Professional Development Guidance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

NCLB, Highly Qualified and IDEA 2004 How it all fits together and What it means for you. RIDE Spring Leadership Conference May 11, 2006 Grossi/Olsen 2006.
PRESENTED BY: RICHARD LAWRENCE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TITLE II, SCHOOL AND SCHOOL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT JAN STANLEY, STATE TITLE I DIRECTOR WEST VIRGINIA.
Hawaii Department of Education Hawaiis NCLB – Title IIA Highly Qualified Teacher and Equity Plans Leadership Update - Outreach September/October 2007.
Implementation of NCLBs Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements November 2003.
1 Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements December 2010.
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Jack O’Connell State Superintendent No Child Left Behind Act.
1 Implementation of NCLB’s Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements November 2006.
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Preparing Program Completers for Meeting NCLB (HiQ) Requirements No Child Left Behind December 2, 2009.
Highly Qualified Teachers and Paraprofessionals Under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Virginia Department of Education.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
Copyright © 2007 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Special Education Teacher Certification and Highly Qualified Requirements.
1 Highly Qualified An overview of “Highly Qualified and HOUSSE” Illinois Education Association-NEA and in Cooperation with The Illinois State Board of.
State Licensure vs Federal Highly Qualified Teachers.
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
Cleveland Municipal School District Educating Cleveland’s Children.
HQ Teachers Professional Development Guidance. TSR Reporting  In fall of 2006 TSR was modified to show up to 7 subject assignments per teacher. In any.
No Child Left Behind Teacher Qualification. NCLB: Three Main Parts All teachers to meet new federal standards –New hires to meet standards now –Existing.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
Federal Programs Directors Conference Office of Professional Preparation WVDE.
Teacher Quality In New Mexico Information Session on New Mexico’s 3-Tiered Teacher Licensure System James Ball, SDE Larry Martinez, SDE Kersti Tyson, SDE.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
Transition to Teaching Recruiting, Preparing, and Retaining Science Teachers through TTT Beatriz Ceja, Gillian Cohen-Boyer and Thelma Leenhouts U.S. Department.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
1 Highly Qualified An overview of “Highly Qualified and HOUSSE” Illinois Education Association-NEA and in Cooperation with The Illinois State Board of.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
H ighly Qualified Teachers IDEA This module will look at: “Highly qualified” teachers as found in the ESEA “Highly qualified” special educators.
Charter School Leadership Institute October 7, 2015 Title IIA Improving Teacher Quality.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
February 15, 2006 Highly Qualified Requirements for Exceptional Student Education Teachers What’s New?
PAFPC CONFERENCE MAY 4, 2015 DON MCCRONE PROGRAM MANAGER TITLE II, Part A, Improving Teacher Quality 1.
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS No Child Left Behind 11/23/09.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge. USDOE - Continued emphasis on equitable distribution OESE priority (of 3): Teacher quality, equity and.
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
Understanding the Illinois NCLB Requirements
Opening Frame The Issue Labels Traditional Cert Pathways
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Effective Educators Title II, Part A
American Institutes for Research
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Perkins 101 Review Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 Purpose and Expectations Act aims to increase the quality of.
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements December 2010.
Demonstrates In-Field Status Overview
Linden Elementary Title I Parent Night
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary
Beth Joseph Angela Landry
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Campus Improvement Planning
Annual Parent Meeting October 10, 2018 Lamar Elementary
Schoolwide Programs.
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Coordinator’s Academy
August 25, 2016 Dr. ScharbreniaLockhart Principal
Lamar Elementary Library
Presentation transcript:

Professional Development Guidance HQ Teachers Professional Development Guidance

TSR Reporting In fall of 2006 TSR was modified to show up to 7 subject assignments per teacher. In any core subject the teacher must be HQ True of special ed, bilingual and ESL teachers Used to report data required by the DE Used to show who is and is not HQ Districts must ensure the data is entered accurately.

Special Ed teachers: Meet requirements of IDEA and NCLB HQ Requirements Elementary Teachers (K-5): Full certificate and pass a state exam or go through HOUSSE (100 pts. Total) Secondary Teachers (6-12): Test, major, advanced degree, Master certificate, or HOUSSE in each subject. Special Ed teachers: Meet requirements of IDEA and NCLB Consultative vs Content (teacher of record)

Special Education Teachers Consultative: do not give the grade; must have a full special ed certificate or a full regular certificate and must have passed the special ed exam Elementary or secondary certificate with endorsement meets the requirement Approvals and emergency certificate do not.

Special Education Teachers IDEA: content teachers must have a full special education endorsement and must meet the NCLB requirements for the children served and must be HQ in each subject they teach.

Special Education Teachers The federal government is pushing, via least restrictive environment and its distinction of special education consultative versus content teachers and content teachers’ requirement to be subject matter HQ, the elimination of persons trained as pure special educators.

Special Education Teachers It appears the goal is either to have all teachers who graduate trained as special educators with core content specializations or to require team teaching between a content teacher and a special educator to adapt the content to the needs of special education children in the same classroom. Having two teachers per classroom would be expensive HOUSSE will likely be eliminated as an option

Special Education Therefore Illinois will likely be required to change either the way that all teachers are trained or the way special educators are employed. Possible: All new graduates could be trained as special educators and in a content area Persons trained as K-12 special ed would be consultants to teachers

HOUSSE is still open for teachers with at least one year of experience - Regarded by feds and observers to be the weakest evidence of subject matter competence Feds may shut it off on NCLB re-authorization Therefore professional development to meet HQ may not be viable for long

Elementary (K-5) teachers need to accumulate 100 points HOUSSE Elementary (K-5) teachers need to accumulate 100 points All other teachers need 100 points in each subject All HOUSSE submissions must be explicitly related to the subject Half the points can come through experience; 1 semester teaching the subject=12.5 points Any coursework completed in the subject is worth 5 points per semester hour HOUSSE requirements are available on the web under “rules in effect”, Part 25 Certification, Appendix D.

HOUSSE Faced with an elimination of HOUSSE in the next year, teachers may wish to pursue a more aggressive method of becoming HQ rather than moving through the minimal requirements of HOUSSE Accumulating a major Passing a test Obtaining a higher degree in a subject Getting a Master Certificate in a subject

District Plans The IL state plan filed with ED requires each district to file with the regional superintendent a general plan for its teachers who are not HQ in their core subjects to move them to HQ within a two year period. The plan must list the number of teachers , subjects and percentages where they are not HQ The plan must list the classes and their percentage that are not taught by HQ teachers

All NHQ teachers must become HQ within 2 years District Plans The district must list the schools and the names of teachers in each who are not highly qualified, subjects where they are not HQ and provide a general plan of remediation. The basis of the report is the prior year’s NHQT report run from IWAS and, for this year only, will be a duplicate of the report filed last year. All NHQ teachers must become HQ within 2 years Any district with no NHQ teachers needs only to report that they had none.

Each district must have a plan to accomplish this Equity Plan Federal Law: Each district must ensure that poor and minority students are not taught at a higher rate by NHQ teachers or inexperienced teachers than are other students. Each district must have a plan to accomplish this Inexperienced means three years or less experience.

Equity Plan The plan must be kept on file at the district office and must show the explicit measures the district is taking to remedy any difference in the access to HQ and experienced teachers by poor and minority students. Districts will be monitored by ROEs and ISBE to ensure the plans are being followed and completed.

State Law (105 ILCS 5/10‑20.39)     Sec. 10‑20.39. Highly qualified teachers; No Child Left Behind Act funds. If a school district has an overall shortage of highly qualified teachers, as defined by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107‑110), or a shortage of highly qualified teachers in the subject area of mathematics, science, reading, or special education, then the school board must spend at least 40% of the money it receives from Title 2 grants under the Act on recruitment and retention initiatives to assist in recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers… .

Each fall the number of not HQ teachers is expected to show a decline. Teacher Road Map to HQ The Plan also requires each teacher who is not HQ to have a plan, the “Roadmap” filed with the district showing what they intend to do in each core subject to become HQ The plan requires a specific outline of the means by which the teacher will become HQ within two years, with benchmarks indicated and funding sources specified. District are expected to provide financial and other support to meet the goal Each fall the number of not HQ teachers is expected to show a decline.

Teachers can add things we don’t know about Recording HQ Educator Certification System (ECS) on Agency website shows all the subjects we know about where the teacher is HQ based on our records. Teachers can add things we don’t know about Teachers can use the union worksheets to reach a conclusion Teachers must keep records to show how they reached their conclusion and the proof of each We will audit at several levels (required by federal rules)

Bilingual teachers holding only a type 29 are not HQ Bilingual and ESL Bilingual teachers holding only a type 29 are not HQ Must have a full certificate for the grade level and meet the NCLB requirements for the subject. ESL teachers teach English and must meet the requirements for the subject at the grade level and must hold the full certificate. If the teacher uses ESL as a means of teaching other core subjects, they must be HQ in those subjects and be reported as teaching them on the TSR

Bilingual and ESL Bilingual teachers with a 29 can be considered HQ for three years from the date of employment if they Have a bachelor’s degree Are enrolled in an approved program leading to a full certificate in the time period Have passed the content test (not a language test) required for the certification program Are receiving HQ professional development and mentoring from the district.

Audits will occur at several levels based on TSR reports ROE district visits ISBE audits NCLB Audits at time of certificate renewal audits. Any teacher found to be not HQ when claimed or in a different assignment than claimed will need to become HQ within a 2 year period.

Federal PD Requirements PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT — The term professional development (A) includes activities that (i) improve and increase teachers’ knowledge of the academic subjects the teachers teach, and enable teachers to become highly qualified; (ii) are an integral part of broad school wide and district wide educational improvement plans; (iii) give teachers, principals, and administrators the knowledge and skills to provide students with the opportunity to meet challenging State academic content standards and student academic achievement standards; (iv) improve classroom management skills;

Federal PD Requirements (v) (I) are high quality, sustained, intensive, and classroom-focused in order to have a positive and lasting impact on classroom instruction and the teacher’s performance in the classroom; and (II) are not 1-day or short-term workshops or conferences; (vi) support the recruiting, hiring, and training of highly qualified teachers, including teachers who became highly qualified through State and local alternative routes to certification; (vii) advance teacher understanding of effective instructional strategies that are (I) based on scientifically based research; and (II) strategies for improving student academic achievement or substantially increasing the knowledge and teaching skills of teachers; and

Federal PD Requirements (viii) are aligned with and directly related to (I) State academic content standards, student academic achievement standards, and assessments; and (II) the curricula and programs tied to the standards described in subclause (I) except that this subclause shall not apply to activities described in clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 2123(3)(B);

Federal PD Requirements (ix) are developed with extensive participation of teachers, principals, parents, and administrators of schools to be served under this Act; (x) are designed to give teachers of limited English proficient children, and other teachers and instructional staff, the knowledge and skills to provide instruction and appropriate language and academic support services to those children, including the appropriate use of curricula and assessments; (xi) to the extent appropriate, provide training for teachers and principals in the use of technology so that technology and technology applications are effectively used in the classroom to improve teaching and learning in the curricula and core academic subjects in which the teachers teach;

Federal PD Requirements (xii) as a whole, are regularly evaluated for their impact on increased teacher effectiveness and improved student academic achievement, with the findings of the evaluations used to improve the quality of professional development; (xiii) provide instruction in methods of teaching children with special needs; (xiv) include instruction in the use of data and assessments to inform and instruct classroom practice; and (xv) include instruction in ways that teachers, principals, pupil services personnel, and school administrators may work more effectively with parents; and

Federal PD Requirements (B) may include activities that (i) involve the forming of partnerships with institutions of higher education to establish school-based teacher training programs that provide prospective teachers and beginning teachers with an opportunity to work under the guidance of experienced teachers and college faculty;

Federal PD Requirements (ii) create programs to enable paraprofessionals (assisting teachers employed by a local educational agency receiving assistance under part A of title I) to obtain the education necessary for those paraprofessionals to become certified and licensed teachers; and (iii) provide follow-up training to teachers who have participated in activities described in subparagraph (A) or another clause of this subparagraph that are designed to ensure that the knowledge and skills learned by the teachers are implemented in the classroom.