Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages e2 (September 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arthur Schmidt, Michael Damm, Karel Caca  Gastroenterology 
Advertisements

Volume 148, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Yosuke Toya, Makoto Eizuka, Takayuki Matsumoto  Gastroenterology 
Biologic Tissue Sampling With Untethered Microgrippers
The Esophageal Epithelial Barrier in Health and Disease
Volume 146, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 2-3 (September 2016)
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages e1 (December 2010)
Long-Term Budesonide Maintenance Treatment Is Partially Effective for Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis  Alex Straumann, Sebastien Conus, Lukas Degen,
Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for En Bloc Removal of Large Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors  Nikhil A. Kumta, Monica Saumoy, Amy.
Long-Term Budesonide Maintenance Treatment Is Partially Effective for Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis  Alex Straumann, Sebastien Conus, Lukas Degen,
Volume 146, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 154, Issue 5, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms in 200 Consecutive Cases  Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, Naohisa Yahagi, Naomi.
NOTES: Current Status and New Horizons
Ira J. Fox, Stephen C. Strom  Gastroenterology 
Volume 151, Issue 3, Pages e2 (September 2016)
Cause-Specific Mortality of People With Barrett's Esophagus Compared With the General Population: A Population-Based Cohort Study  Masoud Solaymani–Dodaran,
How to Approach a Patient With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Tissue-Engineered Cell Sheets for Stricture Prevention: A New Connection Between Endoscopy and Regenerative Medicine  Joshua D. Penfield, Emmanuel C.
Volume 132, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Unusual Case of an Upset Stomach
Amir Klein, Michael J. Bourke  Gastroenterology 
Volume 153, Issue 3, Pages e16-e17 (September 2017)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 150, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Intrathoracic esophageal replacement by in situ tissue-engineered esophagus  Yuen Nakase, MD, PhD, Tatsuo Nakamura, MD, PhD, Shuichi Kin, MD, PhD, Susumu.
Volume 154, Issue 4, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 149, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 155, Issue 5, Pages e2 (November 2018)
Multiple Masses in the Colon of a Patient With Ulcerative Colitis
Sonia Radunz, Hideo A. Baba, Georgios C. Sotiropoulos  Gastroenterology 
Angel Lanas*, Yolanda Royo‡, Javier Ortego§, M. Molina*, R. Sáinz* 
Peter V. Draganov, Andrew Y. Wang, Mohamed O. Othman, Norio Fukami 
Volume 142, Issue 1, Pages e1 (January 2012)
Elizabeth Montgomery, Marcia Irene Canto 
Volume 138, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2010)
Sibu Varghese, Pierre Lao–Sirieix, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald 
Volume 136, Issue 7, Pages e3 (June 2009)
Endoscopy 20 Years Into the Future
A “resect and watch” strategy with endoscopic resection for pharyngeal cancer with massive subepithelial invasion would not be rational  Yuichi Shimizu,
Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages e2 (April 2008)
Advances in Clinical Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Volume 149, Issue 7, Pages e2 (December 2015)
Laura Rotundo, Sushil Ahlawat  Gastroenterology 
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
A Selection of the Best AGA Abstracts of DDW 2017
Volume 133, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Cancers, Flat Adenomas, and Submucosal Tumors in the Gastrointestinal Tract  Andreas Probst, Daniela Golger,
Intrathoracic esophageal replacement in the dog with the use of an artificial esophagus composed of a collagen sponge with a double-layered silicone tube 
Amer A. Alkhatib, MD, Rodney W. Stuart, MD, Ronald L. Weiss, MD 
Volume 150, Issue 7, Pages (June 2016)
Arthur Schmidt, Michael Damm, Karel Caca  Gastroenterology 
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2010)
The Rise and Fall (and Rise?) of Endoscopic Anti-Reflux Procedures
Multiple Unusual Ulcerated Skin Lesions in a Crohn's Disease Patient
Volume 142, Issue 7, Pages e1 (June 2012)
Volume 156, Issue 1, Pages 7-10 (January 2019)
Jens Hasskarl, Palanivel Velupillai, Karl Münger 
Siddharth Singh, Matthew T. Howard, Konstantinos A. Papadakis 
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages e1 (December 2010)
Esophageal Tumor After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer
Endoscopic Resection of Esophageal Mucosal Bridge
Electronic Clinical Challenges and Images in GI
Painful Anterior Chest Wall Mass, Compatible With Abscess on Computed Tomography and Possible Osteomyelitis in a Man With Ulcerative Colitis  David M.
