Principle 2: CEO Oversight

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principle 13 Community Engagement/ Game Environment.
Advertisements

Principle 12 Institutional Self-Study Guide. January, 2009 Each Division II institution shall conduct a comprehensive self-study and evaluation of its.
1. NCAA Division III Financial Aid Reporting Program and Self-Assessment 2012.
Developing a Gender Equity Action Plan Judith M. Sweet Former Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services and Senior Woman Administrator.
Principle 2 Chancellor/President Oversight. January, 2009 A model Division II member institution’s Chancellor/ President sets forth a vision for the institution’s.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
Principle 3 AD Management. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full-time administrator that takes responsibility for the.
Current Status of the SWA within the NCAA Judith Sweet NCAA Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services/ Senior Woman Administrator.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program
National Association of Division III Athletic Administrators Round Table Topics and Discussion Questions 2006 NCAA Convention.
NADIIIAA Summer Forum June 6, 2006 Integration – Education & Athletics, A Model for Success Debbie Lazorik Bob Malekoff Ronda Seagraves Integration, the.
Oversight of Intercollegiate Athletics At Western Michigan University.
ACFID CODE OF CONDUCT Changes to the Code Effective Jan 2015.
Principle 20 Strategic Plan for Intercollegiate Athletics.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit January, 2009.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
Principle 15 Continuing Education and Professional Development.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
Peer Information Security Policies: A Sampling Summer 2015.
NCAA Division III Bylaw 15 – Financial Aid Brandy Hataway Jeff Myers.
Governance & Leadership Structure Influence Build Connect.
A model Division II athletics program shall encourage all student-athletes, coaches and fans to respect each other, practice civility, encourage teamwork.
Principles and Practices For Nonprofit Excellence.
NCAA Certification – 3 rd Cycle Governance & Commitment to Rules Compliance Materials linked from the February 10, 2010 Academic Advising Council minutes.
Our Mission Intercollegiate Athletics at CU Boulder provides student-athletes a rewarding academic and athletic opportunity while embracing the principles.
Principle 1 Integration and Institutional Control.
Athletics Certification Orientation Presentation.
Principle 17 Assessment. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a tool that is used as a written assessment each year to measure.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility in establishing a culture of compliance.
Principle 6 Coach’s Role. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility.
Principle 7 SAAC Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns.
The NCAA, its Conferences, and the Economics of Athletics.
Principle 4 FAR Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative.
Principle 5 SWA Involvement or Fifth Representative to the Governance Structure.
Evaluation of the Strategic Plan How did we grade out?
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
SCC Tenure Process November 13, Goal: Ensure Faculty Excellence  Faculty excellence supports Shoreline’s vision of being a world-class institution.
Principle 11 Compliance. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full- time compliance coordinator whose primary responsibility.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns and ideas of the institution’s student-athletes.
Board Chair Responsibilities As a partner to the chief executive officer (CEO) and other board members, the Board Chair will provide leadership to Kindah.
Principle 3: AD Management A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full-time administrator that takes responsibility for the academic and.
Board Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
NCAA Division III Institutional Performance Program Eric Hartung Nicole Hollomon Erin Irick.
Principle 19 Communication/ Campus Relationships.
Risk Assessment ABOR Audit Committee April 5, 2017
Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness
Division I Recruiting Hot Topics
UNIVERSITY SENATE REPORT Athletic Affairs Committee
Who’s Who at MU? An introduction to important campus resources and individuals by Hiram G. Martinez, Director of CSIL September 21, 2014 Center for Student.
IIASA Governance Review
Division I and Division II Institutional Performance Program
Athletics Certification Orientation
Trust, Accountability and Integrity: Board Responsibility for
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
Student Government… What does it do?
Succession Planning DGN Charles Johnson.
Division II Strategic Plan
Using Federal Compliance for Institutional Learning and Improvement
September 19, 2016.
Information Technology Policy Institutional Data Policy
2020 Strategic Planning Search Conference
Department of Intercollegiate Athletics Board of Trustees Academic Affairs Committee Mr. Earl Hilton, Director February 17, 2012.
Board of Regents Policies Administrative Policies
Main NCAA Title.
Principle 4: FAR Involvement
Interpretations process Kelly Brummett Kris richardson
2018 WASBO New Director Board Orientation
Division II Strategic Plan
Penn State University Change Initiatives Presented By: Matthew Bell Anjaih Clemons Obie Evans Bruce Kastner.
UNI Athletics Department
Presentation transcript:

Principle 2: CEO Oversight A model Division II member institution’s CEO sets forth a vision for the institution’s intercollegiate athletics program, ensures that adequate resources exist for the athletics department to carry out this vision, emphasizes the importance of the institution’s compliance system and the roles of various departments (e.g., financial aid office) in this system, and prioritizes self-reporting of compliance violations and compliance with Title IX.

Best Practices: CEO Oversight Multiple reporting structures Actively engaged and informed in conference and national issues Attends national convention and encourages athletics administration to engage in national issues Provides final approval for all athletics legislation and athletics department policies

Best Practices: CEO Oversight Provides support and resources for athletics department to meet model athletics department principles Consistent with the total operations of the university Articulates vision of athletics campus-wide Schedules frequent meetings with AD

Best Practices: CEO Oversight Attends an early athletics staff meeting each year and articulates philosophy Provides leadership for DII Community Engagement Initiative and Strategic- Positioning Platform Appoints members of compliance committee and attends first meeting each year

Best Practices: CEO Oversight Seeks and encourages information regarding self-reporting violations and compliance with Title IX Provides visibility at athletics events/ practices and booster club gatherings