The Research Council of Norway

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Warszawa 18 luty 2004 The European Union Industrial Research Actions The nanotechnology, materials, production research area (NMP) Traditional instruments.

Advertisements

Illustrated Story on funding research Europides has got the instruments!

HP - NCPs - 23 Oct th Framework Programme Implementation of Priority 3 Dir G - DG Research Brussels - 23 October 2002.

Oficina AproTECH de AETIC: Información y asesoramiento en la preparación de propuestas de I+D+I The structure of the FP7: Funding schemes,

7 th Framework Programme (FP7) - Malta’s participation th January 2013 Anthea Fabri FP7 National Coordinator Malta Council for Science and.

European Framework Programme for Business FP7 UK Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation FP7UK NMP and PPP 2011 Calls Alastair McGibbon National Contact.

Access to Research Funding – Ireland’s Experience Dr Imelda Lambkin, 29 April 2013

InJoy&Train FAFB Information Day 16 November, 2007 FP7 OVERVIEW TIGRAN ARZUMANYAN.

South Africa’s S&T partnership with the European Union From FP4 to Horizon 2020 Daan du Toit Senior S&T Representative to the EU.

Project ideas for the last NMP Call Cooperation between New and Old Member States in NMP priority Warsaw, Zbigniew Turek National Contact Point,

Main headings  Integrating European Research Priority thematic areas Specific SME activities Specific international cooperation activities JRC activities.

Companies and the Sixth Framework Programme. Agenda Overview of the 6 th Framework Programme (FP6) Why participate ? Industry participation in FP6 What’s.

NMP seminar, EU FP6 Priority 3 NMP Nanotechnologies and nano-sciences, knowledge-based Multi-functional materials and new Production processes.

Overview, Instruments and Prospects Sixth Framework Programme Thematic Priority 3 - NMP Nanotechnology & nanosciences, knowledge-based functional Materials,

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 1 How to participate in the 6th EU Framework Programme Manfred Horvat BIT - Bureau for International Research and Technology.

6th Framework Programme Implementation of Priority 3 Dir G - DG Research 26 November Warsaw.

Panagiotis KARNIOURAS NCP for SPACE / Technology Transfer Consultant PRAXI/ HELP-FORWARD Network … the Greek experience 9 October 2009.

Implementation Instruments for FP6 Thematic Priorities Joseph Prieur - Aeronautics DG Research- Space &Transport.

Active European Research Networks and International Collaboration SUPERGEN Marine Energy Consortium Sustainable Power Generation and Supply Initiative.

NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND NANO-SCIENCES, KNOWLEDGE-BASED MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND NEW PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND DEVICES Priority 3 – NMP in FP6 Ewa Jędryka.

NMP-NCP meeting – Brussels, 27 January 2005 European Commission - DG Research Directorate G – Industrial Technologies Priority 3 “NMP” in FP6 The Next.

Practical aspects Dr. Ir Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison “Practical Aspects of Preparation FP6 projects Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir.

Experiences of a NMP 1 st call STREP coordinator How to develop a project from the idea 23/05/2005, Poznan, Poland Prof. Dr. ir. Bert LAUWERS Department.

NCP meeting - September 17, 2004 – WP - 1 The WP revision for 2005 : some indications NMP Programme « Thematic Priority 3 »

1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.

FP7: Framework Program 7th

Participation in 7FP Anna Pikalova National Research University “Higher School of Economics” National Contact Points “Mobility” & “INCO”

Republic of Slovenia Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology Republic of Slovenia Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology 6.

Interdisciplinary research on consumers and consumption patterns Centre for Consumer Science.

1 NORWAY-US WORKSHOP Financial and organizational implications related to a targeted increase in R&D in the areas of Energy and Environment.

2004 Forum Activities Meeting place Scientific forum events Network resource.

GETting Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises from Candidate Countries to INcrease Participation on IST Projects GET-IN Eigirdas Žemaitis, Lithuanian Innovation.

Ministerie van Economische Zaken 1 SenterNovem is een agentschap van dr. ir. Matthijs Soede Poznan, 15 January 2007 Types of projects in FP7.

Agency for International Science and Technology Development Programmes in Lithuania A. Goštauto str , LT Vilnius Phone: (370 5) , Fax:

Warszawa 18 luty th Framework Programme NMP - 2nd Calls Integrated Projects for SMEs Hervé Péro, Christophe Lesniak DG Research.

Poznan 19 April Kwietnia 2005 Poznan FP6 The Next Calls for 2005 Technology Platforms FP7.

Review on the Participation of Lithuanian Organizations in EU Funding Anzelma Useliene International programmes, MITA.

Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation Herlitschka 1 Warsaw FP6 Launch Conference - 26 Nov Small and Medium Enterprises -

New Methods for Involving SMEs in Mechatronics sector in FP6 To support small and medium size companies (SMEs) to take part in proposals and on-going projects.

1 Priority 3 NMP: generalities Renzo TOMELLINI Head of Unit “Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies” Directorate “Industrial Technologies” Research Directorate-general.

Information day on FP6 Budapest Tor Ulsund (abelia)

Materials Research in the 6th Framework Programme Anne de Baas Materials Unit, DG Research, EC Cracow 15Sept 2004.

Richard Escritt, Director – Coordination of Community Actions DG Research, European Commission “The development of the ERA: Experiences from FP6 and reflections.

Virtual Institute for Multi-length Scale Modelling of Nano-structured Materials (VIANO) Warsaw, Tomasz Wejrzanowski Faculty of Materials Science.

EURATOM RESEARCH AND TRAINING ON NUCLEAR ENERGY Slide 1 A. Zurita D:/DATA/POWERPNT.PPT Range of FP-6 Instruments

Industrial & ACC participation in NMP Stage IPs DG RTD/G-1/IA NCP Meeting - Ad Hoc group’s results Slide 1 Results of the AD HOC Group.

2. The funding schemes ICT Proposer’s Day Köln, 1 February 2007 The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7.

INSTRUMENTS ? PurposeTarget audience EU-funded activities Indicative EU funding Average duration ‘Optimum’ consortium Specific characteristics NoE Art.

6th Framework Programme Implementation of Priority 3 Dir G - DG Research December Budapest.

ENVINET PROPOSAL: UV TASKS Jussi Kaurola (FMI, Finland), Ola Engelsen (NILU, Norway), Gunther Seckmayer (IMUK, Germany), Harry Slaper (RIVM, the Netherlands),

Interreg Europe Elena Ferrario

DevSecOps for the construction of Cyber-Physical Software & Systems

Third Meeting of National Contact Points

Priority 3 NMP A Review & Preview The new Work Programme 2004

FP7 – Basic Info NINA BEGOVIĆ, NCP - SSH, SiS, Research Infrastructures University of Sarajevo.

Inspiring excellence – The Norwegian Way

Presentation for information days Units involved:

IPR’s: new challenges and opportunities

Research Directorate General

Senior Adviser, Birgit Jacobsen

Priority 3 NMP: generalities

Emissions – environmental state – effects – impacts

Indicative budget allocation: 29 MEuro

Presentation for information days Units involved:

Information Society Technologies in the 6th Framework Programme

Dr Georgios Amanatidis DG Research - Dir I European Commission

International Co-operation

Coordination and Support Actions

Experience of the implementation of FP6; preparations towards FP7

DG RTD Common Implementation Centre Common Data and

Presentation transcript:

The Research Council of Norway FP6-2002-NMP EU FP6 Priority 3 NMP Nanotechnologies and nano-sciences, knowledge-based Multi-functional materials and new Production processes and devices Status for Norway after 1. Call Tor Einar Johnsen The Research Council of Norway NMP seminar, 09.01.04

NMP: Norwegian success ? NMP seminar, 09.01.04

1. Call FP6-2002-NMP-1 2003 FP6-2002-NMP-2 IP’s for SME New instruments (IP, NE) 260 M€ Trad. Instrum. (STREP, CA, SSA)140 M€ Norway 11 points FP6-2002-NMP-2 IP’s for SME New instruments (IP) 40 M€ Norway 0 points! Tall fra Call fiche NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Participation 103 proposals with 149 Norwegian partners Final results: 11 proposals with 14 Norwegian partners NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Participation NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Who participated? HE – Higher education RES – Research institute FP6-2002-NMP Who participated? HE – Higher education RES – Research institute IND – Industry ISME - Industrial SME OSME – Other SME NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Who were successful participants ? FP6-2002-NMP Who were successful participants ? IP glimrer med sitt fravær!! NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Who are the Norwegian partners ? FP6-2002-NMP Who are the Norwegian partners ? Instrument Acronym Norwegian Partners NE – Network of Excellence NANOMEMPRO SINTEF (R. Bredesen) INSIDE_PORES Institute for energy technology, IFE SINTEF CA – Coordination Action ELFNET Abelia SSA – Specific Support Actions EMUDE National Institute for Consumer Research, SIFO NAPOLY Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Who are the Norwegian partners ? FP6-2002-NMP Who are the Norwegian partners ? Instrument Acronym Norwegian Partners STREP – Specific Targeted REsearch Projects NANOCAPS KeraNor AS SINTEF (Chr. Simon, Coord.) SENPIMAG SINTEF SEMINANO University of Oslo SFINX Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU I-IMAS COMPOSE NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Comparison to Finland Norway Finland Projects Total 103 203 Successful 11 32 Partici-pants 149 404 14 64 NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Comparison to Denmark Norway Denmark Projects Total 103 198 Successful 11 30 Partici-pants 149 329 14 55 NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Norwegian summary, NMP-1 FP6-2002-NMP Norwegian summary, NMP-1 Traditional instruments: STREP, CA and SSA Low Norwegian ”score” Success rate 10,3% (Finland 27,4%) New instruments: IP and NE Success rate 6,5% (Finland 9,2%) No Norwegian partners in IP! 3 (2) institutes in 2 NE! KeraNor is the only Norwegian industrial partner (STRP) NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Concluding remarks Very low participation from Norway Have we failed to inform about possibilities? Too much nano? Too little about multifunctional materials and processes Not relevant for the Norwegian industry? Too early for the Norwegian research community? Low interaction between institutes and industry NMP seminar, 09.01.04

Can we improve? Thank You ! Need closer cooperation between institutes and industries National funding for participating institutes Less costly for research institutes to participate Less costly for industry (not paying institutes) More resources in the Norwegian Research Council Thank You ! NMP seminar, 09.01.04