Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (February 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biochemical Specialization within Arabidopsis RNA Silencing Pathways
Advertisements

Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Mark M Metzstein, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
Mobility of Yeast Mitochondrial Group II Introns: Engineering a New Site Specificity and Retrohoming via Full Reverse Splicing  Robert Eskes, Jian Yang,
How an RNA Ligase Discriminates RNA versus DNA Damage
EM Visualization of Transcription by RNA Polymerase II
RNA-Guided RNA Cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-Cas Protein Complex
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Base-Pairing between Untranslated Regions Facilitates Translation of Uncapped, Nonpolyadenylated Viral RNA  Liang Guo, Edwards M. Allen, W.Allen Miller 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
EM Visualization of Transcription by RNA Polymerase II
The Small RNA IstR Inhibits Synthesis of an SOS-Induced Toxic Peptide
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
ATP-Dependent Allosteric DNA Enzymes
The Three Chemical Steps of Tn10/IS10 Transposition Involve Repeated Utilization of a Single Active Site  Silvia Bolland, Nancy Kleckner  Cell  Volume.
The Transmembrane Kinase Ire1p Is a Site-Specific Endonuclease That Initiates mRNA Splicing in the Unfolded Protein Response  Carmela Sidrauski, Peter.
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
John F Ross, Xuan Liu, Brian David Dynlacht  Molecular Cell 
Human Telomerase Activation Requires Two Independent Interactions between Telomerase RNA and Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase  James R. Mitchell, Kathleen.
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Rosemary C Dietrich, Robert Incorvaia, Richard A Padgett 
A Deletion Site Editing Endonuclease in Trypanosoma brucei
Zbigniew Dominski, Xiao-cui Yang, William F. Marzluff  Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Hairpin Coding End Opening Is Mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
The Mutagenesis Proteins UmuD′ and UmuC Prevent Lethal Frameshifts While Increasing Base Substitution Mutations  Nina Bacher Reuven, Guy Tomer, Zvi Livneh 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Transcriptional Fidelity and Proofreading by RNA Polymerase II
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
Volume 125, Issue 5, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Yasunori Aizawa, Qing Xiang, Alan M. Lambowitz, Anna Marie Pyle 
Marc Spingola, Manuel Ares  Molecular Cell 
Yingqun Huang, Joan A. Steitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Helena Celesnik, Atilio Deana, Joel G. Belasco  Molecular Cell 
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Direct Visualization of Uridylate Deletion In Vitro Suggests a Mechanism for Kinetoplastid RNA Editing  Scott D Seiwert, Stefan Heidmann, Kenneth Stuart 
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Recombinational DNA Repair: The RecF and RecR Proteins Limit the Extension of RecA Filaments beyond Single-Strand DNA Gaps  Brian L Webb, Michael M Cox,
RNAi as Random Degradative PCR
Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts  Rajashree A. Deshpande, Ji-Hoon.
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Exon Identity Established through Differential Antagonism between Exonic Splicing Silencer-Bound hnRNP A1 and Enhancer-Bound SR Proteins  Jun Zhu, Akila.
Insights into Branch Nucleophile Positioning and Activation from an Orthogonal Pre- mRNA Splicing System in Yeast  Duncan J. Smith, Maria M. Konarska,
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages (November 2001)
Human Pre-mRNA Cleavage Factor Im Is Related to Spliceosomal SR Proteins and Can Be Reconstituted In Vitro from Recombinant Subunits  Ursula Rüegsegger,
Modification of the Properties of Elongating RNA Polymerase by Persistent Association with Nascent Antiterminator RNA  Ranjan Sen, Rodney A King, Robert.
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Figure 1. DNA-guided RNA cleavage activity
Kirk M Brown, Gregory M Gilmartin  Molecular Cell 
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Rodney A King, Sarbani Banik-Maiti, Ding Jun Jin, Robert A Weisberg 
Exon Skipping in IVD RNA Processing in Isovaleric Acidemia Caused by Point Mutations in the Coding Region of the IVD Gene  Jerry Vockley, Peter K. Rogan,
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 401-409 (February 1998) T. brucei RNA Editing: Adenosine Nucleotides Inversely Affect U-Deletion and U- Insertion Reactions at mRNA Cleavage  Jorge Cruz-Reyes, Laura N Rusché, Kenneth J Piller, Barbara Sollner-Webb  Molecular Cell  Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 401-409 (February 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80040-4

Figure 1 Current Understanding of U-Deletional and U-Insertional Editing RNA editing involves gRNA-directed cleavage of the mRNA, followed by either a 3′-U exonuclease or a 3′ TUTase acting on the cleaved upstream fragment, and RNA ligase action (Blum et al. 1990; Cruz-Reyes and Sollner-Webb 1996; Kable et al. 1996; Seiwert et al. 1996). The 3′-U-removal reaction is not a reverse TUTase reaction (Cruz-Reyes and Sollner-Webb 1996; Rusché et al. 1997). The present paper demonstrates that gRNA-directed cleavages at U-deletional and U-insertional editing sites are biochemically distinct, with the former requiring an adenosine nucleotide, while the latter is inhibited by adenosine nucleotides. 90% of editing sites are U-insertional while 10% are U-deletional. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 401-409DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80040-4)

