SPS Transverse Damper System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEAM STABILITY IN SYNCHROTRONS WITH DIGITAL TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK SYSTEMS IN DEPENDENCE ON BEAM TUNES V.M. Zhabitsky Joint Institute for Nuclear Research.
Advertisements

Development of a Chromaticity measurement application using Head-Tail phase shift technique.
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
Strategy for SPS 200 MHz LLRF upgrade (1)  Each of the four cavities (2x 5 sections, 2x 4 sections):  1-T Feedback (loop around cavity and amplifier)
March 2, 2007ELC Experience with clearing voltages and solenoids at SPS damper pick-ups W. Hofle Acknowledgements PS-OP, SL-OP, SL-BI LHC-VAC, SL-HRF.
Few slides from J. Fox’ talk in last November’s LARP meeting LARP CM
Mathilde FAVIER Fellow in BE/BI/QP Mathilde FAVIER BE/BI-QPSCHOTTKY STATUS - BI DAY - December 6th
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
BBQ system Tatiana and Benoit, thanks to a lot of help from Christian Boccard, Marek Gasior and Ralph Steinhagen (BE/BI-QP)
SPS re-commissioning with beam K. Cornelis PS-SPS days.
Nominal intensity bunches ● First ramp with nominal intensity bunches suffered from an instability appearing around 1.8 TeV. ● Nominal intensity bunches.
W. Hofle LIU-SPS Meeting SPS BA2 Damper LS1 Progress and plans reported by W. Hofle LIU-SPS Meeting G. Kotzian T. Levens D. Valuch.
The Quadrupole Pick-up in the CPS -intro and progress report PPC 3 Dec 1999 A. Jansson.
High Bandwidth damper Input from W.Hölfe Acknowledgement to all collaborators at SLAC, INFN, LBNL and CERNL Presentation of recent MD results (J.Cesaratto):
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Interplay of transverse damper and crab cavities W. Hofle BE/RF/FB W. Hofle, 4th Crab Cavity Workshop16-Dec-10 Acknowledgements: RF group, G. Arduini,
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam Instruments PSB + Transfer Lines B. Mikulec, J-F. Comblin.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
Coupled-bunch oscillation feedback studies 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 20 February 2013 Many thanks to R. Garoby, S. Gilardoni, S. Hancock,
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
Experience and Perspectives of Transverse Feedback Systems for Scrubbing Thanks to: SPS OP crew and colleagues from BE-ABP and BE-RF, for their support.
LHC transverse Damper Observations versus expectations W. Hofle BE/RF/FB CERN BE-RF team for ADT L. Arnaudon, P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, G. Cipolla,
Thursday 20 th April 01:53 RCBV17.R7B2 tripped as happened few days ago: SIS intercepted. 05:54 Stable beams, 1380b, still RF problems B1, abort gap cleaning.
ADT kickers and amplifiers in tunnel point 4 of LHC, RB44 and RB46 1 W. Hofle LHC Transverse Damper LARP CM20 Napa April 8-10, 2013 LHC Transverse Damper.
07:00 Dump fil #2219, 123 pb -1 delivered. Trim TDI parking position to +/- 55 mm in the collimator BP trimmed the temperature kicker limit to 62 degrees.
RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.
W. Hofle / March 5, 2008 Extended LTC meeting 1/22 Acknowledgements: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, E. Ciapala, B. Goddard, A. Koschik, F. Killing, G.
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Transverse Damping Requirements
Status of the PS TFB Hardware Overview Machine results To be done
The SPS Transverse Damper
Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements
Summary of the dedicated MD on July 4th 50ns in SPS with nominal and low γt optics – transverse aspects T. Argyropoulos, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, A. Burov,
-9:00: Test IP transverse adjustment (CMS) and optics verification.
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Digitizers in CCR for transverse wide-band pick-ups
Summary Friday h38: Ramp down and pre-cycle.
Monday h00: Ramp 10 A/s (chromaticity, crossing angle non-closure, beta-beating): At 7m and 3.5m, put in one by one crossing angles, calculated.
Transverse Feedback System (LHC Damper)
Saturday 09:40 Stable beams #1369 (56 bunch scheme)
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Wednesday /Thursday 09-11:00 Verification of the LSS6 interlocked BPMs: took longer to fill due to some problems with RF cavities in the PS. In the mean.
The SPS 800 MHz RF system E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF
Wednesday Morning 8: :30 end of fill study - octupole polarity inversion (Elias, Tatiana, Alexey, Georges, …): Goal: study the effect of the.
Summary of Week 16 G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
Lost at 12:05 to power converter (RTQX2.R1) problem
Limits on damping times
The LHC25ns cycle in the PS Triple splitting after 2nd injection
Monday Morning – recovery from cryo.
Monday February 28th 8h00: Injection
Friday 11/5 08:00 RF communication problem solved. Ready to inject but beam not available from the injectors. Injection line collimators opened from 4.5.
450 GeV Initial Commissioning with Pilot Beam - Beam Instrumentation
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
Wednesday 10:00 test of the un-squeeze to 90 m at 4 TeV.
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Thursday Fill 1364 (24 bunch) dumped at 07h
Thursday 04/11 - Morning Access until ~13:00 Pre-cycle Proton checks:
Collective effects in the SPS and LHC (longitudinal plane)
Summary Tuesday h23: Machine closed. Precycle started.
Wednesday 23/2 Thanks CRYO!!!.
Wednesday 6th April Injection of 50 ns up to 108 bunches (3 x 36).
Wednesday h18: 228b fill lost just before start of ramp.
RF Parameters Calculation for JLEIC Colliders (e Ring)
Feedbacks & Stabilization Getting them going
Wednesday :35 : Beam lost because of trip of RCBXH3.L1
Daniel, Gianluca and Belen (for the Collimator team)
Presentation transcript:

SPS Transverse Damper System

Overview What is it used for ? How does it work ? Control and Diagnostics Electronic details

What is it used for ? Damping of transverse injection errors Feedback: to cure transverse coupled bunch instabilities Excitation of transverse oscillations for beam measurements (Multi-Q) and increase of emittance (blow up)

How does it work ? A feedback loop including : Pick-ups (2.04 => 2.15) Associated by pairs according to the beam type A Low Level part (Signal process + Pick-up Mixing + Low Level) 4 “electrostatic” kickers (H1, H2, V1 and V2) H1, H2 and V1 Installed in LSS2- V2 installed in LSS2+

Feedback Loop Beam Position deflector monitor BEAM Low Level + - Low Level Surface – BA2

Association of the Pick-ups 2.04 2.06 H plane LHC 2.08 2.10 - Ions (before) 2.12 2.14 Fix Target 2.05 2.07 V plane 2.09 2.11 2.13 2.15 Used as spares

The Pick-ups (position monitors) BDH 2.04 BDV 2.05  Shared with BI (MOPOS) but specific electronics

Block Diagram (H1 & H2)

Simplified Block Diagram (H1 & H2) 2 pick-ups 2.12 & 2.14 Fixed Target beam Closed orbit suppr. Delay adjust. Pick-ups Mixing Betatron phase adjust. Timing ON/OFF External excitation Damper H1 BDH 214.37 ( ) D Gain LSA Level adjust. S Level adjust. 2 pick-ups 2.04 & 2.06 LHC beam Closed orbit suppr. Delay adjust. Timing ON/OFF External excitation Damper H2 BDH 214.51 ( ) D Gain LSA Level adjust. S Level adjust.

The electrostatic kickers BDH 214.37 (H1) BDH 214.51 (H2) BDV 214.57 (V1) BDV 221.76 (V2)  LSS 2 +  LSS 2 -

Control and Diagnostics Control  New RF Control Application (MMI)  Trim Editor Application (LSA) Diagnostics  Oasis Application Compare with reference signals

New RF Control Application More ergonomic All parameters readable Role based access to change settings Synoptic : Experts view / Simplified view for Operation

Block Diagram (H1 & H2) 2.12 & 2.14 2.04 & 2.06 timing timing Multi-Q New MMI LSA 2.12 & 2.14 LSA New MMI 2.04 & 2.06 timing timing Multi-Q

Dampers H1 & H2 (simplified) 2 pick-ups 2.12 & 2.14 Fixed Target beam Level adjust ‘DGCA’ Pick-ups Mixing ‘DPUM’ - p.u. select - Polarity Phase Betatron phase adjust. Closed orbit suppr. (Notch Filter) Delay adjust. Timing ON/OFF External excitation Damper H1 BDH 214.37 ( ) D Gain LSA Level adjust ‘DGCA’ S 2 pick-ups 2.04 & 2.06 LHC beam Closed orbit suppr. (Notch Filter) Delay adjust. Timing ON/OFF External excitation Damper H2 BDH 214.51 ( ) Level adjust ‘DGCA’ D Gain LSA Level adjust ‘DGCA’ S - Controlled by the new MMI application - Controlled by LSA (Trim Editor Application)

Diagnostics Observation with OASIS Application: Delta : difference between the signals of one pick-up (= not normalised transverse position of the beam  position * Intensity) Sum : sum of the signals of one pick-up (= intensity of the beam) Input : signal leaving the low level Plates : voltage of the kicker’s plates (= delta signal between the two plates)

Diagnostics Delta Sum Input Plates

Diagnostics 2.13V and 2.15V (CNGS beam – Damper V) Delta signals + BCT (100ms/div) 2.13V and 2.15V (CNGS beam – Damper V)

Diagnostics 2.13V and 2.15V (CNGS beam – Damper V) Sum signals (100ms/div) 2.13V and 2.15V (CNGS beam – Damper V)

Diagnostics Input V2 and Plates V2 signals (100ms/div)

Diagnostics Observation Diagnostic - Damper Trip - Reset and restart - No signals from the Pick-ups (Δ and Σ) - Bad contact in the tunnel - Problem pre-ampli alimentation - Phase error on an ‘Input‘ signal - MMI datas corrupted (software error) - Amplitude difference between 2 ‘Plates’ signals of the same plane - Power Problem Damping too long - Bad damping - Need more gain (Trim Editor) Wolfgang’s settings Bad Tune

Few more details.. How the signals are treated in the electronic part of the system ?

2.04 D and 2.06 D – H plane (LHC Beam - Single Bunch, scope in SR4)

 Betatron phase advance between p.u. and the kicker has to be = 90° Pick-up Mixing Main * cos F Aux * sin F  Betatron phase advance between p.u. and the kicker has to be = 90°

Vector sum = Main*cos F + Aux*sin F Pick-up Mixing Vector sum Aux. pu D F Main pu D Vector sum = Main*cos F + Aux*sin F  Betatron phase adjustment is done by combining 2 “orthogonal” (~ 88°) signals with good signs and good ratios

After Pick-up Mixing

Low Level Notch Filter does the difference between 2 turns  delete the closed orbit Delay is to ensure that the signal arrives at the kicker at the right time (right bunch) (Delay = Dt + temps de vol du signal) LSA Gain to be adjusted with the Energy of the Beam (damping time & losses)

After closed orbit suppression

Before & after Notch

Feedback Loop Beam Position deflector monitor BEAM Low Level Surface – BA2 1st turn: Measurements only 2nd turn: Meas + correct but with orbit offset 3rd turn: Correction OK