Optimizing MFSP: Performance Measures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Advertisements

Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Using a Logic Model to Target your Evaluation Amy D’Andrade San Jose State University School of Social Work November 20, 2014.
Evaluation. HPS is a “change” process that takes place within a school community A key consideration is that the change needs to be sustainable.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
SIM Evaluation Approach Presentation to the SIM Steering Committee September 25, 2013.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
GEF Evaluation Office. Two overarching objectives:  Promote accountability for the achievement of GEF objectives through the assessment of results, effectiveness,
Data-based Decision Making: Basics OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports February 2006
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Line of Fire – Injury Reduction Program Business Unit Level of Effort Discussion.
Stephanie Shaw: Civil Aviation Authority
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
New BC Framework for Enhancing Learning Rocky Mountain District Framework for Enhancing Learning.
Introduction in to Social Accounting & Audit Building Confident Communities, in Partnership Louise Robson Customer Focus Service Manager 1.
Social Performance State of Practice in the Microfinance Industry.
The Programme is funded by Erasmus+ under
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation
Project monitoring and evaluation
4th Assessment of Progress Against the GEOSS 2015 Strategic Targets
UNIDO-GEF Industrial Energy Efficiency Project in Macedonia
Emergency Resiliency Fund (ERF)
Southampton City Council School School Improvement Service
The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification in Sudan –Next Steps
April 21 Francesca Recanatini, WBI
MUHC Innovation Model.
Workload Assessment Model
Garrett Mehl, Tigest Tamrat, Maeghan Orton
Supporting Learning and Organisational Effectiveness
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Eastham Group Practice
RAPID RESPONSE program
Primary health care performance measurement initiatives across three Canadian provinces Martin-Misener, R., Johnston, S., Burge, F., Blackman, S., Scott,
Directions for Expert Review Panel
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Research Program Strategic Plan
Accountability Court Certification and Peer Review
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Strategic & Operational Planning:
Strengthening our Commitment to Accountability to Beneficiaries
2017/18 Focus Area & Goal 2017/18 Measures of Success
RC Ohio Valley Region Strategic and Annual Planning Process January – September 2016 Notes Fr John says greeting and reflects on 75 anniversary and then.
Strengthening our Commitment to Accountability to Beneficiaries
Joint session with IHP+ introduction
Strengthening our Commitment to Accountability to Beneficiaries
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Deloitte Consulting LLP SCOOPS Session
BAI Gender Action Plan 27th April 2018 IFI - Spotlight Stephanie Comey.
Emergency Resiliency Fund (ERF)
Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
Student Administration and Support Programme and Project Timelines
Proposed Strategic Planning Process for FY 2013/14 thru FY 2015/16
Workload Assessment Model
Quality in Evaluation: the international development experience
A collaborative approach to support Primary Care demand management: In-hours GP Triage Lynn Huckerby, Associate Director, Service Transformation and Digital,
SMART & CARING GRANT APPLICATION WORKSHOP
Developing Metrics to Assess Community Impact The Anchor Dashboard
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
MFRC Governance C MPC LGen Lamarre
Performance and Quality Improvement
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Xueman Wang, GPSC, World Bank
Roles and Responsibilities
Establishing HTA Impact Evaluation From Day One Ruth Louise Poole
Presentation transcript:

Optimizing MFSP: Performance Measures September 2015

Outline Where We’ve Been Where We Are Where We’re Going We’ll be recording this session, just so those who weren’t able to attend can take advantage of the discussion. 2 2

Where We’ve Been “Finally, a modernized Military Family Services Program must contain a systemic qualitative performance measurement mechanism focused on evaluating institutional support to military families on a recurring basis.” CF Ombudsman Report, 2013, p. 79 Key points to pull from this quote are that Performance measurement should include: Systemic elements (what is the impact overall for military families, in addition to at specific locations or for specific issues) Qualitative elements (not just quantitative or numbers) Quantitative data: MFRC Service Delivery Stats, QOL Survey Qualitative : informed by the Community Needs Assessments, Annual Reports, feedback from families (including through the Military Family Panel Process), etc. Be recurring (more than one point in time, to show a trend) 3 Draft-Not for dissemination

Where We’ve Been Jan-Mar 2014 Apr-Jun 2014 Jul-Sep 2014 Oct-Dec 2014 Apr-Present 2015 MFS Logic Model Consultations MFS Logic Model Revisions Performance Measure Development Performance Measures MFRC Tiger Team Performance Measure Data Gathering The MFS Logic Model, part of which is represented by the MFS Communications Logic Model provided to DGMPRA, was created in alignment to the MFS Operating Plan to provide valid, reliable and tangible evidence of our investment in CAF families.  It represents a shift from a program focus to a family focus while taking into consideration the recommendations of the CRS Report and the Ombudsman’s Report The MFS Logic Model was developed in consultation with over 100 participants, including teleconferences with 81 participants from 27 locations across Canada, US and Europe. These participants included military family members, MFRC staff and Board Members and CAF military Chain of Command Once the MFS outcomes  were determined in the Logic Model, the key performance measures were developed through a literature review of standard indicators used in government and the family service industry and in consultation with subject matter experts both inside (DG Military Personnel—John Currie, Maj Carter; DGMPRA—Dr. Zhigang Wang) and outside of DND (Mark Schacter, Mark Cabaj at Tamarack CCI) The measures were further refined through consultation with a Tiger Team comprised of staff from 10 MFRCs across the country and a series of tele- and video-conferences with 34 participants across 24 MFRCs in Apr 2015   Draft-Not for dissemination

Where We Are We have 4 Dashboards to show how we are doing on Performance Measures: MFS Dashboard (focussing on how we are doing with our People—absenteeism rates, health of employees, partnerships—community partners, and resources) MFRC Dashboard—how we are doing with people, partnerships and resources Family Dashboard—what impact we are having for families in terms of awareness, access and use of family services Leadership dashboard—to show status of MFS’ tasks for CAF leadership (DGMWS, CMP, CDS and MND) We now have some data on 4 Dashboards (e.g.: absenteeism rates for MFS staff) and waiting on other data (e.g.: MFRC service delivery data, to be submitted in Apr 2016 World Bank, Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System (2004) 5

Where We’re Going MFRC Service Delivery Data Due Apr 2016 Establish benchmarks, performance targets Ongoing analysis of how we’re doing and the impact of support to families As noted in the MFS Operating Plan, performance measurement is intended to be integrated into the MFSP, providing: tangible quantitative and qualitative evidence of impact to families at 12-month increments Strategic information for decision-makers Increased transparency and accountability to the military family community by evaluating “the extent to which MFS activities and services are tangibly contributing to the well-being of contemporary military families” The overarching purpose of setting up PMs is for strategic learning and accountability. Essentially, we need to demonstrate: How we are supporting families What is the value of the support to families; and What impact that support is having 6 Draft-Not for dissemination

Discussion If you have any additional questions or something occurs to you after the fact, don’t hesitate to email me so that we can capture all feedback Thank you to all for taking the time out of your days to offer your feedback. Have a great day! 7