Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Advertisements

Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structure and DNA Binding of the Human Rtf1 Plus3 Domain
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e2 (November 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Crystal Structure of a Human Cleavage Factor CFIm25/CFIm68/RNA Complex Provides an Insight into Poly(A) Site Recognition and RNA Looping  Qin Yang, Molly.
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages (December 2010)
Joseph D. Mancias, Jonathan Goldberg  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Structural Basis for the Histone Chaperone Activity of Asf1
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Structure and Mechanism of Homoserine Kinase
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Structural Basis of Core Promoter Recognition in a Primitive Eukaryote
Crystal Structure of Protein Isoaspartyl Methyltransferase
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Structure and Site-Specific Recognition of Histone H3 by the PHD Finger of Human Autoimmune Regulator  Suvobrata Chakravarty, Lei Zeng, Ming-Ming Zhou 
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Thomas R. Lane, Elaine Fuchs, Kevin C. Slep  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Partial Agonists Activate PPARγ Using a Helix 12 Independent Mechanism
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Structure and DNA Binding of the Human Rtf1 Plus3 Domain
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
The structure of ribosomal protein S7 at 1
Solution Structure of the Interacting Domains of the Mad–Sin3 Complex
Nina C. Leksa, Stephen G. Brohawn, Thomas U. Schwartz  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (May 2000)
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 1649-1658 (November 2008) Core Structure of the Yeast Spt4-Spt5 Complex: A Conserved Module for Regulation of Transcription Elongation  Min Guo, Fei Xu, Jena Yamada, Thea Egelhofer, Yongxiang Gao, Grant A. Hartzog, Maikun Teng, Liwen Niu  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 1649-1658 (November 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.08.013 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Linear Maps of the Eukaryotic Spt4, Spt5 and the Prokaryotic NusG, RpoE″ Conserved motifs are shown as boxes. The C-terminal portion of Spt4 is absent in RpoE″. Residue numbers refer to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spt5. Structure 2008 16, 1649-1658DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.08.013) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Architecture of Spt4-Spt5NGN Complex (A) Ribbon diagram of the structure of Spt4-Spt5NGN complex. The Spt4 and Spt5 NGN domains are shown in yellow and pink, respectively; the Zn atom is shown as a blue sphere. The central β sheet is shown by the 2mfo-Dfc map calculated with REFMAC coefficients contoured at 2σ level. (B) Topology of the secondary structure elements. Residue numbers and the N and C termini of Spt4 and Spt5NGN are indicated. (C and D) Views of the Spt4-Spt5NGN interface. (C) Surface of Spt5NGN is shown and colored according to electrostatic potential; interacting residues in Spt4 are labeled and shown as yellow sticks. (D) Surface of Spt4 and interacting residues in Spt5NGN are shown; interacting residues in Spt5NGN are labeled and shown as pink sticks. Structure 2008 16, 1649-1658DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.08.013) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mutations of the Acid-Dipole Interaction Disrupt the Spt4-Spt5 Complex (A) Conserved acid-α-helix dipole interaction between Helix_α4 of Spt4 and Glu338 of Spt5NGN. The carboxyl of Glu338 is also fixed by two hydrogen bonds with Spt4_Ser58 and Spt5_Ser324. The coloring is the same as in Figure 2. (B) Suppression of spt5-4 and spt5-194 by overexpression of Spt4. The indicated strains were transformed with either empty vector or a high-copy Spt4 plasmid and replica plated to YPD media at 39°C or SC-ura media with 50 μg/ml 6-azauracil at 30°C. (C) Coimmunoprecipitation of Spt4-Spt5 from extracts of Spt5, Spt5-4, or Spt5-194 cells. (D and E) The spt5-4 mutation disrupts the Spt4-Spt5 complex. Extracts of cells expressing wild-type Spt5 or Spt5-4 and Flag-tagged Spt4 were fractionated on 10%–30% sucrose gradients. Fractions were separated on SDS gels and blotted with the indicated antisera. Structure 2008 16, 1649-1658DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.08.013) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structural Conservation of Spt4 and Spt5NGN Domain (A) Structural superimposition of Spt4 (yellow) with Pyrococcus furiosus RpoE″ (orange, pdb1ryq). (B) Structural superimposition of Spt5NGN domain with the Aquifex aeolius NusG (green, pdb1npp). (C) Structural superimposition of Spt5NGN domain with the e.coli RfaH (pdb2oug, NGN in dark blue and KOW in light blue). (D) Alignment of representative Spt4 and Spt5 homologs. Residues that fall in the binding interface between Spt4 and the Spt5NGN domain are noted with a yellow background; residues that contribute to structural stability are noted by the green background. Highly conserved residues are depicted in bold type; residues in pink are involved in the acid-dipole interaction. Hs, Homo sapiens; Dr, Danio rerio; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Ce, Caenorhabditis elegans; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; St, Sulfolobus tokodaii; Pf, Pyrococcus furiosus; Tv, Thermoplasma volcanium; Dd, Dictyostelium discoideum; Af, Archaeoglobus fulgidus; Mm, Methanococcus maripaludis. Structure 2008 16, 1649-1658DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.08.013) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Conservation of the Spt4-Spt5 Interface (A) Model of archaeal NusG bound to RpoE″. Archaeal RpoE″-NusG complex was modeled by superimposing the pfuRpoE″ structure and pfuNusG model onto the Spt4-Spt5NGN structure. The pfuNusG model is shown as a white surface; yellow, Spt4; orange, pfuRpoE″. (B) GST Pull-down assay of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii RpoE″-NusG interaction. (C) A sequence-based phylogeny derived from an alignment of NGN domain in Spt5/NusG homologs. Organism names are color coded according to the domain of life. Alignment of Glu338 for the acid-dipole interaction is shown at right. Bootstrap support is indicated for major braches. Structure 2008 16, 1649-1658DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.08.013) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Evolution of the Spt4-Spt5 Complex (A) An evolutionary model of Spt4-Spt5 shows the distribution and domain organization of their homologs across evolution. (B) Superimposition of five distinct bacterial aaeNusG structures (described in Reay et al., 2004) and the eukaryotic Spt4-Spt5NGN complex. Only the Spt4-Spt5NGN and KOW structures are shown; the superimposed NusG_NGN domains were omitted for clarity. A notable feature of the NusG structure is the flexible linkage between NGN and KOW domains. In one of the five NusG structures shown here (in black, pdb1npp, chain D), the orientation of the KOW domain relative to the NGN domain is dramatically different from that of the other four structures. Structure 2008 16, 1649-1658DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.08.013) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions