VII. Earthquake Mitigation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Advertisements

Response To Tectonic Hazards
CyberShake Project and ShakeMaps. CyberShake Project CyberShake is a SCEC research project that is a physics-based high performance computational approach.
SEISMIC HAZARD Presentation is based on: Allen, R., Earthquake hazard mitigation: New direction and opportunities, in "Treatise on Geophysics”, Bilham,
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS JAPAN PART 1A: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
OWENSBORO: LIVING WITH EARTHQUAKES IN THE NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE OWENSBORO: LIVING WITH EARTHQUAKES IN THE NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE WALTER HAYS GLOBAL.
Test 2 mean: 75, median: 79 multiple choice: 42 questions, 2 points each short answer: 4 questions, 4 points each 100 total: circled number inside front.
Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking. Earthquake Origins and Seismic Waves –Focus point where earthquake rupture occurs Shallow focus - 70 km or less (80%
Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.
From NOAA CD Ch 5: Natural Hazards. Natural events causing great loss of life or property damage Dangerous natural processes Impact risks, depending.
Earthquakes. Figure 11.8 Figure 11.9A Figure 11.9B.
SURFACE FAULT RUPTURE, GROUND SHAKING, GROUND FAILURE (LIQUEFACTION, LANDSLIDES), AFTERSHOCKS.
IMPACTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON WATER RESERVOIRS, PIPELINES, AQUEDUCTS, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University.
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES Mark A. Hartwig, Fire Chief.
The San Francisco Earthquake of 1906 By Mrs. Cheney.
C.E.R.T. Community Emergency Response Team What is it, who are they?
CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKE EXERCISE OCTOBER 21, 2010 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina, USA.
Chapter 5 EARTHQUAKES and ENVIRONMENT. Earthquakes Violent ground-shaking phenomenon by the sudden release of strain energy stored in rocks One of the.
Structural Engineering Issues for a Large Cascadia Event.
Earthquakes Most destructive forces on Earth. But it is buildings and other human structures that cause injury and death, not the earthquake itself 1988.
Section 3: Earthquakes and Society
Do Now – In Notebooks  What are some effects of earthquakes?  Why is intensity not always the same as magnitude for an earthquake?
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
Natural Disasters Natural Disasters are disasters that occur in this world naturally and we can not control nature to stop them – we can only control our.
Michael Hodges, Chris Kohlenberger, Nolan Mattox, and Christian Vanderwall Seismic Hazard Map Plugin Improvement of ShakeMap Plugin Custom Color Maps Team.
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
Engineering Geology and Seismology
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
Kenneth W. Hudnut USGS, Pasadena, CA West Newport Beach Association Public Forum, Newport Beach City Hall March 5, 2003 Coping with ‘quakes.
REDUCING DISASTER RISK THROUGH EFFECTIVE USE OF EARTH OBSERVATIONS Helen M. Wood Chair, U.S. Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction August.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS KAZAKHSTAN PART 2: EARTHQUAKE Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Chapter 16 Natural Disasters and Catastrophes. Hazards, Disasters, and Catastrophes The Most Devastating Natural Hazards -Earthquake -Volcanic Eruption.
Earthquake Damage Unit. Where would you be the safest in an earthquake? Open level field away from buildings Movement of the ground rarely causes deaths.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
Zack Bick Erin Riggs Alicia Helton Cara Dickerson Presentation by:
SEISMIC HAZARD. Seismic risk versus seismic hazard Seismic Hazard is the probability of occurrence of a specified level of ground shaking in a specified.
Loss-Estimation Modeling of Earthquake Scenarios for Each County in Nevada Using HAZUS-MH Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 University.
Earthquake Risk in the Bay Area: The Hayward Fault Ellen Metzger BAESI March 23, 2013.
George Crawford, Washington Emergency Management Division June 25,2007 UW Educational Outreach – Tsunami Science & Preparedness Program (Su 07) Sponsored.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Earthquake is Inevitable: The Disaster is Not.
Can we forecast an Earthquake??? In the next minute there will be an earthquake somewhere in the world! This sentence is correct (we have seen that there.
Dr. Walter Hays US Geological Survey (Retired) Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction.
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
MAGNITUDE 6.7 EARTHQUAKE STRIKES CENTRAL JAPAN Saturday, November 22, 2014 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
1906 San Francisco EQ ~7.8M 1811 New Madrid EQ ~7.7M V VIII II - III VI IX 200 km Modern shaking hazard map Magnitude is not the whole story… Intensity,
TOWARDS PRE-EARTHQUAKE PLANNING FOR POST-EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY (PEPPER) EXAMPLES: TOKAI, JAPAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
DISASTER MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION: AN ENGINEER’S PERSPECTIVE SHUBHI JAIN B.E. 4 th YEAR (e.c.) G.G.I.T.S. JABALPUR.
Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazards are those Earth processes that are harmful to humans and/or their property. Includes: Earthquakes Volcanic eruptions.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS MEXICO PART 3: EARTHQUAKES
What are Earthquakes? The shaking or trembling caused by the sudden release of energy Usually associated with lithospheric plates moving against each other.
M7.1 RABOSA EARTHQUAKE 1:15 PM; September 19, 2017
MODERATE-MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKE IMPACTS GREECE AND TURKEY 1:30 AM local time Friday, July 21, 2017 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
A M7.8, 20-KM-DEEP EARTHQUAKE LOCATED OFFSHORE ECUADOR STRUCK ON SATURDAY MIGHT, KILLING AT LEAST 77, WJTH MORE DEATHS EXPECTED.
More lectures at Disasters Supercourse - 
THE IMPACT OF NATURAL DISASTERS
EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS, PATTERNS, AND RISK
Understanding Earth Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES Grotzinger • Jordan
7.3 Measuring and Predicting Earthquakes
Faults and Earthquakes
19.4 – Earthquakes & Society
Effect of Earthquake on Fire Protection Systems
Forces Within Earth Earthquakes are natural vibrations of the ground caused by movement along fractures in Earth’s crust, or sometimes, by volcanic eruptions.
Dr. Praveen K. Malhotra, P.E.
HayWired We Can Outsmart Disaster
JOINT EXCON MEETING CUM TRAINING
An ocean wave produced by earthquakes or underwater landslides.
Disaster mitigation and management
Presentation transcript:

