Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 20, Issue 16, Pages (August 2010)
Advertisements

Bifocal Is a Downstream Target of the Ste20-like Serine/Threonine Kinase Misshapen in Regulating Photoreceptor Growth Cone Targeting in Drosophila  Wenjing.
Kálmán Somogyi, Pernille Rørth  Developmental Cell 
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
TAF11 Assembles the RISC Loading Complex to Enhance RNAi Efficiency
A Hedgehog-Responsive Region in the Drosophila Wing Disc Is Defined by Debra- Mediated Ubiquitination and Lysosomal Degradation of Ci  Ping Dai, Hiroshi.
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 18, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Dimers Probe the Assembly Status of Multimeric Membrane Proteins 
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Repulsive Axon Guidance
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
LIN-23-Mediated Degradation of β-Catenin Regulates the Abundance of GLR-1 Glutamate Receptors in the Ventral Nerve Cord of C. elegans  Lars Dreier, Michelle.
Initiation of RPS2-Specified Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis Is Coupled to the AvrRpt2-Directed Elimination of RIN4  Michael J. Axtell, Brian J. Staskawicz 
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 20, Issue 16, Pages (August 2010)
Zijing Chen, Hsiang-Chin Chen, Craig Montell  Cell Reports 
Silvia Cermelli, Yi Guo, Steven P. Gross, Michael A. Welte 
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Ayelet Schlesinger, Amy Kiger, Norbert Perrimon, Ben-Zion Shilo 
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Recognition of a bicoid mRNA Localization Signal by a Protein Complex Containing Swallow, Nod, and RNA Binding Proteins  Eric A. Arn, Byeong J. Cha, William.
Heather B. Megosh, Daniel N. Cox, Chris Campbell, Haifan Lin 
PAR-1 Kinase Phosphorylates Dlg and Regulates Its Postsynaptic Targeting at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction  Yali Zhang, Huifu Guo, Helen Kwan,
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
ELAV, a Drosophila neuron-specific protein, mediates the generation of an alternatively spliced neural protein isoform  Sandhya P. Koushika, Michael J.
Melissa L. Ehlers, Barbara Celona, Brian L. Black  Cell Reports 
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Regulation of MBK-2/Dyrk Kinase by Dynamic Cortical Anchoring during the Oocyte-to- Zygote Transition  Michael L. Stitzel, Ken Chih-Chien Cheng, Geraldine.
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages (November 2001)
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Drosophila atonal Fully Rescues the Phenotype of Math1 Null Mice
Yi-Ping Hsueh, Eunjoon Kim, Morgan Sheng  Neuron 
Justin P. Kumar, Kevin Moses  Cell 
PHYL Acts to Down-Regulate TTK88, a Transcriptional Repressor of Neuronal Cell Fates, by a SINA-Dependent Mechanism  Amy H Tang, Thomas P Neufeld, Elaine.
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (July 1997)
ASPP2 Regulates Epithelial Cell Polarity through the PAR Complex
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages S1-S2 (August 2000)
PAR-1 Kinase Plays an Initiator Role in a Temporally Ordered Phosphorylation Process that Confers Tau Toxicity in Drosophila  Isao Nishimura, Yufeng Yang,
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Allele-Specific Suppression of a Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor Reveals a Physiological Role of UGGT in ER Quality Control  Hua Jin, Zhenyan Yan,
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
F. Christian Bennett, Kieran F. Harvey  Current Biology 
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (August 1999)
Nucleoporin Nup98 Associates with Trx/MLL and NSL Histone-Modifying Complexes and Regulates Hox Gene Expression  Pau Pascual-Garcia, Jieun Jeong, Maya.
Protein Therapeutics for Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa: Incorporation of Recombinant β3 Chain into Laminin 332 in β3-/- Keratinocytes In Vitro  Olga.
Kevin Johnson, Ferdi Grawe, Nicola Grzeschik, Elisabeth Knust 
Requirement for the PDZ Domain Protein, INAD, for Localization of the TRP Store- Operated Channel to a Signaling Complex  Jorge Chevesich, Andrew J. Kreuz,
Drosophila Schip1 Links Expanded and Tao-1 to Regulate Hippo Signaling
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 43-52 (January 2005) Fragile X Protein Functions with Lgl and the PAR Complex in Flies and Mice  Daniela C. Zarnescu, Peng Jin, Joerg Betschinger, Mika Nakamoto, Yan Wang, Thomas C. Dockendorff, Yue Feng, Thomas A. Jongens, John C. Sisson, Juergen A. Knoblich, Stephen T. Warren, Kevin Moses  Developmental Cell  Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 43-52 (January 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.020

Figure 1 dlgl Mutations Are Dominant Suppressors of sev:dFmr1 Genotypes as indicated, anterior right, dorsal up. (A–D) Adult compound eyes, scanning electron micrographs. (E–G) Retinal sections. (H) Histogram of rhabdomere numbers per ommatidium, percentage of ommatidia against number of rhabdomeres as indicated. Error bars: standard error of the mean. (I–K) Confocal sections at the same depth within larval eye discs stained for dFmr1 antigen, anterior right, arrowheads indicate morphogenetic furrow. Bracket below (J) and (K) indicates domain of transgene expression as denoted by elevated dFmr1 in sev:dFmr1 (J). dFmr1 overexpression is reduced by removing dlgl dosage (K). (L) Histogram of dFmr1 levels. Scale bars equal 50 μm in (A), 10 μm in (E), and 20 μm in (I). Developmental Cell 2005 8, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.020)

Figure 2 dlgl Acts Genetically Upstream or in Parallel to dFmr1 (A–D) Neuromuscular junctions (NMJs), segment 3, muscle 6/7. Large (arrow) and small (arrowhead) boutons, genotypes indicated. dlgl null allele is a significant dominant enhancer of dFmr1 (compare [B], [C], and [D]). (E) Histogram: number of boutons per junction, error bars: standard error of the mean. dlgl4/+; dFmr13/+ is very highly significantly different to dlgl4/+ or dFmr13/+ alone (p << .001, asterisk), while dlgl4/+ and dFmr13/+ are not statistically significant from wild-type. (F–K) Developing egg chambers stained for dFmr1 (F, H, I, K) and dLgl (G, H, J, K). dFmr1 accumulates in wild-type (F–H) but not in all dlglts3 (I–K) oocytes (compare arrows to arrowheads in [F]–[K]). Note in (J) and (K), some dLgl perdurance after 24 hr at restrictive temperature. Scale bars equal 20 μm in (A) and 60 μm in (F). Developmental Cell 2005 8, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.020)

Figure 3 Fmrp and Lgl Proteins Coimmunoprecipitate and Cofractionate with aPKC-zeta and PAR6 Visualizing antibodies indicated right. (A) Immunoprecipitation from Drosophila heads. Input (10% of total extract), supernatant (loaded 10%), pellet, precipitating antibody indicated above. Note: anti-dFmr1 precipitates dLgl and anti-dLgl precipitates dFmr1 (asterisks). Note: for clarity, five times more dFmr1 pellet than the dLgl pellet was loaded for the dLgl blot and five times more dLgl pellet than dFmr1 pellet was loaded for the dFmr1 blot. (B) FLAG-dFmr1 precipitates dLgl from fly extracts and this is reduced by competing FLAG peptide. (C and D) Precipitating antibody indicated above; anti-mFmrp coprecipitates with mLgl in the developing mouse brain, weakly at birth (asterisk) and more strongly at 2 weeks (two asterisks). (E) Western blot of cellular fractions from a sucrose gradient show dFmr1, aPKC-zeta, and PAR6 comigrating in several fractions with and without dLgl (fractions 6–10 and 11–17, respectively). Molecular weights: dFmr1 ∼82 kDa, dLgl ∼127 kDa, aPKC-zeta ∼75 kDa, PAR6 ∼45 kDa. Developmental Cell 2005 8, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.020)

Figure 4 dFmr1 and dLgl Proteins Have Overlapping Expression Proteins below, genotypes/cell type right. (A–C) Single confocal sections of developing eye, endogenous expression. (D–I) RFP-mFmrp in MEFs. (D–F) Arrow, transfected; arrowhead, untransfected cell. (G–I) Projections of seven consecutive sections (each 1 μm thick) showing that the most intensely staining mFmrp granules contain mLgl (arrows), while more diffuse mFmrp granules do not (arrowheads); asterisk indicates a mosaic of both types of granules. (J–O) Mouse CNS catecholaminergic (CAD) cells. Arrows indicate colocalization of RFP-mFmrp and mLgl in granules trafficking within developing neurites. Scale bars equal 10 μm in (A), 20 μm in (D) and (J), and 1 μm in (G) and (M). Developmental Cell 2005 8, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.020)

Figure 5 dFmr1 and dLgl Cosediment with Golgi Membranes in Density Gradients and Associate with mRNA (A) Western blots of fractions from a linear Optiprep density gradient show that the majority of membrane-associated Lgl and Fmr cosediment with the Golgi-associated protein Lava lamp (Lva). Portions of membrane-associated Lgl also cosediments with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) marker BiP and the plasma membrane marker Toll, fractions 2–5 (data not shown). Equal volumes of each fraction and 50 μg of the gradient load (P100) were analyzed. (B) Venn diagram shows the total number of genes represented on the chips (large square: 14,010), the number of genes present in input (small square: ∼6,250), the number of mRNAs specifically associated with dFmr1 in wild-type (83), and the number of mRNAs enriched in dLgl IP from wild-type versus input (78). Nine mRNAs are shared between dFmr1 and dLgl IP but unchanged in dLgl IP versus input from dFmr1 nulls (see Table 1). Developmental Cell 2005 8, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.020)

Figure 6 Fmrp Interacts with the PAR Complex (A and B) Immunolocalization of dFmr1 and Baz show upregulation in the developing oocyte (see arrows). (C–F) Adult compound eyes, scanning electron micrographs (genotypes as indicated). (G–I) Neuromuscular junctions (NMJs), segment 3, muscle 6/7. aPKC null allele is a significant dominant suppressor of dFmr1 (compare [G], [H], and [I]). (J) Histogram: number of boutons per junction, error bars: standard error of the mean. dFmr13 (102 boutons, n = 13) and aPKC06403/+ (81 boutons, n = 12) both show elevated bouton numbers relative to wild-type (see Figure 2A), but this elevation is largely rescued in aPKC/+; dFmr13 (66 boutons, n = 8); the difference between dFmr13 and aPKC/+; dFmr13 is statistically significant (p < 0.001, asterisk). (K) aPKC-zeta associates with mFmrp and mLgl in developing mouse brains. Precipitating antibody indicated to the left, blotting antibody to the right. (L) aPKC-zeta phosphorylates dFmr1 in vitro. dFmr1 expressed as fusion with Maltose Binding Protein (MBP). Coomassie-stained gel on top, autoradiograph on the bottom, lanes loaded as indicated. Scale bars equal 20 μm in (A), 50 μm in (C), and 15 μm in (G). Developmental Cell 2005 8, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.020)