Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 430-452 (February 2014) Robot-assisted and Laparoscopic Repair of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Riccardo Autorino, Christopher Eden, Alaa El-Ghoneimi, Giorgio Guazzoni, Nicolòmaria Buffi, Craig A. Peters, Robert J. Stein, Matthew Gettman European Urology Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 430-452 (February 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.053 Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis flow of study selection. European Urology 2014 65, 430-452DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.053) Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Meta-analysis of success rate and complication rates between minimally invasive pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty in the adult population. CI=confidence interval; M-H=Mantel-Haenszel (test); MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty. European Urology 2014 65, 430-452DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.053) Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Meta-analysis of analgesic requirement and hospital stay between minimally invasive pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. CI=confidence interval; IV=inverse variance; MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty. European Urology 2014 65, 430-452DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.053) Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 4 Meta-analysis of success rate and complication rates between minimally invasive pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. CI=confidence interval; M-H=Mantel-Haenszel (test); MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty. European Urology 2014 65, 430-452DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.053) Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 5 Meta-analysis of operative times and hospital stay between minimally invasive pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. CI=confidence interval; IV=inverse variance; MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty. European Urology 2014 65, 430-452DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.053) Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 6 Meta-analysis of operative times and complication rates between robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. CI=confidence interval; IV=inverse variance; MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty. European Urology 2014 65, 430-452DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.053) Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 7 Meta-analysis of hospital stay and success rate between robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. CI=confidence interval; M-H=Mantel-Haenszel (test); MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty. European Urology 2014 65, 430-452DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.053) Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions