Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci for Seed Coat Cracking from Two Soybean Populations. Sung-Taeg Kang*1, Hyeun-Kyeung Kim2, Min-Jung Seo1, Jung-Kyung.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning breeding programs for impact
Advertisements

MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION Individuals carrying the trait of interest are selected based on a marker which is linked to the trait and not on the trait itself.
Potato Mapping / QTLs Amir Moarefi VCR
Cameron Peace, Washington State University
GENETICS AND VARIABILITY IN CROP PLANTS. Genetics and variability of traits are grouped by:  Qualitative traits Traits that show variability that can.
Association Mapping as a Breeding Strategy
Qualitative and Quantitative traits
Chapter 6: Quantitative traits, breeding value and heritability Quantitative traits Phenotypic and genotypic values Breeding value Dominance deviation.
Molecular Mapping of Seed Tocopherols in Soybean HEINRICH S. WOHLESER 1, YUKIO KAKUDA 2, and ISTVAN RAJCAN 3 1 University of Guelph, Department of Plant.
Mapping Autotetraploid Alfalfa Joseph G. Robins and E. Charles Brummer.
Backcross Breeding.
Update on the NSA SNP project Dr. Venkatramana Pedagaraju – Molecular Breeding and Genomics Technology Manager Dr. Brent Hulke -- Research Geneticist.
QTL Mapping R. M. Sundaram.
Quantitative Genetics Up until now, we have dealt with characters (actually genotypes) controlled by a single locus, with only two alleles: Discrete Variation.
Quantitative Genetics Theoretical justification Estimation of heritability –Family studies –Response to selection –Inbred strain comparisons Quantitative.
Statistical association of genotype and phenotype.
MCMC-Based Linkage Analysis for Complex Traits on General Pedigrees: Multipoint Analysis With a Two-Locus Model and a Polygenic Component Yun Ju Sung Elizabeth.
Quantitative Genetics
Mapping Basics MUPGRET Workshop June 18, Randomly Intermated P1 x P2  F1  SELF F …… One seed from each used for next generation.
Identification of Elemental Processes Controlling Genetic Variation in Soybean Seed Composition José L. Rotundo, Silvia Cianzio & Mark Westgate Iowa State.
GENOMIC MAPPING FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN SORGHUM Introduction Drought is a major abiotic factor limiting crop production. Sorghum is one of the most drought.
Module 7: Estimating Genetic Variances – Why estimate genetic variances? – Single factor mating designs PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding.
Methods of Genome Mapping linkage maps, physical maps, QTL analysis The focus of the course should be on analytical (bioinformatic) tools for genome mapping,
Genetic Mapping Oregon Wolfe Barley Map (Szucs et al., The Plant Genome 2, )
Course on Biostatistics Instructors – Dr. Małgorzata Bogdan Dr. David Ramsey Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science Wrocław University of Technology.
Figure S1. Rust disease responses of parents of the mapping populations, ICSV745 (a), R (b), IS8525 (c), R (d) and S. bicolor subsp.
Genotyping and association analysis of Gossypium hirsutum lines for resistance in Reniform Nematodes Megha V. Sharma*, Stella Kantartzi, David Weaver,
Dr. Scott Sebastian, Research Fellow, Pioneer Hi-Bred International Plant Breeding Seminar at University of California Davis Accelerated Yield.
Experimental Design and Data Structure Supplement to Lecture 8 Fall
Quantitative Genetics. Continuous phenotypic variation within populations- not discrete characters Phenotypic variation due to both genetic and environmental.
Quantitative Genetics
Discovery of a rare arboreal forest-dwelling flying reptile (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea) from China Wang et al. PNAS Feb. 11, 2008.
MOLECULAR MAPPING OF LEAF CUTICULAR WAXES IN WHEAT S. MONDAL, R.E. MASON, F. BEECHER AND D.B.HAYS TEXAS A& M UNIVERSITY, DEPT. OF SOIL & CROP SCIENCES,
Marker Assisted Selection in Soybean Brian Diers University of Illinois.
Lecture 23: Quantitative Traits III Date: 11/12/02  Single locus backcross regression  Single locus backcross likelihood  F2 – regression, likelihood,
Chapter 22 - Quantitative genetics: Traits with a continuous distribution of phenotypes are called continuous traits (e.g., height, weight, growth rate,
IV. Variation in Quantitative Traits A. Quantitative Effects.
Quantitative Genetics as it Relates to Plant Breeding PLS 664 Spring 2011 D. Van Sanford.
Comparative mapping of Brassica oleracea using sequence-based markers derived from other Brassica relatives and transcriptome sequences generated from.
Jinkwan Jo1, Jelli Venkatesh1, Koeun Han1 and Byoung-Cheorl Kang1*
Fall HORT6033 Molecular Plant Breeding
Moukoumbi, Y. D1. , R. Yunus2, N. Yao3, M. Gedil1, L. Omoigui1 and O
Genotypic and Phenotypic Variance in Soybean Oil
Comparative mapping of the Oregon Wolfe Barley using doubled haploid lines derived from female and male gametes L. Cistue, A. Cuesta-Marcos, S. Chao, B.
MULTIPLE GENES AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS
Box 9.1 History of Conservation Genetics
upstream vs. ORF binding and gene expression?
From: Will genomic selection be a practical method for plant breeding?
Genetics: Analysis and Principles
Relationship between quantitative trait inheritance and
Recombination (Crossing Over)
Backcross Breeding.
Washington State University
Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci
MULTIPLE GENES AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS
Complex Traits Qualitative traits. Discrete phenotypes with direct Mendelian relationship to genotype. e.g. black or white, tall or short, sick or healthy.
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Linkage analysis and genetic mapping
Genetics.
QTL Fine Mapping by Measuring and Testing for Hardy-Weinberg and Linkage Disequilibrium at a Series of Linked Marker Loci in Extreme Samples of Populations 
Washington State University
Lecture 9: QTL Mapping II: Outbred Populations
Chapter 7 Beyond alleles: Quantitative Genetics
Evan G. Williams, Johan Auwerx  Cell 
Modes of selection.
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (July 2012)
Flowering-time QTL in crosses of Lz-0 with Ler and Col.
M. D. Jasani, J. H. Kamdar, A. K. Maurya and S. K. Bera
Fig. 1. Summary of linkage analysis and congenic strain
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci for Seed Coat Cracking from Two Soybean Populations. Sung-Taeg Kang*1, Hyeun-Kyeung Kim2, Min-Jung Seo1, Jung-Kyung Moon1 , Hong-Tae Yun*1, Suk-Ki Lee1 , Yeong-Ho Lee1, Si-Ju Kim1 1 National Institute of Crop Science, RDA, 209 Seodun-Dong, Kwonsun-Gu, Suwon, 441-857, Republic of Korea 2 Busan National University Hospital, Medical Research Institute, 10 ami-dong 1ga Busan, 602-739, Republic of Korea INTRODUCTION MATERIALS & METHODS Seed Coat Cracking (SCC) showing cracks in the surface of seed coat, causes serious effect on seed quality in soybean. However, breeding for resistance to SCC is difficult due to the complicated genetic behavior and environmental interaction. The objective of this research was to improve breeding efficiency for resistance to SCC based on DNA marker in soybean. In this study, SSR markers were used to identify the genomic regions significantly associated with the quantitative trait loci (QTL) that controls SCC in two segregating F2:11 RIL populations,'Keunolkong' /'Shinpaldal kong’ (K/S) and 'Keunolkong' / 'Iksan10' (K/I). The two populations were phenotyped at two locations in Suwon and Yeoncheon, Korea. Material : F2 derived F11 RILs , 2 populations - 117 Keunolkong / Shinpaldalkong, 115 Keunolkong/Iksan10 Field experiment Location (year) : Suwon (2005), Yeoncheon (2005) Plot arrangement : Randomized Complete Block Design with Two Rep. Traits : SCC, Flowering (R1), Maturity (R7) DNA marker analysis : PCR, Silver-Staining(or Agarose) - Linkage mapping : Mapmanager Macintosh program (LOD 3.0) - QTL analysis : SAS program (v. 9.1) satt276 0.0 satt050 28.5 satt385 48.9 satt545 61.3 satt236 86.0 1 A1 satt177 satt187 54.3 A2 satt411 satt212 20.1 satt151 57.4 satt045 satt263 74.1 satt204 76.8 satt268 79.1 satt117 84.0 satt483 89.8 satt185 102.0 satt231 133.3 satt553 174.7 2 3 E satt596 satt287 38.8 satt285 44.6 sct065 78.5 satt132 81.1 satt529 86.7 satt406 91.4 satt183 109.5 satt215 121.3 satt547 171.3 J satt173 satt592 30.0 satt243 O satt197 B1 satt184 satt580 50.0 satt147 95.5 D1a satt216 satt157 21.4 satt266 40.6 satt537 59.8 satt189 73.9 satt506 79.4 satt141 83.9 satt350 90.7 satt546 104.4 satt172 115.4 satt274 129.3 satt459 137.6 D1b satt571 satt496 20.0 satt292 52.1 satt148 81.8 satt440 111.5 I satt137 satt417 10.2 satt167 14.0 satt260 41.8 satt196 60.8 K satt495 satt238 18.9 satt398 33.7 satt278 45.7 satt418 61.7 satt313 77.7 sct010 97.6 satt166 109.0 satt229 120.8 satt513 136.9 satt373 139.8 L satt100 satt460 4.7 C2 satt453 41.5 8.0 satt371 45.9 satt160 satt114 57.7 satt335 74.0 satt554 114.9 F satt590 satt567 13.4 satt245 30.3 satt175 43.4 satt336 M satt108 60.7 9.4 12.3 satt414 16.1 satt380 19.8 27.5 sct_001 41.0 satt431 75.6 125.6 satt458 satt014 9.6 satt372 22.0 satt154 37.1 satt397 65.6 satt389 78.7 satt226 sat_022 123.9 D2 satt577 satt126 33.3 satt556 81.5 satt020 86.5 satt066 92.8 satt063 105.5 B2 satt296 45.5 61.4 91.3 105.2 17.3 satt523 24.4 25.4 28.0 30.5 satt462 40.2 satt497 54.6 sct_010 82.8 satt076 86.4 satt527 91.9 92.9 115.0 133.5 - POP1 : Keunolkong / Shinpaldalkong - POP2 : Keunolkong / Iksan10 Flowering Maturity ’05, Suwon ’05, Yeoncheon ’01, Milyang R2(%) 25 50 Seed Coat Cracking RESULTS Table 1. Range and means of SCC (unit: %), broad-sense heritability estimates for the parents and populations for individual environment and across two environments. Suwon Yeoncheon Over Env. Population 1 (Keunolkong x Shinpaldalkong) Population 2 (Keunolkong x Iksan 10) Parents P1 4.8 17.0 10.8 P2 0.0 1.0 0.5 Population Minimum Maximum 80.5 96.5 88.5 74.5 78.5 76.5 Mean 10.5 17.9 14.2 14.6 22.5 18.6 h2 92.6 93.5 80.9 75.6 87.5 82.8 Fig. 2. The location of QTLs associated with flowering (red), maturity (blue) and SCC(green) in two populations.  QTLs significance(R2 value) are represented with vertical bars. ① Suwon ② Yeoncheon ③ Milyang Table 2. One-way ANOVA for QTLs associated with SCC across environments in two populations Suwon Yeoncheon LG marker P R2 (%) Allelic Means AA BB Population 1 (Keunolkong x Shinpaldalkong) D1b satt172 ns  2.0  7.9  12.1  *** 10.9 10.7 25.2 satt216 ** 5.0 14.9 9.8 12.0 25.9 satt157 * 5.2 7.2 15.0 6.5 12.4 23.8 I satt496 11.1 5.1 16.2 12.3 10.1 24.9 J satt406 7.6 5.5 23.1 11.6 satt529 7.7 15.1 5.6 4.8 21.4 12.2 satt215 7.5 14.7 5.4 3.7 21.8 13.4 K satt196 7.0  13.7  7.8  9.9 25.0 O satt243 4.1 13.5 7.0 22.0 Population 2 (Keunolkong x Iksan 10) B2 satt556 5.7 9.5 17.8 16.7 26.3 11.5 8.0 20.0 26.7 D2 satt372 8.5 9.7 19.9 17.3 28.8 satt183 18.8 9.4 3.0  25.6  18.4  Population 1(Keunolkong x Shinpaldalkong) Population 2(Keunolkong x Iksan 10) Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of lines for SCC at Suwon & Yeoncheon environments in 2005. SUMMARY § Probability : *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, P < 0.05 QTLs on D1b, D2, and I were commonly associated with SCC at two locations. Especially QTL tightly linked with Satt216 on LG D1b was commonly associated with SCC across populations and locations. Results showed that major QTLs for SCC have been identified on LG D1b, D2, and I. And these major QTLs for SCC may be used for minimizing soybean SCC through effective marker-assisted selection (MAS). Corresponding Author : DR. SUNG-TAEG KANG (e-mail : kangst@rda.go.kr)