Effectiveness and feasibility of hysteroscopic sterilization techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis Claire F. la Chapelle, M.D., Sebastiaan Veersema, M.D., Ph.D., Hans A.M. Brölmann, M.D., Ph.D., Frank Willem Jansen, M.D., Ph.D. Fertility and Sterility Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages 1516-1525.e3 (June 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.009 Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Flow diagram. Fertility and Sterility 2015 103, 1516-1525.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Number of pregnancies for included Ovabloc studies. Probabilities are shown with 95% CIs. Fertility and Sterility 2015 103, 1516-1525.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Number of pregnancies for included Essure studies. Probabilities are shown with 95% CIs. Fertility and Sterility 2015 103, 1516-1525.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Supplemental Figure 1 Risk-of-bias graph. Review authors' judgments about each risk-of-bias item presented across all included Ovabloc studies. Fertility and Sterility 2015 103, 1516-1525.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Supplemental Figure 2 Risk-of-bias graph. Review authors' judgments about each risk–of-bias item presented across all included Essure studies. Fertility and Sterility 2015 103, 1516-1525.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions