Alignment of the PHENIX Silicon Vertex Tracker (VTX) in 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Heavy Flavor and Charged Hadron Flow measurement using Silicon Vertex Detector at PHENIX Hiroshi Nakagomi for the SVX Group and the PHENIX Collaboration.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL A Quick Look at Some Systematic Errors in the TPC By Jim Thomas.
1 Vertex fitting Zeus student seminar May 9, 2003 Erik Maddox NIKHEF/UvA.
Invariant Mass Calculation J/ψ Rosi Reed 10/31/07.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
The Physics Potential of the PHENIX VTX and FVTX Detectors Eric J. Mannel WWND 13-Apr-2012.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes, July2002 SVT Analysis/Status Update Jun Takahashi – University of Sao Paulo.
FTPC calibration status Joern Putschke for the STAR FTPC group STAR Analysis Meeting 2002 October 22-24, 2002.
Report of the NTPC Test Experiment in 2007Sep and Others Yohei Nakatsugawa.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Status of W analysis in PHENIX Central Arm Kensuke Okada (RBRC) For the PHENIX collaboration RHIC Spin Collaboration meeting November 21, /21/20091K.Okada.
Non-identified Two Particle Correlations from Run I Understanding drift chamber tracking – Tracker and candidatory – Two particle efficiencies/ghosts A.
1 MTD Calibration for Cosmic Ray Triggered Data in RUN 10 at STAR Lijuan Ruan (BNL), Liang Li (UT Austin) 04/01/ Workshop on STAR MTD Production.
STAR Collaboration Meeting Rene Bellwied – Wayne State University July 2004 SVT Calibration and STI tracking status An update of work since the SVT review.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Simulation and Analysis of VTX03 and Upgrades to LASS Ryan Page.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Higher harmonics flow measurement of charged hadrons and electrons in wide kinematic range with PHENIX VTX tracker Maki KUROSAWA for PHENIX collaboration.
Simulations Report E. García, UIC. Run 1 Geometry Radiator (water) 1cm x 2cm x 2cm with optical properties Sensitive Volume (hit collector) acrylic (with.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
A simple formula for calculating the momentum spread from the longitudinal density distribution and RF form Recycler Meeting March 11, 2009 A. Shemyakin.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
FTPC calibration status & plans for Y03 Joern Putschke for the STAR FTPC group STAR Calibration Meeting 2002 November 7, 2002.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
1 HBD Update Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, May 7, 2008 May7, 2008.
STAR SVT Self Alignment V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 2003 Fall Meeting of the Division of Nuclear Physics (2003/10/31) 1 KANETA, Masashi for the PHENIX Collaboration RIKEN-BNL Research.
Software Update Takashi HACHIYA RIKEN 2012/2/10RIKEN VTX software meeting1.
PIXEL ladder alignment Hidemitsu ASANO. Photo analysis & survey beam data (with zero magnetic field) ① SVX standalone tracking Global Tracking Strategy.
Central-Cluster Tracking Takashi Hachiya Maya Shimomura.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
Monitoring Energy Gains Using the Double and Single Arm Compton Processes Yelena Prok PrimEx Collaboration Meeting March 18, 2006.
Detector Alignment with Tracks Wouter Hulsbergen (Nikhef, BFYS)
y x Vincenzo Monaco, University of Torino HERA-LHC workshop 18/1/2005
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Current Status of the VTX analysis and the DCA measurement
External Alignment Maya Shimomura (ISU)
Z-alignment Hidemitsu Asano.
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
VTX tracking issues Y. Akiba.
Analysis Test Beam Pixel TPC
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Software Update Takashi HACHIYA.
Pixel-strip-EMC tracker and DC option
External alignment Maya Shimomura (ISU) 12/03/15 RIKEN VTX meeting.
External Alignment Maya Shimomura (ISU)
First results from technical run with deuteron beam
Tatia Engelmore, Columbia University
Z-vertex dependent residuals in phi (2nd request of Akiba-san)
Current status of run14 VTX alignment
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Heavy Ion Physics in RUN14-16
Weekly Report Maya SHIMOMURA Run dependent check for VTX alignment
Yuxi Pan University of California, Los Angeles
Run4 Fiducial Match between Real and MC
RIKEN VTX software Meeting
Current Status of the VTX analysis
Presentation transcript:

Alignment of the PHENIX Silicon Vertex Tracker (VTX) in 2014 Yasuyuki Akiba Takashi Hachiya Hidemitsu Asano Taebong Moon Yonsei Univ./RIKEN Nov. 27th 2014

Motivation of the alignment Equalizing the expected detector position to the installed position. Mis-alignment: will degrade quality of measurement. ex) DCA, pT, invariant mass, primary vertex and etc.. can lead to ineffective/wrong physical conclusion. Distance of Closest Approach (DCA2D) x y Reconstructed track Primary vertex Real particle track

PHENIX detector Silicon Vertex Tracker (VTX) Drift Chamber (DC) - Primary/secondary vertex - Global/standalone tracking - DCA measurement Drift Chamber (DC) - Charged paritcle tracking - Momentum measurement - |𝜂|<0.35 𝛥𝜙=𝜋/2

Silicon Vertex Tracker (VTX) B0 B1 EAST Y WEST B2 B3 X |𝜂|<1.2 𝛥𝜙~2𝜋 Layer Kind R (cm) Z (cm) RO Channel # Ladders Pixel 2.5 ±10 1,310,720 10 1 5 2,671,440 20 2 Strip-pixel 11.7 ±16 122,880 16 3 16.6 ±19 221,184 24

Alignment procedure Offset calibration VTX ladder by ladder alignment VTX and DCH of both west and east have their own coordiante systems. The origins of the detector don’t coinside with each other. Should take account of the relative positions first. VTX ladder by ladder alignment The expected location of the ladders is different from the installed location. Should equalize them.

Offset calibration using field-off run Relative positions can be calculated if we know BCs in their own internal coordinates. Beam Center (reference point) BC by VTXE in VTXE coordinate O(VTXE) BC by VTXW in VTXW coordinate O(VTXW) EastToWest offset BC by DCHW in DCHW coordinate O(DCHW) VTXToCNT offset

Beam center in the VTX BC in the VTX can be represented by the following formula. - DCA = Xbeam 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝝋𝒃 - Ybeam 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝝋𝒃 - 𝝋𝒃=𝒕𝒂𝒏 −𝟏 ( 𝒚𝟏−𝒚𝟎 𝒙𝟏−𝒙𝟎 ) (x1, y1) O (VTX) (x0, y0) Beam center (XBEAM, YBEAM) DCA from O X Y 𝝋𝒃

Beam center in the VTX DCA [cm] Beam Center (reference point) 𝝋𝒃 [rad] O(VTXW) O(VTXE) Beam Center (reference point) BC by VTXW in VTXW BC by VTXE in VTXE EastToWest offset Fit using the following formula. - DCA = P1 * sin𝜑𝑏 + P2 * 𝑐os𝜑𝑏 - P1 = XBEAM = 0.293613 cm - P2 = -YBEAM = 0.047278 cm

Beam center by DCH Due to offset btw beam center and the origin of DC, α is not 0 and represented by following formula. O (DCH) DCH West Arm α Ф 𝛼=− 𝑋 𝐵𝐸𝐴𝑀 𝑅 𝐷𝐶 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜙+ 𝑌 𝐵𝐸𝐴𝑀 𝑅 𝐷𝐶 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜙 Track by DC from BC Beam center (XBEAM, YBEAM)

Beam center in the DCH Beam Center (reference point) O(DCH) Beam Center (reference point) BC by DCH in DCH 𝑿 𝑩𝑬𝑨𝑴 =−𝟎.𝟏𝟏𝟓𝟔𝟏𝟗𝒄𝒎 𝒀 𝑩𝑬𝑨𝑴 =𝟎.𝟎𝟔𝟒𝟏𝟏𝟗𝟓𝒄𝒎

Offset calibration using field-off run Relative positions can be calculated if we know BCs in their own internal coordinates. Beam Center (reference point) BC by VTXE in VTXE coordinate O(VTXE) BC by VTXW in VTXW coordinate O(VTXW) EastToWest offset BC by DCHW in DCHW coordinate O(DCHW) VTXToCNT offset

After offset calibration using field-off and -on run Before offset calib After offset calib DCA in X-Y plane (cm) DCA in X-Y plane (cm) DCA in X-Y plane became a Gaussian distributin after offset calib. The problem still exists. The mean of Gaussian is shifted to the right. A poor DCA resolution. VTX ladder by ladder alignment is requred.

Alignment in φ (ladder by ladder) Trajectory estimated by initial vector by DC 𝑦 Real hit in VTX 𝑥 𝑫 φ Expected hit in VTX 𝑫 𝟏 𝑫 𝟐 𝑫 𝝋 = 𝑫 𝟏 − 𝑫 𝟐 : Residue in φ. 𝒖 The position of the ladder should be shifted to the opposite direction by 𝑫 𝝋 Primary vertex by VTX

DCA in X-Y plane

DCA resolution in X-Y plane DCA resolution becomes better as pT increased.

