Ex ante conditionality and macroeconomic conditionality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transparency and Domestic Regulation Mina Mashayekhi Division on International Trade UNCTAD.
Advertisements

Planning and use of funding instruments
1 The 6-pack: tools for a stronger Economic Governance.
Regional Policy Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities Ad hoc expert meeting 6 March
Performance Framework
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Commissions proposal for incentives and conditionality in Open Days.
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
1 Generating EU Added-Value Building Bridges between UN CRPD, Rights of the Elderly & EU Structural Funds Gerard Quinn ‘Community Living for All’ 3 May,
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
The Stability and Growth Pact Frederick University 2013.
Commission’s proposals: 1) Revising Stability and Growth Pact 2) Preventing and Correcting macroeconomic imbalances Lecture 5 LIUC 2010.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Introduction to the Law of Economic and Monetary Union Piet Jan Slot, Europa Insituut University of Leiden February 23, Istanbul.
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
11/06/20161 Transport sector - Preparing for next programming period: SEA as part of ex-ante conditionality and ex-ante evaluation Adina Relicovschi Senior.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity in programming period
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Financial Support to Third Parties
Structural Funds Financial management and Control, Romania
Training and Development Programme for future Structural Funds Trainers February 2006.
The ‘Six Pack’ and ‘Two Pack’
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
Veronica Gaffey & Antonella Schulte-Braucks
Irena Roštan Ministry of Finance OECD SBO CESEE meeting
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance
Proposal for a Council recommendation on the integration of the long term unemployed in the labour market COM(2015) 462 ESF Committee 23 October 2015.
State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation
Performance Framework
Multiannual Financial Framework review and post-2020 studies
EURO-CEFG Midterm Review
Ex-ante conditionality
Guidance on ensuring the respect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the implementation of ESI Funds.
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 8 February 2018
Ex-ante conditionality and macroeconomic conditionality
Timing June : Negotiations with Council and EP: modification of the Financial Regulation subject to ordinary legislative procedure End 2011:
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,
 DRAFT CEMR Response to the Consultation on the EU Budget Review Communication (COM (2010) 700 final)    Brussels, December 2010.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Amending the Performance Framework
State of play of OP negotiations
Progress of the negotiations on the CPR and ESF regulations
CAP decision making process
Post-2020 discussions 1. State of play of discussions 2. On-going work 3. Questions for debate.
Purpose of the CSF and Staff Working Document
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
FISHERIES AND ENVIRONMENT
Bulgaria – Evolution in the Development of the Medium-Term Budgetary Framework Zagreb, Croatia | May 2018.
State of play of negotiations MFF, Regulations
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
National Confederation of Disabled People –N.C.D.P.
Preparation of Member States’ Strategic Reports 2009 European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities Brussels, 9 June 2009 John.
From ‘Lisbon’ to Europe 2020: a new design of the reporting cycle and how to link it to the ESF ESF Evaluation Partnership Working Group on the ESF contribution.
Bulgaria – Capital Budgeting And Fiscal Institutions
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
Overview of Good Regulatory Practice
CRISTINA BREDEN – Director ROMANIAN COURT OF ACCOUNTS
Eurostat and its activities A. Näslund, Head of Unit A2
Presentation transcript:

Ex ante conditionality and macroeconomic conditionality

Conditionality Why ? How ? Not new Increase the effectiveness of cohesion policy How ? conditions necessary for investments to flourish: regulatory, strategic and policy frameworks are in place sound macroeconomic policies Not new

Ex ante conditionality

Ex ante conditionality Article 17 and – for cohesion policy - Annex IV Exception: ETC Cond. + criteria for fulfilment : each CSF Fund 2 types : general ex ante conditionality: anti-discrimination, gender equality, disability, public procurement, state aid law, environmental legislation and statistical systems thematic ex ante conditionality: linked to the thematic objectives and based on EU policy guidance (employment guidelines, BEPGs, Commission Recommendation on active inclusion, Council Recommendation on ESL, Commission Communication on higher education,…)

Procedure (1) Self-assessment by MS - for thematic ex ante conditionality: limited to the ex ante conditionalities for the selected IPs Non-fulfilment: MS sets out actions to be taken (national/regional level) + timetable for their implementation in OPs and PC (summary) Deadline for implementation: 2 years following adoption PC or 31.12.2016 (earliest date)

Procedure (2) Verification of MS assessment by Commission during negotiations of PC and OPs Non-fulfilment of conditionality: Upon adoption of OP: suspension of part or all interim payments until satisfactory completion of actions to fulfil an ex ante conditionality. Failure to respect the OP deadline for the completion of actions to fulfil an ex ante conditionality = basis for suspension of payments

An example: access to employment Conditionality : ALMPs are designed and delivered in accordance with the Employment Guidelines Criteria for fulfilment: Employment services have the capacity to and do deliver: personalised services and active an preventive LM measures at an early stage, which are open for all jobseekers anticipating and counselling on long-term employment opportunities created by structural shifts in the LM transparent and systematic information on new job vacancies Employment services have set up networks with employers and education institutes

conditionality (MC) – Art. 21 Macroeconomic conditionality (MC) – Art. 21

Macroeconomic conditionality When does it apply ? Council recommendations: Art. 121(2) and/or Art. 148(4) TFEU Art. 136 (1) TFEU: measures for euro zone MS Excessive deficit procedure (EDP) Excessive imbalances procedure (EIP) MS benefiting from financial assistance under: European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM) Facility providing medium-term financial assistance to MS BoP (non-euro MS) Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) (euro MS) (ESM loan) Balanced and gradual system : 2 phases

MC Phase 1 (1) Commission MAY request or propose amendments to PC and relevant OPs to: support implementation of Council recommendations maximise impact of Funds (MS receiving financial assistance) Commission MAY suspend part or all of the payments for the programmes concerned in case of absence of satisfactory response MS within the established deadlines Suspension lifted in case of submission requested amendments to PC/relevant OPs

MC Phase 1 (2) Specific provisions for MS benefiting from financial assistance linked to an adjustment programme: Commission may amend PC and relevant OPs without MS proposal Commission shall become involved in the management of OPs as set out in the adjustment programme or MoU Commission may amend the PC and relevant OP without a proposal from the MS with a view to maximize the growth and competitiveness impact of the available CSF Funds.

MC Phase 2 Obligation for the Commission to suspend part or all of the payments and commitments for the programmes concerned Suspension must be proportionate and effective taking into account the economic and social circumstances of the MS concerned and respect equality of treatment between MS. All suspensions shall be lifted without delay when the underlying cause for suspension has been addressed

Overview MC (1) Type of MC Phase 1 - MAY Phase 2 - SHALL Lifting suspension phase 2 CSRs ex Art. 121(2) and/or 148(4) TFEU Recommendation NA Art. 136(1) TFEU Measures to euro MS Non compliance with measures Compliance with measures

Overview MC (2) Type of MC Phase 1 - MAY Phase 2 - SHALL Lifting suspension phase 2 EDP Council Recommendation ex Art. 126(7) TFEU Council Decision ex Art. 126(8) TFEU and Art. 126(11) TFEU EDP is held in abeyance or EDP has ended (Art. 126(12) TFEU) EIP Council Recommendation ex Art. 7(2) new Regulation on prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances Council conclusion: ex Art. 8(3) - MS has on 2 successive instances not submitted a sufficient corrective action plan or Decision ex Art. 10(4) : non-compliance Council endorsement of the corrective action plan or EIP is placed in abeyance or EIP has been closed

Overview MC (3) MS benefiting from financial assistance Phase 1 – MAY or unilaterally Phase 2 - SHALL Lifting suspension phase 2 European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM) Financial assistance is made available MS has not taken measures to implement adjustment programme – no disbursement MS has taken measures to implement adjustment programme - disbursement Facility providing medium-term financial assistance to MS BoP (non-euro MS) Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) (euro MS) Financial assistance is made available in form of an ESM loan Conditions linked to loan are not fulfilled – no disbursement Conditions linked to loan are met – disbursement of stability support

MC : Re-budgeting suspended commitments Simultaneously with lifting of suspension, suspended commitments will be re-budgeted in accordance with Art. 8 MFF Regulation. Art 8 MFF Regulation: the Council shall decide on a transfer of suspended commitments to the following years. Suspended commitments of year n may not be re-budgeted beyond year n+2.

Thank you

MC Phase 1 : Triggers Commission MAY request amendments to Partnership Contracts (PC) and relevant OPs: Country specific recommendation (Art. 121(2) and/or Art. 148(4) TFEU) measures addressed to euro MS ex Art. 136(1) TFEU EDP: Council recommendation ex Art. 126(7) TFEU EIP: Council recommendation ex Art. 7(2) of the new regulation on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances Programme countries: MS receiving financial assistance under one of the following mechanisms: Facility providing medium-term financial assistance to MS BoP (non-euro MS) European financial stabilisation mechanism (EFSM) Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) (euro MS)

MC Phase 2 : Triggers Commission SHALL suspend part or all of the payments and commitments for the programmes concerned in case of Council decision/conclusion : no compliance with the specific measures ex Art. 136(1) TFEU EDP: no effective action taken by MS : Council decision ex Art. 126(8) TFEU or Art. 126(11) TFEU EIP: no submission of a sufficient corrective action plan (only 2nd decision) (Art. 8(3) of the new EIP Regulation) or non-compliance (Art. 10(4) of the new EIP Regulation) Commission decision: no implementation of the adjustment programme and no disbursement Conclusion of the ESM Board : conditionality linked to ESM loan is not met and no disbursement

MC : Lifting suspension MS has amended PC and relevant OPs as requested and, where applicable, MS complies with measures ex Art. 136(1) TFEU EDP : EDP is held in abeyance or EDP procedure has ended (Art. 126(12) TFEU) EIP: Council endorsement of the corrective action plan or EIP is placed in abeyance or EIP has been closed Programme countries: MS has taken measures to implement the adjustment programme and disbursement is authorised or, in case of ESM loan, conditionality linked to it is fulfilled and disbursement decided Simultaneously, re-budgeting of suspended commitments