doc.: IEEE /xxxx February 2004 September 2004

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1521r2 Submission January 2012 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 AP and Network Discovery Enhancements Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Submission January 2012 Osama Aboul-Magd, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 On Traffic Stream Setup for Audio/Visual Bridging Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE r Submission November 2004 Bob Beach, Symbol TechnologiesSlide 1 Fast Roaming Using Multiple Concurrent Associations Bob.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/535r1 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Scanning and FILS requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / aa Submission Apr 2009 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Considerations for Statistical Multiplexing Support in OBSS Proposal.
Doc.: IEEE /109r1 Submission July 2002 J. Edney, H. Haverinen, J-P Honkanen, P. Orava, Nokia Slide 1 Temporary MAC Addresses for Anonymity Jon.
Doc.: IEEE /0079r0 Submission Interference Signalling Enhancements Date: xx Mar 2010 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1051r2 Multi-channel information for AP discovery 1 September 2012 HTC Corp. NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC.
Doc.: IEEE /0294r2 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Active Scanning Reply Window Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 1 Simplified DLS Action Frame Transmission in 11Z Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0874r0 Submission September 2005 C Trecker, et alSlide 1 Test Methodology, Metrics and Test Cases for measuring Fast BSS Transition.
Supporting Low Power Operation
Overlapping BSS Proposed Solution – “OSQAP”
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
AP Architecture Changes Mike Moreton, STMicroelectronics
Support for Dynamic Channel Selection (DCS) in v
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
Proposed SFD Text for ai Link Setup Procedure
Power Save Delivery for 11ay
White Space Map Notification
P802.11aq Waiver request regarding IEEE RAC comments
TAP/JIT Resource Pre-allocation
Differentiated Initial Link Setup (Follow Up)
TSN Architecture Mike Moreton, STMicroelectronics
Response considerations in Active Scanning
Improvement on Active Scanning
Multicast/Broadcast Communication With Acknowledge
IGTK Switch Announcement
Improvement to TWT Parameter set selection
doc.: IEEE /xxxx February 2004 September 2004
QoS Resource Query Overview
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Beacon Protection Date: Authors: July 2018 July 2018
Jesse Walker and Emily Qi Intel Corporation
GAPA - Efficient, More Reliable Multicast
<author>, <company>
“Not Ready” Response in FT Auth Messages
Slot-based Power Save Improvement
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Access distribution in ai
September 2007 doc.: IEEE /2376r0 November 2007
Policy Enforcement For Resources and Security
Management Frame Policy Definition
Overlapping BSS Proposed Solution – “OSQAP”
AP Load Balancing Requirements
Roaming Improvements to TGe
Fast Roaming Using Multiple Concurrent Associations
Possible Enhancement for Broadcast Services over WLAN
Proposal for authentication cluster
Beacon Protection Date: Authors: July 2018 July 2018
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Roaming Improvements to TGe
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2010
Interference Signalling Enhancements
P802.11aq Waiver request regarding IEEE RAC comments
P802.11aq Waiver request regarding IEEE RAC comments
Simplified DLS Action Frame Transmission in 11Z
AP Load Balancing Requirements
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
WUR Action Frame Format
AP Connection Period in TDLS
Power Aware Link Metric
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2013
Access distribution in ai
Revisiting Path Switch
Unsolicited Block ACK Extension
Extended Usage of STKSA
Enhancement of Low Power Medium Access STAs
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/xxxx February 2004 September 2004 QoS Aspects of Fast Roaming Paul Newton, STMicroelectronics (paul.newton@st.com) 16th September, 2004 Paul Newton, STMicroelectronics Fred Stivers, Texas Instruments

The Proposal Partial Proposal September 2004 The Proposal Partial Proposal Currently partial but open to Mergers to complete Offering solutions to QoS and Fast Roaming Believe there’s enough 11i talent in the room who will solve the issues with security Paul Newton, STMicroelectronics

TSPECS and Fast Roaming September 2004 TSPECS and Fast Roaming What’s the problem ? When a STA roams to a new AP the STA expects a certain degree of service i.e. VOIP Setting up this service after the roam may take time and throughput is not guaranteed What’s the Solution ? During the roam have the STA set up the service (TSPECS) during the roam When STA associates it’s immediately serviced with the required bandwidth Paul Newton, STMicroelectronics

Discovery & Selection Can the new AP service the TSPEC ? September 2004 Discovery & Selection Can the new AP service the TSPEC ? 11K have AP utilisation Suggestion: 11K gives utilisation on all Access Categories STA may do this analysis on a number of APs in sight STA then selects AP and starts roaming transition Above is out of scope just setting the scene for the roam Paul Newton, STMicroelectronics

Pre Authentication & Pre QoS September 2004 Pre Authentication & Pre QoS STA would Pre Authenticate as usual if needed New state introduced called “Pre QoS” STA requests TSPEC via the DS TSPEC is encapsulated in a data frame, similar to Pre Authentication Maximum 8 TSPEC requests TSPECS aggregated in one TSPEC request STA attaches a validity period to the TSPEC Request Timestamp for how long the TSPEC will be held for As pre authentication is done before QoS can the TSPEC be authenticated ? So new AP recognises the TSPEC comes from known STA Paul Newton, STMicroelectronics

September 2004 TSPEC Processing AP responds with the TSPEC response within the pre QoS period The TSPEC Response The AP can adjust the validity period depending on workload Attached is a token for the TSPEC To be used in the re association to start the AP servicing the TSPEC Once the TSPEC has been accepted the AP shall not allocate this bandwidth to any other STA during the validity period The only time the AP may delete the TSPEC is once the validity period expires Paul Newton, STMicroelectronics

September 2004 TSPEC Acceptance During re association the STA attaches the TSPEC token to the re association request This is used by the AP to identify the TSPECS it has held for that STA and to start servicing them The AP then attaches the token to the re association response If the token is valid then this is indicated in the returned token If the token is no longer valid the AP indicates this and its then up to the STA on what to do next If the token is invalid the AP can still accept the TSPEC if it has retained the TSPEC request and has the bandwidth the do so Paul Newton, STMicroelectronics

Summary The TSPEC is setup before the roam September 2004 Summary Discovery & Selection TSPEC Processing Pre Authentication Pre QoS Acceptance The TSPEC is setup before the roam Just the final token analysis is done during the roam Does not effect the roam time Most processing is done while the STA is still able to transmit to the old AP Ensures STA has a adequate bandwidth straight after association After the association response the TSPEC is active and will be serviced Paul Newton, STMicroelectronics

September 2004 Questions ? Paul Newton, STMicroelectronics