Two-sided LMR Feedback between AP and STA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Advertisements

Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /1120r0 Submission Buffer Status Report Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1060r0 September 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Receive Operating Mode Indication for Power Save Date: Authors:
802.11az Negotiation Date: Authors: Jan 2017 Month Year
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
Resource Negotiation for Unassociated STAs in MU Operation
802.11az Negotiation Date: Authors: May 2017 Month Year
Trigger Frame Format for az
Polling for MU Measurements
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
How to collect STAs’ Tx demands for UL MU
SU Sounding Measurement Exchange and Feedback
Protected LTF Using PMF in SU and MU Modes
Ranging ID and its Lifetime Management
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2017
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Availability Window Advertisement
Frame Responding Rules for NDP Ranging
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
NDP Ranging Error Recovery
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Two-sided LMR Feedback between AP and STA
Pre-Association Security Negotiation (PASN) for 11az
Regarding HE NDPA frame for DL Sounding Sequence
Resource Negotiation for Unassociated STAs in MU Operation
MU Ranging Sequence Date: Authors: Nov 2017 Month Year
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Existence Indication of Attacker or Jammer in LMR
An unified az Protocol Date: Authors: Nov 2016
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Availability Window Update
NTB Ranging Flow Control and Power Save
Negotiation for HEz Ranging for Passive Location Support
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Comment resolution on CID 20175
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Replay Attack to Secured TB Ranging
Replay Attack to Secured TB Ranging
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
FTM Frame Exchange Authentication
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
Explanations for CR on NDP feedback report
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
11az related bits in the Extended Capabilities element
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
TD Control field with Response indication in WUR frame
SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO link access
Measurement Report Feedback in 11az
Phase Shift Based TOA Reporting in Passive Location Ranging
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
NDP Bandwidth Selection in Range Measurement
Secure SU and MU Ranging Measurement Procedure
HEz Ranging Availability Window
Sounding-only Support During Ranging
NTB Ranging Flow Control and Power Save
11az Ranging and Location Privacy
Availability Window Termination
LMR and LCI Reporting For Passive Location
ISTA2RSTA LMR Feedback AP Policy and Negotiation
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
11az Negotiation Protocol (update)
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Availability Window Advertisement
Presentation transcript:

Two-sided LMR Feedback between AP and STA Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Two-sided LMR Feedback between AP and STA Date: 2018-03-06 Jonathan Segev, Intel

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Introduction For privacy reasons STA to AP location reporting feedback is optional and on consensual basis (REVmc FTM). The current design of 11az focuses on the single-side LMR feedback (ISTA2RSTA), and to enable two-sided LMR feedback, new feature need to be developed. In this submission, we propose detailed design for two-sided LMR feedback regarding negotiation indication, measurement resource allocation and LMR exchange sequence. Jonathan Segev, Intel

Consideration for Two-sided LMR (1) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Consideration for Two-sided LMR (1) Privacy considerations: For privacy reasons STA to AP location feedback is optional (REVmc FTM). STA can choose whether or not report its LMR to AP. AP behavior based on STA’s response is implementation/usage dependent and out of scope of std. (e.g. asset tracking, within trusted network). Jonathan Segev, Intel

Consideration for Two-sided LMR (2) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Consideration for Two-sided LMR (2) Design consideration: Different STAs have different computation resources, hence TOA calculation delay is different. UL allocation needs to be aligned to results availability at STA side. STA is most cases power conscious, additional report should have minimal additional PWR implication. Minimize number of sequences for development ‒ simplicity preferably one sequence with minimal number of changes from the mainstream sequence: Shorter standard development Simpler development Easier test plan development and testing Results for client side used for user experience, and results for AP side less so (latency is not as important). However the STAs’ LMR computation capability varies, which makes STAs’ LMR ready time different and a resource allocation method need to be designed to enable AP to solicit LMR from multiple STAs efficiently. Jonathan Segev, Intel

Consideration for Two-sided LMR (3) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Consideration for Two-sided LMR (3) SU vs. MU design considerations: Preferably similar ISTA time constraints exist between SU and MU operation modes. ISTA is responsible for medium reservation using NDPA. RSTA is responsible for medium reservation using TF. Jonathan Segev, Intel

Negotiation for Two-sided LMR Feedback Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Negotiation for Two-sided LMR Feedback A new parameter field in the NGP parameter element can be defined to indicate the ISTA2RSTA LMR feedback In the IFTMR frame, the ISTA can use this bit to indicate whether it’s willing to report its LMR information to RSTA. The ISTA can also indicate its LMR feedback type in NGP parameter element: Immediate (LMR in the same TxOP or availability window as measurement) Delayed (LMR for the measurement in previous TxOP or availability window ) In the IFTM frame, this new field can be used by RSTA to notify ISTA whether the RSTA will request the ISTA’s LMR report. Jonathan Segev, Intel

Rule for ISTA’s Resource Request Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Rule for ISTA’s Resource Request Design for simplicity: If a two-sided LMR is agreed on, ISTA may perform respond to poll asking for a new measurement round N only if measurement ToA/ToD for measurement round N-1 are available. For two-sided LMR, RSTA allocates UL resource in the same availability window for ISTA2RSTA LMR (power efficiency). ISTA2RSTA LMR type: STA1 and STA3 (immediate ), STA2 (delayed) Jonathan Segev, Intel

