Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
Advertisements

Zilong Qiu, Anirvan Ghosh  Neuron 
Regulation and Destabilization of HIF-1α by ARD1-Mediated Acetylation
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Apaf-1, a Human Protein Homologous to C
Cdk2 Kinase Is Required for Entry into Mitosis as a Positive Regulator of Cdc2–Cyclin B Kinase Activity  Thomas M Guadagno, John W Newport  Cell  Volume.
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Yingqun Huang, Renata Gattoni, James Stévenin, Joan A. Steitz 
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages (April 2003)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Pcf11 Is a Termination Factor in Drosophila that Dismantles the Elongation Complex by Bridging the CTD of RNA Polymerase II to the Nascent Transcript 
Heterochromatin Dynamics in Mouse Cells
Dimitra J. Mitsiou, Hendrik G. Stunnenberg  Molecular Cell 
Volume 121, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2001)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Exon Identity Established through Differential Antagonism between Exonic Splicing Silencer-Bound hnRNP A1 and Enhancer-Bound SR Proteins  Jun Zhu, Akila.
Volume 133, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Coilin Methylation Regulates Nuclear Body Formation
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
DAPK interacts with HSF1 in vivo and in vitro.
Active Repression of Antiapoptotic Gene Expression by RelA(p65) NF-κB
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Unassembled Ig Heavy Chains Do Not Cycle from BiP In Vivo but Require Light Chains to Trigger Their Release  Marc Vanhove, Young-Kwang Usherwood, Linda.
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 1265-1277 (May 2003) MOF-Regulated Acetylation of MSL-3 in the Drosophila Dosage Compensation Complex  Alessia Buscaino, Thomas Köcher, Jop H Kind, Herbert Holz, Mikko Taipale, Kerstin Wagner, Matthias Wilm, Asifa Akhtar  Molecular Cell  Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 1265-1277 (May 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00140-0

Figure 1 Double-Stranded RNA Interference of Dosage Compensation Proteins (A) SL-2 cells were incubated with MSL-2 dsRNA (for 4 days) or MSL-3 or MOF dsRNA (for 2 days). Whole-cell extracts (WCE) were prepared from control cells (lanes 1–3) as well as dsRNA-treated cells (lanes 4–12), and the proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and probed with antibodies against MSL-2, MSL-3, MLE, MOF, and tubulin. In order to assess the extent of protein reduction by dsRNA treatment, protein extracts were titrated as indicated. The asterisk shows that for this particular blot, MSL-3 dsRNA-treated extract corresponding to 100% of the extract was loaded and probed with MSL-2 antibody. (B) Control and dsRNA-treated cells were fixed and immunostained with MSL-1, MSL-2, MOF, MSL-3, and MLE antibody or Hoechst 33342 as indicated. (C) Quantitation of the X chromosomal localization of dosage compensation proteins upon treatment with dsRNA. In each experiment, 200 cells were counted and scored for localization to the X chromosome in three independent experiments, where cells were treated with dsRNA for MSL-2, MSL-3, and MOF, respectively. The bars show the percentage localization observed in each immunostaining, with standard error of mean represented on top of each bar. Black bars, immunostaining in control cells; whitebars, immunostaining of MSL-2 dsRNA-treated cells; light gray bars, immunostaining of MSL-3 dsRNA-treated cells; and dark gray bars, immunostaining of MOF dsRNA-treated cells. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1265-1277DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00140-0)

Figure 2 MSL-3 Association to the X Chromosome Is RNase Sensitive (A) SL-2 cells were permeabilized with detergent (AA–AL) and subsequently untreated (AB, AF, and AJ) or treated with RNase A (AD, AH, and AL) for 10 min; this was followed by fixation and immunostaining with antibodies against MSL-3 (AB and AD), MSL-1 (AF and AH), and MOF (AJ and AL). Nuclei in (AA), (AC), (AE), (AG), (AI), and (AK) were stained with Hoechst 33342. (B) Top, whole-cell extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitated with either preimmune serum (lanes 1 and 3), control beads (5), or MSL-3 antibody (lane 2), MOF antibody (lane 4), or MLE antibody (lane 6). Bottom, RNA was extracted from the samples indicated above followed by RT-PCR analysis. 25 PCR cycles were performed with roX2 or U6 primers. IP, immunoprecipitated sample; SN, supernatant. The position of the band corresponding to IgG is indicated by an asterisk. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1265-1277DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00140-0)

Figure 3 MOF Acetylates MSL-3 (A) MOF and MSL-3 interact directly. Recombinant MSL-3 was bound to MSL-3 antibody immobilized on protein agarose beads (lane 1). Following binding, beads were washed and incubated with MOF protein (lane 1 and lane 2). As a control, MSL-3 antibody immobilized on protein agarose beads was incubated with MOF in the absence of prebound MSL-3 (lane 2). Lane 3 MOF input, 50%. The membrane was first probed with MSL-3 antibody (top) and subsequently stripped and reprobed with MOF antibody (bottom). (B) MOF protein was incubated with either MSL-3 (lanes 1 and 3) or alone with 3H-labeled acetyl CoA (lanes 2 and 4). Lanes 1 and 2 show Coomassie-stained gel; lanes 3 and 4 show the corresponding autoradiograph of the same gel. Relative mobility of the MOF and MSL-3 is indicated. Degradation product of MOF is indicated by an asterisk. (C) SL-2 cells were treated with 200 ng/ml of TSA and 0.2 mCi/ml 3H-labeled acetic acid and incubated overnight at 25°C. The whole-cell extracts were prepared from these cells and incubated without (lane 1) or with (lane 2) MSL-3 antibody. Following incubation with agarose beads and subsequent washing, the samples analyzed by Western blot analysis using MSL-3 antibody (top panel). Lanes 1 and 2 correspond to control and immunoprecipitated samples (IP); lanes 3 and 4 correspond to 10% of supernatant (SN) of the corresponding samples. The acetylation status of MSL-3 was detected by autoradiography (bottom panel). The position of the band corresponding to IgG is indicated by an asterisk. (D) SL-2 cells were either mock transfected (lanes 2 and 4) or transfected with FLAG epitope-tagged MSL-3 construct (lanes 1 and 3). 24 hr after transfection, cells were treated with 200 ng/ml of TSA and 0.2 mCi/ml 3H-labeled acetic acid and incubated overnight at 25°C. The whole-cell extracts were prepared from these cells and incubated with FLAG affinity beads. Following incubation, beads were washed and the samples analyzed by Western blot analysis using MSL-3 antibody (lanes 1 and 2). The acetylation status of MSL-3 was detected by autoradiography (lanes 3 and 4). (E) SL-2 cells were either mock transfected (lane 3) or transfected with FLAG-tagged MSL-3 construct (lanes 1 and 2). Cells in lane 1 were also incubated with MOF dsRNA. 72 hr posttransfection cells were treated with 200 ng/ml of TSA and 0.2 mCi/ml 3H-labeled acetic acid and incubated overnight at 25°C. The whole-cell extracts were prepared and incubated with FLAG affinity beads. Subsequently, the samples were analyzed by Western blot analysis using FLAG antibody (bottom panel). The acetylation status of MSL-3 was detected by autoradiography (top panel). (F) Precursor ion scan for the reporter ion m/z 126.1 corresponding to the ammonium ion of acetylated lysine after the loss of ammonia. The spectrum of the analysis of the digest of the truncated protein is shown with the different charge states of the acetylated peptide with the mass of 3380.5 Da indicated. (G) Determination of the acetylation site in the tryptic peptide with tandem mass spectrometry. The fragment spectrum of the peptide GGKAAHVEEPIVVPMDTGHLEAEHEMAPTPR is shown. The acetylated peptide was detected on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with precursor ion scanning for the reporter ion m/z 126.1, which is derived from an ammonium ion of acetylated lysine. The four times-charged precursor ion (m/z 845.65) was chosen for fragmentation using a Q-TOF hybrid instrument. The N-terminal b-ion series identified the peptide and the acetylation site within the peptide. Additional singly charged y-ions and doubly charged ions (not assigned) confirmed the identification. The position of the acetylated lysine and the amino acids of the b-ion series are indicated. (H) Point mutation in MSL-3 K116 residue abolishes MSL-3 protein acetylation by MOF. Schematic representation of MSL-3 protein, showing the position of the two chromodomains and the sites of mutagenesis. Mutant derivatives MSL-3 K110-112G (lane 1), K116R (lane 2), and K116G (lane 3) were incubated with recombinant MOF and 3H-labeled acetyl CoA. The top panel shows the autoradiograph, while bottom panel shows the amounts of MSL-3 derivatives added as detected by Western blot analysis using MSL-3 antiserum. Degradation product of MOF is indicated by an asterisk. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1265-1277DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00140-0)

Figure 4 MSL-3 Localization to the X Chromosome Is Acetylation Sensitive (A) SL-2 cells were permeabilized with detergent (AA–AJ) and subsequently untreated (AB) or treated with TSA for 10 min (AD) or 30 min (AF, AH, and AJ). This was followed by fixation and immunostaining with antibodies against MSL-3 (AB, AD, and AF), MSL-1 (AH), and MOF (AJ). Nuclei in (AA), (AC), (AE), (AG), and (AI) were stained with Hoechst 33342. (B) Upper panel, whole-cell extracts were prepared from SL-2 cells that were permeabilized with detergent (lanes 1–4) and subsequently untreated (lanes 1 and 2) or treated with TSA for 30 min (lane 3). Extracts were then incubated with MSL-3 antibody (lanes 2 and 3) and half of the samples were analyzed by Western blot analysis. Lane 4 shows 10% of the input extract. The membrane was first probed with MSL-3 antibody (top) and subsequently stripped and reprobed with MOF antibody (bottom). Lower panel, the other half of the above samples was used for RNA extraction followed by RT-PCR analysis. For PCR using RoX2 and U6 primers, 24 or 28 cycles were performed. Lane 4 corresponds to the roX2 or U6 signal in control extract. (C) Upper panel, whole-cell extracts were prepared from SL-2 cells that were permeabilized with detergent (lanes 1–4) and subsequently untreated (lanes 1 and 2) or treated with TSA for 30 min (lane 3). Extracts were then incubated with MLE antibody (lanes 2 and 3) and half of the samples were analyzed by Western blot analysis. Lane 4 shows 10% of the input extract. The membrane was first probed with MLE antibody (top) and subsequently stripped and reprobed with MOF antibody (middle) and finally MSL-3 antibody (bottom). Lower panel, the other half of the above samples was used for RNA extraction followed by RT-PCR analysis. 25 cycles were preformed for roX2 and U6 primers. Lane 4 corresponds to the corresponding roX2 or U6 signal in control extract. (D) Upper panel, unacetylated (top) or acetylated (bottom) MSL-3 was incubated with paramagnetic beads alone (lane 1), paramagnetic beads bound to biotinylated Y14 DNA (lane 2), biotinylated Y14 RNA (lane 3), or biotinylated roX2 RNA (lane 4). Following binding, beads were washed and the bound fraction was separated on SDS PAGE, followed by Western blot analysis using MSL-3 antibody. Amount of bound MSL-3 is quantified by titration of the input MSL-3 as shown in the right panel. Quantitation of binding to each substrate is indicated as percentage of total protein input. (E) Biotinylated roX2 RNA was bound to paramagnetic beads and nonacetylated (−) or acetylated (+) MSL-3 derivatives MSL3 K110-112G (lanes 1 and 2) and MSL-3 K116G (lanes 3 and 4) were tested for RNA interaction. Lanes 4–8 show 10% supernatant (SN) loaded respectively. Degradation product of MSL-3 is indicated by an asterisk. (F) Chromatinized (lanes 1 and 2) or free DNA (lanes 3 and 4) bound to paramagnetic beads was incubated with MSL-3 (lanes 1 and 3) or acetylated MSL-3 (lanes 2 and 4). Lanes 5 and 6 show 10% MSL-3 of the supernatant (SN) corresponding to lanes 1–4. Degradation product of MSL-3 is indicated by an asterisk. Quantitation of binding to each substrate is indicated as percentage of total protein input. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1265-1277DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00140-0)

Figure 5 RPD3 Association with the Dosage Compensation Proteins (A) Drosophila nuclear extracts were used for immunoprecipitation using MSL-3 antibody (lanes 2 and 7) or preimmune serum (lanes 3 and 8) using binding buffer containing either 100 mM KCl (lanes 1–5) or 150 mM KCl (lanes 6–10). Lanes 4 and 5, and 9 and 10 show 10% of corresponding supernatants. Lanes 1 (I) shows 10% of extract used for the experiment. The samples were analyzed by Western blot analysis. The blot was first probed with MSL-3 and subsequently stripped with antibodies as indicated. The position of the band corresponding to IgG is indicated by an asterisk. (B) Direct interaction between MSL-3 and RPD3. Recombinant MSL-3 was bound to protein agarose beads with (lane 1) or without (lane 3) MSL-3 antibody. This was followed by incubation with recombinant RPD3 in a binding buffer containing 100 mM KCl. RPD3 was also incubated with MSL-3 antibody bound to protein agarose beads (lane 2). Lane 4 shows 20% input (I) of RPD3. (C) Deacetylation of MSL-3 with RPD3. MSL-3 fused to intein or intein alone was bound to chitin beads and acetylated with MOF (bars 1 and 3). Following removal of MOF and excess acetyl CoA, beads were incubate with RPD3 IP or control IP (compare bars 1 and 2 with 3 and 4). The bars show deacetylase activity with standard error of mean represented on top of each bar. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1265-1277DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00140-0)

Figure 6 Proposed Model Dosage compensation can be viewed as a two-step process. The first step includes the assembly of the dosage compensation proteins, in particular MSL-1 and MSL-2, at the chromatin entry sites, followed by the recruitment of MLE, roX2, roX1, MSL-3, and MOF. This leads to assembly of a functional complex that is competent to spread from the entry sites along the length of the X chromosome. Regulated acetylation of MSL-3 may cause a conformational change that leads to temporary loss of its interaction with RNA. A cycle of deacetylation may follow that will allow MSL-3 to contact RNA again on a nearby affinity site. Through a continuous cycle of acetylation and deacetylation, MSL-3 along with the rest of the complex may be able to spread from a chromatin entry site. Chromatin entry sites are indicated as dark gray boxes, affinity sites as light gray boxes. HDAC, histone deacetylase; Ac, acetylated residues. A symbol for each DCC component is indicated. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1265-1277DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00140-0)