by Chungho Kim, Tong-Lay Lau, Tobias S. Ulmer, and Mark H. Ginsberg

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roles of RabGEF1/Rabex-5 domains in regulating FcϵRI surface expression and FcϵRI-dependent responses in mast cells by Janet Kalesnikoff, Eon J. Rios,
Advertisements

Ligand binding to integrin αvβ3requires tyrosine 178 in the αv subunit
Interaction of kindlin-2 with integrin β3 promotes outside-in signaling responses by the αVβ3 vitronectin receptor by Zhongji Liao, Hisashi Kato, Manjula.
Functional analysis of the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin α1 subunit in endothelial cells by Tristin D. Abair, Nada Bulus, Corina Borza, Munirathinam.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Implications of somatic mutations in the AML1 gene in radiation-associated and therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia by Hironori.
Patient-derived C-terminal mutation of FANCI causes protein mislocalization and reveals putative EDGE motif function in DNA repair by Luca Colnaghi, Mathew.
by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
by Kesheng Dai, Richard Bodnar, Michael C. Berndt, and Xiaoping Du
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
by Rafijul Bari, Teresa Bell, Wai-Hang Leung, Queenie P
Activation of the Erythropoietin Receptor Is Not Required for Internalization of Bound Erythropoietin by Diana L. Beckman, Lilie L. Lin, Mary E. Quinones,
ADAP interactions with talin and kindlin promote platelet integrin αIIbβ3 activation and stable fibrinogen binding by Ana Kasirer-Friede, Jian Kang, Bryan.
CD74 induces TAp63 expression leading to B-cell survival
MafB negatively regulates RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation
Differential influence of tyrosine residues of the common receptor β subunit on multiple signals induced by human GM-CSF  Tohru Itoh, PhD, Rui Liu, MSc,
Integrin-linked kinase associated with integrin activation
by Wu-Guo Deng, Ying Zhu, and Kenneth K. Wu
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
by Parisa Asvadi, Zohra Ahmadi, and Beng H. Chong
Volume 11, Issue 17, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (September 1996)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Structural Basis of Integrin Activation by Talin
The structure of the GPIb–filamin A complex
The interferon regulatory factor ICSBP/IRF-8 in combination with PU
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Dimers Probe the Assembly Status of Multimeric Membrane Proteins 
ASK1 Is Essential for JNK/SAPK Activation by TRAF2
Yingqun Huang, Renata Gattoni, James Stévenin, Joan A. Steitz 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Silvia Bolland, Roger N Pearse, Tomohiro Kurosaki, Jeffrey V Ravetch 
Rap1 binding to the talin 1 F0 domain makes a minimal contribution to murine platelet GPIIb-IIIa activation by Frederic Lagarrigue, Alexandre R. Gingras,
Coiled Coils Direct Assembly of a Cold-Activated TRP Channel
Exclusion of CD43 from the Immunological Synapse Is Mediated by Phosphorylation- Regulated Relocation of the Cytoskeletal Adaptor Moesin  Jérôme Delon,
MyD88: An Adapter That Recruits IRAK to the IL-1 Receptor Complex
SYCE2 directly binds to the chromoshadow domain of HP1α.
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages (September 1999)
Monica Kong-Beltran, Jennifer Stamos, Dineli Wickramasinghe 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
FAK-Mediated Src Phosphorylation of Endophilin A2 Inhibits Endocytosis of MT1-MMP and Promotes ECM Degradation  Xiaoyang Wu, Boyi Gan, Youngdong Yoo,
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Structural Determinants of Integrin Recognition by Talin
Ruth Halaban, Elaine Cheng  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.
Michael S. Kuhns, Mark M. Davis  Immunity 
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (February 2001)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Coilin Methylation Regulates Nuclear Body Formation
Takashi Hayashi, Gareth M. Thomas, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Regulating the Conducting States of a Mammalian Serotonin Transporter
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
George Simos, Anke Sauer, Franco Fasiolo, Eduard C Hurt  Molecular Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
by Babs O. Fabriek, Robin van Bruggen, Dong Mei Deng, Antoon J. M
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
by Kevin J. Paavola, Harwin Sidik, J
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
The LIN-2/LIN-7/LIN-10 Complex Mediates Basolateral Membrane Localization of the C. elegans EGF Receptor LET-23 in Vulval Epithelial Cells  Susan M Kaech,
The interaction between PARsylated BRCA1 and RAP80 is required for maintaining BRCA1–RAP80–PARP1 complex integrity after DNA damage and normal HRR regulation.
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

by Chungho Kim, Tong-Lay Lau, Tobias S. Ulmer, and Mark H. Ginsberg Interactions of platelet integrin αΙΙb and β3 transmembrane domains in mammalian cell membranes and their role in integrin activation by Chungho Kim, Tong-Lay Lau, Tobias S. Ulmer, and Mark H. Ginsberg Blood Volume 113(19):4747-4753 May 7, 2009 ©2009 by American Society of Hematology

Integrin αIIb and β3 TMD-tail mini-integrins interact with each other via the TMDs. (A) Amino acid sequences of αIIbTM and β3TM used in this study. Integrin αIIb and β3 TMD-tail mini-integrins interact with each other via the TMDs. (A) Amino acid sequences of αIIbTM and β3TM used in this study. Sequences in the gray box represent amino acid residues in membrane region. GXXXG motif and GFFKR motif in αIIb are underlined. Point mutations used in this study are indicated with arrows. The previously designated membrane-proximal regions containing hydrophobic stretches in both α and β integrin are boxed.25 (B) Schematic diagram of TMD-tail constructs. For β3TM-TAP and αIIbTM-TAP baits, β3TM and αIIbTM (A) were fused to TAP tag for purification and an N-terminal FLAG tag for detection. Tac-αIIbTM and Tac-β3TM were made by fusion of αIIbTM and β3TM, respectively, with Tac extracellular domain. (C) CHO cells were transiently transfected with αIIbTM-TAP (bait) and Tac-αIIbTM or Tac-β3TM (preys), and cells were lysed and incubated with calmodulin beads to capture the baits. Bound Tac constructs were analyzed by Western blot using anti-Tac antibody (top panels). Expression of Tac preys (middle panel) and captured αIIbTM-TAP (bottom panel) were verified by Western blot using anti-Tac antibody and anti-FLAG antibody, respectively. The arrows indicate mature cell-surface proteins, and the arrowheads incompletely glycosylated intracellular proteins. Open symbols represent Tac-β3TM, and closed symbols represent Tac-αIIbTM. (D) CHO cells were transiently transfected with baits and preys, as indicated, and cell-surface proteins were biotinylated before cell lysis. Ten percent of the lysates were incubated with neutravidin beads to determine the input of biotinylated proteins in the lysates (middle and bottom panels). The remaining lysates were first incubated with calmodulin beads to capture the baits, and the bound proteins were eluted with 10 mM EDTA. The eluates were then incubated with NeutrAvidin beads to capture the biotinylated surface proteins and the presence of Tac preys was analyzed with Western blot using anti-Tac antibody (top panel). (E) αIIbTM-TAP constructs containing deletion of GFFKR motif or mutations of 2 Gly in GXXXG motif to Leu were tested for their binding to Tac-β3 as in (C). Chungho Kim et al. Blood 2009;113:4747-4753 ©2009 by American Society of Hematology

In vitro αIIb-β3 TM heterodimerization. In vitro αIIb-β3 TM heterodimerization. (A-C) Spectral region of TROSY-HSQC spectra showing Gly702 and Gly708 of the 2H/13C/15N-labeled β3 TM segment in the absence and presence of unlabeled αIIb TM peptide. One set of signals corresponds to the monomeric signals (A). The signal intensity ratios of monomeric-to-heterodimeric signals, but not their positions, depend on the αIIb and β3 peptide concentrations, demonstrating slow exchange kinetics on the NMR timescale between the 2 species. As evidenced by the disappearance of the monomer signals at higher peptide-to-bicelle ratios (C), heterodimerization is predominant. (D) In the presence of mutant αIIb(R995A) peptide, heterodimerization is weakened. The signal intensity ratio of heterodimer-to-monomer signals drops from 1.56 to 0.14 (C,D), and the heterodimeric signals are shifted compared with the interaction with wild-type αIIb peptide. (E) The effects of charge reversal mutations in the membrane-proximal regions of αIIb or β3 on the TMD interaction were analyzed, as in Figure 1. Chungho Kim et al. Blood 2009;113:4747-4753 ©2009 by American Society of Hematology

Talin binding to the β3 tail inhibits the αβ TMD-tail interaction. Talin binding to the β3 tail inhibits the αβ TMD-tail interaction. (A) αIIbTM-TAP and Tac-β3TM were cotransfected with THD or THD(W359A) mutant into CHO cells, and their interaction was analyzed, as described in Figure 1C. Ratio of the amount of Tac-β3TM bound to αIIbTM-TAP in presence of wild-type THD to that in the presence of THD W359A is shown as a bar graph. The data are the mean ± SE of 4 experiments. (B) αIIbTM-TAP and THD were cotransfected with Tac-β3TM or Tac-β3TM(Y747A) mutant into CHO cells and their interaction was analyzed, as described in panel A. The data are mean ± SE of 3 experiments. Chungho Kim et al. Blood 2009;113:4747-4753 ©2009 by American Society of Hematology

TMD-tail mini-integrins activate native integrin αIIbβ3. TMD-tail mini-integrins activate native integrin αIIbβ3. (A) Tac-αIIbTM or Tac-αIIb was transfected into CHO cells expressing αIIbβ3 (A5 cells). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were stained with PAC1 (activation-specific anti-αIIbβ3 antibody) and 7G7B6 (anti-Tac antibody) in the presence or absence of a selective inhibitor of ligand binding to αIIbβ3, Ro-43-5054, and then analyzed by flow cytometry to generate the dot plots shown (left). Geometric means of PAC1 binding in cells expressing different quantities of Tac constructs were plotted as larger red dots. Specific PAC1 binding was calculated by subtracting the geometric means of PAC1 binding in the presence of Ro-43-5054 from that in the absence of Ro-43-5054 in each range, and plotted as a line graph (right). (B) The effects of Tac-αIIbTMΔGFFKR and Tac-αIIbTMLXXXL on αIIbβ3 activation were analyzed, as in panel A. (C) The effects of Tac-β3TM, Tac-β3, and Tac-β3TM(Y747A) on αIIbβ3 activation were analyzed, as in panel A. The activating effects of each Tac constructs were tested at least 3 times, and representative data are shown. Chungho Kim et al. Blood 2009;113:4747-4753 ©2009 by American Society of Hematology

αIIb TMD-tail binds to the β3 subunit of native integrin αIIbβ3. αIIb TMD-tail binds to the β3 subunit of native integrin αIIbβ3. (A) αIIbTM-TAP, αIIbTMΔGFFKR-TAP, or empty vector was transfected into A5 cells, and after 24 hours, cells were lysed and incubated with calmodulin beads to capture TAP constructs. β3 was detected by Western blot using anti-β3 antibody as representative of the bound αIIbβ3 (top). Expression level of β3 in lysates (middle) and captured TAP constructs (bottom) was assessed by Western blot. (B) A5 cells transfected with Tac-αIIbTM or Tac-αIIb were detached and stained with anti-Tac antibody and PAC1. In the merged image, green and red represent Tac and active integrin, respectively. The 2.7-fold digital enlargement of areas in small rectangles is shown in insets. Bar = 5 μm. (C) A5 cells were incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C with TBS (20 mM Tris, pH 8.4, 150 mM NaCl) containing either 1 mM Ca/Mg or 5 mM EDTA, and stained with αIIbβ3 complex-specific antibody (D57). D57 binding was measured by flow cytometry and plotted as histogram. (D) A5 cells transfected with TAP constructs were detached, and surface proteins were biotinylated and treated with EDTA to dissociate αIIbβ3 complex before the cells were lysed. Five percent of the lysates were incubated with neutravidin beads to determine the input of biotinylated proteins in the lysates (lanes 5-8). The remaining lysates were first incubated with calmodulin beads to capture TAP tag, and the bound proteins were eluted with 10 mM EDTA. The eluates were further incubated with NeutrAvidin beads to capture the biotinylated protein (lanes 1-4). Anti-αIIb antibody (PMI-1), anti-β3 antibody (Rb8053), and anti-FLAG antibody (M2) were used for the Western blot, as indicated. Schematic procedure for this experiment is shown in Figure S4. (E) Model of how the αIIb TMD-tail induced αIIbβ3 activation. αIIb TMD-tail interacts with TMD-tail region of β3 in the native integrin and competes for the heterodimeric interaction between αIIb and β3, resulting in rearrangement of the TMD and activation. Chungho Kim et al. Blood 2009;113:4747-4753 ©2009 by American Society of Hematology