VII. Earthquake Mitigation Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake “forecasting” (prediction) Engineering and Building Codes Preparation in earthquake prone areas

VII. Earthquake Mitigation Approach to earthquake mitigation Main approach is survivability Requires hazard identification and risk assessment Identify areas of where materials at risk of seismic wave amplification and enhanced ground shaking risk Engineering solutions to make structures earthquake resistant Preparation and training of emergency response teams and medical personel Earthquake prediction and evacuation is not a reasonable goal in the foreseeable future

VII. Earthquake Mitigation Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Hazard Identification: deals primarily with the science defining and describing a hazard, its physical characteristics, magnitude and severity, probability and frequency, causative factors, and locations or areas affected Risk Assessment: deals with the societal impact issues Estimating vulnerability of and impact on populations, probabilities of events and magnitude, frequency and return period, mitigation planning

VII. Earthquake Mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Shaking Hazard map = statistical probability (10% chance in 50 year period) exceeding a stated level of shaking (as % of g = acceleration of gravity) Need to know… Probability of a future EQ of given magnitude (need to understand past behavior and how faults work) Response of materials to shaking (intensity) (need to understand how shaking varies with materials and how materials vary with geographic location)

VII. Earthquake Mitigation Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake “forecasting” (prediction) Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) Based on past behavior Historical records + pre-historical records + fault mapping = total record

VII. Earthquake Mitigation Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake prediction Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) Historical Records written and verbal accounts (100s of years) measured seismic activity (~100 years of data) distribution of earthquake activity on a both a global and local scale

Data for U.S. Earthquakes

VII. Earthquake Mitigation C. Earthquake prediction Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) Fault mapping Understanding the distribution of faults and linkage of faults together in a fault system Faults in red active during last 4 million years

VII. Earthquake Mitigation Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake prediction Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) Pre-historical records Geologic investigations; using the “rock record” to build a history of earthquake activity Field of study called paleo-seismology

Reading the geologic record of past events Paleo-seismology

Paleo-seismic study in sediments of a fault sag pond

Paleo-seismic study in sediments of a fault sag pond

VII. Earthquake Mitigation Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake prediction Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) Based on past behavior Historical records + pre-historical records + fault mapping = total record Recurrence Intervals (Frequency - are we over due?) Seismic Gaps (Is a fault segment overdue?)

VII. Earthquake Mitigation Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake prediction Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) Seismic Gaps (Is a segment of a fault overdue?) pre-1989 seismic record of San Andreas fault 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake and aftershocks Source: USGS

VII. Earthquake Mitigation Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake prediction Short-term warnings Radio transmissions faster than seismic waves Potential to Shutdown public transport such as trains Shutoff gas pipelines Warn rescuers of aftershocks Tsunami warnings Use cell phone applications to warn individuals

VII. Earthquake Mitigation D. Engineering and Building Codes “Earthquakes don’t kill people buildings do” If survivability is the goal, then engineering approaches and building codes are the main solution Reinforced buildings and bridges in earthquake prone areas Identify problem soils and avoid them, anchor foundations in bedrock or use foundation isolators Avoid building sites in areas prone to landslides Images: NOAA

VII. Earthquake Mitigation D. Engineering and Building Codes “Earthquakes don’t kill people buildings do” Engineering approaches and building codes require that we know… site specific risk levels for ground shaking, including enhanced shaking (think shake hazard maps) response of buildings (of varying design) to ground shaking, requires monitoring shaking in buildings during earthquakes consider also survivability of occupants vs. survivability of the building for future use (and how much you are willing to spend)

VII. Earthquake Mitigation D. Engineering and Building Codes “Earthquakes don’t kill people buildings do” Engineering approaches and building codes require that we know… site specific risk levels for ground shaking, including enhanced shaking (think shake hazard maps) response of buildings (of varying design) to ground shaking, requires monitoring shaking in buildings during earthquakes consider also survivability of occupants vs. survivability of the building for future use (and how much you are willing to spend)

VII. Earthquake Mitigation E. Preparation in earthquake prone areas Emergency preparedness and training is essential to surviving an earthquake Coordination among emergency response agencies Fire, utilities, police, rescue, medical, public transportation Coordinate communications among emergency response teams and agencies Practice exercises – The Great Shake Out Full scale mock earthquake response exercises Decentralize emergency supplies and equipment Earthquake preparation in homes

VII. Earthquake Mitigation E. Preparation in earthquake prone areas ShakeMap – Real time shaking intensity map product from USGS Computer generated shake map (intensity) for a real earthquake generated automatically in real time Allows emergency first responders to be directed to areas with greatest needs without waiting for emergency calls and first hand on the ground accounts