HMI Reliability Dale Wolfe Reliability Engineer LMSSC*ATC*LMSAL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leicester SRC, 3-5 Dec 2007 Systems engineering at detector level Tim Stevenson.
Advertisements

WP3 High Availability Drives Electrical Machines and Drives Research Group University of Sheffield Dr. Georges El Murr
Mission Success Starts with Safety The Similarities and Differences of Reliability Engineering and Probabilistic Risk Assessment RAMS VII Workshop November.
Module 3 UNIT I " Copyright 2002, Information Spectrum, Inc. All Rights Reserved." INTRODUCTION TO RCM RCM TERMINOLOGY AND CONCEPTS.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
1.B – Solar Dynamo 1.C – Global Circulation 1.D – Irradiance Sources 1.H – Far-side Imaging 1.F – Solar Subsurface Weather 1.E – Coronal Magnetic Field.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Vegard Joa Moseng BI - BL Student meeting Reliability analysis summary for the BLEDP.
RAM Modelling in the Project Design Phase Friday 30 th April, 2010 Paul Websdane Reliability Modelling for Business Decisions Asset Management Council.
Relex Reliability Software “the intuitive solution
FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Start-up Shutdown Malfunction Plan Development and Implementation Duncan F. Kimbro
Mission Assurance Concepts and Discussion NEPTUNE Power CoDR Richard Kemski June 10, 2002.
Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA). 2 Definition of FMEA Failure Modes Effect Analysis (FMEA) is a structured approach to: Predict failures and prevent.
THEMIS Instrument CDR(1) UCB, April 19 & 20, 2004 Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California - Berkeley.
FAULT TREE ANALYSIS (FTA). QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS Some of the commonly used quantitative risk assessment methods are; 1.Fault tree analysis (FTA)
LSST Camera CD-3 Review Brookhaven National Laboratory, Brookhaven, NY LSST Safety Council Camera Review Bremerton, WA 2015 LSST Camera Environment,
Product Development Chapter 6. Hardware & Software Techniques Block diagram the system (Visio) Redundancy  Active: failure of one parallel component.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE BRIAN KLATT MISSION ASSURANCE MANAGER.
Page 1lOhcO 9 meeting From MDI to HMI Jesper Schou Stanford University
Idaho RISE System Reliability and Designing to Reduce Failure ENGR Sept 2005.
Final Version Dick Bolt Code 302 May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Success.
Reliability Assessments Scope Per paragraph of the MAR and PAIP “ When necessary/prudent or when agreed upon with the GSFC Project Office, Glast.
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Mathew Samuel NASA/GSFC/MEI (301)
24b - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Safety Dave Bogart Code 302 August 16-17, 2005.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
DOM Electronic Reliability Progress Report S.Colonges 09/04/2014.
Page 1HMI/AIA Science Meeting – February 13, 2006 HMI Instrument Status HM/AIA Science Meeting February 13, 2006 Barbara Fischer HMI Deputy Program Manager.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP-EFW SMA I-CDR RBSP EFW SMA Safety and Mission Assurance Instrument -
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency INTRODUCTION Module 2.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
GLAST LAT ProjectPeer Review & CDR Preparation Document: LAT-PR Preparation Schedule Subsystems Peer Reviews –ACD January 7-8, 2003 –CALMarch.
2007 Office of Risk Management Annual Conference 2007 David M. Shapiro Disaster Planning & Recovery Consultants
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Power Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005.
Detailed Analyses Chapter 14.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Rose Navarro HMI Lead Thermal Engineer
Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016
ISUAL Product Assurance
TEMPO Instrument Update
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
IENG 461 – System Safety I Lecture 8 – Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) James R. Harris, Ph.D., P.E.
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
2K CB FDR Overview:  Agenda, Charge, Review Process
Russell Lindgren Electronics Lead
HMI Mission Assurance Manager
Peer Review Agenda (Suggested).
University of Alabama in Huntsville
Dave Akin, Lockheed Martin
BRIAN KLATT MISSION ASSURANCE MANAGER
HMI Mission Assurance Manager
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Reliability Calculations
Knowing When to Stop: An Examination of Methods to Minimize the False Negative Risk of Automated Abort Triggers RAM XI Training Summit October 2018 Patrick.
Unit I Module 3 - RCM Terminology and Concepts
SDO Mission Reliability
HMI Top Level Requirements
Reliability Calculations
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
Instrument Commissioning SDO SOWG - January 18-19, 2007 Purpose/Goal:
Instrument Overview Larry Springer HMI Program Manager
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Project Management Unit #2
Definitions Cumulative time to failure (T): Mean life:
DOE Review of the LCLS Project 7-9 February 2006
Jeff Dutton/NASA COR August 26, 2019
Presentation transcript:

HMI Reliability Dale Wolfe Reliability Engineer LMSSC*ATC*LMSAL dale.wolfe@lmco.com 650-424-3030

HMI Reliability Requirements for HMI Reliability are derived from the SDO HMI Product Assurance Implementation Plan, 2H00021 The following HMI reliability analyses are SDO MAR related deliverables covered by DID 4.2 EEE Parts Stress Analysis (PAIP 4.3.2) Reliability Prediction & Reliability Block Diagram (PAIP 4.3.3) Failure Mode and Effects Analysis & Critical Items List (PAIP 4.3.1) Limited Life Items (PAIP 4.3.4)

