NSYM and TPE at RX side for Midamble design – Follow up

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preamble Structure in ax
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /0824r0 July 2015 Slide 1 Pilot Design for 11ax Downlink Transmissions Date: Authors: Yujin Noh, Newracom.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 September 2015 Considerations on Range Extension with SIG-A Repetition Date: Authors:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1089r0 September 2015 Slide 1 Considerations on PHY Padding and Packet Extension in 11ax Date:
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Various Symbol Types for WUR
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
Follow-up on Doppler Design in ax
Usage of Doppler bit in A-Control subfield
Usage of Doppler Bit in 11ax
Data Rate Selection for Wake-up Receiver
Rate 7/8 (1344,1176) LDPC code Date: Authors:
NSYM and TPE at RX side for Midamble design
WUR and Efficiency Tradeoffs
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
Consideration on WUR Frame Structure
OOK Waveform Generation for FDMA Transmission
Consideration on WUR Frame Structure
Usage of Doppler bit in A-Control subfield
Spec Text Motion Date: Authors: July 2018 Month Year
NSYM and TPE at RX side for Midamble design
PAPR Investigation on FDMA Transmission Follow-up
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
WUR and Efficiency Tradeoffs
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices
Considerations on PAPR of Wake Up Packet
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
Performance Investigation on Wake-Up Receiver
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Simulation of Potential PHY Technology
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Simulation of Potential PHY Technology
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
Header-A Definition for EDMG Control Mode
Performance evaluation of Mid-amble
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Performance evaluation of Mid-amble
False L-STF Detection Issue
Consideration on HARQ Unit
Capability on Doppler Mode
Preamble design and auto-detection for 11bd
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
20 MHz transmission in NGV
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Performance evaluation of Mid-amble
Compressed Midamble in NGV
NGV PHY Performance Results
Functional Requirements for a .11az Scalability Requirements
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
20 MHz transmission in NGV
NGV PPDU Format Date: Authors: doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Further discussion for 11be preamble
Preamble Autodetection for 11be
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Preamble design and auto-detection for 11bd
Further discussion for 11be preamble
PHY Signaling for Adaptive Repetition of 11p PPDU
Presentation transcript:

NSYM and TPE at RX side for Midamble design – Follow up Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 NSYM and TPE at RX side for Midamble design – Follow up Date: 2017-09-11 Authors: Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Yujin Noh Newracom 9008 Research Dr. Irvine, CA 92618 yujin.noh at newracom.com Minho Cheong minho.cheong at newracom.com Yujin Noh, Newracom John Doe, Some Company

Summary (1/2) This is the follow-up to determine the equations NMA at the TX side and NMA, NSYM and TPE at the RX side to be in the 11ax spec. Three options are introduced from 17/0998 and 17/0994. Since it is a receiver behavior, we can leave it as implementation decision eventually. Three options provide exactly the same outcomes. One of options can be implemented as an example in the spec. Yujin Noh, Newracom

Summary (2/2) Which options do you prefer? Opt 1) Opt 2) Opt 3) Yujin Noh, Newracom

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Strawpoll #1 Which options do you prefer for explicit/closed form equations in the next version of 11ax draft spec? Depending on the SP results, the text proposal including corresponding equations will be prepared. Opt 1) Opt 2) Opt 3) A) Yujin Noh, Newracom John Doe, Some Company

Appendix 1 Yujin Noh, Newracom

Background For 11ax, Mid-amble design has been introduced by setting Doppler bit to 1 at the last meeting [1][2]. • Considering SP results, it seems not to have big resistance on Doppler procedure based on Mid-ambles. To secure the receiver processing time, 11ax decided to support the packet extension. The receiver computes NSYM and TPE using Equation (28-110) and (28- 111) in D1.3, respectively Two equations need to be updated for Mid-amble design Yujin Noh, Newracom

Considerations (1/2) E.g.) NSYM = 30, M =10  NMA = 3 Preamble DATA_1 Midamble DATA_2 Midamble DATA_k Midamble PE 10 data symbols 10 data symbols 10 data symbols Depending on NSYM and M to derive NMA, the last Midamble of the HE PPDU can be inserted just before the PE field that consists of arbitrary values. Depending on the implementation of channel estimation, this Midable deign allows unnecessary cost and complexity to increase. Number of data OFDM symbols Midamble inserted every M data OFDM symbols HE-STF may not be needed Yujin Noh, Newracom

Considerations (2/2) When Doppler bit sets to 1, how to identify the number of NSYM for decoding data OFDM symbols and duration of packet extension, TPE, from a received HE PPDU? NMA is a function of NSYM and vise versa. Each equation includes floor function. It might be tricky to obtain the NSYM directly with Equation 1) and Equation 2) below. Equation 1) Equation 2) where Yujin Noh, Newracom

Efficient Midamble design E.g.) NSYM = 30, M =10  NMA = 2 Preamble DATA_1 Midamble DATA_2 Midamble DATA_k PE 10 data symbols 10 data symbols 10 data symbols Slightly modified equation below prevents Midamble from being inserted unnecessarily in HE PPDU. Yujin Noh, Newracom

How to get NSYM and TPE Option 1 Option 2 with closed-form equation leave it implementation-dependent with Equation 1 and Equation 2. It is unavoidable burden to derive each value, NMA, NSYM and TPE because it is not intuitive. Given the Equation (28-110) computing NSYM when Doppler bit sets to 0, it is natural to provide NSYM as well when Doppler bit sets to 1. Option 2 with closed-form equation Provide the equation for NMA for the receiver to use. With NMA, the receiver derives NSYM and TPE. Yujin Noh, Newracom

Equation for NMA at the RX (1/2) When Doppler bit sets to 1, or Exactly the same values How to get NMA is shown in Appendix. Yujin Noh, Newracom

Equation for NMA at the RX (2/2) Once NMA is obtained, the receiver computes NSYM and TPE below Only updated part Only updated part Yujin Noh, Newracom

Comparison 1/2 After verifying two different equations from 17/0998 and 17/0994, each value is exactly the same. NMA at the TX side, NMA , NSYM and TPE at the RX side No conditional statement and additional variable required Doppler = 0 Doppler = 1 Yujin Noh, Newracom

Comparison 2/2 Depending on a value by TResidue, NMA is finally determined to get NSYM and TPE at the RX side. In order to get the proper NMA, precise TResidue is very important. Mod operation with rational numbers may not provide precise Tresidue because of simulator’s internal operation such as floating point error (e.g. the fourth decimal position or something.) When implemented, this conditional statement may require additional memory to calculate and store the precise Tresidue Yujin Noh, Newracom

Summary This document has provided the required equations in the 11ax spec when Doppler bit sets to 1. In order to support simple and efficient implementation in Doppler effect driven environment, explicit/closed form equations NMA, NSYM and TPE at the RX side need to be taken into account. Yujin Noh, Newracom

Reference [1] 11-17/0734r1 802.11AX Midamble Design for Doppler [2] 11-17/0773r2 Thoughts on Doppler Design in 802.11ax Yujin Noh, Newracom

Appendix 2 Yujin Noh, Newracom

Step 1) by Equation 1 on slide 4 Step 2) from Equation 2 on slide 4 Step 3) by Step 1) and Step 2) where where  Equation 3) Yujin Noh, Newracom

Step 4) find minimum value and maximum value of Equation 3) to find the boundary Given Assuming Assuming Yujin Noh, Newracom

Step 5) check ( ) to see the range of NMA Given , since NMA is supposed to be a positive integer, NMA should be the only one positive integer between NMA,Upper and NMA,Lower. NMA = floor(NMA,Upper) = ceil(NMA,Lower ) where Yujin Noh, Newracom