Two-sided LMR Exchange Sequence (1) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Two-sided LMR Exchange Sequence (1) Use a single sequence to support both of RSTA2ISTA and ISTA2RSTA LMR RSTA and ISTA can support either immediate or delay LMR feedback. For immediate LMR, the LMR include ToA/ToD or CSI information of round N measurement For delayed LMR, the LMR include ToA/ToD information of round N-1 measurement Jonathan Segev, Intel

Two-sided LMR Exchange Sequence (2) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Two-sided LMR Exchange Sequence (2) The RSTA (AP) uses MU PPDU to transmit the RSTA2ISTA (AP-to-STA) LMR feedback to ISTA A trigger frame (TF) for LMR is used to solicit the ISTA2RSTA (STA-to-AP) LMR and this trigger frame allocates resource for ISTA2RSTA LMR frame. After receiving the TF for LMR, the ISTA responses with HE TB PPDU which includes ISTA2RSTA LMR frame. RSTA and ISTA can support either immediate or delay LMR feedback. The LMR feedback type information can help RSTA to schedule resource. For example, for the ISTA with delayed LMR, the RSTA may not poll the ISTA in every availability window, because the ISTA’s ISTA2RSTA LMR for measurement in last availability window may not be ready. Jonathan Segev, Intel

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Conclusion In negotiation phase, an indication parameter field is defined to enable the RSTA and ISTA to negotiate the ISTA2RSTA LMR feedback. For the two-sided LMR feedback, a resource request rule for ISTA is proposed to simplify the RSTA’s resource allocation for ISTA2RSTA LMR transmission. Efficient LMR exchange sequence is designed to enable two-sided LMR feedback between ISTA and RSTA. Jonathan Segev, Intel

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Straw Poll #1 Do you support the following SU ranging sequence for RSTA2ISTA and ISTA2RSTA LMR feedback? Please note: the LMR could be either immediate (for round N) or delayed (for round N-1) and the error recovery rule is TBD. Y: N: Abstain : Jonathan Segev, Intel

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Motion #1 We agree for the following SU ranging sequence when both RSTA2ISTA and ISTA2RSTA LMR feedback were previously negotiated: Please note: the LMR could be either immediate (for round N) or delayed (for round N-1) and the error recovery rule is TBD. Y: N: Abstain : Jonathan Segev, Intel

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Straw Poll #2 Do you agree to add a new field in the NGP parameter IE within the IFTM and IFTMR frames to indicate the request and consent to use ISTA2RSTA LMR feedback? In the IFTMR frame, the ISTA uses this field to indicate whether it’s willing to report its LMR information to RSTA. In the IFTM frame, this field is used by RSTA to notify ISTA whether the RSTA will request the ISTA’s LMR report. Y: N: Abstain : Absent: Jonathan Segev, Intel

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Motion #2 We agree to add a new field in the NGP parameter IE within the IFTM and IFTMR frames to indicate the request and consent to use ISTA2RSTA LMR feedback In the IFTMR frame, the ISTA uses this field to indicate whether it’s willing to report its LMR information to RSTA. In the IFTM frame, this field is used by RSTA to notify ISTA whether the RSTA will request the ISTA’s LMR report. Y: N: Abstain : Jonathan Segev, Intel

Straw Poll #3 Y: N: Abstain : March 2018 Straw Poll #3 Do you agree to define an LMR feedback type (immediate or delayed) parameter field in NGP parameters subelemet of IFTMR frame for VHTz and HEz ranging sequence: This parameter field is used by ISTA to indicate the ISTA2RSTA LMR feedback type during FTM negotiation. Immediate feedback type ‒ ISTA2RSTA LMR delivers measurement performed at the same TxOP or availability window. Delayed feedback type ‒ ISTA2RSTA LMR delivers measurement performed at the previous TxOP or availability window. Y: N: Abstain :

March 2018 Motion #3 We agree to define an LMR feedback type (immediate or delayed) parameter field in NGP parameters subelemet of IFTMR frame for VHTz and HEz ranging sequence: This parameter field is used by ISTA to indicate the ISTA2RSTA LMR feedback type during FTM negotiation. Immediate feedback type ‒ ISTA2RSTA LMR delivers measurement performed at the same TxOP or availability window. Delayed feedback type ‒ ISTA2RSTA LMR delivers measurement performed at the previous TxOP or availability window. Y: N: Abstain :

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Straw Poll #4 Do you agree that once consent is set and ISTA2RSTA LMR reporting was agreed on, during the HEz sequence the ISTA will only respond to a poll once the delayed ISTA2RSTA LMR results are available at ISTA? Y: N: A: Jonathan Segev, Intel

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2018 Motion #4 We agree that once consent is set and ISTA2RSTA LMR reporting was agreed on, during the HEz sequence the ISTA will only respond to a poll once the delayed ISTA2RSTA LMR results are available at ISTA? Y: N: A: Jonathan Segev, Intel