PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Piedmont Region - Italy Supporting Equal DPs – The Experience of the Piedmont Region Erica Giordano.
Advertisements

TVET working group contributions. What are the possible options for obtaining decent living and working conditions without joining the informal economy?
Improve your Club’s project design and implementation Presented by: Ulrike Neubert SIE PD Ann-Christine Soderlund SIE APD.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
CONTACT SEMINAR November 2008 Project management tools.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 3 Project management methodologies.
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
Results-Based Management
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Project Cycle Management presentation
DESIGNING A PROJECT: FROM ACTIVITY BASED TO RESULTS / QUALITY BASED MANAGEMENT.
How to use the VSS to design a National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) 1.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
CONSISTENCY AND RESULTS EVALUATION IN MEXICO SEMPTEMBER 2008 Gonzalo Hernández Licona.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Using Individual Project and Program Evaluations to Improve the Part D Programs Dr. Herbert M. Baum.
The P Process Strategic Design
Preparing proposals for funding RIMC Research Capacity Enhancement Workshops Series : “Achieving Research Impact”
This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European Union within.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency 3rd Health Programme The Electronic Submission System (JA 2015) Georgios MARGETIDIS.
P3 Business Analysis. 2 Section F: Project Management F1.The nature of projects F2. Building the Business Case F4. Planning,monitoring and controlling.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
University of Palestine Faculty of Applied Engineering & Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Engineering Project Management Chapter 1 Introduction.
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Annex III to BS/SC/PDF/A(2003)1
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 5. Review of the organizational strategy.
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
Project Cycle Management
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
Developing CBC project ideas
Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2017
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Our Understanding of Institution/Capacity Building
Introduction to Comprehensive Evaluation
Welcome Note Opening Remarks Programme Information.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
An introduction to the LiFE Index
Strategic Management & Planning
Project Management.
Logical Framework I want to design a project by planning out the logic
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Public Policy Evaluation Office National Department of Planning
Monitoring and Evaluation of Postharvest Training Projects
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Developing a shelter strategy
EVALUATIONS in the EU External Aid
Thematic areas and overview of the opportunities for bilateral cooperation under the Active Citizens Fund Bulgaria Bilateral Workshop between Bulgarian.
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Project intervention logic
INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT Workshop Oteshevo 14-16 May 2018

Purpose of training To gain theoretical and practical knowledge for all phases of project cycle management To improve skills for development, planning and implementation of projects To understand the principles of Log Frame To improve skills for defining project goals, results, indicators To understand the principle of budget per activity To improve skills for monitoring and evaluation To develop log frame and problem tree 2

Definition Project is a series of activities with purpose of accomplishment of clear defined goals within specific time frame and budget Project cycle management (PCM) is the process of planning, organizing, coordinating, and controlling of a project effectively and efficiently throughout its phases, from planning through execution then completion and review to achieve pre-defined objectives or satisfying the project stakeholders  by producing the right deliverable at the right time, cost and quality Project Cycle Management is an approach that allows you to manage many different projects and improve the quality of your projects over time. PCM uses the idea of a continuous learning cycle and incorporates logical framework analysis to guarantee that the beneficiaries are involved in the project's design.

Project characteristics Determined beginning and end of project Determined quantity, budget, final outputs and resources Managed within it’s size, complexity and need

Project management characteristics Purpose of project management is to achieve the goals of the project within the given time frame and budget using available resources Difference -Regular management – continues management (business as usual) - Project management - “management of changes” 5

Project management cycle

Project management cycle

Why do WE DO projects To achieve goals Profit (if its profitable entity) To implement successful projects To gain new knowledge and experience To gain skills Employment and profit Increase networking Improve value and supply chain ….. 9

Analyzing The current situation is analyzed to get an idea of the "future desired situation" and to help select the strategy that will be implemented to accomplish it What is the problem now? Problem tree analysis What we would like to change? Solution tree analysis How will we do that? Strategic analysis Different stakeholders have different point of view of the situation. All stakeholders needed in the analyzes When we get the answers, we make LOG FRAME 11

Problem analysis First step: define problem and develop cause-effect links between problems Second step: turn negative situation in specific problem Third step: develop “Problem tree” 12

EFFECTS FROM MAIN PROBLEM CAUSES FOR MAIN PROBLEM Problem tree EFFECTS FROM MAIN PROBLEM EFFECT CAUSE CAUSES FOR MAIN PROBLEM

Problem tree Polluted water in the river Effect Causes Poor living conditions of the population Disappearance of certain species Effect Common diseases in the local population Damaged balance of organisms in the river Polluted water in the river Large quantities of untreated water are discharged into the river Insufficient wastewater treatment facilities Non-implementation of the legal framework Causes

Solution analysis Describe future positive situation Define the hierarchy of objectives The negative situation from the tree of problems is turner into a solution Example: Problem Goal To improve the quality of the water in the river Polluted water in the river

Polluted water in the river Reformulating "problems" in "goals" Problem Goal Common diseases in the local population To lower the % of diseases of population Polluted water in the river To improve the quality of the water To lower % of untreated water discharged into the river Large quantities of untreated water are discharged into the river Insufficient wastewater treatment facilities To establish a system for treatment of waste water

To improve the quality of the water Solution tree To contribute to conservation of certain species To improve quality of life for population Effects To lower the % of diseases of population To improve balance of living organisms in the river To improve the quality of the water To lower % of untreated water discharged into the river To establish a system for treatment of waste water To implement legal framework Causes

Да се управува оддржливо со водните ресурси Choosing strategy Подобрени условза живеење Зголемен обем на туризам и рекреација Намалено загадување на земјоделските површини Намален број на болести Да се управува оддржливо со водните ресурси Подигање на свеста на граѓаните и институциите Намалување на загадувањето на водните ресурси Оддржливо водоснабдување Ефикасно ЈКП Кампањи, Едукација, Лобирање Проширување и надградба на фекална канализациона мрежа Изградба на систем за третман на отпадни води Изградба на систем за собирање и пречистување на отпадните води од селските населби Подобрување на системот за управување со цврст отпад Рационално користење на вода за пиење Проширување и реконструкција на водоводна мрежа Аналаиза на оперативна , организациона техничка опременост на ЈКП, проблеми и препораки

To improve the quality of the water Solution tree To improve quality of life for population Main goal To lower the % of diseases of population To improve the quality of the water Project goal Results Lower % of untreated water discharged into the river Construction of system for treatment of waste water Activities

SMART indicators Specific Specific answers the questions "what is to be done?" For the purpose – every indicator to measure one goal/result Measurable Quality, quantity, costs… Achievable Answers the question "Can it be done giving the time frame, opportunity and resources?"    Relevant Relevant answers the questions, "should it be done?",  "why?" and "what will be the impact?" Time oriented Time-oriented answers the question, "when will it be done…within the given resources

What is monitoring? What is evaluation? What is revision?

Monitoring We do it because: Things are not always going as planned To identify eventual problems and changes in plans To react on time on the identified deviations and changes within the plans

Monitoring tools Reports Field visits Project progress reports Programme reports Field visits Monitoring system depending on the complexity of the project

Evaluation Evaluation on the set goals and results Evaluation of the time frame Evaluation of direct beneficiaries Evaluation of final beneficiaries

Evaluation criteria 5 Criteira: - Relevance - Effectiveness - Efficiency - Sustainability - Impact

Revision / Audit Independent confirmation of the projects achievments, regarding Project goals Finances, resources, quality

Difference between evaluation, monitoring and audit Summary: Difference between evaluation, monitoring and audit Evaluation Assessment of relevance, effectiveness (achievement of objectives), efficiency, impact and sustainability. Monitoring Current analysis of the project implementation in terms of the planned results, support for making managerial decisions. Auditing Assessment of: (1) Legal framework and regularity of project costs; (2) Have the project funds been spent efficiently ?; (3) Have the project funds been used effectively (for the intended purpose)?

Approving a project Analize the mission and goals of the organization you are addressing Choose a project that fits into their programs Indicate what is the need for intervention and the problems of non-intervention Provide convincing evidence of your capacity to deal with the project!

Project development mistakes Low financial participation You do not give evidence that the project will result in a permanent change in the situation! Underestimating your own financial capacity? The mismatch of the project with the current strategies and policies of the community and the government Sustainability of the project can not be proven or does not exist!

Recommendations Technical requirements: Language English Number of documentation / length of text Number of copies (incl.electronic) The way that project proposal is submitting Electronically + hard copy Folders, boxes…. What to write on envelope, stamp and signature on right places 30

General remarks There is never enough time to prepare the project Sometimes we do not have all the knowledge regarding project topics Finding right project partners and preparing the documentation requires a lot of time What we have written maybe will not be understood on the same way by the project evaluator 31

Thank you for your attention !!!