Calculation of the Stress intensity factor with CINT command in 3D

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simple buckling analysis Workbench 14.0 Aalborg Universitet esbjerg Søren Heide Lambertsen.
Advertisements

Insert a transient load in a model Workbench 14.0 Aalborg Universitet Esbjerg Søren Heide Lambertsen.
Transient beam analysis Workbench 14.0 Aalborg Universitet Esbjerg Søren Heide Lambertsen.
In these tutorials the import of a externel geometry will be review Workbench 12.1 Aalborg Universitet Esbjerg Søren Heide Lambertsen
FE analysis with shell and axisymmetric elements E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
Parameterizing a Geometry using the COMSOL Moving Mesh Feature
In these tutorials using the Slice command in Design modeler Workbench 13.0 Aalborg Universitet esbjerg Søren Heide Lambertsen.
Advanced Results Processing Winter Semester
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
Linear Buckling Workshop 7. Workshop Supplement Linear Buckling August 26, 2005 Inventory # WS7-2 Workshop 7 - Goals The goal in this workshop is.
Electromagnetic Analysis of a 2 Gap Solenoid
Tutorial 2 SSMA Cee in Compression: 600S F y = 50ksi Objective To model a typical Cee stud in compression and determine the elastic critical local.
AE4131 ABAQUS Lecture Part III
FE analysis with bar elements E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
Ch 1 Sec 3,4,5 Definition of Stress – Sec 3 Average Normal Stress – Sec 4 Average Shear Stress – Sec 5.
AE4131 ABAQUS Lecture Part II
Introduction to ABAQUS 27 th February, Units Before starting to define any model, you need to decide which system of units you will use. ABAQUS.
Chapter 6 Workshop 5 Solid Conductor.
DesignXplorer Parameter Manager Workshop 9. DesignXplorer Parameter Manager Workshop Supplement August 26, 2005 Inventory # WS9-2 Workshop 9 – Goals.
Harmonic Analysis Workshop 10. Workshop Supplement Harmonic Analysis March 29, 2005 Inventory # WS10-2 Workshop 10 – Goals Goal: –In this workshop.
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN The functionality of SolidWorks Simulation depends on which software Simulation product is used. The functionality of different producs.
Axisymmetric Analysis of a Pipe Assembly
Bending Shear and Moment Diagram, Graphical method to construct shear
Engineering Doctorate – Nuclear Materials Development of Advanced Defect Assessment Methods Involving Weld Residual Stresses If using an image in the.
9.0 New Features Large Deformation Analysis of thin plate assembly spotwelded together Workshop 2 Spotwelds.
Advanced Results Processing Workshop 8. Training Manual Advanced Results Processing August 26, 2005 Inventory # WS8-2 Workshop 8 - Goals In this.
Tutorial 3: Plane Beam.
ANSYS Workbench: Mechanical Examples. Step 1. Opening ansys workbench Overview: – Start > ANSYS Workbench – Create Static Structural analysis system.
In these tutorials the use adaptive mesh refinement will be review Workbench 12.1 Aalborg Universitet esbjerg Søren Heide Lambertsen.
Comparing 2D and 3D Structural Analysis Workshop 4.2.
Workshop 6: Thermal Analysis of a Plate with a Hole University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez Department of Mechanical Engineering Modified by (2008): Dr.
9.0 New Features Metal Shaft with Rubber Boot Workshop 7 Load Steps in Workbench.
Mesh Control Workshop 3. Workshop Supplement Workshop 3 - Meshing Controls August 26, 2005 Inventory # WS3-2 Workshop 3 - Goals Use the various.
ME 272 Final Problem 3 By Valerie Lease
Investigation of the Thermal Stresses in a Steel Plate.
REFERENCE: Training Manual Node-to-Surface Elements (8-16) Beam Tip Contact Workshop 12 Node-to-Surface Elements.
Opti 523 Wenrui Cai. Tensile stress will occur just outside the contact area and will form cracks into subsurface of the glass. If damage does occur,
Surface-to-Surface Simulation
Workshop 1 Contact Stiffness
Rib Forging Workshop Nine REFERENCE: Training Manual Viscoplasticity (5-35)
Volumetric Locking Workshop Two REFERENCE: Training Manual Element Technology (2-64)
Snap Fit Workshop Seventeen Introduction to Contact REFERENCE: Training Manual Introduction to Contact (7-69)
Coefficient of Friction MS&T Physics 1135, Lab O3.
Workshop 2 Steel Bracket Modified by (2008): Dr. Vijay K. Goyal Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Puerto Rico at.
Bending of a Pipe by a Punch Workshop 8. Workshop Supplement March 15, 2001 Inventory # WS8-2 Utility Menu > File > Read Input from … > pipe.inp.
Workshop 3 Various Workshops for SOLSH190 Solid-Shell Element
Calculation of the Stress intensity factor with CINT command in 2D Workbench 13.0 Aalborg Universitet esbjerg Søren Heide Lambertsen.
Mesh Control Winter Semester PART 1 Meshing.
Comparing 2D and 3D Structural Analysis Winter Semester
Stress Relaxation Workshop Six REFERENCE: Training Manual Implicit Creep (4-32)
Error calculations and error convergence Winter Semester
Bolt Pretension with Contact. Nonlinear Structural Analysis Goals Goal: – In this workshop our goal is to investigate the behavior of the pipe clamp assembly.
Example Problem #2 Maxwell 2D Hall Sensor. T7_3D, pg. 2 7/21/02 Hall Sensor Description: The Hall sensor works similarly to the vr sensor, except that.
Pre-stressed Modal Analysis Winter Semester
WS2B-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. April 30, 2009 Inventory # Workshop 2B Assembly Contact Workbench-Mechanical.
THERMO-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
WORKSHOP 7 LINEAR CONTACT
Introduction to Off Design Simulations
WORKSHOP 11 PRESS FIT CAT509, Workshop 11, March 2002 WS11-1.
Workshop 5A Metal Plasticity
Kratos 3D Structural Analysis Tutorial
NECKING OF A TEST SPECIMEN
ENFORCED MOTION IN TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
Workshop 2.1 ANSYS Mechanical Basics.
Finding Lengths of Horizontal Lines on a Coordinate Plane
Tutorial 2 SSMA Cee in Compression: 600S Fy = 50ksi Objective
Tutorial 2 SSMA Cee in Compression: 600S Fy = 50ksi Objective
(A) Counterclockwise contour Γ around a crack tip showing an element of path length ds, with unit vector n normal to the path and with stress and displacement.
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, All Rights Reserved
Presentation transcript:

Calculation of the Stress intensity factor with CINT command in 3D Workbench 13.0 Aalborg Universitet esbjerg Søren Heide Lambertsen

Start a new Static Structural

Chose mm as length unit

Build the geometry and model the crack

The crack on this side is made with a ellipse.

At the other side the crack is made of straight lines.

The model is sliced in two parts to get a better mesh control.

Apply a fixed supported on the model

And add a pressure load at 100 MPa that the other side

Then click the solve bottom and plot the stress.

Stress distribution is not as it is expected and the deformation of the crack either. The problem is that workbench sometime add contact elements automatically and these had to be removed.

Remove the contact elements.

Then click on the solve bottom.

Now the stress and deformation is more as it is expected to be.

Then add a coordinate system for each crack Then add a coordinate system for each crack. It is important that the y axis is normal to the crack plane. Also add a name for the coordinate system, in this example the name 44 is used

And the other crack coordinate system get the name 33

Then add a commands (APDL) under static structural Then add a commands (APDL) under static structural. In the 2d crack tutorials there is a detail description of the commands.

The commands: CINT,new,1 ! CINT ID number. CINT,type,sifs ! Type of calculation CINT,norm,5 ! Number of contours to be calculated. CINT,ctnc,tip1 ! Crack tip node component name CINT,ncon,33,2 ! Coordinate system number and Axis of coordinate system CINT,new,2 CINT,type,sifs CINT,norm,5 CINT,ctnc,tip2 CINT,ncon,44,2

And then add a commands (APDL) to the solution and enter the commands to plot the results.

The commands: /show,png ! Show the PNG files PLCINT, front,1,,,k1 ! Plot result from the CINT commands id 1 the value of k1 PLCINT, front,2,,,k1 ! Plot result from the CINT commands id 2 the value of k1 It is also possible to print the result in the solution information window by the command: PRCINT

PLCINT command is shown under the commands (APDL) PLCINT command is shown under the commands (APDL). By the result it is clear that the path 1 give a bad calculation and path 2,3,4,5 gives a better result. Because of the finite element approximation, the value of k1 is different for each path. The first path for K1 is best discarded since it contains the singularity. The true value of K is usually estimated as the average of the remaining paths.

Crack calculation 2 gives a bad result Crack calculation 2 gives a bad result. The reason is often that the y axis has to be switch because the J integral gives a negative result and therefore the K1 calculation is incorrect.

The coordinate system is changed, the contour number is set to 10.

Here is the result final result