Structure of the Presentation :

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
Advertisements

REVERSING THE TREND : LOCAL TLIS AS PROVIDERS OF CROSS- BORDER EDUCATION? Curtis Floyd Director - Registration, Accreditation and Quality Enhancement (Ag.)
Chapter 24 Quality Management.
Assurance Services Independent professional services that “improve the quality of information, or its context, for decision makers” Assurance service encompass.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Erasmus Mundus Information Day 20 January Erasmus Mundus Information Day 20 January ERASMUS MUNDUS PREPARING YOUR APPLICATION.
© fedict All rights reserved Legal aspects Belgian electronic identity card Samoera Jacobs – November 2008.
Document #07-2I RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent (RA) Process Flow Diagram (Move-In) (mod 7/25 & clean-up 8/20) Customer Supplier.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
1 European Commission Taxation and Customs Union European Commission Taxation and Customs Union.
Bologna Seminar – Aligning national qualification frameworks: the principles of self-certification Tbilisi November 2008 Referencing of national.
ActionDescription 1Decisions about planning and managing the coast are governed by general legal instruments. 2Sectoral stakeholders meet on an ad hoc.
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
NPA WG : Single and multiple releases
European Union Cohesion Policy
“Train the trainers” seminar
Scoping the Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Geert Van Hauwermeiren Workshop, Ljubljana, 13 Sept 2011.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
1 Welcome to this Seminar for Board Members. 2 Board Members and Staff – Sharing of Responsibilities Voluntary Organisations and Volunteers Responsibilities.
One Sky for Europe EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 FAA/Eurocontrol Technical Interchange.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
Determine Eligibility Chapter 4. Determine Eligibility 4-2 Objectives Search for Customer on database Enter application signed date and eligibility determination.
Create an Application Title 1A - Adult Chapter 3.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Solve Multi-step Equations
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
Intel VTune Yukai Hong Department of Mathematics National Taiwan University July 24, 2008.
Fact-finding Techniques Transparencies
(Finnish) Higher Education Qualifications Framework
EU market situation for eggs and poultry Management Committee 20 October 2011.
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.
AUDIT IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Assoc. Prof. Dr. Recai AKYEL President of the TCA 04 JUNE 2013 TIRANA/ALBANIA.
1 The interconnection of business registers Judit Fischer – DG Internal Market and Services Budapest, 14 June 2010.
VOORBLAD.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
HR Essentials: Employment Contracts Presented by Kristin Ramsey Associate Director.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
21 Jan 05 1 Presentation at Bridges for Recognition Leuven January 2005 Mette Beyer Paulsen, Project Manager Cedefop/Thessaloniki EUROPASS - a single.
25 seconds left…...
School Census Summer 2010 Headlines 1 Jim Haywood Product Manager for Statutory Returns Version 1.0.
Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvosto — Rådet för utvärdering av högskolorna — The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC) eLearning and Virtual.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Internal Control and Control Risk
Sedex: Registration and Account Set Up Instructions
To the Assignments – Work in Progress Online Training Course
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
1 Budapest, June 14, Cross border communication among registers - Practical aspects - Yves Gonner Managing director - Trade and Companies Register.
Graduate Admission System User Guide for Applicants 1 Last updated: April 2014.
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
Some points of view about Chapters 3 and 4 Grundtvig project
National Qualification Frameworks- Diploma Supplement Seminar for Higher Education Reform Experts, 10 – 11 November 2011 Bishkek Vera Stastna Charles University,
Diploma Supplement (DS). What is? The Diploma Supplement (DS) is a document accompanying a higher education diploma, providing a standardised description.
Commission Staff Working Document Free Movement of Workers in the Public Sector 18 January 2011 Ursula Scheuer European Commission DG Employment, Social.
The revised Professional Qualifications Directive
Presentation transcript:

European Professional Card Steering Group Meeting – 25 February 2011

Structure of the Presentation : Answers to the 10 Questions – 1st Steering Group Meeting FEANI Professional Card, i.e. the “EngineerING card” - concept and design - process of application - organisation and authorities - status February 2011 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group, European Professional Card

Discussion points of Steering Group Question 1 : Added Value of a European Professional Card – What problems could it solve ? 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Added value : Become a reliability label for Professional Groups discussion points Added value : Become a reliability label for Professional Groups Speed up the recognition procedure and cost savings Recruitment tool for employers who will be gaining time Ensure increased transparency on the job market Advantages for the European economic area in terms of mobility of professionals 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Discussion points of Steering Group Question 2 : A common format of the professional card for all professions or integrate some specific elements for certain professions ? 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

discussion points Common format : The benefit of standardization is not obvious for all professional groups Each professional group must determine which qualifications are best documented Example : « engineers » versus « tourist guides » 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Discussion points of Steering Group Question 3 : In which situations should the card be used and what would be the legal effects ? Must the card be obligatory for professionals ? 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

discussion points Use of the card : Benefit will not be as high in professions in which automatic recognition already exists (as compared to other professions) FEANI sees no distinction in « temporary mobility » and « establishment » in terms of security and/or quality of the work to be done : such distinction makes no sense 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Discussion points of Steering Group Question 4 : How cold the professional card work in cases of mobility between non-regulating and regulating Member States ? 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Regulating/non-regulating states : discussion points It will be quicker and easier for the competent authorities to decide if the requirements imposed by national law have been satisfied or not – if not : compensation measures. 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Discussion points of Steering Group Question 5 : How to link the card with European and national existing law ? Develop the card under the current directive or in the context of the modernisation of the directive ? 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Link with European and existing law : discussion points Link with European and existing law : That the qualifications on the card should be recognised throughout Europe, should be stipulated at European level. The actual configuration of the card should be left to national professional organisations. Compliance with national laws and regulations is a matter of the relevant authorities in each country. 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Discussion points of Steering Group Question 6 : Link with the European Qualifications Framework and with a competency-based approach. 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

EU Qualifications Framework : discussion points EU Qualifications Framework : European standards for classification should definitely be taken into account. EngineerING-card complies to EQF-criteria 6, 7 and 8 = a European standard for the classification of professional qualifications. 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Discussion points of Steering Group Question 7 : Who should issue the card ? Is the competent authority of the Home Member State best placed ? What would be the costs of such a card ? 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Competent Authorities and Costs : discussion points At least for the EngineerING profession the card should be issued by the competent national professional organisation in each country. These are best-placed to assess the relevant qualifications of an applicant and to classify them against EQF. Application fee should be determined at national level. 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Discussion points of Steering Group Question 8 : What information is necessary for issuing the card ? What should be present on the card ? What should be the period of validity of the card and how to up-date regularly. Is there a need for a database. 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

What kind of Information ? What Validity ? Which Database ? discussion points What kind of Information ? What Validity ? Which Database ? All qualifications of relevance to the profession : e.g. for engineers this relates to : Education Professional experience CPD Valid for 10 years, update at any time. Plastic card without chip at present, with link to a national registry database. 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Design ENGINEERING CARD 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Education: academic studies ENGINEERING CARD A1 Bachelor, short cycle A2 Master, long cycle A3 PhD, doctoral degree in accordance with the European Qualifications Framework in line with EUR-ACE Framework and/or FEANI-Index-criteria 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Professional experience ENGINEERING CARD Professional experience B1 industry/free economy B2 public service B3 self-employed documented for at least two years 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Training: CPD – further education ENGINEERING CARD Training: CPD – further education C1 training/seminars with attendance certificate C2 training/seminars with final examination C3 continuing education with examination and degree recognition of continuous professional development certificates are not a requirement for obtaining the card 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Registration in the National Engineering Register ENGINEERING CARD Registration in the National Engineering Register 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Discussion points of Steering Group Question 9 : Could a professional card be developed only in the long term or in the short term ? 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Development in the Long or Short term discussion points Significant preparatory work done by individual professional engineering associations already since 2005. FEANI developed the EngineerING card in full within one year – unanimous approval by GA (31 countries) in October 2010. Implementation in the short term is surely possible (expected are 5 to 10 countries to start in the course of 2011). 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Discussion points of Steering Group Question 10 : What must be the format of the card ? Which languages should the card be delivered ? 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

discussion points Format and Languages See previous answers : plastic card in combination with national register entry Bilingual: language of the country of issue and English 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

EngineerING card IN CONCLUSION: 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

EngineerING card : five major characteristics Complete and Comprehensive: education, professional experience, CPD training Standardized : based on EQF Reliable : verification in the country of origin by an independent commission which ensures wide recognition Decentralized : administration of the professional card is the responsibility of the respective EU Member State – leaving room for country specific additions Voluntary : no engineer is obliged to hold a card, it is a service to any engineer who wishes to be internationally mobile. 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Authority, decentralised organisation ENGINEERING CARD National Register Committee defines national implementation of European standards decides on acceptance and issues the engineerING card compiles a national engineering register (database)   FEANI Register Commission defines standards, quality assurance, monitoring compiles a list of all issued cards establishes board of complaint 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Process of application : ENGINEERING CARD application, submission of diplomas and certificates alignment with FEANI-List acceptance into national engineer register verification, acceptance by national register committee 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Implementation – status Feb 2011 ENGINEERING CARD Detailed FEANI Guidelines are approved Process and Rules of acceptance / verification are defined Register Commission (3 to 15 persons) will be defined Several countries are in the process to implement the card 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

FEANI calls on the political world to: discussion points FEANI calls on the political world to: create a suitable framework through revision of 2005/36/EC explicitly acknowledge the engineerING card in the Directive professional cards will simplify cross-border employment and mobility 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card

Thank you for your attention 25-02-11, Meeting Steering Group European Professional Card