IPCRF for T1-3 WILHELMINA P. MATA, Ph.D. SANTA ANA FISHERY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL WILHELMINA P. MATA, Ph.D. Santa ana, cagayan valley

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES Teaching-Learning Process Prepare daily lesson logs of activities in learning areas handled including appropriate adequate and updated instructional materials June-March 10% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1. DLLs have always SMART objectives, developing HOTS 2. Objectives are competency based under the K+12 curriculum 3. Parts of the DLLs have correct entries 4. With appropriate IMs 5. DLLS are 100% complete in subj. handled 6. Submitted on time Very Satisfactory 4 With items no. 1 and 2 plus 3 other indicators specified above Satisfactory 3 With items 1 and 2 but with instances of Non-SMART objectives and not developing HOTS plus 2 other indicators Unsatisfactory 2 DLLs were not properly prepared; with missing parts and incomplete in the subjects handled Poor 1 None of the given indicator was followed Name   Name of Rater Position Teacher Review Period April 2016 Date of Review

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES Teaching-Learning Process Facilitate learning through appropriate and innovative teaching strategies that develop HOTS June- March 20% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1.Learning activities provided were always in line with the objectives specified in the DLL 2. Utilized varied strategies and differentiated instruction always 3. Strategies used elicited 100% class interaction 4. All learning activities developed HOTS 5. ICT integration was evident Very Satisfactory 4 With items 1,2,3 and 4 of the given indicators with no. 3 at 75% only Satisfactory 3 With indicator 1 plus 2 other indicators Unsatisfactory 2 Indicator no. 1 was not always observed but with another indicator followed Poor 1 None of the indicators was followed

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES Teaching-Learning Process Provide a safe, student-friendly and conducive learning environment for learners June- March 10% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1.Classroom is neat and clean, well-lighted, ventilated and with well-maintained facilities (chairs, tables and blackboard, windows and doors) 2. With functional drinking facilities 3. With cabinets for books and cleaning materials neatly arranged 4. Bulletin boards are structured with learners’ information profile and school rules and other required information 5. With available garbage receptacles; evident of proper waste segregation and disposal Very Satisfactory 4 With indicators 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 but with 2-3 instances of non-compliance Satisfactory 3 With any 3 of the 5 indicators Unsatisfactory 2 With any 2 of the 5 indicators Poor 1 With only 1 of the 5 indicators

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES Monitor and evaluate students’ learning outcomes June- March 15% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1.Class records reflect > students’ assessed competencies > date of assessment > at least 10 recorded assessment > remediation assessment conducted 2. Summative assessments reflect the three components that serve as bases for grading as indicated in the TOS 3. Utilization of test results is evident as shown in students’ portfolios in subjects handled Very Satisfactory 4 With indicators 1, 2, and 3 but no students’ portfolios Satisfactory 3 With any 2 of the 3 indicators Unsatisfactory 2 With any 2 of the 3 indicators but incomplete Poor 1 With any 1 of the 3 indicators but incomplete

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES Undertake activities to improve performance indicators June- March 15% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1.100% of learners in the subjects handled have passed for the academic year 2. 100% of the learners handled have completed the school year 3. Taught 100% of the required competencies with 75% mastery level 4. Conducted remediation for slow and absentee learners Very Satisfactory 4 With indicators 1,2,3 but mastery level is not 75% but not lower than 50% Satisfactory 3 With indicators 1,2, and 3 but not 100% but not lower than 75% for indicators 1 and/or 2 Unsatisfactory 2 With indicators 1,2and 3 but below 75% but not lower than 50% Poor 1 Only 1 of the 4 indicators but below 50%

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES Maintain updated students’ school records June- March 10% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1.With complete profiles of students handled including anecdotal records of students with special needs 2. Released students’ grades (100%) every grading period in all subjects handled on or before the due date 3. Submitted SF 2 on time, data reflected in SF1 4. Submitted well accomplished forms of students like forms 138, 137, school clearance and other forms required by the office 5. With evidence of utilization of the students’ school records Very Satisfactory 4 With indicators 1,2,3 and 4 but with instances of not more than 2 delays Satisfactory 3 With indicators 1and 2 plus another indicator either 3 or 4 or 5 with instances of not more than 5 delays Unsatisfactory 2 With at least 1 of the indicators with instances of not more than 5 delays Poor 1 With at least 1 indicator but incomplete and delayed more than 5 times

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Supervise curricular and co-curricular projects and activities June- March 5% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1.Adviser/ Coordinator of recognized school organization/club/program established in the school 2. Initiated activities/projects of the organization/ club handled as reflected in the action plan submitted with external funding and support 3. Accomplished activities/projects/programs within the scheduled date 4. Activities/projects contributed to the improvement of performance indicators 5. Supervision, training and activities were done as additional tasks apart from the regular loads handled Very Satisfactory 4 With indicators 1,2,3,4 and 5 but funding has been provided by the school Satisfactory 3 With indicators 1,2,3,4 and 5 but without action plan submitted Unsatisfactory 2 With indicator 1 plus any other indicator from 2,3,4,5 Poor 1 With indicator 1 only

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Support activities of governmental and non-governmental organizations June- March 5% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1.Officer of a GO, NGO or PO for the current rating 2. Participated in the implementation and completion of a GO,NGO or PO program, project or activities for the current year 3. Program, project, activities have positive impact to the welfare of the youth or the community Very Satisfactory 4 Any 2 of the 3 indicators given Satisfactory 3 Any 1 of the 3 indicators given Unsatisfactory 2 Participant to any 3 government or non-government activities Poor 1 Participant to less than 3 government or non-government activities

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Conduct action research in the area of concern/creative work/publication June- March 5% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1.Action research was in line with the subject area/concern of the researcher 2.Action research has been submitted at least to the school head for approval before implementation 3. Action research has been implemented with reported results within the rating period 4. Results has been utilized in the school Very Satisfactory 4 With indicators 1,2 and 3 Satisfactory 3 With indicators 1,2 and 3 but results had been incomplete Unsatisfactory 2 With indicators 1 and 2 but implementation is initial only Poor 1 With indicator 1 only

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Participate in activities that enhance professional growth (seminar, teachers association) June- March 3% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1.Had finished at least 9 units in post graduate studies within the rating period 2. Had 100% attendance in all seminars required by the school 3. Had 100% attendance in school programs and activities 4. Manifested professionalism in dealing with colleagues, parents and members of the community Very Satisfactory 4 With indicators 2, 3 and 4 Satisfactory 3 With indicators 2,3 and 4 but not 100% for indicators 2 and 3 but not less than 75% Unsatisfactory 2 With indicators 2, 3 and 4 but less than 75 % in attendance to seminars and programs Poor 1 Failure to observe indicator no. 4

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)   MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT Per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Receive special awards/ citation/ recognition for exemplary performance June- March 2% Outstanding 5 INDICATORS 1.Award/s received is for exemplary performance that had contributed to the improvement of performance indicators for the current rating period 2. Received at least 5 awards under the category of outstanding with supporting documents Very Satisfactory 4 With indicator 1 but only 4 awards and only 1 or 2 under the category of outstanding Satisfactory 3 With indicator 1 but only 3 awards and not in the outstanding category Unsatisfactory 2 With indicator 1 only Poor 1 Received award/s but did not contribute to the improvement of performance indicators OVER-ALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS