Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PIC versus Frozen? 5/27/2013 FSOutcome of SC-13 PIC codes are definitely needed when coherent effects are relevant. In our case in presence of strong.
Advertisements

Benchmark of ACCSIM-ORBIT codes for space charge and e-lens compensation Beam’07, October 2007 Masamitsu AIBA, CERN Thank you to G. Arduini, C. Carli,
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
E.Benedetto, 30/05/13, LIU-PSB Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam.
E. Benedetto SC meeting 19/3/15 Update on the LIU curve emittance vs. intensity.
Linac4 Beam Commissioning Committee PSB Beam Optics and Painting Schemes 9 th December 2010 Beam Optics and Painting Schemes C. Bracco, C. Carli, B. Goddard,
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
AGS Polarized Proton Development toward Run-9 Oct. 3, 2008 Haixin Huang.
PTC ½ day – Experience in PS2 and SPS H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
H. Bartosik, K. Cornelis, A. Guerrero, B. Mikulek, G. Rumolo, Y. Papaphilippou, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova June 16 th, 2011.
PS Booster Studies with High Intensity Beams Magdalena Kowalska supervised by Elena Benedetto Space Charge Collaboration Meeting May 2014.
Booster Beam Dynamics Christian Carli On behalf of the team working on and contributing to the study: M. Aiba did all ORBIT simulations (Booster modelling.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
H - injection simulations 13th October 2014 Jose L. Abelleira, Chiara Bracco.
“Beam Losses” Christian Carli PSB H - Injection Review, 9 th November 2011 Several topics more or less related to beam losses, a study still somewhat at.
HB’2008 August 25-29, 2008M. Martini1 Evolution beam parameters during injection and storage of the high brightness beams envisaged for the Linac4 injection.
Main Ring + Space charge effects WHAT and HOW … Alexander Molodozhentsev for AP_MR Group May 10, 2005.
‘Computer power’ budget for the CERN Space Charge Group Alexander Molodozhentsev for the CERN-ICE ‘space-charge’ group meeting March 16, 2012 LIU project.
4 th Order Resonance at the PS R. WASEF, S. Gilardoni, S. Machida Acknowledgements: A. Huschauer, G. Sterbini SC meeting, 05/03/15.
Update on injection studies of LHC beams from Linac4 V. Forte (BE/ABP-HSC) Acknowledgements: J. Abelleira, C. Bracco, E. Benedetto, S. Hancock, M. Kowalska.
ISIS Upgrade Modelling Dean Adams On behalf of STFC/ISIS C Warsop, B Jones, B Pine, R Williamson, H Smith, M Hughes, A McFarland, A Seville, I Gardner,
Simplified Modeling of Space Charge Losses in Booster at Injection Alexander Valishev June 17, 2015.
Simulation of resonances and beam loss for the J-PARC Main Ring Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) Etienne Forest (KEK) for the ICFA HB08 Workshop ICFA HB08.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
PTC-ORBIT code for CERN machines (PSB, PS, SPS) Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) Etienne Forest (KEK) Group meeting, CERN June 1, 2011 current status …
UPDATE IN PTC-ORBIT PSB STUDIES Space charge meeting ( ) * Vincenzo Forte * Follows LIS meeting presentation 16/04/2012.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Tunes modulation in a space charge dominated beam: The particles behavior in the “necktie” Space charge meeting – CERN - 21/11/2013 Vincenzo Forte Thanks.
E.Benedetto, 1/07/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam dynamics.
SIMPSONS: Convergence of the Space Charge simulations for RCS Noda Hotchi.
Study of the space charge effects for J-PARC Main Ring Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) SAD Workshop, September 5-7, 2006.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
CERN PS Booster MDs  space charge and resonances  PTC-ORBIT benchmarking Participants: E.Benedetto, M.Martini, A.Molodozhentsev, N.Monet, V.Forte, F.Schmidt,
ECR - PSB: New KSW magnet in 16L1 Luis Feliciano, 4 th February.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
R. Miyamoto, MEBT Lattice Optimization, ESS AD Beam Physics Internal Review 1 MEBT Lattice Optimization Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) For Beam Physics Group,
The nonlinear dynamics of SIS100 at injection G. Franchetti Beam dynamics meet Magnets II 18/4/2012G.Franchetti1 Magnet multipoles: Dipole: Akishin et.
1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
PTC-ORBIT issues for PSB simulations V. Forte – E. Benedetto – M. Martini S.c. meeting (18/07/2013)
Particle Physics Group Meeting January 4 th – 5 th 2010 Commissioning EMMA, the Worlds First Non Scaling Fixed Field – Alternating Gradient Accelerator.
LIU-PS Beam Dynamics Working Group Introduction and objectives
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
CERN Space Charge Studies 2012/2013
CERN Space Charge Studies 2012/2013
Space charge studies at the SPS
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Sabrina Appel, GSI, Beam physics Space charge workshop 2013, CERN
Space Charge Study Group
Multiturn extraction for PS2
SC Overview 2013 White & Rouge The Codes in Comparison The Noise Issue
Beam dynamics study for J-PARC Main Ring with PTC-ORBIT
Progress of SPPC lattice design
IMPACT Simulation of the Montague Resonance at PS
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB
Impact of short dipoles on PSB performance (status)
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
Emittance Studies at Extraction of the PS Booster: Emittance Calculation S. Albright, F. Antoniou, F. Asvesta, H. Bartosik, G.P. Di Giovanni, M. Fraser,
Presentation transcript:

Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB LIS meeting 07/05/2012 Vincenzo Forte

Preliminary consideration This presentation follows the one at LIS meeting on 14-04-2012 (you can find that on my DFS public): dfs:\\Users\v\vforte\Public\14-04-12_Presentation Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Aim of the study Preliminary study for finding the optimal conditions for PTC/ORBIT space-charge simulations in terms of convergence and computational costs How far do we have to push in simulations settings to obtain reasonable results with less computational costs? Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Logical path Externally created (MadX, …) Internally modified (tables) Lattice setup Inject starting 6-D matched distribution Externally created (Mathematica, …) PTC ORBIT basic settings Adding of space charge Orbit routines PTC-ORBIT 1000 turns tracking RMS emittance 95-99% emittance tunes Results analysis Plots and tunes footprints Best settings choose Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

D.O.E. We wanted to find the best initial parameter settings for transverse space charge studies, with 2 reference models: “with chamber” -> static mesh grid (with “stable” beams) “without chamber” -> mesh grid dynamically adapted by the particle extent We used 2 criteria: Convergence criterium Computational costs criterium Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Computational costs criterium – actual engpara situation for 1000 turns… 23h:8min:53s 16h:46m:43s The space charge mesh doesn’t affect so much the CPU TIME Clearly, the number of m.particles is the main factor for CPU time and elapsed time increasing *This is not a proper benchmarking (not all the tests done on the same machines), but just to have a feeling of the situation Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – best case – with chamber In the case “with chamber” the “RMS Emittance” best case is Nxbins=256 – Nybins=256 with 1000e3 m.p. …but … even 256x256 with 500e3 m.p. is acceptable (half nr. M.p. -> half CPU TIME !) Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – best case – with chamber In horizontal 95% emittance is better for 1000th – 256 x 256 Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – best case – with chamber In vertical 95% emittance is good enough even for 500 th M.p. – 256 x 256 Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – worst case – with chamber In the case “with chamber” the “RMS Emittance” worst case is Nxbins=64 – Nybins=64 with any number of macroparticles… we clearly see a diverging behavior of RMS emittances… Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – footprints - with chamber The 256x256-500e3 shows a footprint far from any structural resonance (in particular Montague resonance) The mesh definition affects the footprint... The 64x64 case (with chamber) seems to be “under-resolution” (unphysical <-> the mesh size is comparable to 1s beam size) Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – RMS Emittance - without chamber In the case “without chamber” the 64x64 case – 500e3 m.p. is comparable with the best case “with chamber” (256x256 – 1000e3 m.p.) – in the case with 250e3 m.particles (64 x 64 without chamber) we have slightly different results (error order 10^-3) Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – 95-99 x Emittance - without chamber In the case “without chamber” the 64x64 case – 500e3 m.p. is comparable with the best case “with chamber” (256x256 – 1000e3 m.p.) … The case with 250e3 m.p. has worst results in 99% emittance computation… Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – 95-99 y Emittance - without chamber Also in vertical transverse, the case “without chamber” the 64x64 case – 500e3 m.p. is comparable with the best case “with chamber” (256x256 – 1000e3 m.p.) Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – footprints – with/without chamber DQx DQy 500e3 – 64x64 (with chamber) ~-0.27 ~-0.40 500e3 – 128x128 (with chamber) ~-0.20 ~-0.28 500e3 – 256x256 (with chamber) ~-0.17 ~-0.24 500e3- 64x64 (without chamber) ~-0.16 ~-0.23 Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – footprints – without chamber - why 64x64 mesh points and not more? RMS emittance & footprints are very similar in 64x64 and 128x128 cases Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – footprints – without chamber - why 64x64 mesh points and not more? 95% & 99% emittances’ behaviors are also very similar… Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Convergence criterium – footprints – without chamber - why 64x64 mesh points and not more? 95% & 99% emittances’ behaviours are also very similar… Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

A longer tracking (2500 turns) example ey First 1000 turns 2.806e-7*turn+4.8944 3.5784e-6*turn+3.3065 From 1000th to 2500th turn 6.9244e-7*turn+4.894 3.1936e-6*turn+3.3065 Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

Conclusions and future implementations We had a good indication for parameter settings in space charge studying with PTC-ORBIT, even using a method (2 ½ D) without boundary conditions. We will keep both ways for further studies (with and without boundaries) for longer turns (starting from 2500 turns as a few synch. periods) We will use a new set of parameters for the new simulations, which also will include acceleration, bumps … Parameters Actual simulations Future simulations Intensity 2.475e12 p.p.bunch 3.52e12 p.p.bunch* Norm. emittance 3/2 mm.mrad 1.9/1.9 mm.mrad* Qx-Qy (w. point) 4.27/4.41 4.41/4.46 * Update of achievable beam characteristics at injection in LHC – G. Brennan (slide 6) Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB – Vincenzo Forte * * Follows Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB - Vincenzo Forte – LIS meeting 14-04-12

CERN PS Booster study: Alexander Molodozhentsev ‘SHORT-dipole’ vz ‘NORMAL’ PSB lattice  emittance growth analysis … Halo formation at the injection energy … losses in realistic Aperture Effect of the double-harmonic RF system LIU: Machine imperfection and Space charge effects Effects of Basic machine imperfections & resonance correction scheme Benchmarking with existing results of the emittance measurements at the injection energy (160MeV) Acceleration process  ‘time’ scale of the emittance growth … ‘Bare’ working point optimization during injection and acceleration Multi-turn injection scheme (with FOIL and ‘painting’ process)  dynamic variation of the machine properties during the injection process