachers’ Literacy Strategy Use and Adolescent Achievement Kelly Feighan, Research for Better Schools Elizabeth Heeren,
Math Intervention Focusing on Interventions in Mathematics.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Paulding County School District Hutchens Elementary Parent Presentation Powerpoint information has been adapted from resources available at
edTPA: Task 1 Support Module
Proof of Concept: Contextualizing the Data
Morgan County Schools Response to Instruction
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Literacy Across Disciplines (LAD)
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
Evidence-Based Practices: Tier 1
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Cycle of Continuous Improvement for
Introduction to Academic Goal Setting
Sitton Spelling Refresher
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Cluster Week 10 November 5, 2014.
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
VTPBiS Regional Coordinators Meeting October, 2012
Model Demonstration Projects
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
RTI: Response To Instruction
Georgia Milestones Overview
10 Reasons to install SIM in your school
Instructional Leadership Ted Zigler & Kristall Day June 20, 2018
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Response to Intervention = RTI
Common Core State Standards
Parent Information Night
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff:
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Creating Coaching Cycles that Move Coach Practice Forward
#DataMeetingsMadeSimple #StressFree #HavingFunWithData
Your SLO.
Chap. 1: Introduction to Statistics
Data Enhanced Grant Data Enhanced Grant
Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Connecting Fidelity Observations to Secondary Reading Coaching Promoting Adolescent Reading Success Model Demonstration Grant from OSEP Provide context for this work What PARS is Kim St. Martin 10/5/17 miblsi.org

Purpose and Intended Outcomes Provide a brief overview of how we are collecting and using observational data to enhance coaching and feedback to middle school teachers PARS data collection is multi-faceted. This presentation will focus on the collection and use of practice-level fidelity data

Agenda Two layers of fidelity observations Coaching structure Data collection strategies Data use Time for questions and comments

Fidelity Observations Reading Intervention Programs (interventionists supporting struggling readers, including students with IEPs) Phonics for Reading REWARDS REWARDS Secondary REWARDS Plus (Science and Social Studies) Read to Achieve Corrective Reading Secondary Content Area Reading Strategies (ELA, math, science and social studies teachers) Active Participation Explicit Vocabulary Text Summarization Emphasize that there are separate fidelity forms for the 3 strategies and 1 form (or 2 if you count read to achieve) for the intervention programs. If you print copies of the fidelity forms, have people take a look at those handouts here.

Coaching Structure Coach A 2 Middle Schools (6th-8th grade), different districts 13 and 17 Content area teachers 7 and 11 Interventionists 31 and 44 Target students with IEPs Coach B 1 Middle School (6th-8th grade) 11 Content area teachers 8 Interventionists 47 Target students with IEPs These numbers are based on information on our spreadsheets as of 9/27/17, but there may be some adjustments made by John and Soraya in the next week.

Sample Coaching Sign Up Here’s an example of how one coach is scheduling his time for consultation and observations (and distinguishing between the 2) with his teachers for one month at a time.

Strategy Data This is a sample data spreadsheet for explicit vocabulary. It lines up with the fields on the observation form.

Intervention Data This is a sample data spreadsheet for REWARDS. It lines up with the fields on the intervention observation form.

Using Observation Data To provide feedback to teachers To prioritize coaching resources To analyze alongside student outcome data To provide feedback to teachers - This can be pointed out in the notes/next steps sections of the screen shots on the previous 2 slides To prioritize coaching resources - Slide 10 To analyze alongside student outcome data - Slide 11

Prioritizing Follow up coaching + observation needed until: Teacher has demonstrated in at least 2 observations that they are at 80% fidelity or better Consultation continuously available, but prioritized for: Teachers teaching new programs and strategies Teachers with low fidelity data Teachers of students with IEP reading goals

Fidelity + Student Outcome Data This is an example of what we used in TAG last spring. A good example of a teacher implementing with fidelity and consistent student mastery results. Using our new decision rules, we probably could have prioritized observations in other classrooms earlier.

Questions and Comments