Institutional strategy and ILR

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Bologna Seminar Learning outcomes based higher education: The Scottish experience Workshop 5: national qualifications frameworks and levels, and internal.

Advertisements

Student Involvement Madrid October 2006 Norman Sharp, Director, QAA Scotland Duncan Cockburn, Senior Development Officer, sparqs.

Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.

5 th June 2008 Peer review and development Penny Silvester Divisional Manager Learning and skills.

Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework

Inclusion Quality Mark for Wales

HM Inspectorate of Education 1 The Quality Framework for Scottish FE Colleges Angus Allan, HMIE.

A Balancing of Responsibilities Tom Evershed Higher Education Manager, Warwickshire College.

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.

A Snapshot of TEQSA Dr Carol Nicoll Chief Commissioner Festival of Learning and Teaching University of Adelaide Tuesday 6 November 2012.

IASCE Conference Athlone October 7 th & 8 th 2004 Responsive Evaluation. Working with Stakeholders: A review of the Open Training College Quality Assurance.

Standards and Guidelines for External Quality Assurance 19 May 2009 Axel Aerden International Policy Advisor.

What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?

The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education HE-ness.

Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. Page 1  What are the shared expectations for how we will work together?  How can we ensure that high-

Teaching Quality Indicators Project Ian Solomonides Excellence is as low as we go or When is good, good enough?

Ingrid Mula RCE Severn Coordinator Leading Curriculum Change: Strategic approaches to ESD and Quality.

1 Introduction and Basic Elements of Advocacy. 2 What is advocacy? A systematic approach to changing policies and programs to reflect the needs of individuals.

Involving Students Effectively In Quality Assurance Nik Heerens Head of sparqs.

‘to safeguardthe public interest in sound standards of higher education qualifications and to inform and encourage continuous improvement in the management.

Developing trust: Towards Mutual Recognition agreements MERCOSUR – RIACES María José Lemaitre Chile.

Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.

What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.

Learning Teaching and Assessment at University of Worcester Dr John Peters NTF Academic Development and Practice.

Directors of Student Education October 2014 Vivien Jones.

Jan Hausman Academic Manager Bay of Plenty Polytechnic Tauranga, New Zealand August 2011.

The NMC strategy and its alignment with the education strategy Anne Trotter Assistant Director, Education and QA 16 October 2014.

Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.

INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.

Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.

Quality Assurance Dr Christopher Stevens

Evaluating your EQUIP Initiative Helen King. Objectives To enable teams to develop a shared understanding of the purpose, use and stakeholders for evaluation;

The context for the revised guidance Alan Inglis Assistant Principal, John Wheatley College.

FNV Mondiaal 5-C ORGANISATIONAL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHOPS FNV MONDIAAL.

©2008 Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Partner CAA Use of Resources Workshop Halifax 18 May 2009.

SEELB Primary Principals 26 th & 27 th October 2011.

PRESENTATION AT THE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITIES QUALITY FRAMEWORK Professor Sarah Moore, Chair, National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning.

Creating an Integrated Picture of Student Engagement across the Scottish Higher and Further Education Sectors. Eve Lewis Head of sparqs with support from.

External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.

UNESCO: Paris: June 2004 Second Global Forum on International Quality Assurance, Accreditation and the Recognition of Qualifications Widening Access.

The challenges of significant change Colin J Webb New Zealand December 2008.

John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Director, McMaster Health Forum McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster University 7 June 2012.

1 Brent Schools Headteacher Conference 17 th June 2014 Key Strategic Developments for the coming year Farzana Aldridge, Strategic Director.

AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.

@sparqs_scotland Developing a culture of engagement and Partnership Eve Lewis Director Student Engagement in University decision making – towards a more.

Preparing to Apply for Taught Degree Awarding Powers: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Nick Holland – Academic Registrar Conservatoire for Dance and.

Professional Recognition and Development (PRD) Scheme

My research questions What are academics’ perceptions of the influences on their curriculum decisions? What are the drivers that support and inhibit.

Effective Use of Data A reflective and stratified approach to enhancing the quality of the student experience Cathy Milligan, Deputy Director (Education.

What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?

An Update and Consultation

International Practice Scotland

Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network

Program Review For School Counseling Programs

Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh

The view from the ‘regulator’

IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course

Preparing for Higher Education Review (HER)

Re-Engagement / QA Approval Community Education Network meeting Feb 2018 Walter Balfe, QQI February 2018.

Professor Les Ebdon CBE Director of Fair Access to Higher Education

Effective Use of Data A reflective and stratified approach to enhancing the quality of the student experience Cathy Milligan, Deputy Director (Education.

Embedding equality and diversity in assessment and feedback policy and practice Helen Duncan, Equalities and Diversity Adviser Keith Smyth, Professor.

Healthy Learning, Healthy Lives Award Key Stage1-5

school self-evaluation and improvement toolkit

Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.

Role of Academic Services

Periodic Review Departmental Review.

Student engagement in QA in Scotland

February 21-22, 2018.

Quality and Impact AIM PRIMARY DRIVERS SECONDARY DRIVERS INTERVENTIONS

Presentation transcript:

Institutional strategy and ILR Strategically informed review and enhancement

The starting point “Institution-Led Subject Review is the University’s process to formally review and plan future enhancement of its taught provision leading to academic awards” RGU Academic Quality Handbook Empowering Learners Engaging Diverse Audiences Supporting Strategic Decisions Policy Landscapes

ILR as an opportunity An opportunity to consider standards and quality, which combines assurance and enhancement. With a view of enhancement as: making, or doing it better; making the best of opportunities and resources; any aspect of teaching, learning, assessment or the student learning experience; and, delivering positive change for students. Empowering Learners Engaging Diverse Audiences Supporting Strategic Decisions Policy Landscapes

ILR as an opportunity An opportunity to : Engage students and colleagues in discussion and dialogue Consider the overall health of the subject area Discuss alignment to, and contextualisation of, institutional strategy Address issues outstanding from quality assurance Formulate future directions and plans With significant value add through the engagement of the Panel. Empowering Learners Engaging Diverse Audiences Supporting Strategic Decisions Policy Landscapes

Assurance informed, enhancement focused Key elements of the process: Agreement of scope and context ‘Look back’ review of QA outcomes Evaluation, leading to preparation of the Reflective Analysis, addressing: Key messages from QA Substantial or significant issues or opportunities Future direction and plans Engagement with the Panel Refinement and implementation of plans Empowering Learners Engaging Diverse Audiences Supporting Strategic Decisions Policy Landscapes

Maximising value? For all stakeholders, by creating engagement, to: consider areas for development discuss and refine future priorities develop plans which benefit from externality and have buy-in deliver confidence in our quality and standards at subject level Empowering Learners Engaging Diverse Audiences Supporting Strategic Decisions Policy Landscapes

Further information James Dunphy Director of Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Access j.dunphy@rgu.ac.uk www.rgu.ac.uk