Don’t hate on your audience.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

Argument: Rogerian Developed by psychologist, Carl Rogers, in the 1950s Attempts to reach common ground between the speaker and the audience When composing.
OCTOBER 25, 2010 PLEASE TAKE YOUR PAPERS FROM THE FOLDERS. (DO NOT LEAVE THEM, TAKE THEM WITH YOU.) YOUR MIDTERM WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU ON WEDNESDAY.
Part 3 – REFUTING OPPOSING ARGUMENTS.  Before you start writing an argumentative essay, I strongly suggest you to prepare an outline and first, write.
 An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid.  Arguments seek to make people.
Easy steps to writing THE ESSAY. Writing an essay means: Creating ideas from information Creating arguments from ideas Creating academic discourse to.
Being persuasive… Learn how to persuade your peers!
Rogerian Argument Taken from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers.
Rogerian Argument Based on the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers.
Developing an Argument of Your Own
2012. You must assume that your reader will disagree with you, or be skeptical; therefore, your tone must be reasonable, professional, and trustworthy.
Argument as Rational Discourse To make an argument, you need an issue. Issue: Swine Flu or H1N1 How is this an issue?
Terms of Logic and Types of Argument AP English Language and Composition.
Structuring Arguments. Structuring arguments  Defines which parts go where  Logical arguments described as:  Inductive reasoning  Deductive reasoning:
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Art of Critical Reading Mather ● McCarthy Part 4 Reading Critically Chapter 12 Evaluating.
Persuasion Getting people to agree with you Part I: Organizing your paper.
Argument as Rational Discourse To make an argument, you need an issue. Issue: Swine Flu or H1N1 How is this an issue?
Essays are graded on a NINE point scale, just like AP essays 9 = 100 8= 97 7 = 93 6 = 86 5 = 80 4 = 77 3 = 72 2= 70 1 = 65 NS = below 60 Right now, if.
The Five Canons of Rhetoric 1.Invention: Brainstorm/Pre-write 2.Arrangement: Particular order, a set pattern. 3.Style: Grammatically correct, clear and.
Rogerian Model not confrontational in methods; authors do not have an opponent, you have an audience in addition, you are not constructing an opinionated,
 Influences the reader by using fact based evidence and reasoning to express a point of view or uncover the truth  It is the process of establishing.
Shouldn’t we have started with this?!?
Part 4 Reading Critically
Writing an Argumentative Essay
The Research Paper Process
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS (OPINION ESSAYS)
Rogerian Strategy in Arguments
An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument
4 The Art of Critical Reading Reading Critically Mather ▪ McCarthy
Taken from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: Toulmin, and Rogerian Models
Taken from Nancy Wood’s Perspectives on Argument
Rogerian Argument A Psychologist’s View.
Rogerian Argument A Psychologist’s View.
Everything’s An Argument
Writing.
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: Toulmin, and Rogerian Models
Argumentative Writing
The argumentative essay
The In-Class Critical Essay
Ap Language ESSAYS SYNTHESIS.
Argument Essay Point/Counterpoint.
Essential elements of an argument
The In-Class Critical Essay
Don’t hate on your audience.
Rogerian Argument VS..
Constructing Arguments
Taken from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers
…or, “Stop your lippy attitude.”
What is an ARGUMENT? An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid. Arguments seek.
Argumentative Writing
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments:
Don’t hate on your audience.
An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument
Chapter 16 Persuasive Speaking.
Argumentative Writing
Persuasion Basics Persuasion is the use of words or images to influence the actions and opinions of others. It is trying to convince others that your opinions.
Everything’s An Argument
Rogerian Argument VS..
Unit 3: Notes #20 PERSUASION
Critical Response: How to begin
Rogerian argument.
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments:
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Problem-Solution, Evaluation, and more!
Rogerian “Argument”
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Rogerian Model
An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument
Looking at what a text says and how it says it. Norton 38-58
Presentation transcript:

Don’t hate on your audience. Rogerian Argument Don’t hate on your audience.

You don’t pick fights with your audience! The  Rogerian  model  acknowledges  the  audience’s  point  of   view  or  opinions  before  presenting  the  author’s  different  or   opposing  viewpoint .    A  Rogerian argument  supports  the  central  argument  with  tact &  without  outright  attacking  the  audience’s  preconceived  notions, unlike the Toulmin But seriously, the CONCEPTS are more important than the LABELS. Don’t get overwhelmed. THIS IS NOT THE ONE AND ONLY RIGHT WAY TO WRITE PERSUASIVELY!!!!!!!!! There are many right ways to write! Sometimes it works well and is appropriate, sometimes it’s not. As a writer, you have to make the call.

Rogerian Argument Seeks to establish trust and find COMMON GROUND. Assume that audience &/or opposition is made up of REASONABLE people. This is, unfortunately, not always true. Therefore, Rogerian argument is not always the best approach. Seeks to UNDERSTAND the point of view of those with whom they disagree To start a DIALOGUE or DISCOURSE BOTH/AND instead of EITHER/OR WIN/WIN instead of WIN/LOSE

How to use Rogerian Argument While I am NOT a fan of rigidly structured essays, here is an example of what a Rogerian argument might look like: Intro Summary of Opposing Views* Statement of Understanding* Statement of Your position Statement of Contexts Statement of Benefits Important parts/pose a solution – here is where you “concede” something to the opposing side and acknowledge that others who think differently from you are also intelligent, reasonable people.

Things that happen in a Rogerian Argument Speaker/writer shows (sympathetic) understanding to the opposition. Speaker/writer demonstrates that those who disagree with them are still reasonable, intelligent people of good will (not fools and idiots). Speaker/writer is non-confrontational, even friendly (not “my way or the highway”).

Phases of Rogerian Phase One: Present the issue and suggest why it’s important; explain or summarize the opponent’s/other perspectives on this particular issue in NEUTRAL language Phase Two: Acknowledge any valid aspects of your opponent’s argument as well as drawbacks in NON-CONFRONTATIONAL language Suggest common ground that you share

Phases of Rogerian Phase Three: Present a solution; show how both parties will have to concede as well as how both parties will benefit; emphasize the common ground where both could agree Writer creates cooperation, the possibility that both sides might change, and a mutually advantageous outcome.

Rogerian Goals . You should let the readers know they have been understood         a. The other side of the argument has been researched 2. You should show the readers that their ideas/values are valid in certain contexts.         a. What the reader believes is correct

Rogerian Goals You show the readers that that you share the same values, perceptions and attitudes.         a. Find common ground between you and your readers. 4. You should propose solutions made up of elements from both sides that both parties accept.         a. Present a solution both sides can agree on.

Outline . Introduction a. Present both sides of the argument         b. Do not claim any sides         c. Be neutral II. Presentation of Sides         a. Present one side of the argument fully         b. Omit emotionally charged words.         c. Present the opposition fairly and just as fully – be certain both sides are of equal length

Outline Common Ground         a. What do both sides have in common? Think values, outcome, etc. IV. Solution         a. Come up with a solution to fix the problem between the two sides.         b.  Be the mediator – both sides gain but both sides sacrifice as well

Tips Remember, the goal is to achieve a mutually satisfactory solution through communication — not to overpower your opponent with wit, sarcasm, insults or threats. Know your audience. The more you know about your audience, the more you can tailor your essay to draw participants' attention. Having information about your audience will also provide you with a better understanding of the problem and how it is affecting their lives.

Tips Avoid negative language. Focus on the positive aspects of your opponent’s stance. For example, if your opponent is against the teaching of evolution in schools, acknowledge and honor their commitment to the education of their children. Avoid controversial side topics. If you know that discussion of other related beliefs and practices would elicit a negative reaction from your audience, then don’t go there. Steer away from additional controversial topics and focus on the matter at hand. Maintain a neutral tone when stating your viewpoint.The final stage of the argument is for persuading. When stating your point, state it simply without misleading terms or flowery speech. For example, change “I have an easy-to-use niche product that will revolutionize your household chores, saving you hours" to "My product will simplify cleaning chores, such as vacuuming and dishes."

To Review… State the problem or issue. Give the opposing position. Grant some validity to parts of it. Recognize circumstances where it could be acceptable. State YOUR position, support it, and tell why the opposition will be IMPROVED by embracing your views. Why will the world be a better place for this?

Rogerian Model Application Go to the class page under “College Level Writing”; scroll down to “Rogerian Model”. Then, read the student sample essays. Create a chart in your notes with the following. Identify the following in EACH essay sample Establishing common ground Statement of Contexts – multiple perspectives are presented Discussion of benefits and drawbacks of each side Proposes a solution where each side gains and concedes

Rogerian Draft Assignment Topic: The number of AP courses a student can take yearly should be mandated as the rigor and the workload of the courses affect students’ well-being. Present both sides of the argument in non-confrontational language and then propose a solution. Submit your draft to Turnitin by 6am.