Speaker Responsibilities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Mark Veeder-SCFI How to properly construct an AC and NC -Getting the most out of cross-ex -How to structure a rebuttal.
Advertisements

A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I) A N INTRODUCTION TO P OLICY D EBATE - The Minnesota Urban Debate League -
Anatomy of a debate Austin Layton.
The Structure of a Debate Constructive Speeches 1AC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes 1NC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes 2AC: 8.
AUDL Middle School Debate Team Tournament Handbook Debate Tournament Schedule Arrive at tournament & wait in cafeteria. Round 1 Round 2 Lunch Break in.
What is Debate? A debater’s guide to the argumentative universe…
 Debating the Case Mikaela Malsin, Univ. of Georgia DUDA 2012
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing.
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
Debate Terminology Words every debater needs to know!
SUMMARY AND FINAL FOCUS. Summary Basics  2 minute speech, after the rebuttals.  It’s a time to clear up for the judge what she should really be paying.
DEBATE FINAL EXAM STUDY GUIDE Spring Debate Final Exam Study Guide Define terms using the answers here; if the answers aren’t complete, use Google.
FLOWING! (AND FILING BASICS). Filing basics Many new debaters lose debates because they have misplaced parts of their files. Following these simple rules.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Week 1. Q. From where did LD debate come? Q. Where policy debate involves federal policy, what does LD involve? Q. LD involves which civilization?
Stoa Speech and Debate Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Judge Orientation.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
AN INTRODUCTION COMPETITION DEBATES. DEBATE Debate is essentially the art of arguing a point, policy or proposition of value. When participating in a.
Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.
Basic Structure of a Round. a) Before the Round Pre-flowed arguments.
FILING BASICS Staying organized is crucial.
BASICS OF BEING AFFIRMATIVE
Affirmative vs. negative
Debate Orientation.
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Introduction to the Negative
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
LD Debate Study Information
WELCOME TO DEBATE! Negative Basics.
Developed by Jenny Alme, The Harker School
Types of Debate Lincoln/Douglas Public Forum Policy
Basics of Debate Damien Debate.
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Intro to Lincoln Douglas
How to be negative Gabi Yamout.
Lincoln Douglas Debate
Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Debate Orientation.
CX- 3 minutes Example of CX in Pufo.
Debate Orientation.
1AR 4 minutes for the win.
Public Forum Debate Format
Debate Orientation.
Beginning Strategies Novice Debate Henrichsen
POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.
Format Affirmative Constructive - 5 minutes
Elementary School Debate Round
DEBATE AC ELA.
Introduction to Policy Debate
Times and Tasks in an LD Round or What Do I Do Now?
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Welcome to Debate! Cross-examination
Public Forum Debate.
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
1AC The 1st speech given in a RND. Includes: inherency, advantages, & solvency, as well as a plan text – the textual expression of the aff. Policy option.
POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.
Flowing & Cross-Examination
Debate April 12/13.
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Team Policy Debate Orientation
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I)
Building Affirmative Case Template
Debates.
DEBATE AC ELA.
Presentation transcript:

Speaker Responsibilities Rebuttals

Difference Between Rebuttals and Constructive Constructive are the foundation of the debate rounds where evidence is presented Rebuttals narrow down the debate using analysis on the cards presented earlier

2NC Affirmative CX First Part of NEGATIVE BLOCK Extends some parts of the 1NC and answers back ALL affirmative arguments made on those issues. ITAPIN (line-by-line) Remember: Impact Calculus The 2AC ask 2NC questions Purpose of CX: Clarify, commit on an issue, point out flaws in our opponents arguments

I – T – A – P - I – N Identify—the number of the argument. Orient your judge on the flow. No more than :02 seconds They say—fair description. No more than :5 seconds Argument—Good explanation of what your evidence says. No more than :20 seconds Prefer—Why is our argument better than theirs? :20-:30 See the core file format Impact—why does it matter for the debate as a whole that you have won that particular argument? You’re answering “who cares?!” :30 or less. New Evidence—new, unique idea, ideally.

1NR 1AR Second Part of the NEGATIVE BLOCK Takes the rest of the arguments made in the 1NC and answers ALL of the arguments made by the affirmative on those isses. ITAPIN Condense/narrows the debate by extending the STRONGEST arguments made by the 2AC Responds to ALL of the negative block Embedded clash

2NR Extends strongest one world from the block CP/net benefit Case/ DA T Uses even if or either arguments FORMAT FOR 2NR: Global OVERVIEW- 2-3 sentences of why you win- boil down the debate to the 2-3 key arguments the round will come down to and why you win. Each flow: Impact Calculus ITAPIN

2AR Answer back all the arguments made by the negative Extends strongest arguments from the 1AR Uses format for 2AR Uses even if or either arguments FORMAT FOR 2AR: Global OVERVIEW- 2-3 sentences of why you win- boil down the debate to the 2-3 key arguments the round will come down to and why you win. Each flow: Impact Calculus ITAPIN