Interlimb Muscle and Fat Comparisons in Persons With Lower-Limb Amputation Vanessa D. Sherk, MS, Michael G. Bemben, PhD, Debra A. Bemben, PhD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages 1077-1081 (July 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.008 Copyright © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 The pQCT scan sites for the intact and amputated limbs. NOTE. Figure is not drawn to scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2010 91, 1077-1081DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.008) Copyright © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Thigh and calf percent fat values (mean ± SD) for amputated and intact limbs for each amputation group. For control participants, the same leg (right or left) that was amputated from their age- and sex-matched amputation participant was assigned as the “amputated” limb. *P<.01, significant limb effect; †P<.01; ††P<.05, significant limb × group interaction effect with the control group. ‡P<.01, significant limb and limb × group interaction effect with TF. Abbreviations: Amp, amputated. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2010 91, 1077-1081DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.008) Copyright © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions