Session 4 Introduction to the 2nd monitoring round ( )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
Advertisements

Intensified action on seven behaviours by all development partners Session objectives 1.To review status of intensified action: progress, issues and challenges.
THE APRM MONITORING PROCESS MOZAMBIQUE EXPERIENCE Workshop on Harmonizing the Zambian APRM NPoA with the NDP and MTEF Oct. 2014, Lusaka 1.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
PRESENTATION The Structured Dialogue. What? A participative process for young people and decision-makers to discuss and elaborate recommendations jointly.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool and Suggested Structure for Assessment United Nations Statistics.
1 Capacity Building: Strategy and Action Plan GEF-UNDP Strategic Partnership Capacity Development Initiative.
Project Overview, Objectives, Components and Targeted Outcomes
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
13 January 2011 Country Launch – 2011 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration Role of Donors.
1 Overcoming Challenges in Preparation and Implementation of NAMAs Kigali, 17 th August 2015 African Regional Workshop on NAMAs.
SECTOR POLICY SUPPORT PROGRAMMES A new methodology for delivery of EC development assistance. 1.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
Civil society participation in the Universal Periodic Review.
Metsi Makhetha Regional Program Adviser Regional Bureau for Africa
December_2009 Partnership building. December_2009 Partnership building within the partnering process COREGROUPCOREGROUP FORMAL LAUNCH $ $ $ $ $ cost centre.
WEBINAR 3 rd UN DCF Survey on Global Accountability Office for ECOSOC Support and Coordination, UNDESA.
Trade Union Training on employment policies with a focus on youth employment 11 July, 2007 Turin, Italy.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Proposed Framework for Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Negussie Gorfe.
Preparatory Stakeholder Workshop - Laos 26 May 2010.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
Presentation at the European Seminar on CSO Development Effectiveness, Vienna, 10 and 11 March 2010.
1. Background to CSO Development Effectiveness 2. What is the Open Forum process 3. International Framework for CSO Development Effectiveness 5. GLOBAL.
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
"Learning and achievements of SWA Global platform and its relevance to achieving Hygiene and Sanitation Development in India" India WASH Summit 17 th February.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Session 2 How to meeting countries needs: What has been done and way forward.
Effective development cooperation principles and quality of partnerships in the post-2015 and Financing for Development context ---Bangladesh perspective.
Session 6 Introduction to the indicator clinics UNDP-OECD Joint Support Team
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Process: What, when, by whom? Global Partnership monitoring workshop Copenhagen, June 2013.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions How the ILO works at a national level.
Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metric (SEA-PLM) II CONSULTATIVE MEETING.
The Implementation of United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) “Going Beyond the Minimum” approach 17 July 2012, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso,
Session 2 The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation Setting the scene: the Global Partnership, what it is and how it can make a difference.
stakeholder engagement and gender mainstreaming
The Global Partnership
Monitoring and evaluation of disability-inclusive development
Global Coordination Platform
UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting
Progress on Aid Effectiveness: Monitoring the Global Partnership and the Moldova Partnership Principles Lucreția Ciurea, State Chancellery Jakob Schemel,
National Quality Standards Framework
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Session 3 The monitoring framework
KNOWLEDGE SHARING CONCEPT NOTE
Institutional Strengthening Support
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Global Coordination Platform
Session 3 The 2nd monitoring round ( )
Global Coordination Platform
Session 3 Stock take of the first monitoring round
UN Support to SDG implementation in Seychelles.
IHP+ First Steering Committee Meeting 15 January 2014
Session 1: Setting the Scene
Joint session with IHP+ introduction
Management Group on Statistical Cooperation - MGSC
Session 3 The monitoring framework
How to use this template presentation?
Session 3 Stock take of the first monitoring round
Session 6 Introduction to the indicator clinics
Follow us: June 15-16, 2017 Steering Committee Meeting Summary of Conclusions and Action Items Follow.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
UHC2030 Steering Committee
Grand Palm Hotel, Gaborone, 28th – 29th June 2009
Momade Saide, Ministery of Planning & Development Hanoi, February 2007
Primary Health Care Improvement Global Stakeholder Meting, Geneva
Septiembre 2017 Mexico’s Monitoring Pilot
Presentation transcript:

Session 4 Introduction to the 2nd monitoring round (2015-16) Overall structure, timeline and process UNDP-OECD Joint Support Team www.effectivecooperation.org

Recap: what are the guiding principles? Focus on behaviour change that matters for development: gather evidence on progress/challenges to further incentivise change Voluntary participation in the monitoring efforts – other ways of showcasing achievements Developing country government-led exercise With coordination and support from the OECD-UNDP JST Anchored in existing frameworks Inclusive process Providers (country offices, in liaison with their HQs) Other partners: parliamentarians, CSOs, private sector, trade unions Partners engaged in data collection (where relevant), data validation, and discussions around findings to incentivise behaviour change

Key steps and timeline Notes: Country-level specific milestones should be adapted to country contexts. Meeting the timeline will depend on the timeliness of the provision of validated data by developing country governments. In order to ensure timely submission of country-level data by the 31March 2016 while allowing sufficient time for data validation at the country level, it is encouraged to consider data collection on the basis of whatever data is available in Oct-Dec 2015

DEVELOPING COUNTRY GOVERNMENTS WHO should engage? PROVIDER COUNTRY OFFICES In liaison with their HQs 1 “provider focal point”, who will: Act as the main counterpart Facilitate engagement of other providers OTHER PARTNERS Parliamentarians, CSOs, private sector, trade unions 1 “focal point” for each stakeholder group, who will: Share views from their group DEVELOPING COUNTRY GOVERNMENTS National co-ordinator the leading player! He/she usually sits in ministry of finance / planning With the support of his minister (high level political engagement) In relation with relevant government institutions JOINT SUPPORT TEAM Team in Paris/NY [on a case by case basis] UNDP country offices and regional centres Regional platforms

And HOW should they engage ? While the national co-ordinator is in charge of leading and coordinating the process, all stakeholders should actively engage in the different phases of the monitoring exercise, including: (1) Preparation (2) Data collection and validation (3) Data review and final processing In addition, all stakeholders are invited to contribute to the use and dissemination of findings Identifying progress factors and bottlenecks Identifying joint actions to address the bottlenecks Key messages to inform global and regional dialogue and actions

STEP 1. PREPARATION

Who does what? JST Developing country government Providers Sensitisation and outreach to countries Regional “pre-monitoring workshops” Guide note, FAQs, country spread sheets for data reporting Developing country government Minister: official letter confirming participation in the 2nd round Appointment of a National co-ordinator = the focal point in charge of leading and co-ordinating the exercise at the country level National co-ordinator participates in the pre-monitoring workshop Providers HQs: Appointment of a HQ focal point Encourage countries to participate Sensitise their country offices Country offices Identify a contact person that will engage Agree, in consultation with the government and other providers, on a single provider focal point Other partners Country level Agree, in consultation with the government, on 1 focal points for each stakeholder: parliamentarians, CSOs, private sector, trade unions

STEP 2. DATA COLLECTION AND VALIDATION

Who does what? JST National co-ordinator (NC) Providers Other partners For country sourced data (indic. 1,3,3,5,6,7,8,9b) Support and guidance to the national co-ordinator (guide, helpdesk, community space, FAQs) [on a case by case basis] Support from UNDP COs and RCs For globally sourced data (indicator 4, 9a, 10) Data consolidation National co-ordinator (NC) Initiates a launch meeting with all focal points to inform them about the exercise Oversees the collection of data, either through existing mechanisms and tools or ad hoc processes Coordinates data collection for country-sourced data (indic. 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9b) Consults with relevant stakeholders for data collection Oversees the validation of data with all stakeholders (validation meeting) Submits validated data (fill submission tool) by 31 March 2016 to the JST Providers Country offices Provide data to the NC when need be (ind. 1,2,3,5a,6,9b) Participate in data validation Other partners Relevant focal points report to the NC for indic. 2 and 3 Participate in data validation

Examples of ways to ground data collection and validation in countries’ own frameworks and systems Many countries have made progress in establishing or strengthening national institutional frameworks and processes to increase transparency, co-ordination, harmonisation, alignment and results focus of development co-operation, through: Launching a national plan or action plan for implementing EDC commitments (e.g. Bangladesh’s Joint Co-operation strategy) Discussing on EDC in an institutionalised discussion forum (e.g. Myanmar’s Development cooperation Forum) Reviewing and revising development co-operation partnership strategies (e.g. Lao’s Vientiane Declaration on Partnerships for Effective Development Co-operation) Adapting existing national systems to regularly gather information on GPEDC indicators (e.g. Cambodia’s ODA data base)

Reporting data For each indicator: Who reports to the national co-ordinator? What type of data (quantitative or qualitative)?

Scope of reporting: what transactions should be recorded? Official Development Assistance (ODA) – REQUIRED This includes: all transactions undertaken with the promotion of economic development and welfare as the main objective at concessional financial terms (if a loan, having a grant element of at least 25%) Other official flows (OOFs) – STRONGLY ENCOURAGED Countries that are interested in monitoring the effectiveness of a broader range of development co-operation funds (e.g. non-concessional lending) are encouraged to do so, provided that the following criteria are met: official source (bilateral or multilateral) promotion of economic development and welfare as the main objective The tool used for reporting country level data includes separate rows distinguishing between concessional and non-concessional funding (to ensure comparability with data from previous years) Private concessional flows – VOLUNTARY (parallel pilot exercise with JST) In countries where private development partners (foundations, NGOs) are very active in supporting government priorities, the national co-ordinator can also chose to incorporate private concessional flows (if interested, contact the JST at monitoring@effectivecooperation.org)

What is the reporting year of reference? The latest fiscal year of the developing country for which there is information available. In order to ensure timely submission of country-level data by the end of March 2016 while allowing sufficient time for data validation at the country level, it is encouraged to consider data collection on the basis of data that is available in December 2015. This also means that all data from providers of development co-operation is expected to be provided according to the developing country’s fiscal year. Exchange rates Reporting should be made in US Dollars. A table of exchange rates  is provided in the monitoring section of the Global Partnership community site.  

STEP 3. DATA PROCESSING AND FINAL REVIEW

Who does what? JST National co-ordinator (NC) Providers Consolidates and aggregates country-sourced data (indic. 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9b) and globally sourced-data (indics 4, 9a,10) Sends final country-sourced data to the NC for final review Sends globally-sourced data to the NC for information Makes raw data available online National co-ordinator (NC) Ensures final review of the country-sourced data (indic. 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9b) in consultation with relevant stakeholders If errors, notify the JST Providers Country offices If any comments on finalised country-sourced data ((indic. 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9b), communicate them to the NC HQs If any comments on globally-sourced data (indic. 4 and 10), communicate them to the JST

STEP 4. ANALYIS & PROGRESS REPORT PRODUCTION

Who does what? JST Regional platforms Carries out the analysis - on the basis of data collected at the country and global levels AND of complementary qualitative evidence (desk review) Co-ordinates the production of the global 2016 Progress Report (launched of the report expected by Sept 2016) The Progress Report will contain: a global snapshot of progress made at the global level for each indicator short country-pages presenting data for each country participating in the monitoring exercise – in a visual and reader-friendly manner Regional platforms Undertake specific regional analysis (based on available raw data)

Scope of the 2016 Progress Report: Building Evidence for political engagement Provide overview of progress made in implementing the EDC commitments on the basis of the 10 indicators Are we on track to deliver our commitments and achieve targets? Global aggregate analysis of progress and challenges Country analysis of progress & challenges (country pages) Identification of possible actions to accelerate progress Where do we need to take actions to accelerate progress? Identify good practice and emerging lessons learned Illustrative examples of development effectiveness in action What are emerging lessons learned from focusing on effective development cooperation? Provide overview of key areas of consideration for the strengthening the relevance of the monitoring in the post-2015 context. How can the monitoring indicators fit for purpose in post-2015?

STEP 5. DISSEMINATION & USE OF FINDINGS

Who does what? JST GPEDC Co-Chairs and Steering Committee members Support to dissemination of findings (launch of the Progress Report, dissemination of key highlights, on-line access to data) Facilitate linking the findings to the HLM 2 preparation and GPEDC SC dialogue GPEDC Co-Chairs and Steering Committee members Reflect on key messages and actions Developing country governments, regional platforms, providers, other stakeholders Facilitate and actively participate in exchanges, learning and dialogue around findings at country, regional, global levels (HLM2 will be an opportunity to discuss international EDC commitments) Shape up policy and practice

What support is available? Community space (incl. FAQs) Monitoring guide Tool for reporting Helpdesk: monitoring@effectivecooperation.org [on a case by case basis] Support from UNDP country offices and regional centres

তোমাকে ধন্যবাদ Gracias Thank you Dankjewel Hvala Merci Asante مننه ありがとう Gracias Thank you Dankjewel Hvala Merci Asante مننه شكرا Obrigado Salamat