Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Structure of the Rab7:REP-1 Complex
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Crystal Structure of a Human Cleavage Factor CFIm25/CFIm68/RNA Complex Provides an Insight into Poly(A) Site Recognition and RNA Looping  Qin Yang, Molly.
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Structure of the E. coli DNA Glycosylase AlkA Bound to the Ends of Duplex DNA: A System for the Structure Determination of Lesion-Containing DNA  Brian.
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Ryan C. Wilson, Janice D. Pata  Molecular Cell 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Structural Basis of Homology-Directed DNA Repair Mediated by RAD52
An Atomic Model of the Interferon-β Enhanceosome
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Crystal Structure of a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, MTMR2
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Jingqi Duan, Ling Li, Jing Lu, Wei Wang, Keqiong Ye  Molecular Cell 
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Phosphorylated Histone H3 by the Survivin Subunit of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  A. Arockia Jeyaprakash,
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Minsun Hong, Mayuree Fuangthong, John D. Helmann, Richard G. Brennan 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages (July 1998)
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Yogesh K. Gupta, Deepak T. Nair, Robin P. Wharton, Aneel K. Aggarwal 
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages 982-993 (June 2010) Helix Unwinding and Base Flipping Enable Human MTERF1 to Terminate Mitochondrial Transcription  Elena Yakubovskaya, Edison Mejia, James Byrnes, Elena Hambardjieva, Miguel Garcia-Diaz  Cell  Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages 982-993 (June 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2010 141, 982-993DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 MTERF1 Is a Modular Protein (A) Amino acid alignment of MTERF1 proteins in different species. Invariant residues are white over a black background. Conserved residues are bold. The numbering corresponds to human MTERF1. Asterisks indicate residues that stack with everted nucleotides and dots indicate residues involved in sequence recognition. Horizontal black bars represent α helices and dotted lines represent 310 helices. Hs, Homo sapiens; fc, felis catus; ss, sus scrofa; ec, equus caballus; bt, bos taurus; mm, Mus musculus; rn, rattus norvegicus; oa, ornithorhynchus anatinus; dr, danio rerio. (B) Overview of the MTERF1 fold. The structure is shown in the absence of DNA. Mterf motifs are color coded as in (A). (C) Overlay of the 8 mterf motifs. The rmsd between the first (transparent red, ribbon representation) and each of the other repeats ranges between 1.0 and 3.3 Å for 24 C-α atoms (the average is 2.5 Å). Each repeat is color coded as in (B). (D) Hydrophobic interactions stabilize each mterf repeat. The second mterf motif is shown in ribbon representation. The hydrophobic residues are shown in ball-and-stick representation with their Van der Waals surface in yellow. See also Figure S1. Cell 2010 141, 982-993DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A Unique DNA Binding Mode (A) Global view of the protein-DNA interaction. Each repeated mterf motif is colored as in Figure 1. The light strand is brown and the heavy strand is gray. The molecular surface is rendered transparent. (B) A 90° rotation of the view in (A). (C) MTERF1 induces a 25° bend in the DNA molecule. The light strand is green and the heavy strand is yellow. (D) MTERF1 unwinds the DNA double-helix. Overlay between the DNA observed in the crystal structure (the heavy and light strands are green and yellow, respectively) and ideal B-form DNA (magenta and blue). The ends of the DNA molecule adopt B conformation (black bars). The central part of the molecule (black arrows) is unwound. (E) Three nucleotides (yellow in the figure; corresponding to A3243 of the light strand and T3243 and C3242 of the heavy strand) are everted from the double-helix in the central part of the structure. A simulated annealing fo-fc electron density map is shown contoured at 3σ. (F) The three everted nucleotides are stabilized by π-stacking interactions. R162 (orange), F234 (magenta) and Y288 (red) stack against each of the everted nucleotides (color coded as in [B]). The light strand is green and the heavy strand yellow. Cell 2010 141, 982-993DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Interactions of MTERF1 with DNA (A) Scheme of the interactions between MTERF1 and the double-stranded DNA. Each interaction is listed with an arrow pointing either to the phosphate or to a DNA base. The three everted nucleotides and the residues that stack with them are colored. The five arginine residues that determine sequence specificity are shown in blue. W indicates a water mediated interaction. (B) Overlay of C-α traces of WT (yellow) and triple mutant (magenta) structures. The DNA backbone is also shown for each of the DNA strands. The WT light and heavy strands are colored red and orange, respectively. The mutant DNA strands are colored green (light) and blue (heavy). (C) Overlay of the central part of the DNA duplex in the WT and mutant structures. The three nucleotides that are everted in the WT structure are shown. The mutant heavy strand is blue, while the light strand is green. A