EEE Parts Stress Analysis The stress analysis was performed at the most stressful part parameters that can result from the specified performance and environmental requirements. Stress analysis results are compared to EEE-INST-002 derating guidelines and documented in 2H00233, Rev A, “EEE Parts Stress and Derating Analysis Those parts that were determined to exceed their derating limits were resized, redesigned, or removed from the system Currently no parts exist in the HMI Instrument that exceed the derating limits of EEE-INST-002

Reliability Block Diagram HMI Reliability Block Diagram (full instrument)

Reliability Block Diagram HMI Reliability Block Diagram (degraded instrument) Not required

Reliability Prediction The reliability prediction calculates the probability of success for the HMI instrument over the 5-year mission. The HMI Reliability Prediction and Reliability Block Diagrams are documented in 2H00032, Rev A. Failure rate calculations are primarily derived from MIL-HDBK-217F Mechanism failure rates are derived from similar mechanisms on-orbit experience and life testing Changes from the PDR reliability calculation include the incorporation of RAL CEB reliability numbers, update in mechanism cycling and use of vendor failure rates for Actel FPGAs. This resulted overall in a slightly higher HMI reliability calculation from PDR Subsystem Full Instrument Degraded Instrument Camera and Camera Electronics (Includes Camera I/F electronics) 0.8651 0.9951 HMI Electronics 0.9590 0.9926 Mechanisms & Mech. Controllers 0.9737 0.9955 Oven/Optics 0.9990 Total (5 years) 0.8070 0.9823

FMEA and Critical Items List An FMEA is a procedure by which the ways an item or function can fail (failure modes) are identified and the effects of the failures on performance (failure effects) and mission objectives (severity) are evaluated. The following severity categories are used in the FMEA for each failure mode. Category Severity Description 1 Catastrophic Failure modes that could result in serious injury, loss of life, or total loss of mission. 1R Failure modes of identical or equivalent redundant hardware items that, if all failed, could result in category 1 effects. 1S Failure in a safety or hazard monitoring system that could cause the system to fail to detect a hazardous condition or fail to operate during such condition and lead to Sev. Cat. 1 consequences. 2 Critical Failure modes that could result in loss of one or more minimum mission objectives as defined by the GSFC project office. 2R Failure modes of identical or equivalent redundant hardware items that could result in Category 2 effects if all failed. 3 Significant Failure modes that could cause degradation to full mission objectives and still meet a minimum mission. 4 Minor Failure modes that could result in insignificant or no loss to mission objectives.

FMEA and Critical Items List Failure modes that affect the SDO or HMI mission adversely, category 1, 1R, 1S and 2 are identified on a Critical Items List. The critical items list is maintained within the FMEA where a risk mitigation approach is listed for each item. The FMEA and Critical Items list is documented in HMI document 2H00229, Rev A.

Critical Items List Critical Item Mitigation approach Power Converter subsystem Relay Select circuitry: CAMERAS 1 & 2 CCD DECONTAMINATION HEATERS OVEN CONTROLLERS 1 & 2 Affected components: SN54154J decoder 54HC14 inverter HCPL523 optocoupler resistor Design is currently under review to possibly remove this category 2 single point failure Optics/Optics signal path: Lens, mirror, beam splitter The optics are set up, aligned and tested on an optical bench prior to being installed in the optics package. Environmental testing will include vibration testing and thermal cycling at qualification temperatures. Testing, handling and operation to be contamination and environmentally controlled.

Limited Life Items Limited Life items are defined as those items that are time or cycling sensitive in nature and whose expected useful life is less than twice the required life The limited life items are maintained in the HMI FMEA, document 2H00229 Mitigation actions are identified in the limited life items list to minimize potential risk in meeting mission requirements and provide confidence in their use for the duration of the HMI mission.

Limited Life Items Subsystem Limited Life Item Expected life Required life Failure Impact Risk Mitigation Mechanisms Polarization Selector mechanism hollow core motor 160 million operations 80 million operations Modulator does not rotate resulting in a loss of instrument data due to inability to make spectro-polarimetric measurements and produce 3-dimensional vector magnetographs. Redundancy (2 of 3 motors required) has been incorporated. Life test is in progress. Testing will include vibration and thermal testing. No history of failure with similar mechanisms used in life tests and on orbit for prior programs. Michelson Interferometer (Tunable Filter) mechanism hollow core motor 40 million operations 20 million operations Filter does not rotate resulting in the loss of ability to orient filter and capture images at very specific wavelengths of light: degradation of instrument data Redundancy (3 of 4 motors required) has been incorporated. Life test is in progress. Testing will include vibration and thermal testing. No history of failure with similar mechanisms used in life tests and on orbit for prior programs. Shutter Motor and Bearings 80 million exposures 40 million exposures Shutter fails: loss of instrument data from one camera. Life test is in progress. Similar shutter mechanisms are qualified, including life testing. Similar shutters used on the MDI and TRACE with no problems after many millions of operations.

Summary All EEE components meet the derating requirements of EEE-INST-002 Reliability calculations and Reliability Block Diagram are prepared based on the latest HMI design and are documented No category 1 single point failures exist in the HMI instrument Category 2 single point failures are documented in the Critical Items List The Power Subsystem single point failure will be addressed prior to the build of the flight model HMI Limited Life items are identified and risk mitigation is documented