HSC (Hadron Synchrotron Collective effects section)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emittance Measurement: Quadrupole Scan C. Tennant USPAS – January 2011.
Advertisements

A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
Optics for Skew Correction and Emittance Measurement Leo Jenner This talk is going to look familiar if you were at the recent LC-ABD meeting in Manchester…
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Theoretical studies of IBS in the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, Y.Papaphilippou MSWG – LIU meeting, 1/10/2013.
E. Todesco FIELD MODEL AT 7 TEV N. Aquilina, E. Todesco CERN, Geneva, Switzerland On behalf of the FiDeL team CERN, 17 th June.
Partikeldagarna, Göteborg 21 September 2007 LHC: Status and Plans Lyn Evans.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
MTE vs CT D.Manglunki for BE/OP - pictures from M.Giovannozzi - details in “Fifty years of the CERN Proton Synchrotron (Vol I)” CERN
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
PS losses during CT extraction, a history about 30 year long... J. Barranco, S. Gilardoni CERN - AB/ABP.
June 2006LHCCWG / J. Wenninger1 Orbit response measurements and analysis J. Wenninger AB-OP Principle Software status Example from SPS ring and lines Potential.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
Elias Métral, ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany, 18-22/10/ E. Métral TRANSVERSE MODE-COUPLING INSTABILITY IN THE CERN SUPER PROTON SYNCHROTRON G. Arduini,
Andreas Jansson, "Quadrupole Pick-ups", LHC BI-Review, November 19-20, Quadrupole Pick-ups  What is a quadrupole pick-up?  PS pick-ups and experimental.
E. Todesco EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team CERN, Space charge th April 2013.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 30/11/2010 /241 PRELIMINARY FINDINGS FROM INSTABILITY MEASUREMENTS DURING THE 75ns AND 50ns.
Saturday 11.9 ● From Friday – Minimum required crossing angle is 100  rad in 2010 – Plenty of aperture at triplets: > 13  (n1 > 10) – Can stay with 170.
Tune: Decay at Injection and Snapback Michaela Schaumann In cooperation with: Mariusz Juchno, Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci, Jorg Wennigner.
A Possible Source of the Tune Drift on the Front Porch in the Tevatron.
Tuning Knobs for ATF2: An Update Anthony Scarfe, James Jones The Cockcroft Institute LCWS’07 31 st May 2007.
Booster lattice measurement and correction with LOCO C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya Booster workshop 23 Nov 2015.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06 1/15 TRANSVERSE LANDAU.
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Fabio Follin Delphine Jacquet For the LHC operation team
y x Vincenzo Monaco, University of Torino HERA-LHC workshop 18/1/2005
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
Dispersion correction in the bypass dogleg
Alignment and beam-based correction
A monitoring system for the beam-based feedbacks in the LHC
ICE SECTION The coolest place to be! Elias Métral
Expected hardware status and Priority of the commissioning task
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Wire tests at injection energy
Transverse Damping Requirements
Tolerances & Tuning of the ATF2 Final Focus Line
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Setup beam intensities for FCC-hh
ELENA Tracking studies
Emmanuel Tsesmelis TS/LEA 26 January 2007
Status on Work for Splitter FS and Dilution System FS
Beam-based alignment measurements
CNGS Proton Beam: Introduction
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Introduction to particle accelerators
G. Arduini, R. Calaga, E. Metral, G. Papotti, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, R
Introduction to particle accelerators
TT20 MD for the NA61/SHINE fragmented beam experiment
Proton Beam Diagnostics
TT20 MDs for the NA61/SHINE fragmented beam experiment
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Wire almost entirely through beam before BLM triggers dump
Thu 15/9 – Fri 16/9 09:30 Controls network problem fixed The network problems have been fixed since 9:30am when the network switch for the Service IP57.
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Friday 16/3 08:30 – 10:15 Access for QPS and EPC (BI in point 4)
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Orbit response measurements and analysis
Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project (v2) F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT, March 7th, 2013.
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
TI8 analysis / J. Wenninger
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Another Immortal Fill….
Linear beam dynamics simulations for XFEL beam distribution system
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
LHC An LHC OP guide… under construction J. Wenninger
Presentation transcript:

HSC (Hadron Synchrotron Collective effects section) TT10 calibration curves Olav Berrig HSC (Hadron Synchrotron Collective effects section) 18/04/2016 HSC section meeting

The TT10 transfer line brings LHC and fix-target physics beams from the PS to the SPS 05/04/2016 HSC section meeting

The magnets calibration curves, gives the relationship between the current in the magnet and the strength of the magnet. This presentation will focus on the calibration curves for the quadrupoles: QIF .1004, QID.1005, QIF.1006,QISK.1006M, QID.1007M, QIF.1008M, QID.1011M, QIF.1012M Quadrupole BPM (pickup) θ Δ If the strength of the quadrupole is changed, then the angle θ is also changed, i.e. θ = k * Δ where k is the strength of the quadrupole. The strength is a function of the quadrupole current 18/04/2016 HSC section meeting

If calibration curves are wrong, then matching between the TT10 and the SPS is wrong, with the bad result that the beam emittance will increase A special concern is that for the fixed target physics, there is a special emittance exchange implemented between the X and Y planes. This emittance exchange is done with the help of skew quadrupoles in the TT10 lines: qisk.100637 : qisk1006m.f , at = 137.29668; qid.100700 : qid1007m.f , at = 152.70048; qif.100800 : qif1008m.f , at = 182.94848; qisk.100835 : qisk1006m.f , at = 197.15818; qid.100900 : qid1007m.f , at = 213.19648; qif.101000 : qif1008m.f , at = 243.44448; qisk.101036 : qisk1006m.f , at = 257.85658; 05/04/2016 HSC section meeting

From the Trim Editor, we see that the currents and strengths are linearly related. The Trim Editor shows what is really implemented ! ! ! Trim Editor shows what is really implemented ! ! ! 18/04/2016 HSC section meeting

In NORMA (magnet DB), there are no calibration curves In NORMA (magnet DB), there are no calibration curves. However, there is a simulation of the magnets, which give a linear relation between currents and strengths. Nominal current = 120 A 18/04/2016 HSC section meeting

A calibration curve is in the LSA DB (from CO group and J.W.) 18/04/2016 HSC section meeting

How do all these different data fit together? NB Trim Editor shows what is really implemented ! ! ! 18/04/2016 HSC section meeting

Conclusion What is really implemented in the magnets, is a linear relationship between currents and strengths. This relationship is practically identical to the simulation of the TT10 quadrupole magnets. Since simulations are generally very reliable (in the non-saturated state), this explains why the models fit well with the observations at 14 and 26 (private communications) The calibration curve from the LSA DB is not implemented in the magnets – why not? This calibration curve does not fit with the simulation of the magnets However, the real calibration curves are then not known !!! They could be measured with kick/response measurements of the TT10 line 18/04/2016 HSC section meeting

The end 18/04/2016 HSC section meeting