DCH moving VTX moving

Further study This is residue as a fuction of phi angle. I sliced residuals though z-vertex. Black: no primz cut Red: primz < -8 Green: -8 < primz < -4 Blue: -4 < primz < 0 Yellow: 0 < primz < 4 Pink: 4< primz < 8 Bright blue: primz > 8 /direct/phenix+user06/phnxreco/Takashi_VTX_LbyL/tmoon/dsts/5.Akiba/2.p2Out/macros

Summary Alignment finished and we chieved a good DCA resolution less than 70 micron when pT is 1GeV/c. There is room for improvement of DCA. Rotation of the coordinate and/or the ladder in VTX Cosideration of the DCHE coordinate system.

Thanks!

Get paramenters from linear fit. *523 PRDFs used. X-vertex for E is wider than others Y-intercept : -0.00159907 (cm) Slope : 0.00158915 (cm) Y-intercept : 0.00177275 (cm) Slope : -0.000699638 (cm) Y-intercept : -0.00112291 (cm) Slope : 0.000222804 (cm) Y-intercept : -0.00263372 (cm) Slope : 0.00107324 (cm) /direct/phenix+user06/phnxreco/Takashi_VTX_LbyL/tmoon/dsts/3.Akiba/4.p2Out/rootfiles/ana.C

Residue in phi for B0

Mean of residue in phi

DCA0 formula for fitting DCA0 can be represented by beamcenter. For fitting, DCA0 = Xbeam sin φb - Ybeam cos φ b 𝝋𝒃=𝒕𝒂𝒏 −𝟏 ( 𝒚𝟏−𝒚𝟎 𝒙𝟏−𝒙𝟎 ) Before fitting, DCA0 as a function of 𝜑𝑏 should be known. (x1, y1) Y Beam center (xbeam, ybeam) (x0, y0) DCA0 from O (VTXW/E) 𝝋𝒃 O (VTXW/E) X This is calculated in VTX internal coordinate

DCA0 formula for data point By using position of hits in B0 , we can know DCA0 for data point. |𝑫𝑪𝑨𝟎|= 𝒅 𝒙 •𝒅 𝒙 −| 𝒖 •𝒅 𝒙 || 𝒖 •𝒅 𝒙 | 𝒅 𝒙 =(𝒙𝟎,𝒚𝟎 𝒖 =(𝐜𝐨𝐬 𝝋 𝒃 ,𝐬𝐢𝐧 𝝋 𝒃 𝝋𝒃=𝒕𝒂𝒏 −𝟏 ( 𝒚𝟏−𝒚𝟎 𝒙𝟏−𝒙𝟎 ) (x1, y1) O (VTXW/E) (x0, y0) Beam center (xbeam, ybeam) Y 𝒖 •𝒅 𝒙 𝒅 𝒙 𝒖 =(𝐜𝐨𝐬 𝝋 𝒃 ,𝐬𝐢𝐧 𝝋 𝒃 DCA0 from O (VTXW/E) 𝝋𝒃 X This is calculated in VTX internal coordinate

Beam center by VTX : fit DCA0 vs Фb Plot 2-D distribution of DCA0 vs 𝜑 𝑏 . Do Fitting using below function. - DCA0 = par[0]sin Фb + par[1]cos Фb - par[0] = XBC = 0 - par[1] = YBC = 0 After fitting, it return beamcenter in the VTX West coordinate. - par[0] = 0.285206+E-4 - par[1] = 0.0465125+E-5 Parameters should not be fixed Those will be used as initial parameters for next fitting. ZEROFDATA_P00_0000405836_000(0~19).PRDFF Run Number : 406541 Energy : 200 GeV Number of events : 1.315M

Beam center by VTX : background reduction Before 2nd iteration, let’s eliminate background. Calculate DCA0 - par[0]sin Фb - par[1]cos Фb. par[0] = 0.285206 par[1] = -0.0465125 Fitting function. 𝑦= 𝐴 2𝜋𝜎 exp(− 1 2 𝑥−𝜇 𝜎 2 )+𝐶 Get σ from fitting. Apply 5-sigma cut - lDCA0 - par[0]sin Фb - par[1]cos Фbl < 5σ DCA0 - par[0]sin Фb - par[1]cos Фb

Beam center by VTX : refit DCA0 vs Фb Plot 2-D distribution of DCA0 vs 𝜑 𝑏 again. Fit function again. - DCA0 = par[0]sin Фb +par[1]cos Фb - par[0] = 0.293506+-E-5 - par[1] = -0.0471569+E-5 Final result. - par[0] = Xoffset = 0.293613+E-5 cm - par[1] = -Yoffset = 0.0472786+-E-5 cm

𝒛𝒆𝒅 What is zed ? 𝛼 𝑦 𝑦 𝑥 𝑧 Beam View Side View 𝑹 𝑫 𝑪 𝒐𝒖𝒕 =𝟐.𝟒𝟕𝒎 𝑹 𝑫 𝑪 𝒐𝒖𝒕 =𝟐.𝟒𝟕𝒎 𝒛𝒆𝒅 𝑹 𝑫 𝑪 𝒓𝒆𝒇 =𝟐.𝟐𝟎𝒎 𝑹 𝑫 𝑪 𝒊𝒏 =𝟐.𝟎𝟑𝒎 𝛼 𝑦 𝑦 𝑥 𝑧 𝑳 𝑫𝑪 =𝟐.𝟒𝒎 Beam View Side View

Alignment in 𝒖𝑵 (ladder by ladder) Trajectory estimated by initial vector by DC 𝑦 Real hit in VTX 𝑥 Projected hit in VTX 𝑫 𝟏 Expected hit in VTX 𝑫 𝟐 𝒖 Primary vertex by VTX

Alignment in 𝒖𝑻 (ladder by ladder) Trajectory estimated by initial vector by DC 𝑦 Projected hit in VTX 𝑥 Real hit in VTX 𝑫 𝟏 Expected hit in VTX 𝑫 𝟐 𝒖 Primary vertex by VTX

Alignment in φ (Ladder by Ladder( Trajectory estimated by initial vector by DC 𝑦 Real hit in VTX residue 𝑥 Projected hit in VTX 𝑫 𝟏 𝑫 𝟐 𝒖 Primary vertex by VTX

Introduction to calibration Alignment 1st STEP Alignment 2nd STEP BeamCenter STEP

2) Alignment Ladder by Ladder in φ and z

Alignment in 𝒖𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 (ladder by ladder) Trajectory estimated by initial vector by DC 𝑦 Real hit in VTX 𝑥 Projected hit in VTX 𝑫 𝑵 Expected hit in VTX 𝑫 𝟏 𝑫 𝟐 𝐷 𝑁 = 𝐷 1 − 𝐷 2 : residual normal to u. ( = residual in phi in our notation) 𝒖 This is what we did during alignment in phi so far. Primary vertex by VTX

Alignment in 𝒖𝑻𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒕 (ladder by ladder) Trajectory estimated by initial vector by DC 𝑦 Projected hit in VTX 𝑥 Real hit in VTX 𝑫 𝑻 Expected hit in VTX 𝐷 𝑇 : residual tangent to u. ( it doesn’t take account yet in present alignment step) 𝒖 We didn’t take account of all translation. Primary vertex by VTX

Feb. 14: East carriage moved into run position, ready for physics. Feb. 18: Zero-field runs 402340 and 402338 with a total of ~780k events. Feb. 19: Access, East carriage moved out and in. Feb. 20: Zero-field run 402765 with a total of ~590k events. Feb. 24: Access and move of East carriage out and in. Feb. 24: Zero-field run 403312, 403318, 403319, 403322, 403324, 403329 with a total of ~3M events. Note: extended runs because of possible timing shift. Mar. 05: Access (maintenance day) and move of East and West Carriage. Mar. 08: Zero-field runs 404895, 404891, 404892, 404893, 404894 with a total of ~1.4M events. Mar. 11: End of LE run, maintenance day, East carriage moved. ----- Mar. 15: 200 GeV Au+Au, Zero-field runs 405836, 405837, 405838 with a total of ~13M events. Mar. 19: West carriage moved, Zero-field run 406541 with ~1.5M events Apr. 02: East/West carriage moved, Zero-field run 408185 with a total of ~ 2M events. Apr. 04: East carriage moved, Zero-field run 408327 with about 2M events. Apr. 16: West carriage moved, Zero-field run 409446 with about 9M events. Apr. 25: West carriage moved, Zero-field run 410113 with about 11M events. Apr. 30: West carriage moved, Zero-field runs 410660, 410661 with about 2.5M events. May 05: West carriage moved, Zero-field run 410925 with about 8.8M events. May 12: East carriage moved, Zero-field runs 411562, 411653, 411654, and 411655 with about 7.5M events. May 14: East carriage moved, Zero-field run 411768 with about 3.8M events. May 28: East and West carriage moved, Zero-field run to be performed.

VTX W/E Beamcenter

DCH W/E Beamcenter

CNT East To West

VTX To CNT Offset

VTX East To West