Recurrent IVF failure: other factors Alan S. Penzias, M.D. Fertility and Sterility Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages 1033-1038 (May 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.017 Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates in IVF-ICSI cycles according to the women's BMI. Each point represents percentages and 95% CI. Fertility and Sterility 2012 97, 1033-1038DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.017) Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Pregnancy rate and implantation rate following IVF for controls without fibroids and subjects with fibroids stratified by their uterine position. SS = subserosal; IM = intramural; SM = submucosal. ∗P<.05 for IM vs. controls or SS; ∗∗P<.005 for IM vs. controls. Fertility and Sterility 2012 97, 1033-1038DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.017) Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Forest plot of studies of non-cavity-distorting intramural fibroids versus no fibroids in women undergoing IVF treatment for outcome of live birth rates. Fertility and Sterility 2012 97, 1033-1038DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.017) Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Forest plot of studies of clinical touch embyro transfer (CTET) versus ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (UGET) for outcome of clinical pregnancy rate. Fertility and Sterility 2012 97, 1033-1038DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.017) Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions