Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages (July 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CATALASE2 Coordinates SA-Mediated Repression of Both Auxin Accumulation and JA Biosynthesis in Plant Defenses  Hong-Mei Yuan, Wen-Cheng Liu, Ying-Tang.
Advertisements

Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
JAV1 Controls Jasmonate-Regulated Plant Defense
Silke Kloppholz, Hannah Kuhn, Natalia Requena  Current Biology 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
The hypersensitive response facilitates plant infection by the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea  Eri M Govrin, Alex Levine  Current Biology  Volume.
Richard Sibout, Stéphanie Plantegenet, Christian S. Hardtke 
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Mobile 24 nt Small RNAs Direct Transcriptional Gene Silencing in the Root Meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana  Charles W. Melnyk, Attila Molnar, Andrew.
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages e6 (January 2018)
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages (December 2015)
Left Habenular Activity Attenuates Fear Responses in Larval Zebrafish
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Julien Colombani, Cédric Polesello, Filipe Josué, Nicolas Tapon 
Marco Trujillo, Kazuya Ichimura, Catarina Casais, Ken Shirasu 
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
An RNAi Screen of Chromatin Proteins Identifies Tip60-p400 as a Regulator of Embryonic Stem Cell Identity  Thomas G. Fazzio, Jason T. Huff, Barbara Panning 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
CATALASE2 Coordinates SA-Mediated Repression of Both Auxin Accumulation and JA Biosynthesis in Plant Defenses  Hong-Mei Yuan, Wen-Cheng Liu, Ying-Tang.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 13, Pages (July 2007)
Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance  Valeria R. Fantin, Julie St-Pierre,
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e5 (November 2018)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Silke Kloppholz, Hannah Kuhn, Natalia Requena  Current Biology 
Glial Cells Physiologically Modulate Clock Neurons and Circadian Behavior in a Calcium-Dependent Manner  Fanny S. Ng, Michelle M. Tangredi, F. Rob Jackson 
Physcomitrella patens Auxin-Resistant Mutants Affect Conserved Elements of an Auxin- Signaling Pathway  Michael J. Prigge, Meirav Lavy, Neil W. Ashton,
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (May 2005)
STIL Microcephaly Mutations Interfere with APC/C-Mediated Degradation and Cause Centriole Amplification  Christian Arquint, Erich A. Nigg  Current Biology 
Natural Variation in Tomato Reveals Differences in the Recognition of AvrPto and AvrPtoB Effectors from Pseudomonas syringae  Christine M. Kraus, Kathy R.
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
David Vanneste, Masatoshi Takagi, Naoko Imamoto, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2019)
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
E. Wassim Chehab, Chen Yao, Zachary Henderson, Se Kim, Janet Braam 
Volume 17, Issue 20, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages e4 (February 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Effect of vd-sRNA on CalS12-like mRNA
Ichiro Mitsuhara, Kamal A. Malik, Masayuki Miura, Yuko Ohashi 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages 1898-1903 (July 2015) A Secreted MIF Cytokine Enables Aphid Feeding and Represses Plant Immune Responses  Elodie Naessens, Géraldine Dubreuil, Philippe Giordanengo, Olga Lucia Baron, Naïma Minet-Kebdani, Harald Keller, Christine Coustau  Current Biology  Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages 1898-1903 (July 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.047 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2015 25, 1898-1903DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.047) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Expression of Aphid MIF1 in Salivary Glands (A and B) Relative expression ratios of MIF members in whole bodies (black) and salivary glands (white) from (A) the A. pisum genetic lineage LL01 and (B) M. persicae. Expression values are normalized to EF1 expression and shown as a percent of total expression of MIFs in whole bodies. Each bar represents the mean expression ± SD obtained from three independent experiments. (C) Representative western blots showing ApMIF1 or MpMIF1 protein in 15 μg total protein prepared from aphid whole bodies (WB) or saliva-conditioned medium (SM). Antibodies were raised against two MIF1 peptides [11] (Figure S1). Current Biology 2015 25, 1898-1903DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.047) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MIFs Are Required for an Exploitation of the Host Plant (A and B) Survival rate (%) and average individual offspring production (daily fecundity expressed as number of offspring per day per adult) of adult A. pisum aphids feeding on plants (A) or maintained on artificial diet (B) for 13 days post-injection (DPI) of dsRNA. Aphids were injected with non-relevant GFP dsRNA (black lines) or ApMIF1 dsRNA (red lines). Highly significant differences between GFP dsRNA- and ApMIF1 dsRNA-injected aphids are boxed with a dashed line (p < 0.001). The blue box on the x axis corresponds to the period of optimum RNAi efficiency (see Figure S2). Data are means ± SD from triplicate experiments carried out on 20 individuals. (C) Schematic representation of aphid stylet progression within plant tissues during feeding. After a non-probing period (1) aphid stylet progression toward the phloem cells is achieved through insertion between epidermic cells (ec) (2a), followed by punctures of mesophyll cells (m) (2b), long-repeated punctures of companion cells (cc) and their associated phloem cells (pc) (3), and finally, insertion in the phloem cells (pc) for phloem sap ingestion (4). (D) Reconstructed typical electropenetrogram showing the corresponding feeding phases. (E) Comparison of EPG parameters from the feeding phases 3 and 4 in GFP dsRNA- (dsGFP; black bars) or ApMIF1 dsRNA- (dsApMIF1; red bars) injected aphids. Error bars represent the SE of triplicate experiments carried out on 24 individuals. The asterisks indicate differences with p < 0.05 according to the Mann-Whitney U-test. All parameters are listed in Table S1. Current Biology 2015 25, 1898-1903DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.047) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 MpMIFs Impair Plant Immune Responses (A and B) Representative pictures showing hypersensitive cell death (A) and callose deposition (B) in N. benthamiana leaves. Leaves were inoculated with A. tumefaciens harboring the empty vector (EV) or the MpMIF constructs (MpMIF1, MpMIF3, or MpMIF4) 24 hr prior to infiltration with cryptogein (Cry+) or water (Cry−). The efficiency and dynamics of Agrobacterium-mediated MpMIF expression in planta are shown in Figure S3. (A) The visible symptoms of cryptogein-induced hypersensitive cell death are dehydration and brown lesions (top left). These symptoms do not establish in leaf areas that express MpMIFs. The local expression of MpMIFs in leaf tissues does not trigger hypersensitive cell death (lower lane) neither does the empty vector control (bottom left). Photographs were taken 48 hr after inoculation with A. tumefaciens and 24 hr after treatment with cryptogein or water. (B) Callose deposition is induced by cryptogein in infiltrated leaf areas and appears as blue fluorescence after aniline blue staining (top left). Cryptogein-induced callose deposition is reduced in leaf areas that express MpMIF1, MpMIF3, or MpMIF4 to levels that are triggered by the local expression of MpMIF genes in the absence of cryptogein. Agroinfiltration with the empty vector control (bottom left) did not induce callose deposition. Photographs were taken 36 hr after inoculation with A. tumefaciens and 12 hr after treatment with cryptogein or water. The scale bars represent 150 μm. Numbers indicate means ± SD of callose spots obtained for six individual leaf discs. (C) Expression of the defense-related genes NbPR1, NbPR2, and NbPR3 in leaf areas transfected with the EV (black bars) or MpMIFs (gradation of red bars) prior to treatment with cryptogein (Cry+) or water (Cry−). Expression of the target genes is presented as a relative expression normalized to internal reference genes and to expression in the control sample (EV/Cry−). Bars represent means ± SD from three biological replicates. Values marked by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.001; ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer test). Values marked by identical letters are not significantly different. Current Biology 2015 25, 1898-1903DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.047) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Host-Delivered MIF1 Restores Lifespan and Fecundity of Cytokine-Silenced Aphids Survival rate (%) and average individual offspring production (daily fecundity expressed as number of offspring per day per adult) of adult M. persicae aphids feeding on non-transformed N. benthamiana leaves (A); maintained on artificial diet (B); or feeding on N. benthamiana leaves expressing MpMIF1 (C), MpMIF3 (D), or MpMIF4 (E) for 10 days post-ingestion (DPI) of dsRNA. Highly significant differences between GFP dsRNA- (black lines) and MpMIF1 dsRNA-silenced aphids (red lines) are boxed with a dashed line (p < 0.001; Kruskal-Wallis test). The blue box on the x axis corresponds to the period of optimum RNAi efficiency (see Figure S3). Data are means ± SD from triplicate experiments carried out on 50 individuals. Current Biology 2015 25, 1898-1903DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.047) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions