ASSESS Initiative Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To find out more or to apply, please visit our career portal and post your CV. goodyear-dunlop.com/career The Opportunity Develop and apply skill to analyze.
Advertisements

Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
Episode 3 / CAATS II joint dissemination event Lessons Learnt Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Philippe Leplae EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels,
Requirements Engineering Processes
Annual SERC Research Review - Student Presentation, October 5-6, Extending Model Based System Engineering to Utilize 3D Virtual Environments Peter.
Challenging title MAKING THE CASE FOR PLM Jos Voskuil.
Requirements Engineering Processes
Systems Analysis And Design © Systems Analysis And Design © V. Rajaraman MODULE 14 CASE TOOLS Learning Units 14.1 CASE tools and their importance 14.2.
Testing Challenges in an Agile Environment Biraj Nakarja Sogeti UK 28 th October 2009.
Software Requirements Engineering CSE 305 Lecture-2.
1 Introduction to Software Engineering Lecture 1.
Census Quality: another dimension! Paper for Q2008 conference, Rome Louisa Blackwell Quality Assurance Manager, 2011 Census.
April 8-10, 2002 XXXXXXXXXXXXX Business Unit 2002 Action Plan Your Name January 28-30, 2002 MSC.Software: How to Deliver Software Services Systems Fiat.
INCOSE IW12 MBSE Workshop 15 INCOSE (MBSE) Model Based System Engineering Integration and Verification Scenario Ron Williamson, PhD Raytheon
1 The XMSF Profile Overlay to the FEDEP Dr. Katherine L. Morse, SAIC Mr. Robert Lutz, JHU APL
Information Technology Planning
NASA Model-Based Systems Engineering Pathfinder 2016 Summary and Path Forward Karen J. Weiland, Ph.D. Jon Holladay, NASA Systems Engineering Technical.
Welcome and Introduction January 11, 2017
Project Cost Management
APPEA 2017 Miranda Taylor CEO.
The Five Secrets of Project Scheduling A PMO Approach
INCOSE Usability Working Group
SMS Roundtable Discussion NAFEMS Americas 2016, Seattle, WA, USA
Digital Workplace.
Report From:.
Chapter 10 Understanding Work Teams
Francis Bordeleau Chairman, Papyrus IC May 11th, 2016
SAMPLE Develop a Comprehensive Competency Framework
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
It’s not all about the tool!
Integration Community of Interest
Project Integration Management
The Systems Engineering Context
Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee
Ron Williamson, PhD Systems Engineer, Raytheon 20 June 2011
Business System Development
ASSESS Workgroups Democratizing Software Tools for Analysis, Systems Engineering, and Simulation (STASES) John Chawner, Pointwise STASES Confidence Keith.
Object oriented system development life cycle
MANCOSA Honours Marketing Research.
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Effective Category management focus to deliver more
Overview of System Engineering
Research Program Strategic Plan
Advantages OF BDD Testing
Global Social Venture Competition Pitch Deck
IT Governance Planning Overview
Where We Are Now. Where We Are Now Project Oversight Project Oversight Oversight’s Purposes: A set of principles and processes to guide and improve.
Production and Logistics Systems Modeling Challenge Team
WaterHUB People Worksteam Update 10 July 2018.
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
TDL: The ETSI Test Description Language
System Modeling Assessment & Roadmap Joint OMG/INCOSE Working Group
Open data for more effective grantmaking
CS 8532: Advanced Software Engineering
TDL: The ETSI Test Description Language
What elements to develop? What are communities of practice?
Core Competencies of a World Class Customer Advisory Board
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KM) Session # 35
Building Valid, Credible, and Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models
INCOSE IW 2014 Town Hall January 27, 2014
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Human Computer Interaction Lecture 14 HCI in Software Process
TDL: The ETSI Test Description Language
Presentation to SISAI Luxembourg, 12 June 2012
KEY INITIATIVE Shared Services Function Management
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Étienne Saint-Pierre, Statistics Canada
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Presentation transcript:

ASSESS Initiative Update Analysis, Simulation and Systems Engineering Software Strategies

Understanding the Simulation Revolution

Understanding the Simulation Revolution Failure Analysis This is where simulation begins Understanding “why it failed” Run by a few “experts” Dominated by test vs analysis comparisons

Understanding the Simulation Revolution Design Validation Checking before it fails The dawn of Virtual Prototyping Broader use of simulation

Understanding the Simulation Revolution Design Decision Support Why not use simulation to make better design decisions Why not ask designers to run simulations

Understanding the Simulation Revolution Design Drivers Simulation Driven Design Simulation making design decisions

Understanding the Simulation Revolution Systems Engineering Driven by growth of embedded software Heavily used in EDA world Design drivers extended to systems

Understanding the Simulation Revolution Engineering Simulation Market Continues to grow and is over $ 5 Bn annually But growth rate is slowing to ~ 8.5% Data courtesy of Cambashi CAE Observatory

Understanding the Simulation Revolution Growth of the Engineering Simulation market is tempered due to lack of expertise available Engineering Simulation is still done primarily by specialized Analysts

Understanding the Simulation Revolution Business Drivers are going to force a “revolution” to overcome the expertise based limitation Engineering Simulation will be forced to find a way A Simulation Revolution will occur

Understanding the Simulation Revolution A Simulation Revolution is occurring: “Model-Based” “Fit for purpose” “Integrated” “Smart” “Transparent” / “Invisible” “Generative” “Digital Twin” CULTURE CHANGE

Bob Tickel’s ASSESS 2017 Congress Keynote illustrated estimated spend on Engineering Simulation at Cummins is very similar to ASSESS demand curve. Biggest growth in the next two decades is expected to be in Systems Engineering “Democratization” - New Tools, Methods and Skills (MDO, MBSE, etc.) Automation, Knowledge Management & Reduced Rework

Understanding the Simulation Revolution The Simulation Revolution is about making Engineering Simulation widely available & appropriate to support improved decision making throughout the entire life-cycle of engineered products and processes

Understanding the Simulation Revolution Approaches Increased emphasis on Model Based Systems Engineering Increased emphasis on purpose built applications Leveraging less accurate near real time approaches Leveraging simulation knowledge capture & reuse Generative Design Digital Twins

Understanding the Simulation Revolution Engineering Simulation is a key enabler to Increased Innovation & Increased Competitiveness

The ASSESS Initiative

The ASSESS Initiative The ASSESS Initiative was formed to bring together key players to guide and influence strategies for software tools for model-based analysis, simulation, and systems engineering.

The ASSESS Vision The ASSESS Initiative “To significantly expand the use and benefit of software tools for model-based analysis, simulation, and systems engineering in the engineering applications domain.”

ASSESS Initiative ASSESS is a broad reaching multi-industry initiative which will interact and collaborate with multiple activities and organizations across the complete spectrum of model-based analysis, simulation and systems engineering including NAFEMS and INCOSE.

ASSESS Initiative Defined 6 key Themes to support the Engineering Simulation revolution Alignment of Commercial, Research and Government Efforts Business Challenges Democratization of Engineering Simulation Engineering Simulation Credibility Generative Design Integration of Systems and Detailed Sub-System Simulations

Integration of Systems and Detailed Sub-System Simulations

Integration of Systems & Detailed Sub-System Simulations Why is it so hard? History CAE tools developed discipline based Existing Assets Mental Models different discipline create different level of input output and different level of mathematical representations and different characteristics / behavior Data sets not consistent Coupling can introduce error states Sub models are usually built by different suppliers in different mathematical models and fidelity Knowledge and key parameters are not shared across models

Integration of Systems & Detailed Sub-System Simulations What are the major Issues “SILOS” of understanding Lack of a common understanding that makes it possible to understand different silos from a common point of view. Existing standardization efforts (e.g. FMI) are good, but very far from complete Lack of funding / focus / momentum

Integration of Systems & Detailed Sub-System Simulations ASSESS Systems Theme Goals Explore and explain the various different models used and their characteristics related to integration (e.g. parametric or instance based, run times, sizes, assumptions, …) Establish a common understanding, language and terminology for models and simulations across all levels of fidelity and physics Explore improving the understanding of what models should be used, and when and how they should interact

Integration of Systems & Detailed Sub-System Simulations ASSESS Systems Theme Goals Define an understanding of current and future methodologies for integration of the full range of physics performance models from systems to detailed components. Establish consistent expectations between end users and software vendors Develop an applicability and maturity model for different approaches through description and example use cases

ASSESS in Action

ASSESS in Action ASSESS Advisory Committee established 63 thought leaders Working Groups established One for each ASSESS Theme Marketing & Outreach

ASSESS in Action ASSESS 2017 Congress (November 2017, Potomac, MD) “Understanding the Simulation Revolution” 80 industry leading participants 2 Keynote presentations 8 Technology Briefings 8 Working Groups each with a particular ASSESS related theme Democratization of Engineering Simulation Engineering Simulation Confidence / Governance Business Challenges Aligning Commercial, Government and Research Efforts Potential Game Changers Looking Forward Integration of Systems and Detailed Sub-Systems Simulations

ASSESS in Action ASSESS 2018 Congress (October 2018, Chateau Elan) “Launching the Simulation Revolution” Targeting 115 industry leading participants 2 Keynote presentations 10 Notes from the Front Briefings 12 Working Session each with a particular ASSESS related theme question Alignment of Commercial, Research and Government Efforts Business Challenges Democratization of Engineering Simulation Engineering Simulation Credibility Generative Design Integration of Systems and Detailed Sub-System Simulations

ASSESS in Action Membership Program Launched January 2018 Access to all ASSESS initiative “deliverable documents” at no charge, including: Research Papers as available Survey research Others as appropriate Access to ASSESS Theme status and update reports Working Group Notes Congress Working Session Notes Access to previous ASSESS Congress presentations Access to ASSESS Members Only LinkedIn Group ASSESS Members Only newsletter

Thank You