Optimal Interesting Quantum Gates with Quantum Dot Qubits David DiVincenzo 19.8.2014 Spinqubits summer school, Konstanz Hall Effect Gyrators and Circulators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Henry Haselgrove School of Physical Sciences University of Queensland
Advertisements

What’s QEC to Solid State Physics David DiVincenzo QEC14.
Biexciton-Exciton Cascades in Graphene Quantum Dots CAP 2014, Sudbury Isil Ozfidan I.Ozfidan, M. Korkusinski,A.D.Guclu,J.McGuire and P.Hawrylak, PRB89,
Quantum dynamics and quantum control of spins in diamond Viatcheslav Dobrovitski Ames Laboratory US DOE, Iowa State University Works done in collaboration.
Coherence between spin singlet and triplet states in a coupled quantum dot University College London Jeroen Elzerman Kathi Weiss Yves Delley Javier Miguel-Sanchez.
Dynamical response of nanoconductors: the example of the quantum RC circuit Christophe Mora Collaboration with Audrey Cottet, Takis Kontos, Michele Filippone,
D-Wave Systems Inc. THE QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANY TM A.M. Zagoskin (D-Wave Systems and UBC) Tunable coupling of superconducting qubits Quantum Mechanics.
Quantum Computing with Trapped Ion Hyperfine Qubits.
LPS Quantum computing lunchtime seminar Friday Oct. 22, 1999.
David Gershoni The Physics Department, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel and Joint Quantum Institute, NIST and University of.
Quantum Entanglement of Rb Atoms Using Cold Collisions ( 韓殿君 ) Dian-Jiun Han Physics Department Chung Cheng University.
Chien Hsing James Wu David Gottesman Andrew Landahl.
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
Silicon-based Quantum Computation Cheuk Chi Lo Kinyip Phoa Dept. of EECS, UC Berkeley C191 Final Project Presentation Nov 30, 2005.
Josephson Junctions, What are they?
Image courtesy of Keith Schwab.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Quantum Dots and Spin Based Quantum Computing Matt Dietrich 2/2/2007 University of Washington.
Error-correcting the IBM qubit error-correcting the IBM qubit panos aliferis IBM.
Deterministic teleportation of electrons in a quantum dot nanostructure Deics III, 28 February 2006 Richard de Visser David DiVincenzo (IBM, Yorktown Heights)
Image courtesy of Keith Schwab.
Quantum Information Processing
Tomáš Bzdušek QSIT student presentation 28 th november 2011.
Interfacing quantum optical and solid state qubits Cambridge, Sept 2004 Lin Tian Universität Innsbruck Motivation: ion trap quantum computing; future roads.
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
Quantum Devices (or, How to Build Your Own Quantum Computer)
Paraty - II Quantum Information Workshop 11/09/2009 Fault-Tolerant Computing with Biased-Noise Superconducting Qubits Frederico Brito Collaborators: P.
Dynamical decoupling in solids
Matt Reed Yale University Boston, MA - February 28, 2012
@Nagoya U. Sept. 5, 2009 Naoto Nagaosa Department of Applied Physics
Witnessing Quantum Coherence IWQSE 2013, NTU Oct. 15 (2013) Yueh-Nan Chen ( 陳岳男 ) Dep. of Physics, NCKU National Center for Theoretical Sciences (South)
Quantum computation: Why, what, and how I.Qubitology and quantum circuits II.Quantum algorithms III. Physical implementations Carlton M. Caves University.
An Introduction to Quantum Phenomena and their Effect on Computing Peter Shoemaker MSCS Candidate March 7 th, 2003.
Implementation of Quantum Computing Ethan Brown Devin Harper With emphasis on the Kane quantum computer.
Meet the transmon and his friends
Entanglement for two qubits interacting with a thermal field Mikhail Mastyugin The XXII International Workshop High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory.
Gang Shu  Basic concepts  QC with Optical Driven Excitens  Spin-based QDQC with Optical Methods  Conclusions.
Seung Hyun Park Hyperfine Mapping of Donor Wave Function Deformations in Si:P based Quantum Devices Seung Hyun Park Advisors: Prof. Gerhard Klimeck Prof.
Quantum Computing: An Overview for non-specialists Mikio Nakahara Department of Physics & Research Centre for Quantum Computing Kinki University, Japan.
Large scale quantum computing in silicon with imprecise qubit couplings ArXiv : (2015)
Single Electron Spin Resonance with Quantum Dots Using a Micro-magnet Induced Slanting Zeeman Field S. Tarucha Dep. of Appl. Phys. The Univ. of Tokyo ICORP.
Quantum Computing: Solving Complex Problems David DiVincenzo, IBM Fermilab Colloquium, 4/2007.
Journal Club február 16. Tóvári Endre Resonance-hybrid states in a triple quantum dot PHYSICAL REVIEW B 85, (R) (2012) Using QDs as building.
1 Quantum Computation with coupled quantum dots. 2 Two sides of a coin Two different polarization of a photon Alignment of a nuclear spin in a uniform.
1 Department of Physics , University at Buffalo, SUNY APS March Meeting 2015 Phonon mediated spin relaxation in a moving quantum dot: Doppler shift, Cherenkov.
Kondo effect in a quantum dot without spin Hyun-Woo Lee (Postech) & Sejoong Kim (Postech  MIT) References: H.-W. Lee & S. Kim, cond-mat/ P. Silvestrov.
On Decoherence in Solid-State Qubits Josephson charge qubits Classification of noise, relaxation/decoherence Josephson qubits as noise spectrometers Decoherence.
Universität Karlsruhe Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, (2006)
Adiabatic quantum computer (AQC) Andrii Rudavskyi Supervisor: prof. Petra Rudolf.
Suggestion for Optical Implementation of Hadamard Gate Amir Feizpour Physics Department Sharif University of Technology.
Purdue University Spring 2016 Prof. Yong P. Chen Lecture 18 (3/24/2016) Slide Introduction to Quantum Photonics.
Violation of a Bell’s inequality in time with weak measurement SPEC CEA-Saclay IRFU, CEA, Jan A.Korotkov University of California, Riverside A. Palacios-Laloy.
TC, U. Dorner, P. Zoller C. Williams, P. Julienne
Circuit QED Experiment
Spin-orbit interaction in a dual gated InAs/GaSb quantum well
Linear Quantum Error Correction
Coherent interactions at a distance provide a powerful tool for quantum simulation and computation. The most common approach to realize an effective long-distance.
Algorithmic simulation of far-from- equilibrium dynamics using quantum computer Walter V. Pogosov 1,2,3 1 Dukhov Research Institute of Automatics (Rosatom),
BASIS Foundation Summer School 2018 "Many body theory meets quantum information" Simulation of many-body physics with existing quantum computers Walter.
Outline Device & setup Initialization and read out
Design and Realization of Decoherence-Free
FAM Mirko Rehmann March
Coupled atom-cavity system
Leon Camenzind 11/08/17.
Multielectron Atoms The quantum mechanics approach for treating multielectrom atoms is one of successive approximations The first approximation is to treat.
A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier
NV centers in diamond: from quantum coherence to nanoscale MRI
Hole Spin Decoherence in Quantum Dots
Quantum Computing Hakem Alazmi Jhilakshi Sharma Linda Vu.
Dynamics of a superconducting qubit coupled to quantum two-level systems in its environment Robert Johansson (RIKEN, The Institute of Physical and Chemical.
Presentation transcript:

Optimal Interesting Quantum Gates with Quantum Dot Qubits David DiVincenzo 19.8.2014 Spinqubits summer school, Konstanz Hall Effect Gyrators and Circulators I will begin by explaining the very important role that microwave circulators play in current microwave quantum optics work.  The Faraday-effect circulator was invented in the 1950's, at which time circulators using the Hall effect were also considered.  It was "proved" then that a Hall bar cannot make a good gyrator (a close cousin to the circulator).  This proof is flawed, and we have shown that good gyrators are possible for Hall angle -> 90 degrees (aka "quantum Hall state") if the device is contacted capacitively.  We predict that the resulting Hall circulator can be much more miniaturized than the Faraday kind.  We will discuss the relation of this device functionality to the physics of chiral edge magnetoplasmons in the Hall conductor. I will give an overview of my work in a team of researchers at IBM on achieving highly coherent two level systems (qubits) in superconducting Josephson-junction devices. I will review the basic phenomenology that makes coherence possible, and discuss the startling progress in reducing decoherence in these systems. I will end with concepts for coupling arrays of qubits coherently to make a fault-tolerant quantum computer. Should have more of basic circuit theory Title: Scalable Scheme for Multiqubit Parity Measurement Abstract: Error correction for quantum computation is envisioned to involve local interactions in a two-dimensional structure, with frequent measurement of ancillas to acquire syndrome information.  Since cavities are involved both in mediating the necessary quantum gates and in enabling the measurement, we have investigated how both functions can be accomplished in one step, and how ancilla qubits can be dispensed with.  This single step is non-demolition measurement of a multi-qubit parity.  The measurement is accomplished by using a microwave tone to interrogate the scattering phase shift of a resonant structure with multiple, closely spaced resonant modes, each coupled dispersively to the set of qubits whose parity is to be determined. I will show an explicit concept for an implementation with 3D cavities; almost cubical cavities would give the necessary near-degeneracy of modes. 

Sebastian Mehl, PhD 2014, FZ Juelich

Virtual fluctuations with real implications: Not for today… Poster A38: Michael Hell Virtual fluctuations with real implications: Renormalization-induced torques in spin-qubit control and readout virtual fluctuations of quantum dot electrons induce torques affecting the qubit Bloch vector induce spin torque → coherent backaction → anomalous spin resonance source ferro- magnet sensor quantum dot quantum dot charge / spin qubit ferro- magnet drain

QD Arrays – how can we use them to make effective gates? Petta, Science (2005) Shulman, Science (2012) Medford, Nature (2013) Higginbotham, PRL (2014) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo Title

Outline double quantum dots high bias phase gates how more electrons can be useful double quantum dots of different sizes new sweet spot manipulation with spin-orbit interactions two-qubit gates for double quantum dots triple quantum dots 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

DQD: High bias phase gate singlet-triplet qubit Levy, PRL (2002) PRB 88, 161408 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

DQD: High bias phase gate singlet-triplet qubit Levy, PRL (2002) exchange interaction, low bias magnetic field gradient PRB 88, 161408 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

DQD: High bias phase gate Pauli spin blockade sweet spot PRB 88, 161408 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

DQD: High bias phase gate go deep into (2,0) – triplet using excited state orbital comes into play sweet spot 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo PRB 88, 161408 (2013)

DQD: High bias phase gate charge noise in leading order: orbital picture for doubly occupied states: Can we find ? PRB 88, 161408 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

DQD: High bias phase gate Fock-Darwin states: “atomic” orbitals for quantum dots For Fock-Darwin conditions (circular, harmonic dot) L orbitals are complex conjugates of one another. Story is more complicated for any other shell. PRB 88, 161408 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

DQD: High bias phase gate Fock-Darwin states: “atomic” orbitals for quantum dots 4 electron configuration has unique charge density, independent of spin use (3,3) <-> (4,2) instead of (1,1) <-> (2,1) PRB 88, 161408 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

2. Playing with confinement and spin-orbit interaction: finding a different kind of sweet spot

DQDs of different sizes Different kind of sweet spot? Can we get rid of ? arXiv 1408.1010 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

DQDs of different sizes (l0=20nm vs. 100nm) Different kind of sweet spot? singlet-triplet inversion: strongly confined QD favors singlet weakly confined QD favors triplet degeneracy of singlet and triplet in (1,1) sweet spot? arXiv 1408.1010 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

DQDs of different sizes is sufficient to operate a STQ at the sweet spot Also spin-orbit interactions do it! Estimate: ΔSO=25 MHz (GaAs), 250MHz (InAs) arXiv 1408.1010 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

3. Achieving longer-ranged coupling for two-qubit gates “Conventional” ST qubit, but with new type of coupler

Entangling operation of STQs single quantum state couples QD2 and QD3 empty/doubly occupied: (super) exchange singly occupied: exchange PRB 90, 045404 (2014) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

Entangling operation of STQs empty/doubly occupied: (super) exchange note: works also for direct exchange between QD2 and QD3 PRB 90, 045404 (2014) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

Entangling operation of STQs singly occupied: exchange PRB 90, 045404 (2014) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

Entangling operation of STQs excellent control: exchange interaction can be controlled with independent gate at QS magnetic fields at QD1 and QD4 do not matter noise discussion, cf. paper PRB 90, 045404 (2014) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

Entangling operation of STQs more complicated gates for e.g. for (1,1,0,1,1) and (1,1,2,1,1): PRB 90, 045404 (2014) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

Outline double quantum dots high bias phase gates how more electrons can be useful double quantum dots of different sizes new sweet spot manipulation with spin-orbit interactions two-qubit gates for double quantum dots triple quantum dots 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo

Triple Quantum Dot Qubit exchange-only qubit theory: DiVincenzo, Nature (2000) experiment: Medford, Nature (2013) Noise discussion: PRB 87, 195309 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo Title

Triple Quantum Dot Qubit exchange-only qubit PRB 87, 195309 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo Title

Triple Quantum Dot Qubit exchange-only qubit PRB 87, 195309 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo Title

Triple Quantum Dot Qubit exchange-only qubit PRB 87, 195309 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo Title

Triple Quantum Dot Qubit Fidelity: Qubit encoding in all other states have different quantum numbers decoherence free subspace But: dominant noise channels are local e.g. hyperfine interactions PRB 87, 195309 (2013) 18.-21.08.2014 | DiVincenzo Title