Amir Klein, Michael J. Bourke  Gastroenterology 
A Female Patient With Persistent Epigastric Pain for 1 Week
Unrelenting Abdominal Pain after Recent Initiation of a Direct Oral Anticoagulant: A Cause for Concern  Nicholas R. Crews, Nabil Fayad  Gastroenterology 
A Rare Tumor of the Liver With a Sudden Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages 582-588.e2 (September 2012) Prevention of Esophageal Stricture After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using Tissue-Engineered Cell Sheets  Takeshi Ohki, Masayuki Yamato, Masaho Ota, Ryo Takagi, Daisuke Murakami, Makoto Kondo, Ryo Sasaki, Hideo Namiki, Teruo Okano, Masakazu Yamamoto  Gastroenterology  Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages 582-588.e2 (September 2012) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.050 Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Treatment of the artificial ulceration after esophageal ESD by transplantation of autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets fabricated on temperature-responsive culture inserts. (1) Biopsy specimens were taken from the patient's own oral buccal mucosal tissue. Oral epithelial cells were isolated from the tissue by proteolytic enzyme treatment. (2) The epithelial cells were seeded onto temperature-responsive culture inserts without a 3T3 feeder layer and cultured with autologous serum for 16 days at 37°C. (3) Oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets (23 mm in diameter) were harvested by reducing the culture temperature to 20°C. Bar = 50 μm. (4) Autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets on a support membrane were transplanted with endoscopic forceps onto the bed of the esophageal ulceration immediately after ESD. Gastroenterology 2012 143, 582-588.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.050) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Method of endoscopic cell sheet transplantation. (A) The cell sheet on a support membrane passed through the EMR tube. The membrane was passed down to the esophagus with the side attaching the cell sheet facing the inside and the side without the cell sheet facing the esophageal wall. (B) An entrance balloon was inflated to keep cavity dilated. (C) Operation of the scope continued as the entrance balloon maintained a wide working space by preventing air leakage. (D) When the cell sheet reached the ulceration site, the membrane was rotated 180 degrees with endoscopic forceps so that the side of the membrane containing the cell sheet now faced the ulceration site. (E) The cell sheet was placed directly onto the esophageal ulceration. (F) The cell sheet was held in place for about 10 minutes. Gastroenterology 2012 143, 582-588.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.050) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A case with esophageal stricture prevented by the application of the transplantation of cell sheets (case 1). (A) A 70-year-old man underwent transplantation of 2 cell sheets. (B) One week after transplantation, epithelialization was observed at the center of the ulcerative site. (C) Three weeks after transplantation, epithelialization was endoscopically observed to be almost complete. (D) Four weeks after transplantation, complete epithelialization was observed without any evidence of stricture. Gastroenterology 2012 143, 582-588.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.050) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A case with esophageal stricture prevented by the application of the transplantation of cell sheets (case 6). (A) A 55-year-old man underwent transplantation of 7 cell sheets in a spotted manner. (B) One week after transplantation, novel epithelia were regenerated from the transplanted sites. (C) Three weeks after transplantation, complete epithelialization was observed without any evidence of stricture. (D) Three weeks after transplantation, iodine staining also confirmed the complete epithelialization. Gastroenterology 2012 143, 582-588.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.050) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The healing process of the ulcer after esophageal ESD without cell sheet transplantation and a small biopsy from the center of the ulceration. A and B show the wound healing process after ESD without cell sheet transplantation. (A) The markings of the esophageal tumor immediately before ESD. (B) Four weeks after esophageal ESD without cell sheet transplantation. The healed scar shrank and focused in one point in a radial fashion. Strong staining by iodine areas indicates glycogenic acanthosis. (C) Schematic drawing of wound healing without cell sheet transplantation. Without cell sheet transplantation, wound healing is mainly caused by the elongation of native esophageal epithelia around the wound and the contraction of the esophageal wall to reduce the ulcer size. (D) Immunohistochemistry of a small biopsy specimen from the center of the ulceration at 1 week with anti-pancytokeratin antibodies to detect transplanted epithelial cells in case 9. Gastroenterology 2012 143, 582-588.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.050) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 A case with esophageal stricture (case 4). (A) Very large esophageal ulceration (11 cm in diameter, involving almost a whole circumference, and expanding to the esophagogastric junction). (B) One week after transplantation of 7 cell sheets to the posterior wall. (C) The epithelial tissue of the posterior wall was thicker than that of the anterior wall. (D) The patient underwent endoscopic balloon dilation 21 times. Gastroenterology 2012 143, 582-588.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.050) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Figure 1 The surface of temperature-responsive dish is hydrophobic at 37°C which allows cell adhesion, spreading, and proliferation. However, the same surface becomes hydrophillic once the temperature is reduced to less than 32°C and all the cells cultured on it are detached without any need for proteolytic enzymes like trypsin. Confluently cultured cells are harvested as a single contiguous cell sheet. (1) Culture condition on temperature-responsive dishes at 37°C. (2) Harvest of cell sheet with attached protein (after decreasing of temperature). Gastroenterology 2012 143, 582-588.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.050) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions