Neighborhood Planning Area

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kevin Guillaume TREES GONE WILD Moe Hachem Muller Alcindor Danielle Jenkins.
Advertisements

An Interdisciplinary Approach to Increase Interest in Information Technology Through an Environmental Project A Joint Partnership Grant between Claremont.
Environmental Planning Ph. D Research Proposal
Expanding Participation by the Forest Sector in Greenhouse Gas Registries and Markets Richard Birdsey USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Presented.
John Watermolen Nevada Division of Forestry. Project funded by a U.S. Forest Service Western Competitive grant, through the State and Private Forestry.
1 The Challenge Preserving forest cover, parkland and open space can help to meet needs for water quality, air quality, recreation and wildlife habitat.
Green Roofs By The Edgemont Environmental Club. What are green roofs? Roofs that are either partially or completely covered with plants are considered.
Socio-Economic Benefits of Austin’s Tree Canopy A proposal for analysis presented by: Kyle Fuchshuber (Project Manager) Jerad Laxson (Asst. Project Manager)
Regional Green Infrastructure Task Force Meeting April 24, 2012.
Using Trees to Help Mitigate Tropospheric Ozone Levels and Stormwater Runoff in Desoto County Eric Kuehler Technology Transfer Specialist USDA Forest Service.
Watershed Forestry Initiative Ellen Kohler Attorney & Policy Specialist Funded in part by Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Urban.
An i-Tree Benefit Analysis for the for the Cities of Bellevue, Covington, Florence, Fort Thomas, and Newport Kentucky Presented by: The Northern Kentucky.
1 payback from investment in landscape ian phillips mrtpi, cmli 5th European Landscape conference, 2011.
Urbanization of an area can be devastating to the environment in and around a city. Because of the loss of plant life, there can be greater soil erosion,
Urban Forests Capstone Objectives Show that urban forests are key component of “Green Infrastructure” Show that urban forests are key component of “Green.
USING MULTISPECTRAL IMAGERY AND GIS TO ASSESS THE ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF URBAN TREES FOR JONESBORO, ARKANSAS By: Jennifer Worlow.
Siting Considerations for Utility Scale Photovoltaic Power Generation Systems. Tim Green, Brookhaven National Laboratory NE FWS Biologists Conference February.
Greater Oxford Area Tree Canopy Analysis 2006 vs Oxford Tree Board / Ole Miss Funded by an Urban & Community Forestry Grant from the MS Forestry.
A Policy Evaluation of Planting Street Trees in Morgantown, West Virginia: A Spatial and Benefit-Cost Analysis GIS Conference and Workshop 2004 Vishakha.
Inventory and Valuation of Shade Trees in Kingston, Pennsylvania using CityGreen Nina Sweppenheiser Kenneth M. Klemow Biology Department Wilkes University.
Socio-Economic Benefits of Austin’s Tree Canopy Final report presented by: Kyle Fuchshuber (Project Manager) Jerad Laxson (Asst. Project Manager) Megan.
Land Cover Classification Mapping & its uses for Planning.
Green Infrastructure and Climate Change Dr Susannah Gill The Mersey Forest
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance Montgomery County, MD Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth at Preliminary Project.
ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,
T.E.E.G.S Transportation, Emergency, and Environmental GIS Services Matt Smith Project Manager Lauren Bender GIS Analyst Amanda Magera GIS Analyst Aaron.
1 Urban Heat Island Mitigation and Air Quality David Hitchcock, AICP Houston Advanced Research Center August 2004.
Introduction to STRATUM Model and Application. What makes STRATUM different? Street trees, not entire urban forest Costs, not only benefits Management.
The Potential Benefits of Greenroofs in Waller Creek Watershed Katherine Jashinski GIS in Water Resources December 1, 2009.
Green Week 2013 Air Quality and Domestic Heating.
Energy Efficient Home Amanda Hemmer. Solar Panels  Brand:  Sharp  Cost:  $ each (10 Total)  Description:  Sharp ND-240QCJ; 240 Watt; 65 “
Forestry & Society Urban Forestry HORT/RGSC 302 J.G. Mexal Spring 2001.
Mitigation of Urban Heat Island Effect via NeighborWoods Tree Program- Austin, Texas Project Manager-Clancy Taylor GIS Analyst/Web Designer-Will Johnston.
Mitigation of the Urban Heat Island Effect via NeighborWoods Tree Program Project Manager-Clancy Taylor GIS Analyst/Web Designer-Will Johnston GIS/Remote.
Quantifying Public Power’s Environmental Contributions: Tree Benefits Estimator APPA National Conference, June 20, 2005 Misha Sarkovich, Ph.D. Program.
Key Findings and Recommendations from an i-Tree Eco inventory in the City of Winooski: Phase 2 Prepared for the Winooski Natural Resources Conservation.
Doubling Baltimore’s tree canopy one tree at a time.
Climate Change in Cincinnati Larry Falkin City of Cincinnati, Office of Environment and Sustainability
Urban Heat Islands and Mitigation Strategies
Green Roofs by Diane deWilde
Urban Forest (Climate Change) SORATH ABBASI. Introduction Urban forest is defined as the totality of trees and shrubs on all public and private land in.
References/Acknowledgments
GREEN STREETS | GREEN JOBS | GREEN TOWNS INITIATIVE
INTRODUCTION Energy can not be created; it can be converted from one form to other by technical, biological and chemical means: Solar and wind energy into.
Strategies to Reduce Urban Heat Islands
Building for the climate - The impact of heat mitigation strategies on thermal comfort in Melbourne's suburbs Joseph Oppedisano, Nigel Tapper, Andrew Coutts.
Austin Tree Planting Prioritization
Progress Report Project Manager-Clancy Taylor
Hyde Park Central School District
Urban Environments (Water, Soil, Air)
Sustainable Cities: Urban Land Use and Management
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
The Urban Heat Island Types of UHI, Diurnal and Seasonal Behavior.
The Urban Forest Management Plan
#MKEnergy © 2017, CAPE.
A Science Sisters Presentation.
Agricultural Sustainability Through Cover Crops Andres Tapia, Dr
Calculating Form, Function and Value of the Urban Forest
Project Manager: Brietta Perez
Carbon Storage In Street Trees of Manchester, NH
West Virginia University
Communities Mapping Communities
Sustainable Cities: Urban Land Use and Management
Do Now Please have out any information pertaining to heat islands as we will be discussing them today to prepare for your engineering design challenge.
A Test Application of the WRAP Economic Analysis Framework Lee Alter
Stay on Green! Project number: SK01-KA
Trees and Climate Action
Green Infrastructure Tools for Planning & Management
ECONOMIC INCENTIVES FOR
Arizona League of Cities Sustainability
Presentation transcript:

Neighborhood Planning Area Tree Planting in Austin, Texas: An Analysis of the Austin Community Tree Program Introduction Methodology Task 2 – Carbon Sequestration and Energy Conservation: Total lbs. of CO2 sequestered = 173,034 lbs. Equal to 8.65 tons/yr Total kWh of conserved energy = 68,657 kWh Equal to 6,866 kWh/yr The sample map of the Crestview neighborhood portrays assigned CO2 values. The sample map of the Coronado Hills neighborhood portrays assigned conserved energy values. Task 3 – Extrapolation: The values shown represent the projected extent of canopy contributed by ACT Program trees. Conclusion As Austin grows, so does the threat that UHI island effects pose to its residents. With this study, Green City GeoTech has evaluated the effectiveness of the ACT Program based on the three accomplished tasks. ACT trees provided a 16.5% canopy growth from 2006 to 2010, 173,034 lbs. of sequestered carbon, and 68,657 kWh of conserved energy. Based on our extrapolation method, ACT trees are currently providing 1.4 acres of canopy cover and will exceed to 2.43 acres by 2025. With this study, Green City GeoTech provides information that helps the City of Austin Forestry Division to make important decisions about its urban forestry efforts. Data and Software Methods Canopy growth 2006-2010: [(total canopy gain – total canopy loss) / 2006 canopy area] * 100 Carbon sequestration and energy conservation: Total lbs. or kWh/tree/yr. (NTBC) * total trees at address = total carbon or energy/address/yr. Total lbs. or kWh/address/yr * (years in ground + 1) = total carbon or energy/address from 2006-2015 Extrapolation to 2015 and 2025, assuming 1 ft2/yr: Years in ground + 1 = years to 2015; years in ground + 11 = years to 2025 Years to 2015 * 1 ft2 = 2015 canopy extent; years to 2025 * 1 ft2 = 2025 canopy extent (converted to acres) Background Many communities have implemented various strategies to reduce urban heat islands, one of which is increasing urban tree canopy. Scientific analysis has shown that trees cool their environment through evapotranspiration and by providing shade, blocking heat-carrying winds, and reducing air pollution. The Austin Community Tree (ACT) Program seeks to mitigate urban heat island effects by distributing young trees to residents of chosen neighborhoods. Residents plant the trees on their property and maintain them, thereby substantially increasing urban tree canopy and ultimately increasing energy conservation and the sequestration of carbons that would otherwise pollute the air. Purpose Green City GeoTech was assigned to evaluate the effectiveness of the Austin Community Tree Program for the City of Austin. Our objectives consisted of three analytical tasks and the design and composition of a map book. Task 1: To create an overlay that compares the locations where ACT Program trees were delivered and canopy growth by neighborhood, expressed as a percentage Task 2: To calculate the total electrical energy conserved (kWh) and total CO2 sequestered (lbs.) from 2006 to 2015 using the National Tree Benefit Calculator (NTBC) Task 3: To extrapolate tree canopy growth to 2015 and 2025 and express the total canopy gain in acres  Scope The study area of this project is limited to the 14 neighborhoods where ACT Program delivered trees. ACT Program deliveries (to 2014) Canopy cover 2006 and 2010 vector files Neighborhood Planning Area boundaries Change in canopy 2006-2010 ArcMap 10.3 NTBC Results Neighborhood Planning Area Canopy Extent 2015 (acres) Canopy Extent 2025 (acres) Coronado Hills 0.08 0.16 Crestview 0.17 0.26 East Cesar Chavez 0.07 0.12 East Congress 0.10 Franklin Park 0.13 0.24 McKinney 0.06 0.11 Montopolis 0.19 0.33 North Austin Civic Association 0.34 Old West Austin Rosewood 0.09 0.15 St. John 0.02 0.03 Sweetbriar West Congress 0.20 Wooten Totals: 1.40 2.43 Task 1 – Canopy Growth: Using canopy cover data from 2006 and 2010, we found the total growth and reduction within individual neighborhood planning areas and over the entire study area. The analysis showed 16.5% overall tree canopy growth from 2006 to 2010. The sample map of the North Austin Civic Association neighborhood overlays tree canopy growth and tree delivery locations for comparison. Project Manager/GIS Analyst: Brietta Perez Assistant Project Manager/GIS Analyst: Mujahid Hussein GIS Analyst: Jeffrey Cuevas GIS Analyst: Nick Waters  Acknowledgements Austin Community Tree Program: Alan Halter, Margaret Valenti, Forestry Division, City of Austin Instructor: Dr. Yihong Yuan Lab Instructor: David Szpakowski