Low Incidence Funding CTEBVI Conference April 4, 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Overview of Indianas Special Education Rules Professor Daniel J. Abbott ED 242 Fall 2009.
Advertisements

California Statewide System of School Readiness Networks Inclusion of Children with Disabilities Prepared by Chris Drouin, Special Education Division Anne.
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Assistive Technology Definitions and the Law. Assistive Technology Devices Services Consideration.
SCHOOLS K - 12 Dr. Susan W. Floyd Education Associate Speech-Language Disabilities, Assistive Technology Office of Exceptional Children South Carolina.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
--Special needs students in nonpublic schools may be on an: --Individual Education Plan (federal); --Individual Services Plan (federal); --Plan in accordance.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction EDUCATION CODE CHANGES THAT MAY AFFECT YOU.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 LOW INCIDENCE FUNDING GUIDELINES FOR PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers and Educators.
Assistive Technology in the Educational Setting Ed Computers and Technology in Special Education.
Application for Approval of Funding for Residential Placement
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
8301 Stateline Rd, Suite 204 Kansas City, MO / / Understanding the IEP Process for Parents.
Special Education Policies, Practices, and Programs
True or False A student’s need for AT must be considered at every ARD.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Sharing Personnel and Funding Options.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Funding Assistive Technology for Students with Visual Impairments with Low Incidence Funds.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction The Role of the State Program Guidelines in the Education.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Program Guidelines for Students who are Visually Impaired PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
AssistiveTechnology101 SPECIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Assistive Technology Denise Bazel ED505 June 8, 2015 Dr. Minear.
New IEP Process and Product March/April/May/June 2008 Barrie Grossi, Lynne Ryan RI Department of Education RI Technical Assistance Project.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY LEGAL ISSUES that influence decision making.
New IEP Process and Product Preschool Special Education Conference Series #3 May 22, 2008 Barrie Grossi, Lynne Ryan RI Department of Education RI Technical.
SPECIAL FACTORS PIKES PEAK BOCES LEADERSHIP DECEMBER 2015.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
“iPads, iPhones…iCaramba!”: Evaluating and Providing Assistive Technology in the Digital Age Cynthia S. Buechler Buechler & Associates, P.C Stoneridge.
Legal Foundations of Special Education Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 1.
M eetings of the IEP Team Produced by NICHCY, 2007 | Updated by CPIR, 2016.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discipline.
Slide 1 Assistive Technology Guidelines for Kentucky Schools AT Training Team.
Section 504 training.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Introduction to Assistive Technology for Special Educators 2016
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
The Special Education Process
Legal Foundations of Special Education
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Santa Barbara County SELPA Parentally Placed Students in Private School Training & Meaningful Consultation for Private School Representatives and Parent.
Teaching Students with Disabilities
Federal Regulations for Students with Disabilities
Stanislaus SELPA Session 1
Leadership Academy Special Education.
Low Incidence Equipment
1:1 Aides 1/29/2016.
Meetings of the IEP Team
A Child with Deaf-Blindness and Eligibility Criteria
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Equitable Participation (EP) Child Find Free and Appropriate Public
Writing Assistive Technology (AT) in the IEP: A brief guide
Assistive Technology Legal Requirements and Implications
A Child with Multiple Disabilities and Eligibility Criteria
Assistive Technology: What Every Parent Needs to Know
Autism (ASD) and the Educational Environment
Presentation transcript:

Low Incidence Funding CTEBVI Conference April 4, 2014

State Funds 56836.22 (a) Commencing with the 1985-86 fiscal year, and for each fiscal year thereafter, funds to support special education and related services as required under the individualized education program for each pupil with low-incidence disabilities, as defined in Section 56026.5,

State Funds (cont’d) shall be determined by dividing the total number of pupils with low-incidence disabilities in the state, as reported on December 1 of the prior fiscal year, into the annual appropriation provided for this purpose in the Budget Act.

State Funds (cont’d) (b) The per-pupil entitlement determined pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be multiplied by the number of pupils with low-incidence disabilities in each special education local plan area (SELPA) to determine the total funds available for each local plan.

State Funds (cont’d) (c) The Superintendent shall apportion the amount determined pursuant to subdivision (b) to the special education local plan area for purposes of providing special education and related services as required under the individualized education program for each pupil with low-incidence disabilities.

Definition of Low Incidence Disability means a severe disabling condition with an expected incidence rate of less than one percent of the total statewide enrollment in kindergarten through grade 12.

Definition of Low Incidence Disability (cont’d) For purposes of this definition, severe disabling conditions are hearing impairments, vision impairments, and severe orthopedic impairments, or any combination thereof.  For purposes of this definition, vision impairments do not include disabilities within the function of vision specified in Section 56338.

2012-13 Funds The 2012-13 budget included $15,195,000 for low incidence funding. The funds were from two separate budget line items. One line item was for specialized equipment, books and materials. The second line item was for specialized services.

2012-13 Funds (cont’d) Of the funds appropriated in Schedule (1), up to $13,208,000, plus any cost-of-living adjustment, shall be available for the purchase, repair, and inventory maintenance of specialized books, materials, and equipment for pupils with low-incidence disabilities, as defined in Section 56026.5 of the Education Code.* *These funds went to SELPAs as an apportionment.

2012-13 Funds (cont’d) Of the funds appropriated in Schedule (1), up to $1,700,000 shall be used to provide specialized services to pupils with low-incidence disabilities, as defined in Section 56026.5 of the Education Code.* *These funds went to SELPAs as grants to SELPAs. SELPAs reporting 25 or fewer students were considered Sparse SELPAs.

2013-14 State Funds …up to $17,226,000, shall be available to provide special education and related services to students with low-incidence disabilities pursuant to their Individualized Education Program.* All of these funds will go to SELPAs as an apportionment. There will be no more grants.

2013-14 New Language Special education local plan areas (SELPAs) shall use up to $2,100,000 of these funds ($17,226,000) for career technical education or services for students with low-incidence disabilities. This will be included in the apportionment going to SELPAs.

Removal of Language In the past the legislation indicated that SELPAs should share the equipment with other SELPAs if it wasn’t currently needed. The language about SELPAs sharing equipment has been eliminated in the legislation.

Low Incidence Funding The funding is to supplement, not supplant other funding. The funding is for students with Individualized Education Programs (IEP) with low incidence disabilities reported in Disability 1 and 2 on the CASEMIS report. The funding is not to be used for students with 504 plans.

Role of the IEP Team 56341.1 (b) The individualized education program team shall do the following:…… (5) Consider whether the pupil requires assistive technology devices and services as defined in Section 1401(1) and (2) of Title 20 of the United States Code.

Role of the IEP Team (cont’d) (c) If, in considering the special factors described in subdivisions (a) and (b), the individualized education program team determines that a pupil needs a particular device or service, including an intervention, accommodation, or other program modification,

Role of the IEP Team (cont’d) in order for the pupil to receive a free appropriate public education (FAPE), the individualized education program team shall include a statement to that effect in the pupil's individualized education program.

Assistive Technology Services EC §§56020.5 and 56341.1 Title 5 §§3065 (b)(1) “Assistive technology (AT) service” means any service that directly assists an individual with exceptional needs in the selection or use of an assistive technology device that is educationally necessary.

AT Services (cont’d) The term includes the evaluation of the needs of an individual with exceptional needs including a functional evaluation of the individual in the individual's customary environment; coordinating and using other therapies, interventions, or services with assistive technology devices,

AT Services (cont’d) (2) Assistive technology services shall be provided only by personnel who possess a: (A) license in Physical Therapy issued by a licensing agency within the Department of Consumer Affairs, where the utilization of assistive technology services falls within the scope of practice of physical therapy as defined in Business and Professions Code section 2620 and implementing regulations; or

AT Services (cont’d) (B) license in Occupational Therapy issued by a licensing agency within the Department of Consumer Affairs; or (C) license in Speech-Language Pathology issued by a licensing agency within the Department of Consumer Affairs or a valid document, issued by the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, where the function of the assistive technology service is augmentative communication; or

AT Services (cont’d) (D) baccalaureate degree in engineering with emphasis in assistive technology; or (E) baccalaureate degree in a related field of engineering with a graduate certificate in rehabilitation technology or assistive technology; or

AT Services (cont’d) (F) certification from the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America and Assistive Technology Provider (RESNA/ATP); or (G) a certificate in assistive technology applications issued by a regionally accredited post-secondary institution; or (H) a credential that authorizes special education of physically handicapped, orthopedically handicapped, or severely handicapped pupils.

Definition of Assistive Technology Device 56020.5 "Assistive technology device," as provided in paragraph (1) of Section 1401 of Title 20 of the United States Code, means any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially without the need for modification, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve functional capabilities of an individual with exceptional needs.

Definition of AT Device (cont’d) The term does not include a medical device that is surgically implanted, or the replacement of that device.

Use of AT at Home and in Community The AT must be considered a part of the requirements for a student with an IEP to a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). The IEP should indicate if the AT is needed at home or in the community to meet the student’s educational needs.

Independent Evaluation for AT An independent AT evaluation may be requested by a parent: “If the parent disagrees with an evaluation obtained by the public agency” 34 CFR §” or, “If they believe the evaluation conducted by the agency fails to address appropriately the child’s needs”. (Letter from OSEP)

Agency Response Under § 300.504 the public agency has the right to initiate a hearing to demonstrate that its evaluation is appropriate.

Placement The process for determining the educational placement for children with low-incidence disabilities (including children who are deaf, hard of hearing, or deaf-blind) is the same process used for determining the educational placement for all children with disabilities.

Placement (cont’d) That is, each child's educational placement must be determined on an individual case-by-case basis depending on each child's unique educational needs and circumstances, rather than by the child's category of disability, and must be based on the child's IEP.

Placement (cont’d) We (ED) believe the LRE provisions are sufficient to ensure that public agencies provide low-incidence children with disabilities access to appropriate educational programming and services in the educational setting appropriate to meet the needs of the child in the LRE.

Role of CDE in the Process For low incidence funding CDE is to calculate the funding using the formula described in the budget; CDE is to ensure that students with low incidence disabilities get the services and devices described in their IEPs; CDE cannot require that these services and devices be paid for with low incidence funds.

Working Together What role should teachers of the visually impaired (TVIs) play in securing career and technical education for students with LI disabilities using LI funds? What role should TVIs play in developing and implementing the transition plan for secondary students with LI disabilities using these resources?

Special Education Consultant California Department of Education Contact Information Linda Wyatt, Ed.D. Special Education Consultant California Department of Education 916-322-3254 lwyatt@cde.ca.gov