simulated-annealing fo-fc omit electron density map is shown, contoured at 3σ. The DNA in the WT structure is shown as a reference. The WT heavy strand is shown in brown while the light strand is magenta. Black arrows indicate the changes in the position of the everted nucleotides that are observed upon mutation of the three stacking residues. (D) Electrostatic surface potential of MTERF1. The protein surface is shown, colored between −10 kT e−1 (red) and 10 kT e−1 (blue). The DNA backbone is shown in yellow (light strand) and green (heavy strand). (E) Sequence recognition by arginine residues. Five arginine residues determine sequence recognition by MTERF1. A representative example showing how R169 and R202 interact with their partner guanine residues. The R202 interaction is atypical in that only one hydrogen bond is established with the guanine base. Hydrogen-bonding distances are shown in orange. A simulated annealing fo-fc electron density map is shown contoured at 4σ. See also Figure S2. Cell 2010 141, 982-993DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 DNA Binding Measurements ITC data from the titration of the leu-tRNA MTERF1 binding sequence into WT MTERF1 (A), the triple R162A-F243A-Y288A mutant (B) or the R387A mutant (C). (D) Summary of the observed binding constants. The sequence of each substrate (one of the strands) is indicated at the top of the table. See also Figure S3. Cell 2010 141, 982-993DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Termination Activity of WT and Mutant MTERF1 (A) In vitro termination activity. WT MTERF1 and the different mutants were assayed for their ability to terminate transcription from the HSP promoter in vitro (see Experimental Procedures). The termination sequence was cloned in either the forward (A) or reverse orientation (B). The results are equivalent on both orientations and show clear termination for WT MTERF1 but only residual termination for the triple (RFY) mutant and the R387A mutation. FL, full-length run-off transcription. T, termination product. C, control lane without MTERF1. (C) Quantification of the termination activity. The bar graph shows the percent termination observed in in vitro termination experiments with the termination sequence in the reverse orientation. Values correspond to the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. (D) Termination activity of the remaining arginine mutants. E. Model depicting the events leading to specific DNA binding by MTERF1 (represented as a yellow oval). Cell 2010 141, 982-993DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Pathogenic DNA Mutations in the Mitochondrial Termination Sequence (A) Scheme indicating the location of the mutations in the termination sequence and binding constants for titrations of a 22 bp oligonucleotide containing the leu-tRNA MTERF1 binding sequence carrying each of the pathogenic mutations into WT MTERF1. The DNA residues involved in arginine guanine interactions with MTERF1 are indicated by an asterisk. (B) Interaction of R387 with G3249. Hydrogen-bonding distances are shown in orange. A simulated annealing fo-fc electron density map is shown (blue) contoured at 4σ. (C) In vitro termination activity of WT MTERF1 on substrates containing each of the nine pathogenic mutations. FL, full-length run-off transcription. T, termination product. C, control lane without MTERF1. (D) Quantification of termination activity on the different mutant sequences. The bar graph shows the percent termination observed in in vitro termination experiments with the termination sequence in the reverse orientation. Values correspond to the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Cell 2010 141, 982-993DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Multiple Sequence Alignment of the Four Human Members of the mterf Family, Related to Figure 1 Invariant residues are shown in white over a black background. Conserved residues are bold. The three residues that stack with everted nucleotides in MTERF1 are shown in green. The five arginine residues involved in sequence recognition in MTERF1 are shown in red. Horizontal black bars represent α helices and dotted lines represent 310 helices. Cell 2010 141, 982-993DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Conservation of the mterf Binding Sequence, Related to Figure 3 Alignment of the light strand of the MTERF1 binding site on the leu-tRNA in different species. The asterisks indicate the six positions that appear critical for sequence recognition. Hs -Homo sapiens; fc, felis catus; ss, sus scrofa; ec, equus caballus; bt, bos taurus; mm, Mus musculus; rn, rattus norvegicus; oa, ornithorhynchus anatinus; dr, danio rerio. Cell 2010 141, 982-993DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 ITC Measurements, Related to Figure 4 Titration of a 22 bp oligonucleotide pair of arbitrary sequence (see Experimental Procedures) into WT MTERF1 (A) or a triple R162A-F243A-Y288A mutant (B). (C) Titration of a 22 bp homopolymeric A:T oligonucleotide pair into WT MTERF1. (D) Titration of a 22 bp oligonucleotide pair containing the A3243G mutation into WT MTERF1. (E) Titration of a 22 bp oligonucleotide pair containing the G3249A mutation into WT MTERF1. In each panel, the upper portion shows raw data for the titration, whereas the lower portion shows the normalized, integrated binding isotherm together with the fitted binding curve. Cell 2010 141, 982-993DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions