DAD: PMI Action Team District Assessment and Data for the purpose of Progress Monitoring and Intervention February 14, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Advertisements

When Students Can’t Read…
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Curriculum Leadership Institute (CLI) Academic Program Governance.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Commit” ” to Program Reviews Rhonda Back Program Review Director Bath County Public Schools Kentucky Association of School Councils September 17, 2014.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Implementing ISO 9001 Our project plan Copyright ©2008 The 9000 Store.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT SPECIALIST TRAINING SEPTEMBER 14, 2011.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
{ Principal Professional Learning Team March 2012.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
Teacher Data Teams FOR RTI MODULE 5 ..
Using the framework to ground decisions in the quality of teacher practice.
New BC Framework for Enhancing Learning Rocky Mountain District Framework for Enhancing Learning.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
SC/SVNTP (Silicon Valley) Steering Committee
Avon Grove School District October 2009
J. Sterling Morton High Schools
District Program Design Update
Problem Solving Process.
MUHC Innovation Model.
Duncanville ISD Curriculum Update
Building on our tradition of excellence – planning for the future.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
The Year of Core Instruction
Add your school name and the date and time of the meeting
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Tuesday, April 10, 2012 Southwest Middle School Commons
DAD: PMI Action Team District Assessment and Data for the purpose of Progress Monitoring and Intervention March 13, 2012.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Organizational Consulting
State Board of Education Progress Update
ENDS Report Priority #3 Create Spaces of Optimism
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
Roles and Responsibilities
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
EDD/581 Week 1.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Schoolwide Programs.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Building a Strategic Plan
needs assessment summary and next steps for continuous improvement
ENDS Report Priority #3 Create Spaces of Optimism
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

DAD: PMI Action Team District Assessment and Data for the purpose of Progress Monitoring and Intervention February 14, 2012

Walk the Line(s)! Use the sentence starters to reflect upon our work from the last meeting, BUT… …DON’T EXCEED THE LINES PROVIDED!

Putting the Pieces Together Jigsaw! Number 1-10 Find your group Share (round robin) ONLY what you have written After sharing, use your group notecard to record one strategy that will help us move the work forward collectively and collaboratively

Idea “Stew”

Reasons to More Clearly Define Our Work Clarity Connection Communication Coordination

DAD:PMI Plan Report to Parkway Board of Education May 2, 2012 (Julie & John) Report to Superintendent’s Action Team April 9, 2012 (Julie & John) Finalize Updated DAD:PMI Plan-w/Feedback From Team April 2, 2012 (Julie & John) Pull all 5 Work Team Plans together into 1 Draft DAD:PMI Plan March 13, 2012 (Julie & John) Updated/Revised Work Team Plans Completed March 6, 2012 (Work Team Leaders) Work Teams Assigned Job of Revisiting Plans February 14, 2012 (Julie & John)

Revisiting Work Team Plans Work Team Plan Elements Needed for DAD:PMI C-4 Does your plan have tasks that are: Specific? Concrete? Actionable? Relevant to Work Team Goals? Assigned to Person(s) Responsible? Do each of your tasks have: Start Date (M/Y)? Completion Date (M/Y)?

A Tool To Help GANTT Chart What It Is Use It When Applications A scheduling tool for action planning that depicts relative timing of process steps Use It When You need to be able to judge the timing of action steps Applications To schedule the steps needed to carry out an action plan After identifying action steps

Develop Common PMI Language MONTH TASKS 10/11 11/11 12/11 1/12 2/12 3/12 4/12 5/12 6/12 7/12 8/12 9/12 Develop Common PMI Language   Adopt Conceptual District Framework Define Systematic Problem Solving Define Structures to Support PMI Identify Administrator Roles Universal, Targeted, Intensive Levels Needed Integration between PMI and other initiatives Integrate Problem Solving with PLC Identify Supports Currently In Place to Support Implementation Conduct Gap Analysis and Revise Action Plan to Address Needs Develop District-wide Evaluation Process Develop Communication Plan

Assessment Planning 2012! Final Plan Ready for Board Approval April 11 DAD: PMI (Feb) APT (Feb-Mar) (March) Principals Teachers Comm Arts Assessment Teams Final Plan Ready for Board Approval April 11

Assessment Planning

Assessment Planning Team Members Jason Adams John Barrow Kevin Beckner Darcie Brady Becky Langrall Toby McQuerrey Lisa Merideth Denise Pupillo Derek Scott Objectives Create a conceptual model of Parkway’s Data Framework Synthesize multiple sources of information regarding district, state, and national initiatives that have impact upon Parkway’s Assessment System Recommend a 3-year transitional assessment plan for implementation through 2014-15

Developing a Model: Geometric Thinking

From Abstract to Sequential Who needs to have access to and understanding of the data (Data Users)? What do they want/need to know? How frequently? How should they access the data? Classroom Teachers PLC Teams School Improvement Teams Building Administrators District Staff Supporting Schools and Programs Parents The Board of Education Project Parkway Steering Committee The Parkway Community (news media)