Volume 22, Issue 22, Pages (November 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Circadian Timekeeping System of Drosophila Paul E. Hardin Current Biology Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages R714-R722 (September 2005) DOI: /j.cub
Advertisements

Evolutionary Genetics: You Are What You Evolve to Eat
DDT resistance in flies carries no cost
Teddy A. Wilkin, Ben C. Sheldon  Current Biology 
Evolution: When Dinosaurs Bested Their Early Rivals
The nature of Drosophila melanogaster
Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages R673-R676 (August 2013)
Homing Behavior: Decisions, Dominance and Democracy
Abdominal-B Neurons Control Drosophila Virgin Female Receptivity
Flying in Tune: Sexual Recognition in Mosquitoes
Victoria F. Ratcliffe, David Reby  Current Biology 
Evolutionary Genetics: How Flies Get Naked
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Information considered harmful in animal communication
Sexual Selection: Roles Evolving
Bats eavesdrop on the sound of copulating flies
Defining Resistance and Tolerance to Cancer
Morphogens: Precise Outputs from a Variable Gradient
Female-led infanticide in wild chimpanzees
Activation of Latent Courtship Circuitry in the Brain of Drosophila Females Induces Male-like Behaviors  Carolina Rezával, Siddharth Pattnaik, Hania J.
Behavior: Warriors Shaking Hands
Alternative Strategies: The Evolution of Switch Points
Cognition and Evolution: Learning and the Evolution of Sex Traits
Genetic Identification and Separation of Innate and Experience-Dependent Courtship Behaviors in Drosophila  Yufeng Pan, Bruce S. Baker  Cell  Volume 156,
Interspecies Sex and Taste
Homing Behavior: Decisions, Dominance and Democracy
Evolutionary Genetics: Reuse, Recycle, Converge
Joyce F. Benenson, Richard W. Wrangham  Current Biology 
Effects of Anxiety on Spontaneous Ritualized Behavior
Competitive Helping in Online Giving
Reinforcement Can Overcome Gene Flow during Speciation in Drosophila
Invertebrate Neuroethology: Food Play and Sex
Human Evolution: Thrifty Genes and the Dairy Queen
Sounds of Modified Flight Feathers Reliably Signal Danger in a Pigeon
Serial Dependence in the Perception of Faces
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Bats Are Acoustically Attracted to Mutualistic Carnivorous Plants
Neurogenetics: Short-Circuiting Sexually Dimorphic Behaviors
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (June 2013)
Dopaminergic Modulation of Arousal in Drosophila
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages R62-R63 (January 2008)
Asif A. Ghazanfar, Daniel Y. Takahashi, Neil Mathur, W. Tecumseh Fitch 
Nicolas Mathevon, Caroline Casey, Colleen Reichmuth, Isabelle Charrier 
Adaptation can explain evidence for encoding of probabilistic information in macaque inferior temporal cortex  Kasper Vinken, Rufin Vogels  Current Biology 
Steven K. Schwartz, William E. Wagner, Eileen A. Hebets 
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages (December 2015)
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Auditory-Visual Crossmodal Integration in Perception of Face Gender
Volume 26, Issue 22, Pages (November 2016)
Paolo Domenici, David Booth, Jonathan M. Blagburn, Jonathan P. Bacon 
Octopus Movement: Push Right, Go Left
Neuronal Plasticity: How Do Neurons Know What To Do?
Marine Biology: New Light on Growth in the Cold
Small RNAs: How Seeds Remember To Obey Their Mother
Fig. 2. Two signal-producing behaviours of wild-type Canton-S males and per mutant males relative to whether the wild-type female is moving or immobile.
Taina Conrad, Manfred Ayasse  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Temporal coordination signals coalition quality
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 22, Pages (November 2013)
Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Crocodile egg sounds signal hatching time
Evolutionary Genetics: How Flies Get Naked
Motion Adaptation and the Velocity Coding of Natural Scenes
Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Maria J.S. Guerreiro, Lisa Putzar, Brigitte Röder  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 22, Pages 2180-2185 (November 2012) Substrate-Borne Vibratory Communication during Courtship in Drosophila melanogaster  Caroline C.G. Fabre, Berthold Hedwig, Graham Conduit, Peter A. Lawrence, Stephen F. Goodwin, José Casal  Current Biology  Volume 22, Issue 22, Pages 2180-2185 (November 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.042 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Two Behaviors of the Male Vary in Frequency with Respect to whether the Female Is Moving or Immobile (A and B) Frequencies were extracted from the ethograms built from movies of courting pairs. In (A), the x axis shows the values for each of 30 pairs of Oregon-R flies. The y axis shows the percentage of the time the males display wing fluttering (including wing extension/vibration and scissoring) or abdominal quivering. The left scatterplot shows these two male behaviors when the females are moving, and the right one the male behaviors when the females are stationary. Note that one male behavior is shown without indicating whether the same male is also performing the other behavior at that time. Therefore, the table in (B) breaks down male behavior further, showing for each behavior the grand means (n = 30, as before) as percentage of the time the female is moving or immobile. See also Figures S1A and S1B. All intervals in this report are given for a 95% confidence level. (C) Log-linear models of association were tested (see Figure S1D), and the best fit includes a strong association between male quivering (or not) and female movement (or not) and a weaker but still significant association between male fluttering (or not) and female movement (or not). See also Figures S1 and S2, Movie S1, and Movie S2. Current Biology 2012 22, 2180-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.042) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Behaviors of Neuronally Masculinized Females during Courtship with Wild-Type Females Masculinized females, like wild-type males, quiver their abdomens and the wild-type female partners appear to respond by stopping. Data are presented as in Figure 1. See also Figure S3 and Movie S4. Current Biology 2012 22, 2180-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.042) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Substrate-Borne Vibrations Generated during Abdominal Quivering of Courting Males (A) Scheme of the video and laser vibrometer recording system. (B) Oscillogram of substrate-borne vibrations generated during a single bout of quivering of about 7 s; the wings of the male were amputated. There is some variation in the amplitudes of the substrate vibrations. (C) Details of (B) above to show higher resolution. See also Movie S5. Current Biology 2012 22, 2180-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.042) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Behaviors of Courting Drosophila yakuba and D. sechellia Pairs An association between male quivering and female immobility is apparent. (A and B) Data are presented as in Figure 1. (C) Oscillograms of substrate-borne vibrations generated during a single bout of quivering show that the vibrations are similar to D. melanogaster. See also Figure S4 and Movie S6. Current Biology 2012 22, 2180-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.042) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions