Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages (May 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic optical layout of the instrument. Color box legend: Upright optical tweezers.
Advertisements

Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Mapping Three-Dimensional Stress and Strain Fields within a Soft Hydrogel Using a Fluorescence Microscope  Matthew S. Hall, Rong Long, Chung-Yuen Hui,
Kevin T. Takasaki, Jun B. Ding, Bernardo L. Sabatini 
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Computer Simulations and Image Processing Reveal Length-Dependent Pulling Force as the Primary Mechanism for C. elegans Male Pronuclear Migration  Akatsuki.
Koichiro Uriu, Luis G. Morelli  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 111, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Marine Bacterial Chemoresponse to a Stepwise Chemoattractant Stimulus
Mechanical Properties of a Drosophila Larval Chordotonal Organ
Volume 105, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
One-Dimensional Brownian Motion of Charged Nanoparticles along Microtubules: A Model System for Weak Binding Interactions  Itsushi Minoura, Eisaku Katayama,
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Self-Organization of Myosin II in Reconstituted Actomyosin Bundles
Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages (November 2016)
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Heng Lu, Adam Sokolow, Daniel P. Kiehart, Glenn S. Edwards 
Regulation of Airway Ciliary Activity by Ca2+: Simultaneous Measurement of Beat Frequency and Intracellular Ca2+  Alison B. Lansley, Michael J. Sanderson 
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
3D Single Molecule Tracking with Multifocal Plane Microscopy Reveals Rapid Intercellular Transferrin Transport at Epithelial Cell Barriers  Sripad Ram,
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Vertex Models of Epithelial Morphogenesis
Megan T. Valentine, Steven M. Block  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Supraresolution Imaging in Brain Slices using Stimulated-Emission Depletion Two- Photon Laser Scanning Microscopy  Jun B. Ding, Kevin T. Takasaki, Bernardo.
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (March 2018)
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Cholesterol Depletion Mimics the Effect of Cytoskeletal Destabilization on Membrane Dynamics of the Serotonin1A Receptor: A zFCS Study  Sourav Ganguly,
Asako Sawano, Hiroshi Hama, Naoaki Saito, Atsushi Miyawaki 
3D Single Molecule Tracking with Multifocal Plane Microscopy Reveals Rapid Intercellular Transferrin Transport at Epithelial Cell Barriers  Sripad Ram,
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
3D Protein Dynamics in the Cell Nucleus
Bart Smeets, Maxim Cuvelier, Jiri Pešek, Herman Ramon 
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 101, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Torque Generation by Axonemal Outer-Arm Dynein
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Venkat Maruthamuthu, Margaret L. Gardel  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Jens H. Kroeger, Firas Bou Daher, Martin Grant, Anja Geitmann 
Volume 111, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Long-Range Nonanomalous Diffusion of Quantum Dot-Labeled Aquaporin-1 Water Channels in the Cell Plasma Membrane  Jonathan M. Crane, A.S. Verkman  Biophysical.
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Polarized Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
William J. Galush, Jeffrey A. Nye, Jay T. Groves  Biophysical Journal 
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages 2096-2104 (May 2014) Independent Synchronized Control and Visualization of Interactions between Living Cells and Organisms  Vincent Rouger, Guillaume Bordet, Carole Couillault, Serge Monneret, Sébastien Mailfert, Jonathan J. Ewbank, Nathalie Pujol, Didier Marguet  Biophysical Journal  Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages 2096-2104 (May 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.044 Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overview and schematic of the experimental setup. (A) Instrument layout showing the illumination path for brightfield (gray), fluorescence excitation and emission (dark blue, green, and red) and FRAP and arc lamp (cyan) and the trapping IR beam (orange). Mirrors (M1 and M2), dichroic mirrors (D1 and D2), λ/2 wave plate (λ/2), lenses (L1–L4), spatial light modulator (SLM), linear motor (LM), IR filter (F1), and CCD camera (CCD). The gray dotted line represents the software synchronization between the trapping and imaging modules. Two EM-CDD cameras record filtered fluorescence signals coming from the spinning disk confocal module. (B) Representation of L3 motion effect on the trap focalization during 3D sample imaging. On the left side, the focal plane of the trapped object is not dissociated from the one of 3D imaging. On the right side, the displacement of L3 by LM is synchronized compensating the z-displacement of the imaging module and keeping the trap at its reference position. At other positions than the initial one, the IR laser becomes decollimated, this modifies the trapping force (Fig. S5). Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2096-2104DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.044) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effect of uncoupling trap from imaging on the 3D image reconstruction of a trapped object. In (A) and (B), on the left panels, a single latex bead (arrow) from the ones settled down on the cover glass is trapped, moved by the z-top plate and imaged in brightfield (scale bar, 10 μm); on the right panels, a CD45 membrane-stained T cell hybridoma (CD4 3A9 T cell) was trapped and observed by confocal imaging (stack of 20 images at 1 μm intervals). Scale bar, 15 μm. (A) The sample was moved by the z-top plate without synchronization (Fig. 1 B, left panel). The trapped bead stays in the focal plane, whereas beads on the cover glass are defocused. As a consequence, a trapped object is constantly viewed through the identical focal plane all along the stack as illustrated on the right panel with a 3D-image of a cell. (B) Same experiments but with the trapped object maintained in its reference position by synchronization (Fig. 1 B, right panel). The trapped bead appears defocused as the ones on the cover glass. On the right, 3D image reconstruction of a trapped cell becomes possible from the stack of images recorded at different altitudes. See also Movie S1 and Movie S2, on beads and cells, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2096-2104DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.044) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Calibration of the lens displacement compensating the z-top plate motion. (A) Brightfield images of a latex bead (3 μm in diameter) at different altitudes. Out of focus position changes the image of the bead with a white or black centroid above and below the reference plane, respectively. These well-defined changes in the bead shape are used to control L3 position thanks to additional beads settled on the cover glass. 40 × objective and scale bar, 5 μm. (B) Calibration data reported for different combinations of objectives (40 × or 100 × objective) and L3 lenses (100 or 125 mm focal length): 40 ×/100 mm (solid circle), 40 ×/125 mm (solid square), 100 ×/100 mm (open circle) and 100 ×/125 mm (open square). All of the experimental data were fitted with Eq. 1 except the 100 ×/100 mm data fitted with Eq. 2. Fitting parameters are configured in the synchronization module of the Visiview software (Fig. S4). Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2096-2104DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.044) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Multiple spatiotemporal trajectories to analyze spore-worm interactions. (A) Sedated worms can be moved by the xyz stage of the microscope to contact a stationary trapped spore(s). In the case of multiple traps, the spores were moved together with identical displacement. (B) Alternatively, trapped spore(s) can be moved in all directions by HOT. Moreover, each trap is independent both in space and time. Directional movements are indicated by red lines in the xy plane and by a circle in the z axis; the direction by an arrow; multiple arrows represent different arrival times. Movies S3–S5 illustrates the different modes of analysis of D. coniospora spore adhesion on C. elegans. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2096-2104DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.044) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 D. coniospora adhesion on C. elegans at different stages of development. The adhesion tests were performed on different areas of hermaphrodites or males at different stages of development as delineated in Fig. S6. A test is positive 1), if adhesion occurred during the course of HOT contacts between spore and worm and 2), if the association was stable enough not to be dissociated by HOT. In each case, the black column represent the number of spores that stuck to the worm following a single contact, the gray column is the cumulative number of adhered spores following between two and five trials; the white column represents the number of unsuccessful adhesion tests (i.e., following five trials). In most cases, a failure to adhere upon first contact as the result of an unsuitable orientation of the spore. aOnly a precursor of the vulva at this stage. bUncontrolled motion of the worm tail prevent the experiment. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2096-2104DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.044) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 D. coniospora adhesion on adults or eggs of different mutants of C. elegans. Results are expressed as in Fig. 5. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2096-2104DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.044) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Early adhesion of a single spore on C. elegans by 3D multicolor confocal imaging. An adult nematode carrying GFP and RFP markers in the apical epidermis and pharynx, respectively, is visualized after staining its cuticle and neurons with DiD. A fungal spore stained with DiI (arrow) is trapped to contact the head area of the worm by HOT. The system allows the sample visualization in 3D before and during the adhesion process. Inset at T = 216 s: magnified DiI/mRFP fluorescence image of the contacted area showing the spore along the worm. See Movie S6. Scale bar, 20 μm. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2096-2104DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.044) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions