School and District Report Cards Validation WebEx Jon Wiens Office of Assessment Oregon Department of Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AYP Changes for 2007 K-20 Videoconference June 11, 2007 Presented by: JoLynn Berge OSPI Federal Policy Coordinator.
Advertisements

Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
TETN Accountability Update Session June 18, 2009.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
Accountability Reporting Webinar Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Determinations & Federal NCLB Accountability Status, State Accountability & Assistance.
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
ASSESSMENT UPDATE Rhonda Sims, Director Division of Support and Research Office Of Assessment And Accountability
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF) Clark County School District.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
Preparing for Cycle III School and District Accountability Ratings and AYP Determinations Information Sessions August 26 & 27, 2004 Juliane Dow, Associate.
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
October Overview What is the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Waiver? What are priority, focus and model schools? What.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens, Assessment and Accountability Greg Houser, Student Learning and Partnerships Oregon Department.
September 12, 2013 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Nevada Transitioning from measuring status and reporting AYP, to measuring growth and reporting on School Performance.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
1 Student Longitudinal Growth Project Jonathan Wiens Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens and Sara Berscheit Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate April 5, 2010 Jonathan Wiens, Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Communication Webinar:
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Required Training for District Testing Coordinators
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
2012 Accountability Determinations
AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.
AYP and Report Card.
New Statewide Accountability System
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
AYP and Report Card.
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Presentation transcript:

School and District Report Cards Validation WebEx Jon Wiens Office of Assessment Oregon Department of Education

Changes to the Report Card Disaggregated cohort and NCES graduation rates on the summary sheets. Disaggregated cohort and NCES graduation rates on the summary sheets. Attendance for uses 3 rd period ADM. Attendance for uses 3 rd period ADM. Participation rating now includes Science participation. Participation rating now includes Science participation.

Report Card Timeline Sept 91 st Preview of Summary sheets and unsuppressed details Sept 16 SAT validation closes. Sept 232 nd Preview Sept 30 3 rd Preview. All appeals due. Oct 5Final district preview Oct 6District and media webinars Oct 7Public Release

Report Card Overview The main report card includes a lot of data. The main report card includes a lot of data. Much of this was validated prior to September 9. Much of this was validated prior to September 9. We are correcting several formatting errors and reposting on Sept 16 th. We are correcting several formatting errors and reposting on Sept 16 th. Sept 16 th repost will include state and national SAT data. Sept 16 th repost will include state and national SAT data.

RC Validations Here is partial list of RC Validations: ValidationOpenedClosed NCES Graduation (High School Completers)Mar 4Apr 2 Dropout Rate (Early Leavers)Mar 4Apr 2 General FundApr 29May 28 ESD SupportApr 29May 28 Bond LevelApr 29May 28 Videoconferencing FacilitiesApr 29May 28 Classes taught by Highly Qualified TeachersJun 3Jun 24 Emergency CertificationJun 3Jun 24 Spring MembershipJun 8Jul 23 AttendanceJun 8Jul 23

RC Validations (contd) ValidationOpenedClosed School Size6/87/23 Students attending from/in another district6/87/23 English Language Learners6/87/23 Expulsions due to Weapons7/87/15 School Personnel7/88/13 Class Size (elementary)7/88/13 SAT Scores9/99/16 Report Card detail and summary sheets9/99/30

How to Validate Log into the secure ode district site. Log into the secure ode district site. Choose Applications Choose Applications Select Report Card/AYP Select Report Card/AYP Select one of: Select one of: –School and District Report Card PDF –School Report Card Detail PDF –SAT Scores: note that the SAT data we receive from the college board is the latest test for the student, not the highest test.

School Report Card Summary Data Elements

School at a Glance -- HS

School at a Glance -- Elem

School at a Glance – data details Number of Students – based on average daily membership from 3 rd period cumulative ADM. Excludes program type 02 and 03 Number of Students – based on average daily membership from 3 rd period cumulative ADM. Excludes program type 02 and 03 SAT scores – collected directly from the college board SAT scores – collected directly from the college board Attendance – is from 3 rd period cumulative ADM. Uses only program type 01 Attendance – is from 3 rd period cumulative ADM. Uses only program type 01 Participation – based on reading, math, writing AND science at all tested grades. Participation – based on reading, math, writing AND science at all tested grades. Graduation Rate – both the old NCES rate and the new cohort rate are shown. Graduation Rate – both the old NCES rate and the new cohort rate are shown.

Achievement Data

The Academic Achievement charts use AYP reporting rules: –Students resident at the school on May 3 –Full Academic Year –1% flags for extended assessments The Improvement chart uses: –Percent meeting or meeting growth targets –High schools show graduation rates. Next year this will show four- and five-year cohort rate data. Data is suppressed if –Fewer than 6 students –Greater than 95% met –Less than 5% met –Graduation data is not suppressed Writing at Grades 4 and 7 is not displayed

Statewide Assessment Results

The Student Achievement chart uses PAGR reporting rules: –All students resident at the school on May 3, no full academic year required –All extended assessments are not met –Transitioning LEP students are not included in LEP subgroup Data is suppressed if –Fewer than 6 students –Greater than 95% met, in which case both the meets and exceeds columns show >95.0 –Less than 5% met, in which case both the meets and exceeds columns show < 5.0 The Student Participation table has: –PAGR participation rates Science staging is open, so results may differ slightly from PAGR.

Account- ability Information

Accountability Information Shows the AYP met/not met status at your school. Shows the AYP met/not met status at your school. The order of subgroups differs from the AYP report, but is consistent with earlier pages of the RC. The order of subgroups differs from the AYP report, but is consistent with earlier pages of the RC. This page also contains the local information panel. This page also contains the local information panel.

District Report Card Summary Data Elements

Front Page The first page of the district report card shows: District AYP status District AYP status Report Card rating for each school in the district, and the AYP school improvement status for each school. Report Card rating for each school in the district, and the AYP school improvement status for each school.

District Information

Bar charts show grade by grade percent met according to AYP rules: –Students resident in the district on May 3 –Full Academic year within the district –1 percent cap Data is suppressed if –Fewer than 6 students –Greater than 95% met –Less than 5% met Writing at Grade 4 and 7 is not displayed

District Information Participation includes reading, math, science and writing Participation includes reading, math, science and writing Attendance is from 3 rd period ADM Attendance is from 3 rd period ADM HQT High Poverty and Low Poverty schools are in the highest and lowest quartiles for FRL percent in the state. HQT High Poverty and Low Poverty schools are in the highest and lowest quartiles for FRL percent in the state. HQT and Emergency Cert Data utilizes data from the TSPC HQT and Emergency Cert Data utilizes data from the TSPC

Statewide Assess- ment Results

Statewide Assessment Results The Student Achievement chart uses PAGR reporting rules: –All students resident in the district on May 3, no full academic year required –All extended assessments are not met –Transitioning LEP students are not included in LEP subgroup Data is suppressed if –Fewer than 6 students –Greater than 95% met, in which case both the meets and exceeds columns show >95.0 –Less than 5% met, in which case both the meets and exceeds columns show < 5.0 The Student Participation table has: –PAGR participation rates Science staging is open, so results may differ slightly from PAGR.

Account- ability Information

Accountability Information District AYP status. Note that all grade bands have been combined. District AYP status. Note that all grade bands have been combined. NAEP Results. NAEP does not provide scores for districts or schools. NAEP Results. NAEP does not provide scores for districts or schools. Financial Data. Note that this is for Financial Data. Note that this is for

Report Card Detail Sheets and School Rating Formula

Rating Components Achievement Achievement –An index that utilizes growth and weights students in underperforming subgroups Improvement (high schools only) Improvement (high schools only) –The two-year improvement in the performance index Attendance or Graduation Attendance or Graduation Participation Participation –Includes reading, math, writing, AND science AYP Status AYP Status

Detail Sheet Cover Page

The Achievement Index Utilizes the Growth model Utilizes the Growth model –Students not meeting in the prior year are given a growth target for the current year. Those students whose score is at or above their growth target will have Met Growth Points awarded according to: Points awarded according to: –133 points for Exceeds –100 points for Meets –100 points for Did Not Meet, but Met Growth –0 points for Did Not Meet and did not meet growth Use the same students as are used for AYP Use the same students as are used for AYP –includes extended assessments –includes the 1% cap for extended assessments

Weighting of Subgroups To address the Achievement Gap, a schools Achievement Index is a weighted average of the achievement those in subgroups with an historic statewide achievement gap. To address the Achievement Gap, a schools Achievement Index is a weighted average of the achievement those in subgroups with an historic statewide achievement gap. The weighting of subgroups does not provide extra credit to schools with students in the subgroups. The weighting of subgroups does not provide extra credit to schools with students in the subgroups. Schools with significant achievement gaps will see a negative impact on their achievement index. Schools with significant achievement gaps will see a negative impact on their achievement index. Schools in which subgroups are outperforming the all students subgroup will see a positive impact on their index. Schools in which subgroups are outperforming the all students subgroup will see a positive impact on their index.

The Achievement Index Subgroups included in the weighted index: Subgroups included in the weighted index: –All Students –Students with disabilities –Limited English proficient –Economically Disadvantaged –American Indian/Alaskan Native –Black (not of Hispanic origin) –Hispanic Achievement Index Cut-scores OutstandingSatisfactory In Need of Improvement Elementary/Middle 90.0 or Higher 60.0 to 89.9 Less than 60.0 High Schools 80.0 or Higher 50.0 to 79.9 Less than 50.0

Detail Sheet - Achievement

Improvement (High Schools) Since high school students do not have growth targets, we measure improvement in high schools as the year to year improvement in student performance. Since high school students do not have growth targets, we measure improvement in high schools as the year to year improvement in student performance. Schools with an Improved rating will have their achievement rating raised by one category. Schools with an Improved rating will have their achievement rating raised by one category.

Detail Sheets: Improvement Index for High Schools

Improvement - Example

Other Indicators Graduation: High Schools with a two-year total of at least 20 graduates and dropouts Graduation: High Schools with a two-year total of at least 20 graduates and dropouts Cohort rates have been included for information only. They will be included in the rating next year. Cohort rates have been included for information only. They will be included in the rating next year. Attendance: Elementary/Middle schools and high schools with small numbers of graduates/dropouts Attendance: Elementary/Middle schools and high schools with small numbers of graduates/dropouts All schools are rated on participation in reading, math, writing AND science. All schools are rated on participation in reading, math, writing AND science.

Other Indicators The ratings for these other indicators can limit a schools overall rating, as shown below. The ratings for these other indicators can limit a schools overall rating, as shown below. Limit for Overall Rating Indicator In Need of Improvement SatisfactoryOutstanding Graduation Less than to or Higher Attendance Less than to or Higher Participation Less than or Higher

Detail Sheets: Additional Indicators

Calculating the Overall Rating 1. The preliminary school rating is the Achievement Rating 2. If the Attendance/Graduation or Participation ratings are lower than the Achievement Rating, reduce the overall rating to the lowest of these two ratings 3. If the school received a Met on AYP, the school can be rated no lower than Satisfactory. This step overrides any prior designation of In Need of Improvement

Overall Rating - Example

Resources Main Report Card Page Main Report Card Page Report Card Manuals Report Card Manuals Report Card Calculators and How to Reads Report Card Calculators and How to Reads Longitudinal Student Growth Model: Longitudinal Student Growth Model: