Cost Sharing Responsibilities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
F4B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Damage Reduction Module F4: Reformulation – Optimization, Incremental Analysis and Selection of the NED Plan.
Advertisements

F EDERAL I NSURANCE AND M ITIGATION A DMINISTRATION Hazard Mitigation Overview Franki Coons Chief, Grants Implementation Branch Risk Reduction Division.
A World of Solutions Pulling Resources How Communities in Dare County are Working Together to Construct Locally Funded Beach Projects Ken Willson CB&I.
State of Montana Hazard Mitigation Plan and Statewide Hazard Assessment – 2013 Update Montana State Hazard Mitigation Coordinator: Kent Atwood
Understanding Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFEs) Understanding Advisory Information and the Implications for Your Home December 2012.
Flood Avoidance and Mitigation
Session 141 Vulnerability to a natural hazard can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from that.
Risk and Emergency Management Division Southside Hampton Roads Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Syed M. Ahmed, Ph.D. Department of Construction Management Risk Management in Construction Syed M. Ahmed, Ph.D. Department of Construction Management Florida.
Business Continuity and You! The Ohio State University Business & Finance Enterprise Continuity Program Quarterly Update October 2008Business and Finance.
Mitigation. Hazard Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and their property from hazards and their.
NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation
Mitigation. Hazard Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and their property from hazards and their.
Ingrid Brakop Coordinator Material Damage Loss Prevention.
Oregon Housing and Community Services What we do matters! Seizing the Day in a Pro-Preservation Environment October 2009.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions 1 What is Engineering Risk and Reliability? Why We Use It? Robert C.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board August 9, 2013 Presented by: Michael Mierzwa California Department of Water Resources DWR’s Involvement in Flood.
Mitigation Focus-Public Assistance Briefing for Hurricane Sandy
Topic 3 Infrastructure Maintenance & Rehabilitation Session Matakuliah: S0902 – Manajemen Infrastruktur Tahun: 2010.
Hazard Mitigation Assistance Hazard Mitigation means any action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk too human life and property from natural.
1 New Orleans District Morganza to the Gulf 23 May 2008 Carl Anderson, Senior Project Manager, USACE.
Our Mission MITIGATIONS. MEANING OF MITIGATION MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF THE RISK OF DISASTER MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF.
A World of Solutions North Topsail Beach Shoreline Protection Project Phase 1 – New River Inlet Channel Realignment & Beach Restoration NC Water Resources.
RFP – Clauses & Fee Structure Mark A. York, MSFOC Contracting Officer.
Harbors Module NH3: Formulation – Measures, Strategies and Plans.
Risk Analysis for Major Rehabilitation. Major Rehabilitation Background  Prior to FY 1992  Funded under Operation and Maintenance, General, Appropriation.
Environmental Commitments/Tracking. Environmental Commitments Federal Agencies Shall –Use all practicable means consistent with the requirements of.
San Francisco Ocean Beach-Great Highway Erosion Control Project.
What’s Wrong with Integrity Management? How Do We Improve Integrity Management? Terry Boss Senior Vice President Safety Environment and Operations PST.
Melinda Terry, Executive Director CA Central Valley Flood Control Association 1.
The Lower Mon Project William A. Karaffa, P.E. Project Manager Briefing to Waterways Association of Pittsburgh April 14, 2004.
Monmouth County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update.
Save the Beach at Hunting Island. Save the Hunting Island Lighthouse.
TOPSAIL BEACH 30 Yr Beach Management Plan June 8, 2011.
BUILDING STRONG ® Levee Safety Program  Levee Safety Program Implementation Guidance provided by HQUSACE in 2007 (Post Hurricane Katrina) ► Designate.
C HARLOTTE C OUNTY B EACHES & S HORES A DVISORY C OMMITTEE J ANUARY 7, 2016 C HARLOTTE C OUNTY E ROSION C ONTROL P ROJECT U PDATE.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® And Taking Care Of People! Josephine Axt, Ph.D. Chief, Planning Division Los Angeles District July 10, 2013.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 4C Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET PREPARATION WORKSHOP City Council November 23, 2015.
Pipeline Safety in Michigan Jennifer McKay Policy Director Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council City of Boyne City Commission Meeting April 25, 2016.
DARSHANA RAGHU MANAGEMENT. Risk Management Risk management is the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks followed by coordinated and.
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2110, 2222 AND 2244 SOUTH AIRPORT WAY Stockton Redevelopment Agency October 7, 2008 City Council Agenda Item 6.13.
P-25 Digital Communication System History: October 2007 explored changing from analog to P-25 digital system. At that time the P-25 standards had not been.
K1 Proposed National Levee Safety Program An Introduction for the Tribal Assistance Coordination Group May 12, 2011.
CRESTWOOD LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY MEETING OCTOBER 15, 2012.
Millions of dollars’ worth of real estate and the accompanying ad valorem and Accommodation taxes lost year in and year out. No protection for other existing.
Campus Wide Safety Committee Initial Meeting 11/9/16
Recovery Operations.
Proposed School Bond Referendum September 26, 2017
2017/18 SIP Request Process September 2016.
Mahoning County Informational Meeting USACE Programs, Authorities, and Ohio Silver Jackets Program Presented by: Ashley Stephens 16 August 2016.
On the Assessment of Robustness: A General Framework
Critical systems design
Parks and Recreation Commission
Infrastructure, Innovation and Standardization
Research Project Overview
Rehabilitation Program impact on Sewer Management
How are schools funded since Proposal A
City of Saginaw Curb Side Leaf Collection Update
Research and Test Reactor Safety: The Regulatory Perspective
Five Star Event Planning System
Disaster Mitigation Mitigation reduces the impact of disasters by supporting protection and prevention activities, easing response, and speeding recovery.
Introduction to: National Response Plan (NRP)
(name) (number) Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment Operations
What’s that smell? Expanding the boundaries of the industrial hygienist Tina Berceli-Boyle, P.E.
Review of Park Facility Uses and Regulations
MPUMALANGA 4TH QUARTER EIG PERFOMANCE
Future Flood Event 2019 Mega Flood CA Central Valley
Larimer County: engineering
Planning Partner Adoption Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
Presentation transcript:

Cost Sharing Responsibilities Problems Opportunities Existing Conditions Future Without-Project Objectives Constraints Plan Formulation Recommended Plan Cost Sharing Responsibilities The LPP is about $29M less than the NED, with a savings of about $16M in Federal funds. Total Initial Construction Cost $30.6 M (OCT 2014) Federal Share $19.9 M Non-Federal $10.7 M [COL COLLOTON] Based on OCTOBER 2014 price levels, the estimated initial construction cost of the plan is $30.6 million, for which the Federal share is approximately $19.9M and the non-Federal share is approximately $10.7M. Initial construction includes sand replenishment, mitigation measures, monitoring, and all other costs related to the initial project construction. The total periodic nourishment costs for the renourishment events are estimated to be $134 million over the 50-year period following initiation of construction, of which the Federal share and the non-Federal share are each approximately $67 M. Continuing construction consists of all subsequent costs related to sand replenishment after the initial replenishment through the 50 year period of Federal participation. As discussed earlier, the project assumes that there is a potential that the renourishment cycles may coincide. Therefore, the cost estimate only assumes that the initial nourishment and 2 of the renourishment cycles will be synched, thus realizing a cost savings of mobilization and demobilization, PED and construction management costs. There is potential future cost savings if all 4 of the renourishment events can by synched. This cost estimate also includes a robust monitoring plan. If continued monitoring of the renourishment cycles shows no impacts from the project, then USACE will coordinate with the resource agencies to discuss reducing or eliminating certain portions of the monitoring plan. Since there are not any structures or facilities that will be constructed as a result of this project that would require special operation and maintenance beyond those services already performed by the sponsor, the Operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation costs over the lifetime, because of the project, are zero. Renourishment Costs $134 M (OCT 2014) Federal Share $67 M Non-Federal $67 M

Public Safety Risk Bluff Failures Encinitas Solana Beach Glenn Both communities experience bluff failures that could result in property damage and potentially loss of life. Each red triangle represents a bluff collapse Since the collapses are episodic and there is no warning system the best protection is a wide sandy beach and avoiding the area near the bluffs Encinitas Solana Beach 2