Hiroshi Itou, Sachiko Muramatsu, Yasuo Shirakihara, Hiroyuki Araki 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Advertisements

The Structure of a Bcl-xL/Bim Fragment Complex
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
The Structure of a Bcl-xL/Bim Fragment Complex
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Conformational Flexibility in the Multidrug Efflux System Protein AcrA
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Zhiqiang Hou, Lijing Su, Jimin Pei, Nick V. Grishin, Hong Zhang 
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
A YidC-like Protein in the Archaeal Plasma Membrane
Recognition of AT-Rich DNA Binding Sites by the MogR Repressor
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Zhiqiang Hou, Lijing Su, Jimin Pei, Nick V. Grishin, Hong Zhang 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Structural Insights into RIP3-Mediated Necroptotic Signaling
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Conformational Flexibility in the Multidrug Efflux System Protein AcrA
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Crystal Structure of the Homology Domain of the Eukaryotic DNA Replication Proteins Sld3/Treslin  Hiroshi Itou, Sachiko Muramatsu, Yasuo Shirakihara, Hiroyuki Araki  Structure  Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 1341-1347 (September 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2014.07.001 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2014 22, 1341-1347DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Amino Acid Sequence Alignment and the Crystal Structure of the Homology Domain Shared by Sld3/Treslin Family Proteins (A) Alignment of the Sld3/Treslin domain from fungal Sld3 (SACCE: S. cerevisiae; KLULA: Kluyveromyces lactis; ASHGO: Ashbya gossypii; SCHPO: Schizosaccharomyces pombe; SCHOY: Schizosaccharomyces octosporus; ASPFU: Aspergillus fumigatus) and Treslin/Ticrr from vertebrates (HUMAN: Homo sapiens; MOUSE: Mus musculus; DANRE: Danio rerio;and XENLA: Xenopus laevis) is shown. Hyphens indicate deletions. CLUSTAL W (Larkin et al., 2007) was used to create the initial alignment, and it was further aligned to match the secondary structures of Sld3/Treslin proteins predicted using the Phyre2 structure prediction server (Kelley and Sternberg, 2009) to that of Sld3-CBD determined by the crystal structure. The secondary structure of human Treslin predicted by the server and that of Sld3-CBD determined by the crystal structure in this study are indicated below and above the alignment, respectively. Dashed lines in the secondary structure of Sld3-CBD indicate disordered regions in the crystal. The conserved (∗) and the conserved change (: and.) amino acids are marked below the alignment and also colored in red, green, and blue. The numbers in parentheses beside the sequences indicate residue numbers of each protein, and the residue numbers of S. cerevisiae Sld3 is indicated above the alignment. The conserved region found in the structurally disordered region (residue numbers 301–330 in S. cerevisiae Sld3) is highlighted with a yellow box. Positions of the amino acid substitutions in the mutations that showed temperature-sensitive (TS) growth identified from S. cerevisiae (sld3-4: Arg269Cys+ Asp578Gly; sld3-5: Gly125Asp+ Phe170Ser; sld3-7: Leu176Pro; and sld3-8: Pro407Leu) (Kamimura et al., 2001) are highlighted with magenta boxes, and those from S. pombe (Sp sld3-10: Glu338Gly; Sp sld3-41: Ser153Leu+ Leu309Pro; and Sp sld3-52: Trp310Arg) (Nakajima and Masukata, 2002) are highlighted with orange boxes. The regions necessary for binding with Cdc45, suggested by yeast two-hybrid analysis (Tanaka et al., 2011b), are shown with magenta lines above the alignment. The basic residues conserved near the presumed Cdc45-binding interface and forming the positively charged region are highlighted with sky-blue boxes. (B) Ribbon representations of the crystal structure of Sld3-CBD. The atomic model from Tyr154 to Ser421 was obtained. The structure for the regions Glu295-Asp337 and Pro362-Asn371 could not be placed because of poor electron density caused by structural disorder. The crystallographic asymmetric unit contained three Sld3-CBD molecules. Views of the molecule are from the direction perpendicular (top panel) and coaxial (bottom panel) to the backbone helix H7. The top panel shows the presumed Cdc45-binding interface suggested by genetic analyses (Kamimura et al., 2001; Tanaka et al., 2011b). The amino acids substituted in the TS mutants sld3-4, sld3-5, sld3-7, and sld3-8 (Kamimura et al., 2001) and in Sp sld3-10, Sp sld3-41, and Sp sld3-52 (Nakajima and Masukata, 2002) and the conserved basic amino acids forming the basic patch are shown in magenta, orange, and sky blue, respectively, in the space-filling model. The representations of the protein tertiary structure in this figure were generated using PyMOL (Schrödinger). (C) Surface-charge representation of Sld3-CBD. The direction of view is the same as in (B). The surface electric potential was calculated using APBS (Baker et al., 2001). Blue and red on the molecular surface show the positively and negatively charged regions, respectively. Structure 2014 22, 1341-1347DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Analyses of the Interaction between Sld3 and Cdc45 (A) Sld3-CBD (Ser148-Lys430, molecular mass 33.1 kDa) and the full-length Cdc45 (molecular mass 74.2 kDa) were coexpressed in E. coli. Sld3-CBD was purified using a His tag connected to it. The lanes are labeled as follows, M, molecular weight markers; ppt, insoluble fraction from the cell extract; sup, lysate of the cell extract; UB, unbound fraction from Ni-affinity chromatography; WS, fraction washed from the Ni-affinity resin;, EL, eluate from the Ni-affinity resin. In this analysis, the eluted fraction (lane EL) was further purified using size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) to remove free Sld3-CBD (Figure S2). (B) The lysate of the cell extract (input) and the eluate from the Ni-affinity resin were analyzed using immunoblotting using anti-Sld3 (red) and anti-Cdc45 (green) antibodies (Tanaka et al., 2011a). The interaction between the mutated Sld3-CBD and Cdc45 was also analyzed in vitro using the purified proteins (Figure S3). (C) The plasmids YEp195CDC45 (high-copy plasmid expressing Cdc45; positive control), YEp195 (vector only; negative control), and YEp195SLD3 (high-copy plasmid expressing Sld3) were transformed into cdc45Δ::LEU2 bearing YCp22cdc45 (D2N) and incubated at the indicated temperature for 3 days. (D) The plasmids YEp195SLD3 (high-copy plasmid expressing Sld3; positive control), YEp195 (vector only; negative control), and YEp195CDC45 (high-copy plasmid expressing Cdc45) were transformed into sld3Δ::LEU2 bearing YCp22sld3 (Δ301–330) and incubated at the indicated temperature for 2 days. Structure 2014 22, 1341-1347DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Analysis of the Interaction between Cdc45 and the Conserved Structurally Flexible Region of Sld3-CBD The purified Cdc45 protein was mixed with various His-tagged versions of GST (negative control), Sld3-CBD (positive control), and Sld3 peptide (residues 296–332), and the His-tagged proteins were collected using Ni-affinity resin. The lanes are labeled as follows: M, molecular weight marker; UB, unbound fraction from the Ni-affinity resin; EL, eluate from the Ni-affinity resin. Structure 2014 22, 1341-1347DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Model of Sld3-Cdc45 Complex Our results suggest that Sld3-CBD is sufficient for binding with Cdc45. Sld3-CBD has two binding segments for the interaction: the conserved structurally flexible region and the convex surface suggested by genetic analyses (Kamimura et al., 2001; Tanaka et al., 2011b). The former is indicated to interact with the acidic concave surface of the Cdc45 core region, and the latter is expected to interact with the lateral extension of Cdc45. These extensive interactions through two spatially separated segments may induce conformational changes in Cdc45 to enable it to bind to the Mcm2-7 complex. Structure 2014 22, 1341-1347DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions