Binocular Stereo Vision

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seeing 3D from 2D Images. How to make a 2D image appear as 3D! ► Output and input is typically 2D Images ► Yet we want to show a 3D world! ► How can we.
Advertisements

Depth Cues Pictorial Depth Cues: aspects of 2D images that imply depth
COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE FINAL PROJECT – DEPTH VISION Omri Perez 2013.
Anatomy/Physiology of Binocular Vision Goals –Follow the M and P pathway out of primary visual cortex –Answer where binocularly and disparity driven cells.
December 5, 2013Computer Vision Lecture 20: Hidden Markov Models/Depth 1 Stereo Vision Due to the limited resolution of images, increasing the baseline.
The Apparatus. Seeing in Stereo It’s very hard to read words if there are multiple images on your retina.
Read Pinker article for Thurs.. Seeing in Stereo.
Contents Description of the big picture Theoretical background on this work The Algorithm Examples.
Motion Depth Cues – Motion 1. Parallax. Motion Depth Cues – Parallax.
Binocular Disparity points nearer than horopter have crossed disparity
The visual system Lecture 1: Structure of the eye
CSE473/573 – Stereo Correspondence
Reading Gregory 24 th Pinker 26 th. Seeing Depth What’s the big problem with seeing depth ?
Stereo matching “Stereo matching” is the correspondence problem –For a point in Image #1, where is the corresponding point in Image #2? C1C1 C2C2 ? ? C1C1.
1B50 – Percepts and Concepts Daniel J Hulme. Outline Cognitive Vision –Why do we want computers to see? –Why can’t computers see? –Introducing percepts.
Careers for Psychology and Neuroscience Majors Oct. 19th5-7pm in SU 300 Ballroom B.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 26 Review for Exam 2.
Chapter 5 Human Stereopsis, Fusion, and Stereoscopic Virtual Environments.
Shape from Stereo  Disparity between two images  Photogrammetry  Finding Corresponding Points Correlation based methods Feature based methods.
December 4, 2014Computer Vision Lecture 22: Depth 1 Stereo Vision Comparing the similar triangles PMC l and p l LC l, we get: Similarly, for PNC r and.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 20 Stereo, Motion.
1 Perception, Illusion and VR HNRS 299, Spring 2008 Lecture 8 Seeing Depth.
“When” rather than “Whether”: Developmental Variable Selection Melissa Dominguez Robert Jacobs Department of Computer Science University of Rochester.
CS332 Visual Processing Department of Computer Science Wellesley College Binocular Stereo Vision Region-based stereo matching algorithms Properties of.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 5 The Retina.
1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 4 Lightness, Brightness and Edges.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 6 Edge Detection.
Outline Of Today’s Discussion 1.Monocular & Binocular Depth Cues: Understanding Retinal Disparity.
Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 8 Seeing Depth
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 16 Stereopsis.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 18 Stereopsis III.
Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 17 Stereopsis II
Independent Component Analysis features of Color & Stereo images Authors: Patrik O. Hoyer Aapo Hyvarinen CIS 526: Neural Computation Presented by: Ajay.
Correspondence and Stereopsis. Introduction Disparity – Informally: difference between two pictures – Allows us to gain a strong sense of depth Stereopsis.
Careers for Psychology and Neuroscience Majors Oct. 19th5-7pm in SU 300 Ballroom B.
Exploring Spatial Frequency Channels in Stereopsis
ORTH 140 NORMAL BINOCULAR SINGLE VISION AND MOTOR FUSION
Depth Perception, with Emphasis on Stereoscopic Vision
Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2016 Lecture 15 Stereopsis
Head-Tracked Displays (HTDs)
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Inhibition of saccade and vergence eye movements in 3D space
STEREOPSIS The Stereopsis Problem: Fusion and Reconstruction
EECS 274 Computer Vision Stereopsis.
Properties of human stereo processing
Common Classification Tasks
Space Perception and Binocular Vision
Early Processing in Biological Vision
Binocular Stereo Vision
Stereopsis: How the brain sees depth
Binocular Stereo Vision
Space Perception and Binocular Vision
Perception We have previously examined the sensory processes by which stimuli are encoded. Now we will examine the ultimate purpose of sensory information.
Binocular Stereo Vision
Christopher C. Pack, Richard T. Born, Margaret S. Livingstone  Neuron 
Binocular Stereo Vision
Binocular Stereo Vision
Stereopsis Current Biology
Binocular Disparity and the Perception of Depth
Detecting image intensity changes
Syed A. Chowdhury, Gregory C. DeAngelis  Neuron 
Course 6 Stereo.
Binocular Stereo Vision
Chapter 11: Stereopsis Stereopsis: Fusing the pictures taken by two cameras and exploiting the difference (or disparity) between them to obtain the depth.
Receptive Fields of Disparity-Tuned Simple Cells in Macaque V1
Binocular Stereo Vision
--- Range Image Registration
Detection of image intensity changes
Visual Perception: One World from Two Eyes
Presentation transcript:

Binocular Stereo Vision Properties of human stereo processing Marr-Poggio-Grimson multi-resolution stereo algorithm

Properties of human stereo processing Use features for stereo matching whose position and disparity can be measured very precisely Stereoacuity is only a few seconds of visual angle difference in depth  0.01 cm at a viewing distance of 30 cm

Properties of human stereo processing Matching features must appear similar in the left and right images For example, we can’t fuse a left stereo image with a negative of the right image…

Properties of human stereo processing Only “fuse” objects within a limited range of depth around the fixation distance Vergence eye movements are needed to fuse objects over larger range of depths

Properties of human stereo vision We can only tolerate small amounts of vertical disparity at a single eye position Vertical eye movements are needed to handle large vertical disparities

Properties of human stereo processing In the early stages of visual processing, the image is analyzed at multiple spatial scales… Stereo information at multiple scales can be processed independently

Neural mechanisms for stereo processing G. Poggio & colleagues: complex cells in area V1 of primate visual cortex are selective for stereo disparity neurons that are selective for a larger disparity range have larger receptive fields zero disparity: at fixation distance near: in front of point of fixation far: behind point of fixation

In summary, some key points… Image features used for matching: simple, precise locations, multiple scales, similar between left/right images At single fixation position, match features over a limited range of horizontal & vertical disparity Eye movements used to match features over larger range of disparity Neural mechanisms selective for particular ranges of stereo disparity

Matching features for the MPG stereo algorithm zero-crossings of convolutions with 2G operators of different size L rough disparities over large range M accurate disparities over small range S

large w left large w right small w left small w right correct match outside search range at small scale

vergence eye movements! large w left right vergence eye movements! small w left right correct match now inside search range at small scale

Stereo images (Tsukuba, CMU)

Zero-crossings for stereo matching + - … …

Simplified MPG algorithm, Part 1 To determine initial correspondence: (1) Find zero-crossings using a 2G operator with central positive width w (2) For each horizontal slice: (2.1) Find the nearest neighbors in the right image for each zero-crossing fragment in the left image (2.2) Fine the nearest neighbors in the left image for each zero-crossing fragment in the right image (2.3) For each pair of zero-crossing fragments that are closest neighbors of one another, let the right fragment be separated by δinitial from the left. Determine whether δinitial is within the matching tolerance, m. If so, consider the zero-crossing fragments matched with disparity δinitial m = w/2

Simplified MPG algorithm, Part 2 To determine final correspondence: (1) Find zero-crossings using a 2G operator with reduced width w/2 (2) For each horizontal slice: (2.1) For each zero-crossing in the left image: (2.1.1) Determine the nearest zero-crossing fragment in the left image that matched when the 2G operator width was w (2.1.2) Offset the zero-crossing fragment by a distance δinitial, the disparity of the nearest matching zero-crossing fragment found at the lower resolution with operator width w (2.2) Find the nearest neighbors in the right image for each zero-crossing fragment in the left image (2.3) Fine the nearest neighbors in the left image for each zero-crossing fragment in the right image (2.4) For each pair of zero-crossing fragments that are closest neighbors of one another, let the right fragment be separated by δnew from the left. Determine whether δnew is within the reduced matching tolerance, m/2. If so, consider the zero-crossing fragments matched with disparity δfinal = δnew + δinitial

w = 8 m = 4 w = 4 m = 2 w = 4 m = 2 Coarse-scale zero-crossings: Use coarse-scale disparities to guide fine-scale matching: w = 4 m = 2 Ignore coarse-scale disparities: w = 4 m = 2