Outline of John Rawls from “Justice as Fairness” and A Theory of Justice (1921) pp. 305-312 The Second Article on Rawls.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
John Rawls A Theory of Justice.
Roderick T. Long Auburn Dept. of Philosophy
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
"... reason accepts no authority above itself and is necessarily subversive." - Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind (1987), p. 258.
Justice In orienting oneself to the concept of justice, three perspectives must be examined: the individual perspective concerned primarily with personal.
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
Ethics, Part 2 Normative Codes. a) DEONTOOGICAL: [161-65] i) DUTY-BASED ii) CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -UNIVERSALIZING ACTS iii) MAXIM OF RESPECT iv) MOTIVES.
Justice as Fairness: A Closer Look by Tom Lupkie James Noonan Brian Rodriguez October 6, 2008 A-115, Professor Charles Willie.
RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.
John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.
Magnasanti by Vincent Ocasla on SimCity3000. Is it possible to produce a Just Urban Environment? I.« Justice as Fairness », a quick overview of John Rawls’
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
An Introduction to Ethics Week Nine: Distributive Justice and Torture.
Sources of General Principles Lawmaking Treaties as a means of reflecting or creating general principles: - Charney maintains that multilateral forums.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
Ethics Theory and Business Practice
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.
John Rawls A Theory of Justice PULSE – April 16, 2013.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.
Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.
Arguments against the Market  Engels complains that free market is completely wasteful.  This is also a utilitarian argument. It leads crisis after crisis.
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
Rationality in Decision Making In Law Nisigandha Bhuyan, IIMC.
Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”
Professor Smith. Unit 3  Make sure you review the power point  Read chapters  Complete your project in time Case study Other Unit 3 assignments  Read.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Rawls’ Justice Srijit Mishra IGIDR, HDP, Lectures 5, 6 and 7 13, 18 and 20 January 2012.
Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.
Monarchies and the Power of Kings During the Dark ages most of Europe was ruled by 100’s of Kings that claimed their power was given as a “divine right”
© 2012 Wanda Teays. All rights reserved. Rawls, like Kant, is a Deontological Ethicist. He emphasizes moral duty and obligations, rather than end goals.
John Rawls By Othello Jimenez. John Rawls
CRJ 201 GENIUS E XPERIENCE T RADITION / CRJ 201 GENIUS. COM For more course tutorials visit
BEJ Lecture Three: Justice and Resources Distribution.
THE UNITED STATES HEALTH CARE SYSTEM Combining Business, Health, and Delivery CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. The.
CRJ 201 Course Experience Tradition / crj201.com
Political theory and law
Deontological tradition
History of Philosophy.
Political theory and law
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
Where are some places that we see law in everyday life?
College of St. Benedict/St John’s University
Charles Beitz: Political Theory and International Relations
CRJ 201 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
CRJ 201 Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
CRJ 201 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com.
CRJ 201 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher
GODFREY HODGSON HOLMES TARCA
Theories of justice.
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
Equality of Opportunity
Module 3 (Adamczak) Theories of Justice.
Integrity and Ethics Achala Dahal.
Ethics: Theory and Practice
John Rawls Theory of Justice.
Liberalism John Rawls.
Steps for Ethical Analysis
The Princples of Justice
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Social and economic inequalities are arranged so that they are both:
Presentation transcript:

Outline of John Rawls from “Justice as Fairness” and A Theory of Justice (1921) pp. 305-312 The Second Article on Rawls

I The excerpt “Justice as Fairness A. Justice and Fairness are the same thing B. He considers justice only as a virtue of social institutions or what he calls practices C. Justice represents one of the many virtues of social institutions D. What he has to say about justice should not be equated with a all-inclusive vision of society. It is only one part of such a conception. E. He will focus on the following understanding of justice: “the elimination of arbitrary distinctions and the establishment, within the structure of a practice (i.e., institution), of a proper balance between competing claims (p. 306, par. 2).”

F. Rawls two principles of justice are not necessarily the only. ones F. Rawls two principles of justice are not necessarily the only ones. They are typical of the principles normally associated with justice. G. Rawls’ statement of the two principles of justice (p. 306, par. 4) 1. Note the contents of this paragraph in relation to the handout on Rawls’ two principles. 2. Note his comment: “These principles express justice as a complex of three ideas: liberty, equality, and reward f for services contributing to the common good (p. 306, par. 4).” H. In the remainder of the first excerpt, he discusses aspects of the two principles of justice (pp. 307 to 310)

II The excerpt A Theory of Justice A. In this excerpt Rawls discusses the notion of the maximin. “In order to make the principle regulating inequalities determinate, one looks at the system from the standpoint of the least advantaged representative man. Inequalities are permissible when they maximize, or at least all contribute to, the long-term expectations of the least fortunate group in society (p. 310, par. 3).” B. Another statement on the maximin “…that the two principles are those a person would choose for the design of a society in which his enemy is to assign him his place. The maximin rule tells us to rank alternatives by their worst possible outcomes: we are to adopt the alternative the worst outcome of which is superior to the worst outcomes of the others (p. 311, par. 1).”