Figure 6 The Adenosine Nucleotide Concentration Needed to Affect gRNA-Directed Cleavages (A–D) Cleavage reactions used DNA-cellulose-purified editing complex, the indicated millimolar concentrations of adenosine nucleotides, and, where indicated, PPi. (A) and (D) (lanes 1–3) used [0,4] mRNA and [2,1] gRNA; (B), (C), and (D) (lanes 4–7) used [0,4] mRNA and [2,4] gRNA (diagrammed in Figure 3G). (E) RNA ligase assay, showing ligated product RNA, was performed using the DNA-cellulose-purified editing complex, the indicated ribonucleotides at 3 mM unless stated, and 3 mM PPi where indicated, as in Rusché et al. 1997. In all reactions, most input RNA remained unligated. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 401-409DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80040-4)

Figure 3 The Nucleotide Involvement in Cleavage at Altered Positions within Mutated A6 ES1, ES2, and ES3 Is Maintained Five mRNA:gRNA pairs with features to specify U deletion within altered sequences of ES1 (A–E) and five mRNA:gRNA pairs with features to specify U insertion within altered sequences of ES2 and ES3 (F–J) were analyzed, and all exhibited the same ATP/ADP effects as the parental sites. The examined mRNAs are: pre-edited wild-type [0,4]; ES1-edited [0,2]; ES2- and ES1-edited [2,2]; and mutants [0,5], [0,1], and [5,2]. The examined gRNAs are: wild-type [2,2] and mutants [2,1], [2,4], and [5,2]. Designations are as in Figure 2, and residues of the editing sites are in bold. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 401-409DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80040-4)

Figure 2 The Nucleotide Involvement in A6 gRNA–Directed Cleavage Is Different at ES1 versus ES2 and ES3 (A–C) Cleavage reactions with the indicated 3′ end–labeled A6 mRNA, gRNA, and 3 mM adenosine nucleotide were performed using Q-Sepharose-purified editing complex (see Experimental Procedures). Similar adenosine nucleotide effects are observed using editing complex that had been additionally purified on DNA-cellulose. Pre-mRNA substrates are designated [x,y] where x and y are the number of U residues present at ES2 and ES1, respectively, and complementary gRNAs are designated [m,n] where m and n are the number of U residues that this gRNA directs to be at ES2 and ES1, respectively. The RNA sequence and cleavage position are indicated. Below is shown a portion of the RNA pairs that includes the anchor region and ES1 through ES3. The gRNA-directed cleavage (arrowhead enclosing the number of the cleaved editing site) occurs just 5′ of the anchor region duplex (shaded box). Solid and dotted lines indicate Watson-Crick and G:U base pairing within the anchor and potential base pairing that will direct subsequent rounds of editing; the asterisk represents the 3′-end label. RNA markers (A+U) prepared with PhyM RNase bear 5′-OH termini and migrate ∼1/2 nt slower than the extract-cleaved mRNA fragments that bear 5′-P termini (Cruz-Reyes and Sollner-Webb 1996). (D) For cleavage reactions, we used the same RNAs as in (A), 3 mM of the indicated nucleotide, and DNA-cellulose-purified editing complex. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 401-409DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80040-4)

Figure 7 Full Round U-Deletional and U-Insertional Editings Reflect the Adenosine Nucleotide Effects of Their Component Cleavage Reactions Full round U-deletional (A) and U-insertional (B) editing reactions used the DNA-cellulose-purified editing complex, 3′ end–labeled input mRNA, and the indicated millimolar concentrations of ATP, ADP, and UTP. (A) and (B) used the [0,4] mRNA and gRNA [2,1] or [2,4], respectively. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 401-409DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80040-4)

Figure 4 The Nucleotide Involvement at Interconverted U-Deletional and U-Insertional A6 Editing Sites Is Also Interconverted Cleavage analysis of A6 RNA pairs mutated to have features of U insertion at ES1 (A) and of U deletion at ES2 (B). Reactions and descriptions are as in Figure 2, using the Q-Sepharose fraction (A) or the DNA-cellulose fraction (B). Molecular Cell 1998 1, 401-409DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80040-4)

Figure 5 Cleavage at Natural, Altered, and Interconverted ES1 and ES2 of CYb Exhibits the Predicted Nucleotide Specificity (A) shows cleavage of wild-type CYb mRNA at ES1 specified by gRNAs directing insertion of two U residues (the wild-type case, lanes 1–3) and one U residue (lanes 4–6). (B) and (C) show two altered CYb RNA pairs where ES1 and ES2 were converted to have features of U-deletion sites, both specifying removal of one U residue. Reactions used 3′ end–labeled mRNA substrates and DNA-cellulose-purified editing complex and are designated as in Figure 2. The G cleavage markers were prepared with nuclease P1 and have 5′-P termini, like the extract-cleaved RNAs (Cruz-Reyes and Sollner-Webb 1996; J. C.-R. et al., submitted). Molecular Cell 1998 1, 401-409DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80040-4)